Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
v

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it

generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an

answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to

dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the

opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]

Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to

the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]
Indeed, it is settled that the filing of a motion for reconsideration is a prerequisite to
the filing of a special civil action for certiorari. This is to give the lower court the
opportunity to correct itself.[29] It is also the rule that since an order denying a motion to
dismiss is only interlocutory, which is neither appealable until final judgment nor could it
generally be assailed on certiorari, the remedy of the aggrieved party is to file an
answer and interpose as defenses the objections raised in his motion to dismiss. [30]