Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CH 19
CH 19
Profit-Maximization
Economic Profit
A firm uses inputs j = 1,m to make
products i = 1,n.
Output levels are y1,,yn.
Economic Profit
The economic profit generated by
the production plan (x1,,xm,y1,,yn)
is
p1y1 pnyn w 1x1 w mxm .
Economic Profit
Output and input levels are typically
flows.
E.g. x1 might be the number of labor
units used per hour.
And y3 might be the number of cars
produced per hour.
Consequently, profit is typically a
flow also; e.g. the number of dollars
of profit earned per hour.
Economic Profit
How do we value a firm?
Suppose the firms stream of
periodic economic profits is
and r is the rate of
interest.
Then the present-value of the firms
is
economic profitstream
1
2
PV 0
1r
(1 r ) 2
Economic Profit
A competitive firm seeks to maximize
its present-value.
How?
Economic Profit
Suppose the firm is in a short-run
~
circumstance in which x 2 x 2 .
Its short-run production function is
~
y f ( x1 , x 2 ).
Economic Profit
Suppose the firm is in a short-run
~
circumstance in which x 2 x 2 .
Its short-run production function is
~
y f ( x1 , x 2 ).
~
The firms fixed cost is FC w 2x 2
and its profit function is
~
py w 1x1 w 2x 2 .
has a slope of
w1
~
w 2x 2
.
p
g
n
i
s
a
e
r fit
c
n
I
pro
w1
Slopes
p
x1
Short-Run Profit-Maximization
The firms problem is to locate the
production plan that attains the
highest possible iso-profit line, given
the firms constraint on choices of
production plans.
Q: What is this constraint?
Short-Run Profit-Maximization
The firms problem is to locate the
production plan that attains the
highest possible iso-profit line, given
the firms constraint on choices of
production plans.
Q: What is this constraint?
A: The production function.
Short-Run Profit-Maximization
y
x
technology set for 2
2
~ )
y f ( x1 , x
2
Technically
inefficient
plans
x1
Short-Run Profit-Maximization
y
g
n
i
s
a
e
r fit
c
n
I
pro
~ )
y f ( x1 , x
2
w1
Slopes
p
x1
Short-Run Profit-Maximization
y
w1
Slopes
p
y*
*
x1
x1
Short-Run Profit-Maximization
y
~ , the short-run
Given p, w1 and x 2 x
2
* ~
*
profit-maximizing plan is ( x1 , x 2 , y ).
w1
Slopes
p
y*
*
x1
x1
Short-Run Profit-Maximization
y
y*
~ , the short-run
Given p, w1 and x 2 x
2
* ~
*
profit-maximizing plan is ( x1 , x 2 , y ).
And the maximum
possible profit
is .
w1
Slopes
p
*
x1
x1
Short-Run Profit-Maximization
At the short-run profit-maximizing plan,
y the slopes of the short-run production
function and the maximal
iso-profit line are
equal.
w
1
*
Slopes
y
p
*
x1
x1
Short-Run Profit-Maximization
At the short-run profit-maximizing plan,
y the slopes of the short-run production
function and the maximal
iso-profit line are
equal.
w
1
*
Slopes
y
p
w1
MP1
p
~ , y* )
at ( x* , x
1
*
x1
x1
Short-Run Profit-Maximization
w1
MP1
p
p MP1 w1
Short-Run Profit-Maximization; A
Cobb-Douglas Example
Suppose the short-run production
~ 1/ 3 .
x
function is y x1/3
1
2
The marginal product of the variable
input 1 is MP y 1 x 2/ 3x
~ 1/ 3 .
1
1
2
x1 3
The profit-maximizing condition is
p * 2/ 3 ~ 1/ 3
MRP1 p MP1 ( x1 )
x2 w1 .
3
Short-Run Profit-Maximization; A
Cobb-Douglas Example
p * 2/ 3 ~ 1/ 3
x 2 w 1 for x1 gives
Solving ( x1 )
3
3w 1
* 2/ 3
( x1 )
.
~ 1/ 3
px
2
Short-Run Profit-Maximization; A
Cobb-Douglas Example
p * 2/ 3 ~ 1/ 3
x 2 w 1 for x1 gives
Solving ( x1 )
3
3w 1
* 2/ 3
( x1 )
.
~ 1/ 3
px
2
That is,
~ 1/ 3
px
2
( x*1 ) 2/ 3
3w 1
Short-Run Profit-Maximization; A
Cobb-Douglas Example
p * 2/ 3 ~ 1/ 3
x 2 w 1 for x1 gives
Solving ( x1 )
3
3w 1
* 2/ 3
( x1 )
.
~ 1/ 3
px
2
That is,
so
~ 1/ 3
px
2
( x*1 ) 2/ 3
3w 1
*
x1
3/ 2
1/ 3 3 / 2
~
p
px 2
~ 1/ 2 .
2
3w 1
3w 1
Short-Run Profit-Maximization; A
Cobb-Douglas Example
*
x1
3w 1
3/ 2
1/ 2
~
x2
is the firms
short-run demand
for input 1 when the level of input 2 is
~ units.
fixed at x
2
Short-Run Profit-Maximization; A
Cobb-Douglas Example
*
x1
3w 1
3/ 2
1/ 2
~
x2
is the firms
short-run demand
for input 1 when the level of input 2 is
~ units.
fixed at x
2
The firms short-run output level is thus
* 1/ 3 ~ 1/ 3
y ( x1 ) x 2
*
3w 1
1/ 2
1/ 2
~
x2 .
so an increase in p causes
-- a reduction in the slope, and
-- a reduction in the vertical intercept.
~ )
y f ( x1 , x
2
y*
w1
Slopes
p
*
x1
x1
~ )
y f ( x1 , x
2
y*
w1
Slopes
p
*
x1
x1
~ )
y f ( x1 , x
2
y*
w1
Slopes
p
*
x1
x1
3/ 2
p
y
3w 1
1/ 2
3w 1
1/ 2
~
x2
~ 1/ 2 .
x
2
3/ 2
p
y
3w 1
1/ 2
3w 1
1/ 2
~
x2
~ 1/ 2 .
x
2
3/ 2
p
y
3w 1
1/ 2
3w 1
1/ 2
~
x2
~ 1/ 2 .
x
2
so an increase in w1 causes
-- an increase in the slope, and
-- no change to the vertical intercept.
~ )
y f ( x1 , x
2
y*
w1
Slopes
p
*
x1
x1
~ )
y f ( x1 , x
2
y*
w1
Slopes
p
*
x1
x1
~ )
y f ( x1 , x
2
w1
Slopes
p
y*
*
x1
x1
3/ 2
p
y
3w 1
1/ 2
3w 1
1/ 2
~
x2
and its short-run
~ 1/ 2 .
x
2
supply is
3/ 2
p
y
3w 1
1/ 2
3w 1
1/ 2
~
x2
and its short-run
~ 1/ 2 .
x
2
supply is
3/ 2
p
y
3w 1
1/ 2
3w 1
1/ 2
~
x2
and its short-run
~ 1/ 2 .
x
2
supply is
Long-Run Profit-Maximization
Now allow the firm to vary both input
levels.
Since no input level is fixed, there
are no fixed costs.
Long-Run Profit-Maximization
Long-Run Profit-Maximization
The equation of a long-run iso-profit line
is
w1
w 2x 2
y
x1
so an increase in x2 causes
-- no change to the slope, and
-- an increase in the vertical intercept.
Long-Run Profit-Maximization
y
y f ( x1 , x2 )
x1
Long-Run Profit-Maximization
y
y f ( x1 , 3x 2 )
y f ( x1 , 2x 2 )
y f ( x1 , x2 )
x1
Long-Run Profit-Maximization
y
y f ( x1 , 3x 2 )
y f ( x1 , 2x 2 )
y f ( x1 , x2 )
x1
Long-Run Profit-Maximization
y
y f ( x1 , 3x 2 )
y f ( x1 , 2x 2 )
y f ( x1 , x2 )
x1
Long-Run Profit-Maximization
y
production plan.
y f ( x1 , 3x 2 )
y f ( x1 , 2x 2 )
y* ( 3x2 )
y* ( 2x2 )
y f ( x1 , x2 )
y ( x 2 )
x*1 ( x 2 )
x*1 ( 3x2 )
x*1 ( 2x2 )
x1
Long-Run Profit-Maximization
y
production plan.
y f ( x1 , 3x 2 )
y f ( x1 , 2x 2 )
y* ( 3x2 )
y* ( 2x2 )
y f ( x1 , x2 )
y ( x 2 )
x*1 ( x 2 )
x*1 ( 3x2 )
x*1 ( 2x2 )
x1
Long-Run Profit-Maximization
y
production plan.
y f ( x1 , 3x 2 )
y f ( x1 , 2x 2 )
y* ( 3x2 )
y* ( 2x2 )
y f ( x1 , x2 )
y ( x 2 )
x*1 ( x 2 )
x*1 ( 3x2 )
x*1 ( 2x2 )
x1
Long-Run Profit-Maximization
Long-Run Profit-Maximization
Long-Run Profit-Maximization
Long-Run Profit-Maximization
The Cobb-Douglas example: When
1/ 3~ 1/ 3
y x1 x 2 then the firms short-run
demand for its variable input 1 is
*
x1
3/ 2
p
y
3w 1
1/ 2
3w 1
1/ 2
~
x2
~ 1/ 2 .
x
2
Long-Run Profit-Maximization
~
py* w 1x*1 w 2x
2
p
p
3w 1
1/ 2
1/ 2
~
x 2 w1
3w 1
3/ 2
~ 1/ 2 w x
~
x
2
2 2
Long-Run Profit-Maximization
~
py* w 1x*1 w 2x
2
p
p
3w 1
1/ 2
p
p
3w 1
1/ 2
1/ 2
~
x 2 w1
3w 1
3/ 2
~ 1/ 2 w x
~
x
2
2 2
p p
1/ 2
~
x 2 w1
3w 1 3w 1
1/ 2
~
w 2x
2
Long-Run Profit-Maximization
~
py* w 1x*1 w 2x
2
p
p
3w 1
1/ 2
p
p
3w 1
1/ 2
2p p
3 3w 1
1/ 2
~
x2 w1
3w 1
3/ 2
~ 1/ 2 w x
~
x
2
2 2
p p
1/ 2
~
x2 w1
3w 1 3w 1
1/ 2
~ 1/ 2 w x
~
x
2
2 2
1/ 2
~
w 2x
2
Long-Run Profit-Maximization
~
py* w 1x*1 w 2x
2
p
p
3w 1
1/ 2
p
p
3w 1
1/ 2
2p p
3 3w 1
1/ 2
~
x2 w1
3w 1
3/ 2
~ 1/ 2 w x
~
x
2
2 2
p p
1/ 2
~
x2 w1
3w 1 3w 1
1/ 2
~ 1/ 2 w x
~
x
2
2 2
3 1/ 2
4p
~ 1/ 2 w x
~ .
x
2
2 2
27w 1
1/ 2
~
w 2x
2
Long-Run Profit-Maximization
3 1/ 2
4p
~ 1/ 2 w x
~ .
x
2
2 2
27w 1
to get
~ x*
x
2
2
3 1/ 2
4p
~ 1/ 2 w
x
2
2
27w 1
p3
27w 1w 2
2
Long-Run Profit-Maximization
What is the long-run profit-maximizing
input 1 level? Substitute
x*2
27w 1w 2
2
to get
into
*
x1
3w 1
3/ 2
~ 1/ 2
x
2
Long-Run Profit-Maximization
What is the long-run profit-maximizing
input 1 level? Substitute
p
x*2
27w 1w 2
2
into
*
x1
3w 1
1/ 2
3/ 2
~ 1/ 2
x
2
to get
p
*
x1
3w 1
3 / 2
2
27w 1w 2
2
27w 1 w 2
Long-Run Profit-Maximization
What is the long-run profit-maximizing
output level? Substitute
x*2
27w 1w 2
2
to get
p
into y
3w 1
*
1/ 2
~ 1/ 2
x
2
Long-Run Profit-Maximization
What is the long-run profit-maximizing
output level? Substitute
x*2
p
into y
3w 1
27w 1w 2
2
1/ 2
~ 1/ 2
x
2
to get
p
*
y
3w 1
1/ 2
1/ 2
27w 1w 22
p2
.
9 w 1w 2
Long-Run Profit-Maximization
So given the prices p, w1 and w2, and
3 1/ 3
the production function y x1/
1 x2
the long-run profit-maximizing production
plan is
p2
.
,
,
27w 12w 2 27w 1w 22 9 w 1w 2
( x*1 , x*2 , y* )
p3
p3
y f(x)
y*
Decreasing
returns-to-scale
x*
y f(x)
y
y
Increasing
returns-to-scale
x
So an increasing returns-to-scale
technology is inconsistent with firms
being perfectly competitive.
y f(x)
Constant
returns-to-scale
y
x
y f(x)
=0
y
Constant
returns-to-scale
y
x
Revealed Profitability
Consider a competitive firm with a
technology that exhibits decreasing
returns-to-scale.
For a variety of output and input
prices we observe the firms choices
of production plans.
What can we learn from our
observations?
Revealed Profitability
Revealed Profitability
y
( x , y ) is chosen at prices ( w , p )
w
Slope
p
y
Revealed Profitability
y
( x , y ) is chosen at prices ( w , p ) so
w
Slope
p
y
Revealed Profitability
y
( x , y ) is chosen at prices ( w , p ) so
w
Slope
p
y
y
Revealed Profitability
y
( x , y ) is chosen at prices ( w , p ) so
w
Slope
p
y
y
Revealed Profitability
y
( x , y ) is chosen at prices ( w , p ) so
w
Slope
p
y
y
x
So the firms technology set must lie under the
iso-profit line.
Revealed Profitability
y
( x , y ) is chosen at prices ( w , p ) so
w
Slope
p
y
y
The technology
set is somewhere
in here
x
x
So the firms technology set must lie under the
iso-profit line.
Revealed Profitability
y
( x , y ) is chosen at prices ( w , p ) so
( x , y ) maximizes profit at these prices.
w
Slope
p
( x , y ) would provide higher
x x
Revealed Profitability
y
( x , y ) is chosen at prices ( w , p ) so
( x , y ) maximizes profit at these prices.
w
Slope
p
y
x x
Revealed Profitability
y
( x , y ) is chosen at prices ( w , p ) so
( x , y ) maximizes profit at these prices.
w
Slope
p
y
Revealed Profitability
y
( x , y ) is chosen at prices ( w , p ) so
( x , y ) maximizes profit at these prices.
w
Slope
p
y
x x
Revealed Profitability
y
Revealed Profitability
y
Revealed Profitability
Revealed Profitability
y
y
y
( w , p )
Revealed Profitability
y
y
y
( w , p )
Revealed Profitability
y
y
y
( w , p )
y f(x)
Revealed Profitability
Revealed Profitability
y
( x , y ) is chosen at prices
( w , p ) so
p y w x p y w x .
( x , y ) is chosen at prices
( w , p ) so
p y w x p y w x .
Revealed Profitability
p y w x p y w x and
p y w x p y w x so
p y w x p y w x and
p y w x p y w x .
Adding gives
( p p ) y ( w w ) x
( p p ) y ( w w ) x .
Revealed Profitability
( p p ) y ( w w ) x
(p p ) y ( w w ) x
so
( p p )( y y ) ( w w )( x x )
That is,
py wx
Revealed Profitability
py w x
Revealed Profitability
py w x