Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Brown JIRC Complaint Jan 11, 2016 PDF

    Uploaded by

    JaniceWolkGrenadier
    14 views48 pages

    Original Title

    Brown JIRC Complaint Jan 11, 2016.pdf

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    14 views48 pages

    Brown JIRC Complaint Jan 11, 2016 PDF

    Uploaded by

    JaniceWolkGrenadier

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 48
    COMPLAINT MAIL To: Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission Post Office Box 367 Richmond, Virginia 23218-0967 Note: The Commission does not accept fax or e-mail complaints, Namo of Judge_d. n Location of Court Date of Incident Case Namo or Number (finown) (Ak (1 OS % Current Status of Case Name and telephone number of persons who witnessed the judge's conduct: ‘or did that you believe was improper: (additional pages may be attached) DO NOT SEND ORIGINAL COURT RECORDS/RECORD WILL NOT BE RETURNED Name Daytime ‘(Please Print Clearly) Janice Wolk Grenadier ___Telephone (202) 368-7178. Address 4 01 — Date 20/b Signatu Note: ‘accept unsigned complaints, Revived: O/042014 COMPLAINT MAIL To: Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission Post Office Box 367 Richmond, Virginia 23218-0367 Note: The Commission does not accept fax or e-mail complaints, Name of Jutge_sJ. f Location of Court Wi Date of Incont Case Name or Number (known) ¥ Current Status of Case Name and telephone number of persons who witnessed the judge's conduct: Description of what the judge said or did that you believe was improper: (additional pages may be attached) DO NOT SEND ORIGINAL COURT RECORDS/RECORD WILL NOT BE RETURNED Name Daytime (Please Print Clearly) Janice Wolk Grenadier ‘Telephone (202) 368-7178 Address date! [i | 20/b Revised 09042014 Janice Wolk Grenadier 15W Spring Street Alexandria, Virginia 22301 703-823-9655 jwolkgrenadier@aol.com September 21, 2011 Judge J. Howe Brown Circuit Court of Alexandria Virginia 520 King Street Alexandria, Virginia 22314 Dear Judge J. Howe Brown, ‘Onéwo occasions you were asked by the Circuit Court of Alexandria to oversee a case that the Judges of the Circuit Court had recused themselves. The Circuit Court of ‘Alexandria had not followed the rules of The Supreme Court of Virginia Rule 17.1 105(b) This was in violation of my Civil Rights, my Constitutional Rights, and The Law ofthe Supreme Court of Virginia were broken, which as a Judge you the responsibilty of knowing. In conclusion you ether you did not know the law ‘ignored the law — unconscionable! incompetence, or, you judges are generally immune from civil abilty for judicial acts, but they do not enjoy this immunity when there is criminal fabilty. Judges are not protected by immunity when they have acted in “the clear absence of all jurisdictions.” | believe in this case You and all the Judge's from this date have acted with Malice and Clear intent to follow the wants of judge Haddock the head Judge of the Circuit Court of Alexandria — who to my face told me | would not get fair tial and how they "Loved llona”. Which | understend frem Nona Grenadier that you often contacted her with legal questions, ‘Your actions Violated the Rule, acting with impropriety created the appearance of Supporting the unprofessional behavior ofthe Virginia Circuit Court of Alexandria, and ‘Supporting the wishes of Judge Haddock, Judge Klock and Judge Bondareff Kemiler, act or acts of tor they ithout jurisdiction), they treason, ! gave The Circuit Court of Alexandria an opportunity to fix this error ~ Instead they have ‘added insult to injury causing me much stress - even more upsetting what this has done to my children. They are well aware of how many times the police have come to my ‘home to make sure I have not committed suicide over what actions they and you have taken, ‘You have lost your immunity. You as a judge did not follow the law, Le. you are a {trespasser of the law, you as a judge have lost subject-matter junistction and your orders should be void, of no legal force or effect. The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that ‘when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into Conflict with the superior authonity of that Constitution, and he isin that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the ‘consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibilty to the supreme authority ofthe United States." | would be writing a motion to have your ruling against me dismissed, again presenting ‘my Motions and to have my case heard by a Judge with Jurisdiction. | tred this with the Gircuit Court. They denied it. So | have gone to the JIRK committee to the VSB - The ‘Supreme Court of Virginia, to my State Representative. To be told | have no rights | am not a part of The Virginia Old Boys network. THEREFORE | will be fling suit against al parties who have decided | am not of value {to deserve a fair trial. Who have violated The Rules and discriminated against me. 1 ‘am notifying everyone of this - On Wednesday September 28, 2011 if have not heard from you | wil assume you are not interested in setting this and wil fe suit against you. Warmly, Janice Wolk Grenadier Pro-se Party Judge J. Howe Brown ~ JIRC Complaint 4.122012 Circuit Court of Alexandria Virginia 520 King Street Atexandria, Virginia 22314 Judge Brown on Three occasions was asked by the Circuit Court of Alexandria to ‘oversee a case that the Judges of the Circuit Court had recused themselves. The Circuit Court of Alexandria had not followed the rules of The Supreme Court of Virginia Rule 17.1-105(b) This was in violation of my Civil Rights, my Constitutional Rights, and. ‘The Law of the Supreme Court of Virginia were broken, which as a Judge he should have the responsibilty of knowing. In conelusion he elthor did not know the law = incompetence, or, he ignored the law — unconscionable! |lunderstand many courts have found that judges who have acted in their judicial Capacity were entitled to immunity. But, courts have found that the judges who acted ‘outside oftheir judicial capacity were not entitled to immunity. Which I beliove isin his ‘and all the Judges from September 7, 2007 who have ruled on my case are in vidation (of many different laws which you lose immunity. Under the common law, judges are ‘generally immune from civil ability for judicial acts, but they do not enjoy this immunity when there is criminal iabilty. Judges are not protected by immunity when they Fave {acted in “the clear absence of all jurisdictions.” | believe in this case he and all the Judge's from this date have acted with Malice and Clear intent to follow the wants of Judge Haddock the head Judge of the Circuit Court of Alexandria — who to my face told ‘me | would not get a fair trial and how they “Loved Ilona’, Which | understand from liona Grenadier that Judge Brown often contacted her with legal questions. llona ‘Grenadier acted as unprofessional in bragging about her close relationship with Judge Brown. Judge Brown allowed llona Grenadier tole in Court Documents, Lie in ‘Admissions, Lie in her Counter Claim, denied my right for a Trial By Jury which wes asked for because, of Judge Haddock informing me | would not get a Fair Tral and that they “LOVED” my opponent llona Grenadier. The Circuit Court of Alexandria contnually also told me the compiete opposite when it came to choosing Judge's ~ I was infomed by them that the only way a Judge was chosen by anyone but them was if they couldn't find someone to hear the case. The complete opposite ofthe law. Judge Brown's actions Violated the Rule, acting with impropriety created the appearance of supporting the unprofessional behavior ofthe Virginia Circuit Court of ‘Alexandria, and Supporting the wishes of Judge Haddock, Judge Klock and Judge Bondareff Kemler He is a trespasser of the law, he did not have subject-matter jurisdiction and his order is void, of no legal force or effect. Whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason. When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason. | gave The Circuit Court of Alexandria an opportunity to fix this error — Instead they have added insult to injury causing ma much stress - even more upestting what this has done tomy children. They are well aware of how many times the police have come to my hhome to make sure I have not committed suicide over the actions of the Judges. Judge Brown has lost his immunity. He as a judge did not follow the law, Le. you are a trespasser ofthe law, he as ajudge has lost subject-matter jurisdiction and his orders ‘should be void, of no legal force or effect. The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that “when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into Conflict with the superior authority ofthat Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the ‘consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibilty to the supreme authority of the United States.” ‘Astrong and clear message needs to be sent to Judge Brown that he is responsible for knowing the Law and following i Exhibit 10 Jadge J. Howe Brown 1) The (2) occniont. Judo Brown sake by be Cicul Cout of Asana yn a case at eludes of the Ceo Coun had reine eros ‘he Grout Goto Alana Nad ot awed th es tT Sapreme Coun of igi Rol 171-18) This was volton of lars Gr Reps [Genattsons lh. The Lan ofthe Sure Court of Vp, Vigcs Code ‘2 a.usge he shout have te respon a rowing In 21 ge Neon Gi 92 Judge int Sa of Vigna ok te owing (than auyer then gain a a Judge under Rule § 424 aie your rt hard, plese, “Do you scam sear oan tat you wl ‘suppor te Coste the Unto Snes the Coraaton oe DavtD MAR RENADIER ‘SOUNTERCLAIM AND CROSS.cOMPLAINT COMES NOW tons ly Grenacier and fies thi, her Countclaim against inti and Cross-Complint gaint Defendant, David Grenadier, and [ements naa its 4 The rue rhe Es Bentebent eaten he go" ean) yun pgs) eanene sey #6 oo Crd £880) ponte by get emaarectanwernnece nnn enter, AMAL Hmeaoeo Apel qog “x '© At some point, the Defendants were presented by the Plaintif, as a . ‘eako, with an opportunity to purchase cerain propery in Prince Willan, a2 1 Shin (al sesh a ° undiowt ud $id. ‘eh ‘Dunn the consingeney period the Pint alleged to Defendants tht she eained an engineer fa them todo an inspection of the propery. Atte se, Plein is beleved, received submanti fers, I: tared out Inter that dhe Plant hed musi the Defendants and in fat the engineer as not employed ‘by her for he Defendants fad in act not emplyed by her a all an serious pirucrumldeiencies were ound w exist inthe property which cost, wt est Defendant, ona iy Grenadier, thousands of dll, putting not ony the Proper in jeopardy but the Gnaneialsicutan of the Defendant. | ‘Ts suaton was pert in necessiating cern refinancing for Peoment ofthe 24 trust note, Ther sno question ao the neglaence af {he Palotit and her agreement to retnance certain propery tase withat east avery small orton of ably ofthe Defendant, tana Bly Grenadier, Porter, uring the marrage of Dad and Janice Grenada, CIC was dase andthe propre dntbuted. The Plains log withthe ete, David Grenadier picked ceria properties hey desed ia hove ne ast Belefote was among shem in that transaction Defendant, David (rena, was granted al ofthe CIC fend lo Ey Grenade) neces n ns tee nd amined bie al ere. Pit pres ni tannin and has ben wel sare of this rm pir tthe ing a {hie su. Plains aware that ais fr this aim, Can es fhe tere aes Brome — Al dey fearaledets dele) % ‘that Pani has no cause of action against any ofthe named deleneante Pure, Plain has collected ent from Bast Bellefonte proper for ‘sor, apparent taken tx deductions and has made no accounting Defendant O16/lona Ely Grenadier, No tex dacumes or documento Provide further tax returns were sent subsequent tote dissolution of TIC az Phististwes avare of and parcizated in the transfer of hat property 0 David Grenadier and of her negligence n the Fao negating the purchase of he Prince Wiliam propery, RE, unless Pini dismisses the Defendant G1 and lon ty Grenadier as Defendant, Defendant, la Ely Grenadier, requests the ‘our enjoin the Paint rom preceding ant dismiss the aut with prec, ‘Further Delendant, Hons Ely Grenadier, prays that the eat be deri fo Paint will laure 2 produce ecard of ret colton, ‘videncng payments of sled expenses, cept, produeton of he tax ‘tums evidencing rental income and depreciation and expense). Purther sould any labitiy exist under the lan of the Pixni,Deerant, ona iy (renadier, quests tat same be that ofthe Defendant, David Grenadin, ureuant to that certain dissolution agreement, Defendant lana iy ‘Creadier, prays forthe out fay time lon by herd tothe continsing «ims and lack of cooperation in diacovery at her hourty me, ia ae Iona streasnaaien bod ae ee ‘eae Pe canto me Thereby Zeb of Februaiy, 20080 Ma dnice Wolk Greater ‘preg See Alena, Vip 230%, and ean “Alesana, Vitginin 22314, VIRGINIA; IW cIRCUEF COURT OF THE CITY “ANICE WOLK GRENADIER Planer ws Cc. No. on ‘GRENIER iwvesrMENT co, ‘A Virnia General Partners WONA BLY oREWDIER DAVID MAR GRENADLER Deendant (OF ALEXANDRIA ‘SSSWERLTO AMENDED BiLL O° COMB AINT (COMES NOW tna Ey Grenier and in ansner te the Amended Bil of ‘Complaint represen and states unt this Cour a Stews 1, Im response to paragraph 2, Deen toca Bly Grenadier, admite \\& __ Paintin esdet of Alcandeia: she denies Pantie or was the owner of OY onerhalrunaided terest ‘9 East Bellefonte, De‘e Ait the propery wa sold dat, Nona Ely Grenadier, 2 Defender, ons Sy Grenvder, denies the allegations contained o paragraph 2 3. Revardnsparacreph 3, Defeadant, Hana tly Grenadier, cannot amt 1s jist Deets vr owned oe ha of he emaning inert in Eat ete Sat onthe ow payments made 0 purchate the oper In fc eto jai toa chiar itis beloved Dean, Dai Ona, omed 28 fam ecg Det By Grae de onion, nti yo db closet Eh ound J ‘+ setang aati to paragraph 4; bower haps nabs no ‘see. Th pte i ao porate propery tm he nit ‘5. Regarding pargroh 8, Detendan GIC (non-existent) and tbe iy [Prenaiec have no lowieder of paid taxes and therefore dees this legaton tmp srt pos pero SI ee: Hem nite eee ovat tn ten UL, Pind da fete om cn mn stom pw Lower tape a fy 6. Reading parsgaph 6, Defendant, Hons ly fetes that [PAIS owns oF onmad 5195 of East Ralsfente. Ae w the aeation tar che J off of any note was contributed t9 By a refinance in whle or in rar by FBsst Belson, any auch necessity was caused by he negligence of the Plast whe trachea GGicicy duy a8 ctor in te nit one > 2 ” Henao cerain propery (ith regard to statements made and actions pe cam vier nneet nena ie fine, which proved to be fie ~ the costo the Dent, then Ey ‘Grenier im partcular, wo caret the exiting problems was aubetantl, sot my have recived substan eres reas om the sale tina fndans ofthis popes, but Paint never povided any ancl a ther ‘tsltance in ecuiving the strscnura problems, Ltt bunt 7. Regt periph 7, Delencant, one Bly Grenai, deniea ther ‘ytd were dtrbted o Defendant, na By Ornate, Ge dicey snd thin ate hnowm toe Pas. “tft WHEREFORE, henng fly answered, Detodant, ona ly Greater, Pave hat sid Anended Bil of Conpant be dame and hat abe be src her coat ands herein expended Does Bh Grenadin VET 0 Sout Wacogton set oxandea Vogal 38 ‘ro ces son {ro $$9:308? tues 2 hereby 2 dayofFebrury, 2008 10 Me Janee Wolk Grog ‘Serng Sree etna ine cc, Boqure, enna andra, gin ane 840455 yo emcurr count oF rie crtr oF RLEKAWOREA peepee, | sono ce csesores rwesreprr co i 7724 Js vancruza censeay eaneweasize | yee so S iow sur ose 5 =. Jano \ nvr wank crenncren, ve Dofensent {WOrION 08 DeAuLE COMES YOM che Plaine: te Flies this here Notion for Default. and An support neseot, cespacttutiy states 4 tellow, Fos at reasons am statod in Hotdon fox desauit Oates 2. For aD voecuthe told in the Anaver co PLD of Complaint by defendant and Counterciain and Cross-Comblaint tives on February 27, 2008, For the Letters Devendant sent belling, threatening Plaintiet if Ptesntige didn’e decp the suits wmich age attached to Sle Peoruasy Response to Tlena tly ornendies/ate Potion Co Guash laintitera Avanded Complaint / eee ‘Fer the non response to letters to ery and ot « new dace 9 1 PRAY THE COURT FINDS the Defendants in Dateule and tind sl favor of the Plointitt and avard the Plaintit£ evecything i ‘ie Amended Bi11 of Conplaint and £OF such other relief a8 the oust may deem appespciate, a ‘hg emma hae Genesee) wee lea Wear excl a cpr herein wat a deere 208 totlons thereat 2 South Wao sie lr David erator, reverent Ca Aging Asad, Vga 2314 a 20g re andi Yop ge 2 octet on wednesday, the 120 Fie c-ncusn coone oF sHe crne (OF ncexawoRsA pes meee | maaan tsa wemeae co | Nat To Dea Js vrecaza cemrnsrasuascice ao — itt |OAVIO ARK GRewaorER, = mete a TAF CLERK OF THE COURT vis) please place Enis cause on the cay of mares, 2008, a iosco ee {iceman se camo he rasing meshes ths [_soyot Mi 208 By Crna renee ivesinet C3 (Re ters Parner) o49 Sth washing Sree Alesana igh taitagee cure erDaM. Grenade 510 Rag Ser Acad Vigo Sette, lp ssc in 1 eae 28 COURT LOOKS STRONGLY RP HTS MOTION FOR DEPAUL. Tam nol a lawyer, and I have done the best 1 can in defending myoelt against 8 lawyer, and a defendant who nas fe Lowyes. They have mado ¢ quiet clear they would dca this out aa Jong az they could. 7 have wade mistakes wich have deagged St ut longer, becouse I don't know al the angles, But, haven’ 2éed. whieh the defendants have ohe Eine and ine agetn. {avor of the Plaiatstf and avard the PLALatiZ£ everything An the tended DiLL of Complaint and for such other relief fas this Court may deen appropriate for the extra cine and Cenecgy this has taken. And £0 aend a nesseqe £0 che detendants about. £09 2 Sw riz CIRCUIT coURE OF THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA Jomzce woux cxsxnoren, case no. cHDi0654 Plaineite, nancies Jonexaotea IwvesTMENT co. | {ME CUERK OF THE COURE WILL please place Ents cause on the Jdocket on Wednesday, eho 7 of May, 2008. At 10:000m For a eeaait Dated this gees sa] 2008 ‘inant, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CFTY OF ALEXANDRIA JANICE WOLK GRENADIER, Paint, . CASE NO. cHOIEESA ‘GRENADIERINVESTMENT CO, LTO. etl, onDER ‘oe pin wre fe Cero My 7,208 Pains Motion fo Dei nd Defendant pps tho dP bjs oSeario in Ber Rensemet As Nett an ete epee, ‘Aer aring res heron by Pitt wn col fo te Dee ADIUDGED, ORDERED ted DECREED hat |. Tisewets ety ato te Co's dct 2 This Mon fr Deh mma ose ley dei, oes Diskintade, Soh geeceere Te 2 igh pa ety his Oner SaaS can tN eat? ce te ea see ate Se tase atl Sam hay 19, 8 oe Ee pdbeihen v "Se We CORCUIT CoURE OF THE CITY OF ALEXANORTA caso mos cnoroese Peon ron teint. BY JURY snace WoL cREMADTER, Puaincies, lancin mamen = | Nv wank caexanrea , a 2 {NE CLERK OF THE COURT vill please place this cause on the on ednesday, the 25 day of Sune, 2008 at 10200 oF clock 1 mente ceNExEY TWAT A ecue copy of the Caregoing wea hand Jasnivered thia 40" aay of June, 2008 to tana ty [srenaeier/orensaier tnvestnent Jatexanceia, Vs 22214 and to Michaet £. Wieer, couraet for Dovid Ik. Gemagier, S10 King St., Alexandese, Virginia 22334. Gish PSH ae cxncurs coum or ave cstv or ALBNREA Jaae2ce wou oxEanoe®, NOTION FoR razAL BF auRY Piaintete, [seewnoreR tovesracwr co, Ih Virginia genecar Parte lana PLonn sy caswazoeR laws ono wae orennoren, orton ros tazat oe auny SOWES NOW THE PLADEEIE, Janice Wolk Grenadier eaquenta that ede Teiat be a te:at by Jury. tuo days in Sepeentar sooe sayy [ise atf0ed by Plainctte « besendants, buring the vine pray to fhe telat we have had several not ons that have hed te wre Jasound the couse schedule of visiting juagen, since there ot chi she judges in Alexandsis have eaplaised to ow ve excrtcutiee of being abie to near ene notions or faiely Suaye bis cares x understand the dictioueies of jessing enlaneee oud hove this vould help the aude ay vers, eee eRy = SelgP2AEEE Lita 5,5 a 5, coco hase See ‘Sige Hse ‘sda, se |amtzce vous enexaoree, Plasntee, Jcseaozes rmeseaeis co. | In vracan2n conzane, oxtovensnce Notion for pafaule (CONES NOW THE PIATITZFY 1102 chia here Motion for BocauLt. land Sn oupport hereot, zespocttully states aa follows 42. for all reasons a9 stated an tho Motion for Ootautt Dated Sopcomer 2, 2007, 42. for ati untruths told in the Antwer to ALLL of Complaint by defendant and Gounterciaim and Crovs-sonpiaint filed on February 27, 2008. Which can be backed up by the ‘Aamisaions by che defendants, The defencant Hes. Tlona Ey Geenadsee 9 lawyer and an officer of this cours, 3 For all the ustruths in the Admissions which can also bo backed vp by Interrogatarien or production of documents, 4. Tor the letters oefendant aeat boiling, threatening attached to the Fobreary Response to tora Ely [Gtonadier/GIC Hetion to Guash Flainti tts Anondad Complain: PAY THE COURT vooK: scRONGLY A tHTE WOTTON FOR BEFAOLT. Fan not a lawyer, and T have done the beat £ can in efonting mysei against 2 lawyer, and a defexsant wno hee 4 lavror. They have mace ic quiet clesr they would ray ‘nis out as Yong as they could. 1 have ide mistaken anicn have dragged st out longer, because I don't know all eho in favor of the Plainesse and avgsd the Plnintize ‘everything in the Aoended 8{1L of Compiaine and for aven other relief as this Couct way dom axpropriave for tne ‘xsea tine and enerey this hay eters And to send © 0 the defendants wbout respact for ets cour a: {291 exx orsmorex * Js. soenadiec, 510 King ae. "su owe circu coun oF cH erty oF aLexminerA | |fonstce wou cromseen, ‘cose No.1 cH0106st te olla) Js vercini ceweans parmneasie | Ba rox crue i 2 Defendant THE CLESK OF 7EE COURT will please pl fae fail a snace noun oenten, ane FEES a a ho, lencanoten vests co. Seok Bi GP «lf viainsa genres Partnership 73 own ety econ cs JOAVED MARK GRENADIEK, * _ eB PELOS Jo 2008 at apn. To include Not sch far Teial by Jury, Motion to Conpel and Notion for Default ‘Th CUERK OF THE COURT WILL please place this cause on the locket on wedneaday, the 9th cay of July, 2008. nt 3:00 orciuck p.m. for a hearing on Pa sianice Wolke Gewpadiee'® Hotton Jor Teal by ur}, Wotton v0 Compe and Wetton for tefesit. [tese totions were schedsied for June 25°, 2008 and reacheduted to aly 9, 2008 a: say #8 } IN THECIRCUIF COURT OF THF CITY OF ALEXANDRIA JANICE WOLK GRENADIER, > , Pst , } eases [ORENADIER EWVESTMENT CO, LTD, > ) Detain > } onpen Tepes wee h Coun a9, 20 ot ltt Ton for Det ‘eS Meo Fr Toby yn Phi St aos Can ag Dendreon: {een ape ny po et 01/0, onoeatD mn DrcRewyc, 1 im Dt deny nse 2 Raita gps © epee on cope itn ies Ga eal a hl adap tage ee are Esai Ad te Ar tt a te Dan a Gens See nae 5 ‘ st Fayens ace OSTER Re Soe CHR, ee Trinkets st tga “teen 07a ENTERED Unie T _ dsy of uly, 2000, ven |seewano — Sash as-02 Could Gait SEEN AND, Fos ie HT Sie Soar Ps. Ti Ey Gem } { i | Pant pose VIRGINI INTHE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA ATITS CRIMINAL TERM COMMENCING October 11, 2011 ‘Direct Indictment = Resisting the execution of the laws under color ofits authority. ‘Commonwealth of ' 4. HOWE BROWN ‘Works at: 820 King Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314 Race: Caucasian Sex: Male Hats (®) WGT: (2) Eyes: (2) Hair: (2) SSN: (2) Defendant ‘The Grand Jurors ofthe Commonwealth of Virginia and the City of Alexandti, alending the Court aforess ‘upon their oaths present that, in the City of Alexandria, in violation of Virginia Code Section § 18.2-481 § 182-481. Treason defined; how proved and punished. ‘Treason sal consist only in (1) Levying war aginst the Commonwealth: (2) Adhering to its enemies, giving them sid and confor; ) Estabishing, without autority ofthe legislature, any government within it Hmis separate rom the existing ‘government, (@) Holding or executing, in such usurped government, any office, or professing allegiance or felt tits or (6) Resisting the execution ofthe laws under color ofits authority, ‘Sach reason if proved by the testimony of two witnesses othe same overt actor by confession in court, hall be Pnishable asa Class 2 felony. NOTE: Under Virginia law, there is NO “Statute of Limitations” on Felony Crimes. 4 17.-105. Designation of jadges to hold courts and assist other judges. 2B. lfall he judges of any court of record are so situated in respect to any eas, civil or criminal, pending {mn their court as to render it improper, in their opinion, for them to preside atthe iia, unless the ease ‘proceeding is removed, as provided by law, they shall enter the fact of record andthe cerk ofthe court shall et once certify the same to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, who shall designate a judge ome other court of record ora retired judge of any wich court to preside atthe tral of suce case ‘In this ease against the widow of former Alexandria judge, the Alexandria judges refused to obey the law. § 182-21. When and where accessories tried; how indicted. ‘An accessory cither before or after the fat, may, whether the principal felon be convicted or not, or be amenable to justice or not, be indicted, tried, convicted and punished in the county or corporation in which he became accessory, orin which the principal felon might be indicted. Amy such aceessory before the fact ‘may be indicted either with such principal or separately. § 192-191. Functions ofa grand jury. ‘The functions of a grand jury are twofold: (1) To consider bills of indictment prepared by the attomey for the Commonweslth and to determine whether as ‘o.ach such bill there is sufficient probable éause to retum such indictment "a true bil." (2) To investigate and report on any condition that involves or tends to promote criminal activity cither in the community or by any governmental authority, agency or official thereof. These functions may be ‘exercised by either a special grand jury or a regular grand jury as hereinafter provided. VIRGINIA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA AT ITS CRIMINAL TERM COMMENCING October 11,2011 ‘Dinect Indictment - Resisting the execution of the laws under calor of its authority. § 19.2197 states in part: {orenan who shall be sworn as follows: "You shal diligently inquire, and true presentment make, of all Such matters as may be given you in charge, oF come to your knowledge, touching the present service. ‘You stall present no person through prejudice or l-will, nor leave any unpresented through fear or favor, but in all your presentments you shall present the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, So help you God.” Virgicia Law states the Jury Foreman is not 1 “leave any unpresented through fear or favor”, that ‘would mean Presentments from any Citizen about Violation of Laws or Abuse of Authority by & Judge oF Judges, a Commonwealth Attorney, an elected Court Clerk, or other Governmental Official, ‘are part of the Juror’s Doty to God and Country and the Commonwealth of Virginia. Equal Justice or All inckudes the lowliest Citizen is equally protected by the laws as protects any attorney or judge. § 192208. Subpoena power of special grand jury. “The special grand jury may subpoeea persons to appear before it to testify and to produce specified records, papers, and

    You might also like