Causes of decline in board exam

performance
Teaching strategies of Chem
professors
The chemistry curriculum
Analysis of the board performance
of Chemistry graduates of Adams
School
1. Ratings from past to recent
2. Factors that caused the
picture
3. Types of students from past to
recent
4. Content of board exams from
past to recent---in the context
of the curriculum

5. The actions done on the

problem so far
Causes of Decline in the Chemistry
Board Performance of Adams
School
SOP
This study aims to determine the
causes of the decline in the Chem
board performance of Adams
School with the end of finding
bases for recommendations to
improve board performance.
Specifically, the study will seek
answers to the following questions:
SOP 1
How do the respondents
perceive the extent of the influence
of the following factors on the

decline in Chemistry board

performance:
1.1 teaching strategies
1.2 curriculum vis a vis the
board exam content
1.3 quality of students
1.4 qualifications of faculty
1.5 retention policy
SOP 2
How do the respondents differ in
their perceptions as to the
influence of the above-mentioned
factors on the .
SOP 3
What issues or concerns were
raised by the different stakeholders
about the problem of decline in
Chem board performance?

Hypothesis
This study attempts to test the
following null hypothesis:
There is no significant difference
in the perceptions of the different
stakeholders as to the extent of the
.
Method: descriptive-comparative;
quantitative with support of
qualitative method
Tools: survey questionnaire,
describe the validation procedures
followed; what type of
questionnaire (rating scale, forcedchoice, semantic differential); scale
of interpretation
interview/focus-group discussion
(FGD)

Sampling method:
Purposive sampling
Sample: 4 groups of stakeholders:
students, alumni, faculty,
administrators; mention the criteria
for selection; number of sample
Data Analysis: (Statistical Tools)
Descriptive statistics: means,
standard deviations for SOP 1
One-way ANOVA for SOP 2
Decision point: If the p value
obtained is below .05, reject the
null hypothesis
If signif diffce is found, do a post
hoc analysis test to determine
which groups are significantly
different.

For SOP 3, do a thematic

analysis