You are on page 1of 2

Case Brief

9th Semester

Submitted by Abhijeet Gupta


Submitted to Mr. Subhradipta Sarkar
30 January y
State v Tahir

This case has been disposed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gurgaon
Distt. Courts. The facts of the case are as follows 1. That a complaint was received by SHO, Kherki Daula Police Station that the
complainant owns a shuttering store in Bhagraula Village.
2. One of the servant Manoj has been accused of stealing shuttering goods
including steel plates and channels.
3. That after committing the said offence, he has been absconding and that the
complainant requested the price to recover all his goods.
4. During the course of investigation, the accused Manoj and Tahir were arrested
on 22-6-2012 and 23-6-2012 respectively.
5. It was alleged that they have confessed selling the goods to a scrap dealer
Naeem and Naeem was also arrested at a later stage.
6. Naeem further confessed selling the goods in Govindpuri New Delhi.
7. Rs 1 lac were recovered from Manoj and 50 thousand from Naeem.
8. The accused Tahir was not at all linked to this case and was made a party to
the case without having any substantial connection with the other two accused.
9. During the course of trial, no evidence of the said offence surfaced against
Tahir and he was granted bail.

Case Brief

9th Semester

10. That on November 30, 2015, the court pronounced its judgment holding
Maonj and Naeem guilty of committing offences under section 381 and 411 of the
IPC 1860 whereas Tahir was acquitted.
11. All the relevant documents

including statements of accused, complaint,

statements of Investigating Officers , Maps have been attached with this report.

I would like to thank the faculty members of the NCU Law School & Mr. Raj
Kumar Gupta for giving to me this opportunity to observe the proceedings of this case.

You might also like