COMPLAINT MAIL. Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission Post Office Box 367, Richmond, Virginia 23216-0367 Note: The Commission does not accept fax or e-mail complaints. Name of Judge. Lis c Location of Court, Date of incident Case Name or Number (if known) Current Status of Case, Name and telephone number of persons who witnessed the judge's conduct: Description of what the judge sald or id that you ballove was improper “he Peseta ly themselves b/ fev do tas pial thease at dialed topoedt Diyorer awn Tlona tera up eckmar Tadtonal ges maybe saad DO NOT SEND ORIGINAL COURT RECORDSRECORD WILL NOT BE RETURNED Name Day (Please Print Clearly) Te pone 202 968-7178. “patel 11] 201 Revited: 09012014Janice Wolk Grenadier 15 West Spring Street Alexandria Virginia 22301 202-468-7178 iwprenedier@ gmail.com December 3, 2015 Hon. Lisa Bondareff Kemler, Chief Judge City of Alexandria Cireuit Court 520 King Street ‘Alexandria, Viginia 22314 (703) RE: Bellefonte Ave Case No.CH 010654 ~ Judge Donald Haddock choosing all Judge's for “LOVE” Grand Jury Case No, MO1100 1482 ~ Denied Access w/ witness KIDKNAPPED other Courtroom COA Gutter and RV Case No, GV 12-3028 — Retribution & Retaliation by this Court and COA Divorce Case No, 99-1253 —No Property Settlement Les Pendens Case No, CL 1400-2193 ona Grenadier - Foreclose on 15 W. Spring Street for illegally gotien legal fees _ Case No. 15 - 003661 USDC ofthe District of Columbia to Mave IEG Foreclose case due to Hate Crime in COA 1:15 me-01540 Dear Chie Fudge Bondareff Kemler: on ‘This leteris to inform you of an abominable injustice that is going on under your supecvisiSn dike witirknowl- edgeable and erminal intent by the Court. That I come to you with great sadness fas st egrort Ere | am sure the FBI/ DOI will be coming next i this snot resolved, That have ignored yourjnveivemenEbey cause of you father and what a greet Doctor and man he is, and al edi for my gi. Bu you fave BEE pot bee your ator ndash gett a pred te a and at scion fags woe Crest ledges ston im mca ny te Tht Yu, Suge Dona eed, Na ans and Judge James Clark have acted outside the law, empowering lawyers to come int four court-roont fact ‘outside the law to protect your own. Tat Divorce Lawyer llona Grenadier Heckman and Davig-Grenadiér's Criminal acts and actions are and still are a “HATE” crime that you have empowered and empowered Di- MaroGinsberg & Michael Weiser by allowing them tole in cour, le n court documents etal. That you and the other Judges have tampered with the Grand Jury, my documents submitted into the courtroom and by all appearance involved in trying to physically harm me and my girls. How would you fee if someone informed 1dge had ordered you to be found incompetent so a gentlemen was hired o drug you and get inap- propriate pictures, RAPE YOUR DAUGHTER, plant drugs on them or in your home. The appearance is YOU ‘were involved in this ora leat empowered Judge James Clark, as you empowered him to LLLEGALLY JAIL, AND TOURTURE ME, ‘As the Chief Judge I come to you about under your supervision and your responsioility ofthe City of Alexan- dria Cireut Court. Tcome to you for help as Hlona has filed a new suit as you and Nolan Dawkins have in the ‘past ignored or signed at different times that you were not going to hear the case and recused yourself, but, by ignoring the fact that Judge James Clark has never had jurisdiction due to Bias, Retaliation, Retribution, Favor— itism, Cronyism and ruling for financial gain for others is are against the law in fevoritism of Jewish Lawyer Iona, David Grenadier whom you went to Hebrew school my opponents and there lawyers. ‘That since 2007 when Divorce Lawyer Iona Grenadier Hackman lied in court I have been persecuted in, this court the Cireuit Court of Virginia in the City of Alexandria and Prince Willinm County by several 1Circuit Court Judges illegally chosen or illegal due bias et al, the USDC of the District of Columbia and the USDC of the Easter District of Virginia court. My opponent in this case is Divorce Lawyer liona Grenadier Heckman, David Grenadier and in some ofthe cases GIC, DiMuroGinsberg, Michael Weiser, Troutman Sand- ersaka Mays and Valentine, Wells Fargo, the State of Virginia, the City of Alexandria et al. ‘That the facts have tied the corruption to my first issue Divorce Lawyer Ilona Fly Freedman Grenadier Heckman widow tothe late Judge Albert Grenadier and his 1* cousin Jerry Hackman founder of KellerHeckman an Intemational Law Firm, Both very powerful men inthe Judiciary, Government and with Elected Officials who could just by there ‘name callin favors and a decision in the courts to favor her. In these eases in May of 2008 statements from llo- ‘na Grenadier in court changed everything: 1, Me and My family had nothing to do with you and your girls as you raised your girls Catholic ( This at ‘became a religious hate crime) 2. don't believe David stole the money from Sonia Grenadier ~ (which only left Hona out of her law firm and Ihave the documents to prove i, that she worked as the lawyer for David and myself lying to all lawyers and everyone involved inthe investigation) 3. About Judge Brown: “He ealls me all the time and I give him free Legal Advice — you will never win” which is bribery, conflict ete Then in Chambers May of 2008 Judge Donald Haddock stated: 1. You ean never win this we “LOVE” Hlona (Judge Fladdock had from September of 2007 ignored the law and picked all the Judges for FAVOR to ensure that Ilona won for his LOVE) That the Old Boys Network has been doing everything it could to Murder me, have me commit suicide as they did toChris Mackney in Arlington. Lam well aware of how the Old Boys Network and the Judiciary /Judge of this court work from being the x wife of David Grenadier and have seen first hand at several partie, lunches, ex-parte communications between Judges and lawyers /lay people of power sway a Judge on how he or she would rule in the ease. The Old Boys [Network owns the Judiciary. I have first hand seen Bribery through gifts, meals, payments towards portraits etal exchange hands or read about them in the news paper. was illegally jailed and tortured in the City of ‘Alexandria by Judge James Clark for two reasons I. To prevent e-mails between myself and Mark Warner's office being exposed and effecting his re-leetion tothe Senate. 2. In the hopes they could mentally torture mi {nto committing Suicide and silencing me for good as to COVER UP the criminal acts and actions of the Judi ary the Government and the Elected Officials along with the Criminal acts of Divorce Lawyer Tlona. Divorce Lawyer lona has created a Scheme tat includes several Civil Rights Violations with her hate of Catholes: ‘roms Lgablaxt294@eacl.com ‘Tuo, Dee 24, 2013 at 2:05 PM want to hear something more scarier [contacted HonaEly Freedman Grenadier Heckman your witch hunt Is over ito! warenmatentamaiconn Tae Dee oa 20k ‘PuBRnenE QU SST sen vows YOU ARE THE KIND THAT WOULD TURN EON irs Tao Faniey REsEcTED YOU RaRNOT Bane JRwan You sTuRD cov, YOU WERE REJECTED ,. ocr mar nro vaur THe SAL NOW'OU ANE Marne) UP STORES AND SPREADING uss)! BLAMING ALL JEWS LIKE HITLER FOR NOT LIVING ON EASY STREET. weu.cer arr youn soe, oc00 You Lost ru Youn Motey mane YU ieGLE. AAO 0000 YOU ARE THE NAZIWORSE A MUSLIN LOVING NAZI you mn. 2‘have come to you from rulings by Judge James Clark etal which show his bias, his favoritism, cronyism and hs lack of Jurisdiction due toa fnancil conflict in jailing me for financial gain for bis finds in DiMuroGineberg and Michae! ‘Weiser. That on November 22,2014 James Clark stated to Mr, Wieser “1 am so soooorrrrryyyvy Lcan’t collect our legal fees for you" You will have to ile for audgment to collect them. Today llona Grenadier comes 1 this court, ‘without Judgesments with Orders asking for my home tobe foreclosed on by Judges whom from the pas I believe ae in ‘on the scheme. Tha the scheme by all appearance i o make me homeless to COVER UP the criminal acts tht started in 2007 and continue tay ~ whieh “VOIT's” any a al state of imitations duc to the eriminel act in a Rico ad Rack- ‘leering type enterprise no different than the mafia or what took place in Nazi, Germany to Jews but i being done to @ Catholic that has been Black Balled by the Old Boys Network - That all “ORDERS” are disingenuous showing ex: parte communications tobe sure that Divorce Lawyer Tlona Grenadier was taken care of wit «cover up of ker criminal acts, That the state of Virginia's Judiciary involvement is not limited to this court house inludes Prince Willan, the Ap- peas Court andthe Supreme Cour of Virginia, The law and our United States Contittion is very clear ofthe rights of ‘American Citizens andthe rights oa fair ering in an open court room with a Judge that has Jurisdiction and is mot Bias, not ruling by Retribution, Retaliation, For Favertism, Cronysm or personal gain. The DOI website is very clea: DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW. SUMMARY: ‘Section 242 of Te 18 makes ia crime fora person acting under color of any lw to wily deprive a person af right or ‘privilege protected bythe Consttulon or Lae of the United States. For the purpose of Section 243, acts unter "colo of la" include acts not only done by federal, state, oF local ofcas within the tet ami authority, but aso acts dane he yd the bounds of tha offical’ lveful authority, the acts are done while the oficial is purporting to or pretending 0 act in the performance of hisher offical dates, Persons acting under calor of law with the meaning of this tatu Include olce offices prisons guards and other law enforcement offical, aswell ax judges, care providers puble health fall fies, and orhers whe are acting as pubile ofa. tis mo necessary tha the erie be matvated by annus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, fall satus or natlona origin ofthe vitim. The offense ls punishable bya range of pris ‘onment up ta life term, or the death penalty, depending. pon the elrumstances of the erime, and the resting ihe 7 any. TITLE 18, US.C, SECTION 242: Whoever, under color of any las, statute ordinance, regulation, or custom, willy subjects any person in any State, Terrtory, Commonwealth, Possession, o Distrito the deprivation of any rights, pileg- or immunities seenred or protected bythe Consltutin ar laws ofthe United States, x. shall be fined under tis ile or {imprisoned not more than ome year, or both; and If Body injury results from the act commuted i violation ofthis sect ‘orf such acts include the use, atempted use oF threatened use of «dangerous weapon, explosives, or fie, shal be fined tunder hist or imprisoned not more than ten years, or Both; amd f death results rom the acts commited in violtion of ‘his section or i'such ats include Kdnaping or an attempt kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, oF an attempt ta com ot ‘gravoted sesul abuse, o an artempt to kl shal be fined under this te, or inprsaned for any term of years or for Hfe, Sot, oF may be sentenced 0 death | would ike to give you the opportunity to right the wrongs ofthe practice and patter oF abuse in your Court House that has gone unchecked by all appearances for several yours, and which will eatinue to happen if nt stopped immediael, ‘The Judges inthis cout and other Judges who have schemed, have shown a pattern and practic with knowledgeable in- tent to prevent Due Process under col of nw for favor of personal Financial gai, a8 wel as members o family members ‘ofthe Judiciary, the Government and Elected Officials, also for personal financial gain, Theres litle ono oversight for this pater and practice, whichis a violation ofthe Rules of the Supreme Court ofthe United States Constitution and aid out clearly inthe Bill of Rights The Bill of Rights (Amendments 1-10) ‘Amendment 1 Freedom of Religion, Speech, snd the Press ‘Amendment 2 The Right to Bear Arms Amendieat 3 The Housing of Soldiers ‘Amendment 4 Protection from Unreasonable Searches and Seizures ‘Amendment 5 Protection of Right o Life, Liberty, and Property ‘Amendment 6 Rights of Accused Persons in Criminal Cases 3‘Amendment 7 Rights in Civil Cases ‘Amendment 8 Excessive Bail, Fines, and Punishments Forbidden ‘Amendment 9 Other Rights Kept bythe People ‘Amendment 10 Undelegated Powers Kept by te State and the People ‘That all of my rights have been striped of me to allow the Criminal activity ina massive Cover up of Divorce Law- yer Toa Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman which started in or around November of 1983 in the forgery ofa Trust ‘Agreement ofthe Sonia Grenadier Trust that she would go onto steal fom til April of 2014 with the sale o he Property known as Bristow Rd, That she would stat her ie and manipulation of me in Pehniary of 1OR6 and tat stealing rom me through David Grenadier in December of 1986, The outline and the back up documents are inthe above cases. Ihave attached to his eter an Article that! put together that gives an culine of what is happening in Virginia and the Old Boys Network, ‘1am now asking this court to vacate the orders in the above cases by Judge Clark, Dawkins, orkort, Brown, MeGrath, Potter as Judge Kloch already recused himself and wrote an apology letter for acts and actions, due to the appearance of the scheme inthis court to deny me Due Process for favor of Divorce lawyer Hona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman and David Grenadier who ae acting and has acted criminally. Ihave asked for all Judges to recuse themselves inthe past and they have refused by all appearance believing they are above the law or wil be protected by the Old Bays Network, ‘That under the Judital Canons by the appearance of any impropriety any judge shall recuse himself, The scheme and ‘orders inthis court andthe appeals court show Blas, Retaliation, Retribution, Favoritism, Cronyism for personal or fiends, and employees’ personal financial gen with the intent of harming a eiizen for which they took a Oath of office to protec. Further the Criminal acs of Jdicial Miscondvet, Criminal Misconduct, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, Disriminacidn, ‘Socal, Economie, Hierarchy, Gang Type Behavior as described inthe laws of Reo and Racketeering. Alem o harm 1me to prevent Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud, Violating the Low andthe Rules ofthe Supreme courts, Violation ofthe Juice! Cannons, Obsrucion of Justice, Fraud on the Court, TREASON, Tile 18 US. Code 241 & 242; Tle 42 US, Code 1981 & 1983 ex-parte communication, and eter ews. ‘The Basic Liberty of Due Process has been violated The basi Hiberty that our Flag stands for and here is wher the ‘andard of Liberty is set forthe rest ofthe Word. Ii under the Oath that each Judge has taken that this heavy burden lies on your shoulder o protect the Rights of each and every American Citizen That the Appearance of Justice i just as important as Justice itself. ‘That Judges are and should be held to 8 High Ethical Standard. That moet importantly the system iesst sn that it sa self eporting system ers inthe system when they see another Judge or Laver commiting a at or actions in violation of ther Oath of Offic, Fraud on the cour, Honest Service Fraud 18 U.S.C. § 1346 or anyother ation ‘in confit with the law that they must report itt the correct authorities or they themselves ean be eld liable for he crim inal acts or ations. “That further Defendants actions as Lawyers shouldbe reported othe appropriate officials and be investigated along with the above Judges by a Special Grand Jury. "come to you as Chief Judge to ask your help and to give meth relle of «Judge with Jurisdiction that can rule fry ‘signed to my case. Iam not Judge shopping, as slated inthe beginning Ihave been a the dinner able and watched the criminal behavior ofludge’s and know tht anyone that Hana has practiced before ori rend / or wshes to coverup the injustices will do so. If this doesnot happen Iwill consider you o be @ party tothe scheme and supporting the Criminal ses ofthe courthouse you overse as being the Chet Judge ‘That Justice Douglas wrote: In 1967, Supreme Court Justice William 0. Douglas posed the following inquiry What about the judge who conspires with local law enforcement officers to ‘railroad’ a dissenter? What 4abou the judge who knowingly turns a tral into a ‘kangaroo’ court? Or one who knowingly louts the Constt- ‘ution inorder to obtain a conviction? ..”" [Pierson v. Ray, 386 U'S. 547, 566-67 (1967)]. ‘Those very issues raised by Justice Douglas over 40 years ago are now surfacing by way of this lawsuit, exposing the two original Plaintiffs and other's such actors while serving as an example to others who might be intentionally abusing the protected rights ofselfrepresented lit Warmly, N smievon fon Hien heneemrencomen Ents ference eee ete ac sivas ea a Argument Recusal of the above Judges ‘Thee are responsiblity and consequences ofa Judge who has grounds to rcase hel is expected todos. judge docs not ‘now tht ground exis o recuse themselves the err is harmless If js doesnt recuse themselves when hey should have own to doo, they may be subject to sanctions, which vary by jurisdiction. Depending on he jurist, an appelate cour finds ‘Judgment to have been made when the judge in question shoud have been etic, ay st asde he upnent ond rer he ease Farrer nthis ease the Scheme of Frat on the Cou 19 work rhe thoxe nt Hong hem to the w= ruling ther favor even with Civil Rights Violation shows a srong bias to harm and inidate Pro Se Liigart Janice, “Any judge who does at comply with hs oath 1 the Cnsittion of the United States, ar gains that Contin and engages in violation the Supreme Law ofthe Land Ifa Juge des no lly comply with the Contin, then hi orders are 0, er, 124 US. 200 (I8E), he without jursdetion, and hsb as engnged ine net rats of treacon” “U.S. HU, 449 U.S. 200, 216,101 S. C1471, 66 6424392, 406 (1980) Coens, Vial, 19 US. (6 Wheat) 264, 408, 5 L857 1821)" ‘Where an exrjuccal hse accusition of deeply personal and profession nature hasbeen made by the Court apninst Poa Janice prior o his ever atending the bench, but manifests tsl in is cient hostile ad antagonistic fame of rind in amt over which eis currently presiing, Seton 48S (a) of Tie 28 mandates tat the Court all agua himl? sites be impartiality might reasonably be guoned Added ote clear langunge of Section 448, which equierdisgusifation where the outs inpaciaty might retsonably be qe Tine ithe frei hlding ofthe US. Sipreme Coun Liteky v U.S, 310 US. 540,557 (1994, clay requing dgulfiction under ihe eteumsances pressed ere: "Seton 485() provides tha ge "shel dually hence any proceeding In which his impardaty might reasonably be quesioned.” Fer present purposes it shoud sufi toy tht Seton 455 (a) tggred by on 5sue or ste of minds eistnt tof and depssionate ini a 10 cute apy the ple oF reviewing cour thay eae Sonable rounds to question the neural en abective character of judge’ rulings o fading” ‘Tae Second Crete he Southern Dict have repeated invoked thet objective standard in defining the bat forrest Enterprizes Ine, Delhy, 79 F.2d 241 (24 Cir 1996); U.S v.Osthipin, 651 F- Sip. 523 SDNY, 1993) As acknowledged in Gro- inv: Random House, in, 61 F.3d. 1088 at 1053, cing appropriate language a Lick: "dee seated antagcism makes fic ula- ‘ent inpossbe.” ‘Te basis for ecusl heres premised on an extraordinary alse accusation leveled aginst counsel while the jdge was il in private practice Iwas and ita personal tack that sexual. See US. v. Serao, 607 F-2¢ 1145 (sth Ct 1919) nd US. v.Zagaire, 419 F.Supp 454 (N. Dis Cal, 1975, where specie moe taken that exrajuealaachs of personal mature ae the rages ‘mss for panting rele. ‘Nor des it ator tht the Cour fis to recall the specifics of the event in question: "The goal of section 45S ito avoid even the sppearance of partial. If would appene to reasonable person tha «judge has knowledge of facts hat would give him an interes in the uigaton then an appearance of partaty ir erented even thous no atu pati exissbecnse te jue does ‘ot eal he a, baeause the judge stay has no neestin theca or because the Jel put ober snd income. The Indu’ forties, however, int the sr of ebectively ascertainable ft tat can avo the appearance of paral.” Likebo Heath Serves Acquistion Corp 46 US. 847, 71 (1988). ‘Te plain language 028 U.S.C. 455(092) I cea: (2) Any sts, judge, or magistrate ofthe United States shal disqualify himself in any proceacing in which his impar. tally might reasonably be questoned (©) He shal also disquatty hist in the folowing circumstances: (2) Wherein private practice he served a Iyer in the materi controversy, or fwyer with whom be previously practiced wy Served ring such association a ewyerconceving the miter, or he udp or ich awyer a been a mtr winesscaneertng In lscusing the inpor of §455(), Chet use Rebagist note, nhs can, in Llyebergv Health Series Acquistion Com, 486 US. 40, £71 1908) tha “Subsection () of § 455 St fo more prcsurizd situation in which a age mst agua mse Congress itened the provisions of § 455 (bt remove any doubt abou reas in cates Whee ge’ interest 00, closely coneced with te Iga 0 allow his patcpaton” Where wo sparse factors involving spat asocatin witha pry and persona animys toward counel combine to eal he peor bas and prejudice of the judge, ast fori ately and mtickent aia, the llegatone must te accede ru and ‘he Court is requied wo recuse sel pursuant 10 BUS. § 144 ‘The reeusal motion hasbeen ied at the earliest possible momen: afer obtain the facts demonstrating ass ores." See US. ¥- Occhi 51 F, Supp. 523, 367 (So Dis, NY 1993). Itsts ot the origins of he Cours ls: a extajudelal epsode and pir association. US. v. Zagaie, 419 F.Supp. 44 (No. Dist Cal, 1976), nd documents with partir the manifestation of ‘as refed i the eure proceeding As such and for purposes of Seton 144 of Tile 2, the allegations ofa cet afdavit must be aecepehy he Court a tus, and ‘he Court must atin aecordance withthe mandate of § 144 and recuse sell U.S, . Sy, 7F-34 1331 (Ci 1983) “That the evidence In the above cases filed shows the Fraud, Perjury, Forgery, Obstruction of Justice, in- tend to mentally harm with much suffering by Janice, Discrimination for Socal Hierarchy and Religious beliefs, the collusion to silence Janice while Megely jailed, Fraud onthe Coun, Profesional Code of Chis Violations, sxppor of hat rns, intimidation, support of egal aling ad torture of Janice ote and sence etal taal cs and ae- tions have been knowidgeabe wilful acts that were and are ongoing alicous, violent, opprecv,faudle:, wanton, or gray reckless bythe above Judges and Divorce Lawyer ons ‘That no Plait or Defendant can win when a Judge bring n Reaiation, Retr for or witha Gaancil cont, Favoriten, Cronyem or 6“The folowing are the conics ths fled with is court, 1 The Hidges hve vilted Canon If the Canons of dial Condac forthe Commonwealth of Virginia and United States of “Americ in that hey: fled io ophol the integrity and independence of the jinn fled fo maintain an enforce sanders of conduct for fellow judges and ocr ofthe cour filed to observe minal standards 5 thatthe ietegriy and independence ofthe judelary woud be preserve, Filed fo onsvue and apply the provisions ofthe Canons of Judea Condac to further ther objectives redoce he poli confidence inthe integrand independence of juges tnd the deference ofthe public tothe jugments trang of cours an injred the sytem of government under ly ete bce on favor, fale to comply wih the law failed ineroet and apply the laws hat over us failed to respect and honor the jc ofc spi trust filed enanos and maintain confidence in our eel sytem. fale be am arbero acts an aw forthe resluon of dst. filed to met even inimal standards for ehsal onda of ude. the above Judge have shown with the Judicial Canons: as has Ben showa in documents eee 2, The Judges volted Canon 2 ofthe Canons of Jui Conduct in tha they fle o respect and comply with he wand fled toactataltimcr na manner tat promotes public confidence te inegry and impart ofthe udieary 5. The Judges violated Canon 3, ofthe Canons of Fudiil Conduct by lng to pefor ted and igen of hi jedi office impartially 4 The Jags volte Canon 3, Seton 332) in tat thy filed o be fh tothe lw nd manta pofesonl competenc in « 5, The Judges voted Canon 3, Section 38(4) in that they fled to hee any proceedings ely and with patine, led dispose Promplly ofthe busines ofthe court and filed te efficient and busines while being honest and deliberate 6. The Judes violated Canon 3, Section 385) nha they fle to perfor judicial tes without Retaliation, Reibuton, Fa ‘orks, Cronysm bas prejudice 17. The Judes voluted Cann 3, Section 38(6) in hat she led to retain in Orders: orm manifeing, by words r conduct, bas oF reje based upon scl rary, opotct oer. Judges visaed Canon 3, Seton 3(7)Inta they fale To mcord every ‘etson whois legal intrest ina proceeding, he ight to be beard according ol 1 The Judges voted Canon 3, Section 38(7) ie hat they and theresa nated, permed, andor considered ex parte ommunieations, or conidred thes commnications made to th judge outsider the presence of te pares canceing2pend- Ingor impending proceeding on sever occasions. 9, The Judges woued Cann 3, Section 3B(7 in tht she filed ducoc tal partis ll ex pee communion decribed in ‘Sexions 3B(7)@) sd JC) regarding a proceeding pending or impendag before he judge, 10, The Judges violated Canon 3, Seton 37) in that thy independently investigated fats na case outs the courtroom and con- sidered evidence eter than that presented in documents and wih the fc they di pt allow my wires oak he stand 11, The Judges violated Canon 3, Section 38(7) in tht thy filed to insure that Seton 387) was ot vite through eles or ‘ter personnel on the judge's staf. [If communication between the tral jude andthe appelte cour wih espe! oa proceed: ings permite copy of ay writen communieation or the sibslance of any ofl communication soul be provided ol par tis) 12, The Judges vied Canon 3, Section 3) in that hy led wo spose promptly ofthe busines ofthe cou Ina fir and unbi- 35 why following the la and rues of tbe Cou. 13. The Judges violate Canon 3, Section 9) in hash ile to abstain fom public comment about a pending o impending pro ceeding nay eu, and fle oditect similar abstention onthe pat of cout personel subject toh ection and cana 14. The Judges violated Canon 3, Section 3C() in that they filed digeny discharge he judges administrative espnsibiies witout bie o prjoice and malnalnprofcionalcompeane In ude admin 72», 2, ‘The Jue violated Canon 3, Seti 3C{2 in tha they fled to requ staf cour oficial and oer subject the jes Acection and con to obseve the sndards of elt and igece that apply othe je and to ein fom manifesting bis or prejudice inthe performance of theo duies. ‘The Jie violated Cann 3, Setion (3) in tha a they Je filed ake easonable mesures to sere the prom dsp son of ters before the courtna profession ed away ‘The tdges violated Canon 3, Seton 3C(4) 1 thal hey filed 0 exercise he power ef spoinimenipacally and onthe bass of mer; b. thlthey engaged in Retalaion, Rerun, Bis, and showed fv; 18. The Judges vilted Canon 3, Seton 31) in tha they recived el cer Judges and Lawyers hat acted eiinally, had confics and (hey cid ot ake appropiate ein, efor indicating substantia iklhood that td commited velaions ofthese Canons or other lnvs and “The Jes voisted Canon 3, Section 3D(1) in that he had knowledge that Judge and lawyers had commited violation of these Canons that ass a substan soeton wt thei fits for fice ands dint info th adil iy and Bee is Commission a-aerathortiesas they art reid ad, ‘eg vas Cone Sein 30) in scp mai nan anal ahodsbashe oorileacton, “The Jes voted Canoa 3, SetionDI2) in that had inowledge that corey ona Grenade Heckona sd oer ha com: insane Coss of fsa sensi ht aed asthenia ue aon inerhisand fess calmer and hey didnot informe Vira Sse Ba. Thatto date December 2,2015 Janice has personaly provided sever statements and Motions to Judge cing uch of the shove and offering provide additonal information, ‘Tae above Judges have engngein"ondutpejudcilothe props administration of jesice" (Va, Cons. at, Vi, § 10; Code of Virgina § 17.1906) and thee performance a Judge need investing and Special Grand Jury shoud be empowered fora fran unbias investigation it thi sour andthe stions ofthe above Judges, ‘The Criminal Misconduct consists ofthe following: Criminal Misconduct and Facisand Laws Miscond ct While in Office T TITLES, USE, SECTION | Wioever, andor calor of any ae, saat, ordnance, regulation, cata, aly | subjects any person n any Site, Terry, Commoneutt, Posen, o Dre 1 the mn amo ass ofthe United Sse shall be fned under iste or prisoned wot mare ‘han one year, o ah and f body inry results from the acs commited in vioaton ofthis section or if such et ncude the we, tenpeduse, ar heated ise of eda Berous weapon, explosives or fr, shal be fned under title o imprisoned not mare {han tea ears, or bat; and If deat ress rom the acts come tn oation of tis, section or f'such cts clue Rdnaping or an etenpt oldnep, aggravated sexwal ‘hase, ran atompto commit aggravated sexual abuse, or at tempt hil shall be fied under this tte, or prsoned for any ters of yous or for Hf ‘oth or maybe sentenced fo death Racketeering 1BUSC§ 1967 Extorion 18 USC § 1981, 1FUSC | Thais appearance o Teak the Tages were and ae Th Toop oT he vllslon oFhar= | 1963, Va Code 182-470 {ng Jane led and rte for being poo, Caole and o Coverup the erimiel ets. VA Code §182-439 Acceptance of | At ‘bribe by officer or candidate ‘tern the intimidation in hopes of Janice being Murdered cr commiting suicide te ects | times trestening nareraton ty eter Judges if ane di not pay. Collision with and ations show pater and prac Collusion of Vigna Crt Coun Judes] USDC Feieral Cour and Appeals Cour in Virginia te Di of Comba That | when DiMuroGistorg, Grenadier Anderon Starnes Dutew & Kiser donated subtantia= Iy tothe Por of huge Donald Heddock was nothing more than & THANK YOU — BRIBARY for always having thee bck. ‘Obsirton of susice 18 USC § 1s03(a), § 1505, § 1506, § 1510, § | 1511, § isa, § 1513, 1514,§ 1314(A), § 1519 VA Code § 182-409 Resisting or obstruction execution of legal process VA Code 18.2 “Making judi deesians outside of the courroom md lying on aoe, ex pe Information ste substantive decisions Conducing ex pare dckssons wh oposl= tion and goverament agence. Not requiring opposition to prove ther ease ut euliog, for them anyway. Denying procsdorl de proces, denying any and ll wit formation that showed the criminal activity of lon Grenadier Heckman! David Gren lerEzka Lewis and thee lawyers. suing baseless, noncompliant odes and seeking oF ying ntmidste with the possibilty of money tooppanet lawyer. ‘Cain ie isnnce of coereie leters demanding payment of bow and making testi do nol py. then zai ang Janie. The above Judges fer conversation wth Judge Haddock, Marth Ken 8 Jane Believes the Judges belive {hey are above the a and by sll appetrance coping ova 0 find for wi others inthe Juda oneal Serves Fraud TE USC § 1967 Systemic denial o Fone saviee oe court jem, while pepovaing ake scheme o gin favor with others, oF financial al Tobe seen as a game plyer with the “Old Boys Network with he hope of ay raise, bons an the payments tarde nner ates, portals or what eer he Jug may regu of he Inwjers whieh ive the apes Snce of bobery. Tht Janice as sen fist hand Tat the Jadge' and Lawyers who are frends tak peor aril and the decision 1s made-vir tothe al fr he Deter lend of ‘the most Power Jadge sin Jnie's eae its ge Donald Kent ond Sedge Donald Haddock by appearance running the Judiciary eal in Viegiia ad in Washington DC ‘would be Judge Wallon, Howell, Leon and Boasbe, and inte USDC of VA Judge Lee ‘with appeals Judge's Wiking, Niemeyer, Hamio long with many ter ate USDC athe District of Columbia Sing Reni ‘Conspiracy 18 USC§ 1961 VA code § Ta2-22 Colton with arrows advise and agencies w obvi unc, Scaring characer tnd reputation o obtain self-serving favors withthe intention of easing ove dena of Se proces and blocking recip of hones services while some judges have ben seeking legal peyrents, Deformation of Janice Wolk Cremdier bls Assistance Fraud VA Code §18.2-469 Officer refusing, delaying, ect, to exeeute proces for criminal [Egregious egal Ero 2 USC § 1981 Equal Rights Under the Law Participating in scheme o Fauculey obtain ste and faa nds ough Hamp ou legal or facta bal, wth he intention of cerbutng the money among co- Eenspitors. Tht ignoring the banks $251 Bllon fine, lowing Lamyes nat to a ssver compluin, gnoring TroenanSandrs aka Mas Valentine cont nll aes, Panicipaon in aenping wo basletydetvoy Fane Taney, py sealya6d wera |y- Colston fo iegally Libel and Slander wih ke Blog jwokareaier- [alec blogspot.com USDC of District f Columbia denying resaiing odes to win favorinadearatory public opinion not ised without due process. Callsion to continae Libel ad slander with cer iuges ee lawyers to protect ealeagues. Ulimte goat of murder or ule, without eg! bai and accomplined through rina, nots ure diction Progam and extort payments rom me, for loa Grenadier Heckman and inure with | “USC § T98ICHnT Action Jor Dep vation of Rights artcipaon aerpingo Easley deay Ties Colson Yo Ube, dar wih r= ious hate a defamatory pli opinion witout ie process. Unite gol of murder, Sblcde to make homers witht legal basi and accomplished through minal in bots jadine: ‘To poet the criminal ston of lon Greader Heckman sp those inte “ocla, Government and Elected Ota whom he ales seppedouade the box of the law inthe Cover Up of Lawyer lloras actors ‘Bae Process Fifth and Fourteenth ‘Amendment no person "deprived of ‘ie liberty, or property without due proces of aw" Deliteat dena of subanive and procedural de proces Hatencallyfvoing a oF ponent nthe basis of Social Hierarchy to bila fr ith he July, the Goverment {nd ber Elected Offeils Colon to deny prostdual due process in VAforecisire proceedings not allowing ary by Tel as demanded by Janice for nines the cout, | That dmisng the compan with bassess eaoning afer proper motions and easing thc Issuance of unoundes lings. [Socal Hierarchy Discrimination Defined Different depres of power aad suhorliy by Parons wha Belov 9 aeThe lw a in Gov, Blesed Offical € Indica when misedby ese persons who be Tove They mike the ls For thee that lee they are above the 20 hey dona have to fllow the sme Ins" Discrimination fr beng poor, lsked baled by the Ol Boys Networ Religious Dissimimation 42 USC § 200066 First Amendment of US Con- “The First Aniendnentguaraiaes feedon of Region — That al Bodies ofthe adr, ‘he Goverment on Bete Oia ve soppnteénea's HATE OF CATHOLICS ct ‘Decisions made in bad faith for a cor- ‘up purpose deliberately and iten- tionally failing ofllow the law. “AT delions and Orders fe be dane dllntaly to Gey Doe Proceso rove Te (Criminal Acs and Knowledgeable actions of FRIENDS and Colleagues” Enrinsic Fraud See eg, Schiossborg 1 Schlossberg, 343 A. 34 234 = Mil Court of Appeals 1975, ality trtng wa founded, bse orden Wi is Knontedge a he CaK ot Con and colin ta eo Janie. Perjury, Fraud hansen seeking money, ‘Abuse of Contempt Powers VA § 182-456 (4) Misbehavior ofan officer ofthe court i his oficial character (G)Disobedionce oe resistance of an officer of the court ‘Cain Wik ees case a deibrily dy dn proses ope cae a conemgt poste then suing eons an odes tha dona comply wth testy procedure {nd teaten cone incarceration and if So ot pay. gall Inarerating, orth, Janice rom October 22~Noverber 12,2014 forte hopes oe omimiting wilde ‘wen se was released, o prevent e-mails showing Mark Wares Knowledge ofthe cor- ‘upton inthe Judiciary andthe coverup of Lawyer llna Grenadier Heckman, fr pure use of Janice, [Ex pare Communications Judicial Canon 3(B)7 Virginia code of Profes- sional Conduct Delieately eondutng ot pre cacsnons wit oppasion and giver agencies ad ein ther own invesigations, the using the exajeicl formation to abe baseless ‘lings while also denying ds process and seeing money fr eimial aby lye ‘Thats hamp progam ofered bythe government has been mibused by the Banks end Lawyers wih hve been ped and ignored ‘Deformation / Libel] Slander VA Code §18.2417 Slander and libel, 28 USC § 4101, “Thatin colin with the other judges the word teens" valoas”“DehaToal, a licious&loking for velous aw ais” sying am Fantastic and ancl mtr by Ger ald Bruce Lee and similarsying by otter ode. Janice ha the documents and te proof ‘of corption byte Judiciary and Lawyer loa ly Fredman Grenades Heckman ~ Law firms DiMroGinsberg and BWW Law Group aad Truman Sanders aka Mays & Valen ‘ine and the fudge fr fvor are coling to cover op al eriminal ee. "Tha the eof Deformation i Because the eal law doesnot wark, bacawse the LAW ison he deo | jury VA Code 5 TRE10,§ TEI" 434, §801-43 ‘Tat wien te Tope's ign Orde iat were esi he aw, nino and caect at were fle in staterens they commited Perjury. That Lawyers lla Grenaler Heckman, Ben Distr, Michel Welse, Andrea Mose, Inge Joba Tra, Hilly Cole, led documents nd mislead this cout Obsting Susie with statment tha hey knew ta be VA Code 517105 ‘esiqnaion af Judges To Bold cor sed sel er adger~ That all adger wall cee IyyJanlc have ben by Judge ht od not have fran making odes "VOID? WA Code § 185-21 ‘An Actessor, etter efor or after te fe nay. whee he rtp felon be con= ‘ted or no, be amenable 0 Jusie or not be nite, vied convicted and punished in ‘he county or corporation ia which he Became aeesory on whic the rip felon sight be indice WA Code § 182481 Treason VA Code § 18.2482 Misprision of ‘Treason “Treason Resisting Wie eveeition ofthe laws wider esr of We authority. amy person ‘owing of uch treason shal no oon ax my be, give infomation thereat othe Gov ror of some conservator ofthe pth he hal ety OF las € Felony VA Code § 18-47% Fle entries oF destruction of records hy offers ofthe cout - Wen Kenier, Dantes and Clark mated back docureat timid property ita the record je Mail Fd VA Code 5 TRETSE Forgag Public Records =llona Grenadier Heskran That when loca was invalid wh forgery of Soa Grenadiers mame in the Te npreement and then er known hd caught forging coninued owe such documer! wh the ei of ether Lawyer, Gow ren ofits VA Code § 182455 Unprofessional Conduct: revocation ofense ‘Conduct lege by an aforney a law any psn olding cee Fam Gommonwe ‘tw engage ina proesion in unprofessional conde, ‘That the above outlines only some of the eriminal activity and collusion 10¢ COMPLAINT MAILTO: Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission Post Office Box 367 Richmond, Viginia 23218-0367 Note: The Commission does not accept fax oF ¢-mail complaints. Name of Judge. Location of Court (ecaitona pages may be ached) — Daytime Telephone: dua Ue 42B07 Note: The Commission does not accept unsigned complaints Revie 0402608a a Lisa Kemler By all appearance she recused herself in September of 2007 without filing the appropriate paper work with the Supreme Court of Virginia. On October 11, 2014 she signed an Order recuing herself from overseeing the Grand Jury on December 12, 2011 as demanded by then Chief Judge Donald M. Haddock and: denied on February 13, 2012 by Randy Sengel and Judge Bowen Potter (appointed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia). The Circuit Court of Alexancria per ‘the Supreme Court did not follow the appropriate and customary procedure on fiing the ‘appropriate paper work in a timely manner and with the appropriate people. ‘September of 2012 Chief Judge Lisa B. Kemler — showed her collusion to protect the ‘other Judges, by not having Judge Clark to the appropriate thing and recuse himself. (On October 14, 2012 JWG delivered to Judges Chambers Lisa Kemler a letter Fequesting a Special Grand Jury to look into why her documents were not in WG's file in the Circuit Court of Alexandria's Clerks office in collusion to intimidate JWG the folowing action occurred: On October 12, 2012 in collusion with Judge Nolan Dawkins, Judge James C. Ciark & herself maiing back documents that had been submitted into evidence and by all ‘pearance involved in the collusion to do whatever harm can be done to Appellent. Chief Judge Lisa Kemier by all appearance has no integrity, has violated the oath of her office and the Judicial Cannons. In September of 2007 by all appearance and per Diane Fiske she had recused herself, and even put i in writing in December of 2012, only to sign and Order taking away Janice Wolk Grenadier’s basics rights as a citizen ‘on December 12" of 2012 On October 13, 2012 in the Mail Plaintiff received a Box which has not been ‘opened from the Circuit Court of Alexandria with the evidence that was submitted into the record on September 26, 2012. If the Judge had not submitted or had not taken away all of Paintif's right to file anything without his permission, along with the Order to quash the Lis Pendens even when Plaintiff had shown the Financial money with back up due to Plaintiff close to $3 million dollars with interest. By all appearance the Circuit Court of Alexandria has become a Trustee to the money owed Appellant by blocking Appellant taking way her Constitutional Right ‘to protect her intorests in a Les Pendens from Corrupt attomeys.ens JUDGE LISA KEMLER ‘As of January 2012 Chiof Judge inthe City of Alexandria Her Oath is attached By all appearance she recused herself in September of 2007 without filing the appropriate paper work with the Supreme Court of Virginia. ‘Attached is the Oath she took on March 1, 2008. ‘On October 11, 2011 she signed an Order recuing herself from oversesing the Grand Jury on December 12, 2011 as demanded by then Chief Judge Donald M. Haddock and denied on February 13, 2012 by Randy Songel and Judge Bowen Potter (appointed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Virgina). Tho Circult Court of Alexandria per the Supreme Court did not follow the appropriate ‘and customary procedure on filing the appropriate paper work in a timely manner and with the appropriate people. Lisa Kemler has been silent. She has lost her judicial immunity, but is not a @ Defendant ig - Jatt to Kemley PIE ah ps ohg Se + 4o Mar t Tella. woe iqned pat captor Py 2018 Leon he FGA “ast Toned hy, psi Bt oo bun, Bie [ting Maga? Doh = Ayu ~ puganding tingeines 4 Oto bi i 2012- Letiew /nppes. Ihe 21, Bebb thi Cae a fn Comet J E a Wl a pias bam Fel TCilank= Lisa B. Kemler John Kloch ~ Recused himself twice ~ ‘Alexandria Circuit Court Judge wh heard the 1st Motion of my case with lona Grenadier Heckman & David Grenadier the Bellefonte Partnership. lana Grenadier a lawyer representing hersel an offer of the court was disingenuous in court that day! ‘The Truth comes out- Judge Kloch was working for Juridical Solutions.when Judge MeGrath was ‘chosen to be my Trial Judge - The entire Alexandria Circuit Court was involved inthis cover up and very Disingenuous! Is this what Judge Haddock meant when he said how they Loved Hlon and I would never gt fair tial? This started in September 2007 when our first trip o theAlexandria Circuit Court Judge Koch was the Judge. llona Grenadier was very disingenuous, Judge Kloch believed llona Grenadier. I had to re-file everything, But, | met a Federal Judge who when he heard what had happened, told me no Judge allowed any one to lie in his court room. Especially an attorney who was an officer of the Court. The Federal Judge helped me to write my Motion for Default (Should have read Motion for Default Judgment according to Judge Dawkins.) But, when I filed with the court to hear my Motion for Default .. none of the Judge's in the Alexandria Circuit Court wanted to hear it. They recluse themselves. It was filed on September 24, 2007 and not heard until December 5, 2007. A motion in the Circuit Court of Alexandria has the following rules :Janice Wolk Grenadier 15 West Spring Street ‘Alexandria, Virginia 22301 August 5, 2012 Chief Judge Lisa Kemler Circuit Court Alexandria Virginia 15 West Spring Street Alexandsia, Viginia 22301 Re: Status of Motion to re-open Case due to Fraud on the Court Dear Judge Kemer: {1am writing this to confirm you ar aware of my fling. To alvo find out what the statis ‘of the Judges in the Cieuit Court in e-guard to who will hear the Motion. If the Judges in the Cireut Court of Atexandria have recused themselves of no? Sincorely, Jarice Wolk Grenadier ‘ec. Michael Wieser for David Grenadier Grenadier, Anderson, Starace, Duffel & Kiesler@ @ Janice Wolk Grenadier 15 West Spring Stet Alexandiia, Virginia 22301 703-836-9655 September 27 ‘The Honorable Lisa Kemler 520 King Street Alexandtia, Virginia 22314 Dear Honorable Lisa Kemler: With this letter, as Chiet Judge, 1 request that you do an overview and look closely atthe documents that were submited on September 26, 2012. Judge Clark was the presiding Judge. diudge Clark did not have jurisdiction to hear this ease, The law is very elear~ Ifa Judye docs ‘ot have jurisdiction his orders are “VOID”, he should have recused himself. By all appearance Judge Clark recused himself when he refused to hear my anpropriately filed Pracepipe"s in January ofthis year. 1 contacted the Judge's Chambers recuesting all udge's to recuse ‘themselves andthe request was denied by you, On September 12,2007 lona Grenadier eame to court and lied about service and the ease was dined being heard until December 52007. On September 26°, 2012 Ilona Grenadier’ attorney John Tran of DiMuroGinsberg lied in court when he said had mailed documents tha he had cetified that he had mailed. I never received such documents an forthe first time in year | was sent a courtesy copy of what was filed by e-mail Thisis just one way as a prose litigant 1 have been treated unfairly. It seems to be the practice inthe Circuit Court of Alexandria for Lawyers and Judges to lic in court. There is no regard to Justice, Due Process in the Circuit Court ofthe City of Alexandria. Which is a disgrace to all,as we have young men and women fighting for our freedoms, that in the Cty of Alexandria caa be bought as llona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman has done, | iled with my original fling all the back up to all my allegations. ‘The Fraud was explained to Judge Clark and ignored. When all the Judges in September {hereby ask for you to do the right thing and resign as Chief Justice ofthe Supreme Court of Virginia. “Your resignation from the Supreme Court will show Virgina is going inthe right direction to taking care ofthe Corruption in the Judicial System. The Supreme Cout is going to rule by the Law & Rules ofthe Supreme Court ~ not on Cronyism and Favoritism, By denying my Appeal, Reconsideration of Appeal, Motion on the law used to deny my appeal, and then knowingly sending a corupt Judge to delay and deny my appearance infront of the Grand Jury to ask fora Special Grand Jury to investigate the riminal actions in the City of ‘Alexandria and the judicial system in Virginia, The appearance of Justice is as important as@ ® © Justice itself: You as the Chief Justice has sent a very strong message tothe Judicial ‘Community in Virgizia —*Vou do not have to follow the Law or the Rules ofthe Supreme Court of Virginia - 1 will protect you and deny any aetions that wll prevent you from Protecting the Old Bey Network” You have not done this once ~ but, in my case Five (3) times ifyou take in coasideration your ignoring what I said in my argument in front of the Supreme Court At your convenience, Iwill be glad to diseuss this matter with you. | wish for you and your family to never have to have this happen to you, or anyone you love, ‘You have the responsitilty of doing the right thing - people's lives rest in your decisions, and ‘you are making those decisions by cronyism and favoritism, not by the Laws and Rules. ‘Your ‘timinal actions of viobting your Oath of Office, the Constitutions of the United States of Americ, the Virginia Constitution, and supporting the violation of my Religious, Civil, US Constitution, Virginia Constitutional rights I request you immediately step down as Chicf Justice of the Supreme Couet ef Virginia, Janice Wolk (obo® Janice Wolk Grenadier 15 West Spring Street ‘Atexandiia, Virginia 22314 October 11, 2012 ‘The Honorable Lisa 8. Kemer Chief Judge Circuit Court of the City of Alexandria 520 King Street Alexandria, Virginia 22314 Re: Request for Presiding Judge to Impanel a Special Grand Jury Dear Judge Kemer: Reading the Virginia Constitution and the Code of Virginia, as well as some supreme Court of Virginia Rules and Handbooks, | have learned: 1. Code of Virginia § 19.2-191 (2) and on, plus the October 2010 edition of the Virginia supreme Court Handbook for Grand Jurors Section 23, titled “Convening’, states: “Any citizen oF group of citizens may ask the Circuit Court of a city or county to convene a Special Grand Jury.” Further, 2, Handbook for Grand Jurors, Section 26, tied "Functions of a Special Grand Jury’ states: "As has been set out in Section 3, a Special Grand Jury is composed of from Seven to eleven citizens of a city or county, selected by the Circuit Court and summoned to investigate any condition which tends to promote criminal activity in the community or by any governmental authority, agency or official” “The Special Grand Jury, composed entirely of private citizens, is the one onpolitical body with legal authority to make such investigations. Research reveals four ways in which a Citizen may ask the Court to convene a Special Grand Jury. One way is for a Citizen to request the Presiding Judge to impanel a ‘Special Grand Jury. By this letter, | exercise my First Amendment Right to Petition the government for a redress of grievances, to the proper agency of government, the Special Grand Jury, by this, my request to you as the Presiding Judge, to impanel one promptlyPlease have the Clerk of the Circuit Court advise me in wnting when | am to make my © _esentmens), in See, ote Jurors othe Special Grand Jury, Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter, s0 We can bring an end to conditions that promote criminal activity in the community of Alexandria, Warmly, sat fenadier ‘ce, Department of Justice FBI Kenneth T. Cuccinali Courts of Justice VirginiaJanice Wolk Grenadier 15 West Spring Street Alexandria, Virginia 22314 October 11, 2012 ‘The Honorable Lisa B, Kemler Chief Judge Gircuit Court ofthe City of Alexandria 520 King Street Alexandria, Virginia 22314 Re: Notice uf Tampering with evidence / exhibits from court on September 28, 2012 Dear Judge Kemer: ‘As Chief Judge you personally are responsible forthe illegal behavior of Judge Clark On September 28, 2012 not only did he take away my basic rights as a citizen he is now tampering with the Exhibits that he accepted in court and made part of the record, My Opposition to his orders and my letter both references Exhibits that he made part of the record. He asked the other side 2 Attomeys if they objected to any of the Exhibits — ‘They both did not object to the Exhibits. After court | asked John Tran and Michael Wieser if| could have my notebook’s which they refused to give me back because uote “No, they are on record as Exhibits and part of the file” a sheriff was with me and is a witness to this. | also had two witnesses in court as well as the sheriff that handed Judge Clark the notebook of Exhibits. In his letter of October 5, 2012 no where does he say that the Exhibits have not been allowed. This is just one more of the many Criminal actions you and your Court have tied to stop me from collecting money that is, ‘due me from llona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman. | want those Exnibis in my fle and | would lke to be notified this has been resolved. ‘This isa criminal action by Judge Clark and Ed Semonian, Warmly, Janice Wolk Grenadier ce. Department of Justice FBI Kenneth T. Cuecineli Courts of Justice Virginia Ed Somonian6 VIRGINIA: INTHE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA JANICE WOLK GRENADIER Paintift, v CASE NO. CHOI0654 GRENADIER INVESTMENT CO,, LTD. eral. Defendants, ‘ORDER Fading tat all matters pening before this Court pertaining tothe mater Janice Wolk Grenatier. Grenadier Investment Co, LTD, ea, Case No. CHO106S4, have ben conclded ‘nd hat Phin, Janice Wolk Grenadier, has flea Noie of Appeal fom the Order entered Scrlember26,2012, denying litt Movon to Reopen Cate- Due to- Frau on he Court by Pefendanis Change of Venue, Tral by Jury, Additional Defendant; tis ORDERED that Janice Wolk Grenadier be, and hereby i, prohibited from submitting any father pleating, eters or ote communications ht relate in any way othe mater, nice Wolk Grenadier \ Grenadier Investment Co, LTD, ea, Case No. CHO1OGS4,etherin person, by ‘eter by tlzpone or electronic commanicaton, tothe Creit Court forthe City of Alexandria ‘until further order ofthis Cour; and itis FURTHER ORDERED tat the Sherif shall forthwith serve a copy ofthis Order on Janice Wolk Grenadier at 15 W. Spring Stet, Alexandria, VA 22301, Page 1 of2, Order dated October_[Z- 2012enters tis 101 any ot ocben 2012 lt fe Mohan 8 p ACopy Teste: 'Semonian, Clerk Wikia tSAhy Deouty Clerk @ @ Page 2 of 2, Order entered October 122017VIRGINIA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA QpMCEWoUKcRENADIER Pr . case no, choroese ILONA ELY FREEDMAN GRENADIER eta. — fd FILED GRENADIER MVESTEMENT CO, LTD etal Nov. 203002 And cay eterno OAWIO MARK GRENADIER oe Defendant : ~~ Statement of Facts For Hearing on September 26, 2042 in the Circuit Court of the City of Alexandria Filed to perfect Order by Judge Clark on October 12, 2012 approving Plaintiff's Appeal Notice GOMES NOW JANICE WOLK GRENADIER, PLAINTIFF files Statement of Fact from the illegal ders by Judge Clark ~ who had recused himself from hearing Plaintiff's Motions in the past © paving had received in May of 2012 a letter stating he would be party to legal action against him by On September 26,2012 the following picture shows the Notebook of evidence that was summited to the Judge and copies to the Defendants attorneys with no Objections by Defendants attorney's When asked by Judge Clark, Judge Clark allowed all evidence in the Notebook to be put into the record1 RS fudge never had them onthe bench — wich is unture how would the Judge have them if {hey hadn't been on the bench and he hadn't received them in court? 2 [hes were never put into evidence - Judge Clark very clealy asked Defendant's lawyers if rReftiad objectons and niatheratomey nor defendant whom isa lawyer and was eo ut 00m had an issue with them being entered on the record. 5S Then was Flaintif could check th transcripts and they would say that they were never Pre oie record (which means to Paint the transcripts have bean tampered wth) srtnosent fom Judge's chambers then gave Plaintif the choice of taking Plaintiff's Exhibits or they would be destroyed -On October 13, 2012 in the Mail Plaintiff received the following Box which has not been ‘opened from the Circuit Court of Alexandria On October 11 2012, Piaintif Jury to look into the liegal beh ‘Summited into court - The fraud on the court since September §, 2007. Plaintiff was served in sponse tothe request the flowing Oror~ Plan was soved he Over wa eae the Gaitnouse on r ound Oceser a nae wrote a letter to Chief Judge Lisa Kemler requesting a special Grand 'avior and irresponsible way the court handled the documents,VIRGINIA; INTHE CIRCUIT COURT FoR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA JANICE WOLK GRENADIER Plait, CASE NO. CHOIO5SS GRENADIER INVESTMENT CO, LTD. et a Defendants, ops long hut all maters pening before this Cut persining ta the mater Janice Min Greraer» Greater ivesment Co, LD, ta, Case No. CHO106S4, have besa cons’ 4 ‘nd tht Pini lance Wok Grenadier, bs filed a Nace of Appeal rom the Onder omen ‘Serember 26,2002, denying Pini’s Motion t Regen Case- Due to- Freud he Cou» Defendants, Change of Vem, Til by Jury, Additonal Defendant vis ORDERED tat nice Wolk Creare, herby pried fom iti ‘ter leading laters or oer commento that relate in any way othe mater Jeb le. Grea» Grenadier Inet Co, 17D, ot a, ese No, CHOIOGS, tern psn by eter by tlephoncor electron communication, tothe Crit Count or the Ciyof alexand ‘un Parker order ois Cour and itis FURTHER OROERED thatthe Sherif shal forthwith serve a copy a this Onder er ce Wolk Grenadier t 15 W. Spring Stet, Alexandia, VA 22301, Poge 1 of 2, Order dated Octoher {2.2012@ exteneoms LI, Page of 2, Onder entered Uetoher 12 2012 ay of Ocoher, 2012 liye Syd a Titre Baa Kemer Wado ® Prodi age Nan Davis —~_~, These two examples since September 26, 2012 shows the extremes the Judges are going to Os2ep:ne truth trom being head since Soptombor 5, 2007. That Platts indore Son ue Process the basic Freedoms that our county stands for. THe rgh © due posese went as oe Lawyers. Judges, Judicial, Elected offils a primary component of Fresdomt The ante ee stitution right that has been the source ofthe light of feedons bert i whal our fag stand for ar hee oe the standard of Lbery set forthe rest ofthe Word, This Case stared cut vos Kens Poca Perinership here one pariner ook advantage of ancther partner = at partner detest nena showed how ite integnty she ha fom how she stole fom the Sonia Grenadier Trost ele but on several cccasions, eo. ec. But, itis deeply saddening now lo sae how fateh te etc eprivaton of basi freedoms, deprivation of consttuona ights aro Plants tesco ease human sighs are to Paints reed, Ga wiednesday September 26, 2012 in the Cty of Alexandria Circuit Courtroom with Judge Clark presiding, Judge Clark did a roll call o see who was there and how long they would take. “The docket Was full, When Grenadier v. Grenadier was called Defendants attomey's asked to go last Plait fete Gas he Was ready to go. As has bean the situation since September 2007 the Judge eiimcalghers had been heard and several di go past the 30 minutes with the Judge being pationt to lgents, The only ligant Judge Clark was rude to — besides Paintif was ancther Pro se renee seg ateryone had let and Grenadier v. Grenadier was heard - the Sherfs were standing outside ‘Re Court Room to make sure that no one was allowed into watch the proceedings, (On the Plaintif side you had pro se Janice Wolk Grenadier Meee gendants side you had John Tran for lla Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman etal, and Michael Wieser for David Grenadier. (Defendant lina attomey was a Bait and switch os Ben Satara and Hilary were involved in the Fraud on the Court nthe fing withthe Supreme Cour of Virgie) PPlaintif started out with asking that Judge Ciark recuse himself forthe folowing reasons 41. Refusing to hear 2 Motions filed by Plaintiff 2. The letter delivered in May that Plaintif planed on naming him ina suit she plans to fle » __ because by all appearance Plainti believe him to be in collusion withthe other Circuit Court 7 Audges to ule in Defendant's favor. Because she is part oftheir lito Old Boys Network group, ‘Plainif then discussed the issue of John Tran being disingenuous and not servicing Plaintiff properly ‘and all the grief from the court Painif received with any type offing or service. John Tran took up and to the Judge said he had mailed the fling to Plaintiff. Which as red as he turned — Plaintiff believes there is itle truth to that? Omictac Weiser had complains about the names onthe Fling -of not his eent but, John Tran's client llona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman, Plaintiff than told the Judge she had a notebook for him and Defendant's lawyers and would lke to have them entered into the court record - Plaintiff handed the Notebook (pictured above) to the Sherif who then handed ito the Judge. The Plaintiff then handed both atfomeys each « notebook Judge Clark asked Defendants if they had any objections — which both Mr. Weiser ‘and Nr. Tran said no. The documents then were entered into the record, Plaintif had planned on starting inthe beginning ofthe Notebook and taking the Judge through — 71. Showing how much money was owed to Plaintiff from Defendants and that Plainti has a aim. right to fle the Les Penitence. But, not one Judge nor have Defendant's atfomeys ver denied that Plaintiff had a claim. All Order's only deny Motions without explanations ruling only on Favoritism, 2. Judge Clark made it clear he didn't care about the money he wanted to know about the Fraud. Which Piaintif went into. as follows: 1. Plainti to date has never had a Judge with Jurisdiction to hear her case ~ no Judge has been properly appointed 2. That llona Grenadier a lawyer when she mislead and led to the Court on September 5, Fay about being served all the Circuit Court Judges atthe time — Judge Koch, Judge e Kemer, Judge haddock recused themselves. Not filing the appropriate paper work with the spubreme Court of Virginia - Being disengeonus to Plant on several occasions tellng her the complete opposite of the rule 17, Fiaintif then went into the folowing facts with Judge Clark at one point saying he didn't understand just move on — you have used your 18 minutes, Sree bea Pat Fea wath te Aexancia Crest Cour @ Moton for Reinstatement ofthe Bi of Comping Sencar Ave Parinersi, Atthe ime | thought bes for ncifaton to the partes to be served tous ing ‘Sherffsoffce, The court dat forthe Motion was on September 12, 2007, September 12,2007 - Motions Day Judge Koch the judge that hears the case. This resulted in the Moton for Default agaret na fled on September 21,2007. As the Motion for Detauit goes into more deta lona was dstensees ‘aur caring she hadn't been served. But, she coukint have known ofthe cout dato unless she wer seed tae ‘inten court to dudge Koch that David Grenade's attorney, Me. Michael Weiser was aware of tre coon das because she had faxed the ntrmation to him. Judge Kloch Kept pasing over to give Ma Weise ns stone shaw UP. He ten sent a clerk down othe Sherif ofice that came back and according to Judge Kich ead thet rete hens enc @‘Afr CoutPiitif went down to the Sher oe. They gave Phin a copy ollona's sence. Mr, Weise’ papers ‘were notin the box, is ofc sin the same bung asthe Sherif offces, they couldnt say whether he had been served oF not. ‘September 21, 2007 - WG fled Motion for Detault, and The Matin to Reinstate (ust incase) for October 10, 2007.» Q seotemtorza, 207 At ne Aan Jetge' use hr fom hearing the case. This isthe start of them bringing in ‘eiges that hold "Kangaroo Court where the decaion is made rior o cout. This is the stato the eolsion lo bina uiges to rule in tlona & Davis side. ona would brag about her tlatonshio wih the Judges and how they calla ner and she would give tee legal advice, (October 17,2007 Letor from Diane Fiske — After informing Plait that the Judges had recuse themselves she would befinding Judge's to ear the case. Judge Frank A. Hoss was avaible for November 28, 2007 at 10.00 am, tthe tone of is eter the Judges were 1. dudge Donald M. Haddock - We learned in he Spring of 2008 he had recised himself rom hearing the case 2. Judge John E. Kloch— ona had ed to him in court on September 5, 2007 — He could have hear the Motion for ‘eau s he knew the truth ~ But the truth isnot what he was looking fo, 3. dudge Lisa Bondareff Kemier— Her Father was our pediatrician fo our gi, | babeve David had gone to Hebrew Schoo! with her, His father and her father were good fiends had shown har and her husband Real Estate. De:ember 5, 2007 - Judge Thomas A Fortkor heard Motion. Denied Plaintiffs Motion for Defaut, The Motion for Default was due to Lona Grenadier an atiomey, officer ofthe court lying to Judge Kioch in court, Fraud on the Sout (@Perember 2007 - ueston Diane Fiske abou a Fai Judge she informs Pant he only way anyone else (Supreme (Court chose's Judge) i they can fad one. Which Is incorrect the rue the cemplote opposite in accordance wih §17.1-105(8) Learn of June of 2010 tal the judges of any court f record are so situated in respect to any case, cil orcrimina, pending in ther court as to {ander itimproper, in thei opinion, for them to preside athe tl, ures the cause or proceeding is remaved, as proved by lw, they shal enter the fat of record anc the clerk ofthe cout shal at once ceil the same tothe Chet lnstoe or the Supreme Cour, who shall designate a judge of some other cout of record ora veled judge of any such cout te retie athe tal of such case, Fenzuat 8 2008 Ltr rom Hona (on her law frm stationary to Pani, lon asserts ownership of 75% ofa property Known as 28 East Gelefonte Ave, Alxandia, VA22305, Paint also fe threatened by he ltier which i ec mistading and deceit statements. She then pus itin wing « February 13,2008 - Judge Brown hears Motions * ona isnot in court Heather Janquen represented her, Motions to compel - February 26, 2008 - Fed with Clerk of Cours folowing letter: Because keepin mid all Judge's had recuse themselves: {anda Motions he ogo through Dane Fisk as she needed tof ajudgeor had tobe ona day they hada way use, ‘Theleter ass lon for dates o get book o Dian Fiske to de @ Maton a no Mots coud be fled witout everyone's a0ehg onthe date before Diane fund a Judge1.75% ownership Prat plant nas provided no proto actual payment for expenses ~ provided tines to defendents 9 TEES Garey caunod by Beeonte as Paitin & out ~ Which now Pai esioes seal gover ‘had been in and out it wasnt for the manipulaton and les of one Gooner snes loa = Defendant, ora Ely Grenacer, denies thal Pini owns or ouned kof Eas Belfort” eanana anaes gan 27,2008 by tora Ey Grenada lawyer wes aed wth LiesThe VSO the hones ‘Alexandria and her good fend - Judge Brown had no proier wit thet re raked uP wit ifcrmaton/decumentaton rm Admission slatements from fora Grenadar which hed oe by Tora Te nasa, UN ey Tena puto he property canbe eslshed by sa ny Prony Oe, We Acountng sows the 25% down payment hal was contnbutedin he pur en aces wey ih ome cocuments at were fled wi the Mbon for Detaut nthe Cre Couto Nerara Cee, Srehe di oegerstip ton ha, ona hed i her possesion the dimers whic sheweu Keron eat the Cont aya yet 7” Motion for Detaut—to be heard March 12,2008 forthe folowing reasons: Fraud onthe Court by a Lawyer 4}, Feral te reasons as stated in Motion for Default Dated September 21, 2007 2 econ Pesan on he Answer Biol Complain’ by defendant nd Courtntom and Crose-Complit filed on February 27,2008, © oe eis Geen! sent bing, teatening attached to te February Response to lana Ey GrenaderfGle © |, thor e iaen awaits anenssicretanns te February 8, 2008. ‘ Forthe non-response o letersi ty and seta new date for deposbons orto seta tal date recat apritd Moton fo Change Date fr Noles of Deposition ano Set Date or Ta - As Defendants woule notiespond to any correspondence. March 11,2008 - Pini es - Prascipe - Remove Motions for March 12 no visiting Juges. Fingal plese remove ram the docket on March 12,2008 Pantie Mton to Compelas ere ent @ vtng judge avatabe fo heart Wise ne ants hat he Crcuit Court udge's had recused themselves. That Plant though out he case Srogan concen on geting a far Tak To the deat ears othe Clcut Cour of alaewere nie oe ‘rogant view of doing whatover they wanted todo" sabacs or necettiPe re fave Maton fr Detat hear as Dan Fiske has found date that wrk or he Judges of Alexandria to find a Judge oftheir choice ~for May 7, 2008 qhtt¥?:2000 ater coun -1 fona Grenadier again brags about her relationship with the Jud fie legal advice to sudge Brown, 2. lona Grenadier explains io Plan why noone has anything do ta with Pantie chilien are because Paint rased {tem Catt. in 19 yeas she has seen the gifs once by her choice, 3. That Paint should be grateful o her forthe isting on Holl Road 4. That lona doesnt blieve David Sole the money for the Sonia Grenadle's Trust which only left ona ard he aw ©, mtr steaover 885 000.00 5 aint inoduced nese to Judge Haddock ater he speaks wth ona he explain o Pitt" could never get a fatal as hey all Love ona” turn to Diane Fiske shocked by the statement and express | cant Velev ne hes ed that to me, 5. Again Paint asks Osane Fiske about geting Judge's that arent frends of loa’ Which she has inthe past & continues to give May 13,2008 Letter from Diane P Fiske tha the case would be heard by Judge John J, McGrath, This leter shows the fotowing Judge's inthe later head: 1. Donald M. Haddock 2 Jona E. Koch (Retred) which means athe tine Judge McGrath was chosen Judge Kloch and Judge NeGrath ‘were working together. 3 Usa Bondavet Remier June 18,2008 ~ Pitt Fes ‘1 Motion for Default - Defendant llona has lied inthe Admissions, ‘A. For llona ving in court to Judge Kloch on September 12,2007 - Motion for Detault 8 ex Motion for Default led in February or Lying nthe Answer o Bil of Complaint by delendant end Counter ‘lam and Cross Complaint . Fer osm Admissions D, For the eters Defendant sent Buting & Threatening Plait it Plaltif idnt cop su. > Motion tr Tt ty Jury— Det comments made by Judge Haddock & one Groner — ‘A sludge Haddock teting Pint she could never get afar trial as they all LOVE" ona B. hen inom Patan eugene es thers sae hee eee ec wen called her wad Jl 2, 2008 - Motion tobe heard Jy 9, 2008 a include: 1. Motion for Trl by sry 2. Moton to Compe! 3. Moto for Default “uly 8,2008 — Judge Howe Brown — rules 41. Denies motion for Detaut 2. Denies motion for Tia by Jury ‘3. ‘And makes both ses work on response’ inthe Motion to Compe engi, Wen Tonal ured to Judge Haddock and introduced myself which he then went onto informs met cect G21 fa tral because they "Loved lon’. Judge Hadiock isthe Head Judge at the Alexandia Groot Gour I tvs qptined Dane Fiske ~in shock ~and sei cant beteve Judge Haddock jist od me would never oot sal wn 10egwuse they loved tone. - That the Circuit Court of Alexandra on several occasions was disingenuous with "bntiff- FRAUD ON THE COURT ‘September 11, 2008 - Trial with Judge John MeGrath as our Judge. ® 1. The 1 issue | haves how frst thing he dd that morning was he called lona Grenadier and me into ‘Chambers to have 2 conference lo See this coud be setled. ‘The problem have ths fs ne coe! he had Studie the lo forthe last 45 minutes and understood there tobe an issue n ncodngy Devad ae there 2 Then ona wes alowed to bring up a situation which deat withthe theft of money from the Sonia Grenadier Sega hatwes run out of her aw offce. Fst in the Opening Statement and then wih questioning we eae oath, 5 Then when t was my time fo queston Dav an one, | wasnt alowed io question them or bring The Sonia Sirgnadier Trust up any way. Judge McGrath said he wasnt going to alow i brought inte na cour ‘ude realy crt understare i. | asked to expan ito him and he weulsit earch. Wines Ire eet Row they had brought it up he just went onto say he wasnt allowing lini cout ron, 4. David Grenadier lied underoath, Judge MeGrath was just move on 5 fe then alowed the atoreys to hammer on me. When Mrs. Grenadier got on the stand | was WARNED on hom | queston Mrs. Grenadier and what questions | asked her. Istried using ts Gronanie va ey, she broke down crying, | asked for recess to give het a chance io compcse Nareel oad a aes ©. x McGrath then went and had a very frend lunch wih Judge Kloch at Jackson 20 a new resturant in Okt Fain, OnW for Judge Koh tobe discussing ging o werk with udge McGrath ond hs company on Solutions 7 en of course found in favor of Vora and David which | would not have hada problem with it hed been a eal 2 ge tat had teary. Judge McGrath was aed and tad diseased Wises One cas Tp Rulge Koc, ara posse citer agente chamber. Theoret was wien pot ecm arguments. irae 7 aa Fle Motion fo Reconsideration Win new evden that had ben dopoed of at my house -A Tne awe gate Setierentatiomey for Batons had me wit im that showed Twas wonng ne sn a lone Dave GIC Sepiembor 23, 2008 1. Diane Fiske Question: Protocol (Judge was out of town last weak) Fo kane MEE al cll ge see ihe wants mailed to him ornare to stop by 2. lantit ~ Noed to know take to net level 2 Frat ne ance? Commonweath tore s Unce Randy Senge explained to me that Judge MoGeath idiot of work inthe Crcut Court of Alexandra and was well known wh te Jers Scbimber 24, 2008 Diane - head from Judge seth Moton-but he did't want Exhibits -So basically didn't “evenconsider the facts ofthe Motion ‘September 26, 2008 - Friday 1. Diane Fske-21 days nopetuly something today Judge has everthing u2 Diane Atenaon received order om Judge in mail sont on 24" - denying and he never looked at Exhints confirmed by Diane & Gerernanel CanmonweatAtcmey ts me the JIRC Commision is whee! need to go Randy Sango! ‘Commonweat's Atorey —Inforns me hat Judge McGrath has done ator wok Wi Alesse Cee ea Inuit 8 Revew Commission Donald Curry informed Plaintif that Judge McGrath was from the nd thats how he knew about Burke & Herbert Bank - had done extensive work are + ataey paz hat the acthe was fom Harisonburg was mute it was a fae. With this new knowledge Plintit ‘realized the folowing was rue ~ Type of Complaints the commission investigates corres uses A) Allowing Family, soca or other retatonships to infuence ths judgment 5) Engaging in private conversations which may influence juciial actions Failing to disquaity ina proceeding in which impartiality reasonably might be ‘Questioned, because of is aclons under A & B ina ee cae Pin ears rm the ntemet that dg Jon Kec snow workhg wth Judge ohn MeGrath J 2009 tht mig nt a snes 22 Dna atomeys incdes Hon an seared to 2s “A ouah cookl for cases that might not be amicable i th work i stro "Match 2009~Alexonia Bar Thanks Hona aw fm fe their generosity in tble sponsors @ “Apt 17, 2009 ~ Letter trom Ben Dituro threatening Paint that she was trying to extort money trom ona cerhaerahnes ce VSB complaint response was FU our awyers can esta or cheat anc they are pat ofthe Old Boy Network we alongwith JIRC and the Supreme Court of Virgina are going to protect then, Jy 7.2009 Ben Datu, Davi’ of emai ful of Bus shit store RobinRacial, Andrea & Karen e-macaling Pope a"Wanker” Best description Tose receinber 23,2008 fr Detetve Pak about geting ogee had Been advised oto meet wth hen | choose to Paint knew had the tuth (Octeber 29, 2009 — Conversation to meet wih Detective Pak Fang Sengel had gorerarncnd Dette Pak tere wou! be charges! was nomed twas up Ray Sega Pons ae ft personaly equsid he invesigaton. Thar a aston epon sean ee tae ncn 2010 June 21, 2010 Letter Ms. Paci L Hartington Re- VSB ce ca eats Atomey~ Cae Bane Fiske - she confi alte Judge's ih The seni Creat Cout hag recuse thomselves 2sly 42,2010 e-mal to Defendants that Pant was fing Moton for Defaut tobe heard on September 21, 2010 —to be heard on duly 28, 2010 ly 13, 2090 - Fie Motion July 28,2010 wi 4 min tet Michae! Wiese les he can't be there * Remember Pint in September of 2007 was (Dsmonishe orang enough te and mobos to Defendants Mic Wcerrnee about this confit 14 days prot to ‘deciding he wasn’ going to Be able to show up in court, ‘uly, 2010 lena files Oppostion- werent we supposed to be in cout onthe 2" When did she know that Miche! ‘Ws0r would be fing with the court the confi? ‘August 4, 2010 Aer being reprimanded by the Clit Curt about contacting everyone — boing treated rudely now every time Plant cals the Alexandria Circuit Cour - fle Motion to be Neard on August 17, 2010 ‘August 71, 2010 ~ Judge Koch - visting Judge s 100% Dsingenuous ‘August 1, 2010 Plans informed The Crcat Cour would not take he phone cals or any messages om her ‘August 12,2010 Plant receives an e-mal-luge Kioch~ Decides to recuse himself ~ works wth Judge Merah uate rom ge Kot’ lotr Bellove strongly tha the appearance of justice is equally important as justice (On or around August 13, 2010 twas agreed by the Alexandria Cut Court, Defendants & Plainitafter Alexandria reut Cour giving the Pint much grit scheduled a new heating for October 13, 2010 at Zhen October 6, 2010 Pint fies Praecipe for Hearing on October 13, 2010 for all Notions that had been fled tobe heard ‘ona wth a Moton fr Sanctons fled on October 6, 2010. The Chit Cout of Aexand's rules ae 7 days pot toa "Maton being heard ts o be fled withthe Clerks office and Notice tobe delivered to opposing partes, (tober 13, 2010/10 the Alexandre Circuit Court ‘ dudge Nolan B Dawkins preceding, Michael Weiser Esq was therefor David Grenadier Delendant Hilary J Caller Esq fr ona Grenadier & GIC, Plant Janice Wok Grenadier was present pro ss a 8 he were ‘ot present 2. There was no Court Reporter. dance Wolk Grenache started wit her Matin to have her Maton fr Datel io be reheard as te ge’ inthe (Gecut Court of Alexandra Vegi in 2007 had recuse themseWes trom nearing te cues, Tha the aonceats Grcut Court had not folowed the nes ofthe Supreme Cult Court 17-1108 18) ‘4 The Judges of recordin 2007 were Judge John Won, ug Lisa Bondate! Kemlr,& udge Donald M. Haridock 5. judge Nolan Dawkins pointed ou to Paint she had miseated the Maton asi should have been tiled @ Motion {or Defaut Judgment © Pint hen went on to focus onthe Mes ofthe Case which includ the flowing Fets Suessing that he judge understands a Mistake wos made by the Alexandra Creu Gout and ts wos s chase December 5, 2007 by udge Frank A Hoss. 9. Plait presented to Judge Davkins a Lette Dated October 17, 2010 setig the date for November 28,2007 trom the Cicut Court of Alexanda writen by Diane Fiske Court Administer Plait Inon Preceneed ce ‘Sled November 15,2007 tat the udge had to reschedule to December, 2010. Both ltrs ware we ty ‘Diane Fiske court Administrator. B@ © 10 Feat presented ete dled May 13.2008 thet Judge John J. McGrath had bean chose a the Judge for nad ope sate was als writen by Dane Fiske who had informed Planta Nanaia cok Gort eee ‘had recluse themselves rom hearing any Moton's or Tat Ht Fyn er, adcressed the ules of he Alexandre Cul Gout and that Motions are normally heard the 2" an df Weshesday ofthe man and th Moton's needed tobe fad by to Tor Wednntes oe ae ‘ty motion took almost 3 months to be head Cant ten informed Judge Dawkins how after the Motions would be heard by visting Judge's Defendant ona ean 2 ae fe court would brag about what god ends she was win I Juspe snd fone here a would cal defendant lla Grenadier when they had lepe! questions 5. Plat! woud then go lo Judge's chambers and request Judge's that were chosen al ams length, Plant eee nudge Dawkrs tat she was normed at he Alexanaia Cicut Court ages sheave te argo unless the coun finda Jude, The Almrandna Circuit Curt shoose tne Daye Motors a Prorat nosey ‘oncide wih the dates they could find the Judge of the choose "4 Flu ten aso presared to Judge Dawkins later that Judge Koch had witen on August 12,2010, t which bene Pini pointed out Judge Koch's statement “ure | belive eongy tal ie aneerence cha Bor tyneatant as ustoe tee” twas Judge Kioch hat defendant had boon degen Seotonte 2007. Which sat hat pont the Judge's had feclise thomsen 1: ecge Dawkins acknowledged having seen the eter poor fo Court at which time Pati asked Judge Dawkins to ret eaeerra Pan fl os a Judge working with Judge's who had been dsingenousin thi coer no 1 nee Dans then went onto reference tht Judge John McGrath was fromm Harsonburg, Vigila. Which sludge Jobn McGrath is fom Harnsonoura, Virgina? 17 Pla tn went on nfo Judge Dawns tal Judge John MeGcath now ved in Harsonbug, (October 13, 2010 Judge Dawkins Order reads 4 Denied Moton for Defaut tobe heer by a Judge with Jurisdiction 2 Denied Sanctons 31 Denied acto io Recluse Himsel, Ccipber 72, 2070 Pant cas Alexancia Creat Couto setup a date fra Moon tobe head. Pans tld she tythe a Con etandents: she must ako them ae wel before date can be sel. Pl otows tho lee nate ner by the Creut Court of Alexandiia fag et 4 2010 Pant sisted The Alexarcia Cult Court wi nat alow anyother Motons on thie case be ed, Ramee ff 2010 Paint es wih the court Facts of what he Pani as camed and wha tte ackone were ofthe ‘Alexandria Circ Couto have it on fie Cees fo, 2010 Pst ios with to cout Moti for Reconsteraton of Onder Dated October 18,2010 Pitt n Coun ot Ansmato for Appeal fo the Supreme Cour fds the folowing information that hee boun fled win he ecu Goan” Manda, which Platt et proved Paint had not ed in cour as Judge Dawkins ad sccoses hea hog doing ‘March 11,2008 Pant Fed a Prascipe inthe Aranda Circuit Cou tha sates te AexaneiaCrcut Frenerudn ear te Moon onthe dt rt ied because here wants Wing lucpe at he Gacy "Motions would be heard i f there was a wating Judge, “in there Admissions tat can be backed up with te mi Grenadiers a lawyer, an ‘fice of the court that should beheld ow higher standard than tobe aiuto be dct ee nn ‘AlexandiaChreut Court October 20, 2010 Order by Judge Nolan 8. Dewkins * 2sfus* Reconsideration Order along this case is cismissed wth prejudice and to be placed mong the ended hameatet 4 2010 Pani eves tothe ta Judge a copy Weiten Statement of Fact othe Alexandria Gicult Cout Chambers, zon January 20, 2014 ~ JWG Appeal to Supreme Court ~ Record #140166 February 22014 -Leter Ber Denuro Give note fle dss of Petition or Appeal Fee 22011 = Respondents Joint Maton o Dismiss Petton for Appeal Ove to Pitt no ing Statement of Facts -Disingenuous to 2 jon for Appeal on P tpt or 8 ERUAD ON THE CouRT BY ~ = MICHAEL WEISER, BEN. Hm LER - WHICH IS ‘MROCTHE BAIT AND. SWITCHUMIH HAVING JOHN TRAN IN COURT ON SEPTEMBER 26-2612 February 10,2011 Respondents fad wi the Supreme Cour - Joint en Oppostion to Patio or Appeal May 4.2011 Letter fom Supeme Couto Vigna to Pini May 24,2011 Ort Argument May 24,2011 Platt Cra! Agument in Richmond in ont ofthe Supreme Court gia June 20,2011 Supreme Court of Vagina. Denis Petition, ignores the fw June 27, 2014 Plantit Petion for Reconsideration Seprember 011 ona Gace & Ben Duro generous donation othe Judge Dona M. Hadock Porat un slapper tla Sreraer trough era fm tows apart on he ss Maly in Alexandr, Vigna, by a appearance a $100,000 + pay September 20,2011 Supreme Court Deny Petition for Reconsideration, once again tynores the lw.'s te hasnt had time fo look tup, When asked where Plait cancalto get ithe sounds rervous on phone and tells Pit he wit get it for Paint. Paint leaves several messages etc. To never boar bach from Delceine Parr Praniff Cals Record in Aland o lear - Theres no Police Report # forthe Extortion vestigation brought on by Randy Sengetcommonweat'satoey which there is. alter from Ben DiMuro Api 16, 2008 charging Plait anh act of toro, ‘January 8, 2012 eter to The Honorable Gynthia Kinser Chit Justice of he Virginia Supreme Court -Plainti dil not ‘er afer conversation with Doug Roubin that anyone can write a dudgea letter. The sausis back nthe real Court ‘anc must be dealt with Inthe Creat Cour. -Jaruary 18, 2012 Praccipe to be heard on January 25,2012 -atuary 2, 2012 Leter fom Law Clerk Cec Cout of Atexandia that my Moon for Sanctions agant My. Sengel ‘woud be heard by Judge Pte. Again the Crout Court of Alexandria does nat follow the rle othe laws ol he ert sie detayed is Justice denied Fetriary 1, 2012- Motion fled to demand Es Semonian Clerk of Court anewer simple questions about Grand duty Since Alexancta has shown inthe past not ofoow the ules of the cours Iwas reasonebie for Plait oot tac ‘Questions which he refused to answer. Most ikaly he doesn't know the basic rules, Fetruary 1, 2012 Precip fed on Fe 1 for Maton tobe heard on February 8, 2012 by te new Judge - Judge Clerk hc had not recused himse rom hearing this case, February 2,2012 Letter Gieut Cour of Alexandra Motion Sanctions against Ed Semoriar tobe heard al Sam February 13, 2012 by sludge Pot. February 7, 2012 Letter to Cut Cour Judges & Ed Semonian Paint planed on being in court on February 8, 2012 that Judge Clark had nat recused himself Peemar 2.2012 Judge Cian court cones he has not reise hse fom he mater and that isnton his docket ‘Yet sudge Car then ums and says yes | am going to hear his eventhough ts maton my cock, In the End what we have is - A Judge that blocked Defendant lana from taking tho etand after Plant hav yone tothe tine, money and trouble to have her subpoena ~ and, by all appearance the Judge's and Clerk of Court had not planned for the Shenff to serve her. It was the diigence of the Plaintf that got the Defendant served, ‘The Defendants attomey's defense was 8. Something the Judge wouldn't explain it when Plaintiff. asked and when Plaintiff looked it up - itis a Rule that you can use to Rule in Favoritism and Gronyism instead of the Law and the Rules of the Supreme Court, ‘Whet Plant proved over and over again - Defendant ona a lawyer mislead and lid in court, in documents filed in the court, Fraud on the Court on several occasions . ‘That Defendant's Lawyers Michael Weiser, Ben DiMuro & Hillary Coiler fled felse statements in the ocuments fled with the Supreme Court of Viginia on February 3, 2012 that Plaintif had nat fied a ‘Statement of Facts — which was untrue, FRAUD ON THE COURT.‘That Judge's Lawyers, Elected Officials, Government employees, have led time and time agein to Protect one another = That the Judicial system in Virginia is about Favoritism and Cronyiem not the Law and the Rules - (Tht the Praintif sited the following in court @ Read the Judicial Cannons — CANON 1. - A JUDGE SHALL UPHOLD THE INTEGRITY AND INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY ‘CANON 2, - A JUDGE SHALL AVOID IMPROPRIETY AND THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY IN ALL OF THE JUDGE'S ACTIVITIES, CANON 3, -A JUDGE SHALL PERFORM THE DUTIES OF JUDICIAL OFFICE IMPARTIALLY AND DILIGENTLY, CANON 4. - A JUDGE MAY ENGAGE IN EXTRA-JUDICIAL ACTIVITIES DESIGNED TO IMPROVE THE LAW, THE LEGAL SYSTEM, AND THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, AND SHALL GeNQUCT ANY SUCH EXTRA-JUDICIAL ACTIVITIES INA MANNER THAT MINIMIZES THE RISK OF CONFLICT WITH JUDICIAL OBLIGATIONS. CANON &. ~A JUOGE SHALL REFRAIN FROM POLITICAL ACTIVITY INAPROPRIATE TO THE JUCICIAL OFFICE. GAIION 6 - JUDGES PRO TEMPORE, RETIRED JUDGES, SUBSTITUTE JUDGES AND PERSONS SELECTED FOR JUDGESHIPS ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE GANONS. ‘As to why Judge Clark should recuse himself qa Supreme rule 17-1-105 () had been ignored and lied about to Paint Plaintiff reminded Judge Clark of his Oath of Office — sin solemnly swear (or affirm) that Iwill support the Constitution of the United States, andthe Conattution ofthe Commonweath of Virginia, and hat wil faithfully and impartially dschivee sey the ‘duties incumbent on me as: Judge of the Judicial Circuit According tothe best of my ability: (so help me God).”" Plaintiff reminded Judge Clark of Due Process ~ ‘The Constitution states only one command twice. The Fifth Amendment says to the federal ‘Severnment that no one shall be “deprived of ife, liberty or property without due process of lew." ‘The Eourteenth Amendment, raed in 1868, uses the same eleven words, called the Due Process Clause, to describe a legal obligation of al states, These words have as their central vPromise an assurance that all levels of American government must operate within the law (legaliy”) and provide far procedures. When a government harms a person without following the Te AUIS ofthe law, this constitutes a due-process violation, which offends against the rule of law. I'vou are denied due process in any way the judge's order is VOID! ~ Under the color of the taw the eppearance ofa legal right. seg act ofa Slate officer, regardless of whether or not the acti within the limits of his or her een fe considered an act under color of aw if the ofcer purports tobe conducting Niecelf or herself in the course of official duties. A he CNL RIGHTS Act of 1871 (42 U.S.C.A. Section 1983), color of law is synonymous with State Sean, which is conduct by an officer that bears a suficentyciose nexus toa tate co hat eae 's treated as though itis by the state, “Justice Delayed is Justice Denied” jiaeuitag doesn’t have Jurisdiction to make an order the order is VOID. The issue whether the Toe atau to do what was done, even i doing so was erroneous ot even Sespicatie fe ERE Not have jurisdiction to act he loses judicial Immunity. Stump v. Sparkman aoe Ga 349, 551 Ed 2d 331, 98 S Ct 1099 (1978) 1rajludge participates in a conspiracy the acts which do not have judicial immunity are Subject to suit and judgment against the judge Ore se etin auicalocoong where ge acing win the uriacction, wih absence of usin ther sno jaca minty Wien aadge proses ar we nas no athariyo presi he ats are od and he eee oan mre Bpainted judge purport to preside under the original appointment, s an order void ifthe judge has ‘no “authority” oF “urisdiction’ over the new matter Where le@ged stool upon which the judge is standing when the judge engages inthe “judicial act” ‘hich ales tse tothe caim. Al tree legs of the juisdltional stool must fo et a Surly. If any leg falls, neither the judge, nor the judge's judicial immunity delenes, con vin i luge must have authorty o act as the judge. The judge must have ‘ursdiction* over ‘hot courtin that paticular case. This element is sometimes mentioned in passhey iis 8general not in doubt itis required, This element may be loosely stated as, “the judge must ‘be a judge” and “the judge must be the judge of the particular cour with power over the articular case.” “ical malpractice. The consequence of a judge acting without “authority” or “jurisdiction” over a case or court, he loses judicial immunity. He had no authority, He had no power, and His only duty was to not act. 'son ~ whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is ‘engaged in an act or acts of treason, il, 449 U. S. 200, 216, 101 S. Ct, 471 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980): Cohen v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1621) When reviewing a pro se pleading, itis prudent to folow the federal practice of iberally construing {he allegations set out inthe pleading to determine whether the pleading asserts any valid causes of ‘acions. See e.g, Harrison v. U.S, Postal Service, 840 F.2d 1149, 1152 ($! Gir. 1988). The factual allegations should be viewed in the light most favorable tothe pleading party Davis v. City of Potsmouth. $79 F. Supp. 1206, 1208-10 (E.0. Va, 1983), aff, 742 F.2d 1448 (4 ‘cur. 1964) {1am not a lawyer since 2007 - | have been fighting for a Trial with a Judge with Jurisdiction - 1 didn't Sreduate from college - A lot of people don't know why I didn't graduate from College - Itis because 2 year after Ted Bundy had killed agi rom my high school in Tallahassee, | was being stalked by a ca! boy in Statesboro Ga, - | reported it to my RA, that this boy made me nervous, ! had an partment on campus - One Friday night ~in the middle of the he broke into my apartment and hurt me~ he went to jal for 6 years. | was on trial for the way | lived my life ~just as he was on trial for What he had done to me. | understand Justice —! understand the Old Boy Network ~ A mistake was ‘mate in 2007 ~ the Slippery Sloop of injustice started with alot of people not knowing the whole truth ‘bout Defendant ona ~ and that included Plaintiff. What | have leamed about Defendant llona and ‘many have learned is horrid. This is just one of many things llona used to control me in helping her cover her mess withthe Theft ofthe money from the Sonia Grenadier Trust. | am Never Never Never {0ing to give up | have gone from being a victim of lona & David's to beirg a vitim of yal ‘Judge Clark n his Order has taken away all my rights as a citizen in the Unted States of America by ayag | cannot fie anything without his permission. He didn't write it once he wrote it 3 times, The Question is how premeditated was it. He has created a Trustee type situation that he must take into Consideration when reading this and in his decision to sign this or not sign this. But, it should be date ‘stamped November 20, 2012 showing 1 had met the requirements to perfec! my Appeal tothe ‘Supreme Court of Virginia, eof laintif has proven moro than once that she has not had a Judge with jurisdiction, that there “has boen Fraud on the court by Defendant's and thelr atiorneye. ht shold not be meus against 1»Plaintiff thatthe Old Boy Network doesn't like her or she is not a part oft. Attached copy of Exhibits ‘that Plaintiffs assuming is in the Box sent back from the Circuit Court of Virginia that has not been ‘opened by Plaintiff denis +4 show te Money lona ones Plinttfr his suit and oer moneys forthe purpose and reason of Lis Pendens — Exhibit 5 — Documents that back up all other Fraud on the Court The infortnation on the Belletonte Property - The Documents that ona fled and lied in — the documents that prove Judge's didn't have jurisdiction, the documents that show Attorneys Motion to Supreme Cour that Plaintiff had not fled a Socmeese “ wenwman Aly slatlee Wok Grenadier oes 15 West Spring Seat ‘Alexandria, Viginia 22301 olcom "708-536-9655 202-368-7178 November 20, 2012 (We * stice Viok Grenacer @ 20tay onan: |THE GRCUIT COURT OF EMT OF ALEXANDRIA Janice wouR omaneR , iit } . }—caseno.cumoss cABUDERBWERENTCO ima} Deca, 3 armmpavrr ov arvonneve res comoxweaLnor vinta, Srtator mt “TS DAY Mice. Weer peop! bln. Noy cna vito aie who afer bins dl vor, made oh ot 1. Helsemusel fs: Davi M, Grater inte above syst. 2. iat bya wit Dod M,C $25000- 2. epimers fel wan tie mer ees ni eed nes 4 David. emer teu ey sof SL.U.0 a dr ms» ‘ce wih eps fe aera the rig brs the Cort vn Sept 3hMicra J, Weise Silver Spring, "MD 2090. ACE'T NO, 18-Iwo00O1-07-5) 0 om a bom erst sowie ertro 0 Regan i see te, SE Suerte gions, Save pellet alee, = SE SHEE Butte main = 12 Foe Achy Festa 'o Ent at ci = Hes = 7 flr = aa = ‘Prep: for Region netion a rom gavasnceDavid ms Seeatioe OULENe FaE 07-31-19 wy aes an19. 183 Re: Opring Cae # CHONOS4Frautonthe Cat snd Cast From: Janice Wolk Grenadier duokigrenacler@olcom> To: jwolgrenadier; béimuro rigrenadier ‘renasier@hatamihfav.com>renowt : mwas ; jan ‘jrangrimure.com>; Holler ; blenquine : béutot bauitet@ratamisfav.com>; aslarace : canwerson oS -; bdulfett; evades : lew le @etailvaw-com> wiksr swinhlor@hatamifaw com: tlenquine ‘hienquine@uafamiaw.com>;rubin ; dun : cpaterson Skelsler, Subject: Re: Opening Cate # CHO10554 Fraud onthe Court and By the Court Date: Tuo, Jul3, 2012 10% pm ‘Atachments: Moson_lo_Re-open_case_Fraud_on_the_Court 2.docx( 160K) ToAll, | will fle on Thursday for the Motion to be heard on the 18th of July. | still have a few finishing touches to it and the Exhibits. The Extibits willbe on a disk unless Iheardifferent from you, Michael Wiser oranyone has a legitimate issue to prevent a 4 minutes fo 5 pm filing to give Judges, and defendants more time, with the date lexpect to hear from you prior to the end of business today. Youhave now had plenty of time to get back with me -if there is a date issue to have this heard, Warmly, @ytice Wok Grenadier ~ new phone number 202-368-7178 Original Message— From: Janice Wolk Grenatior {e: bsimuro ; grenade ; renowt imjwesa : Jan Zi ance Wok Grenier , (Brader serenacieratamivi com>; rent enone esa cmnanderta.cons: oon tan Cgetaac Pillar Caller Ser paging cane: hence hradnedhataniNier an Sent Fe dn 29, 2012 1.38 pk Stet RE: Opeing Case # CHO10654 Fae the Cutan By the Court Cawilbe tn, Bemard J. DiMuro Disture® isis, pe 1101 King Steet, Sute610 Alexandria, Virginia 22314 703.684.4333 703.548.3181 (fax) x Sear Fo: ok ade nia oteaadidt con) ‘Sent Fridy, June 29,2012 1249 PAy Tori Coyote co sander mivowcom nae “nan. misese@eml.con: en Dino, ohn Tan, Hilary Colyer henna ad Subject Re: Opesing Case CHOOS54 Fd on he Coun, end By the Coun, have elose t9 1000 pages of Exhibits ‘hat willbe fled with the Fraud on the Cour - Wouid you preter paper (oF CD with the documents? Janice Wolk Grenadier Original Message — Toate Wal Gender , 2013 122379, SSP¥St Re-Opening Case #CHOI0S Pau onthe Com ne 8 the Court “THpu hae any questions - Please fel fee to contact. me, Warmly, Stet at ees engewns "Re oping Cae CHOMESA Fas onthe Cat ny Gast Janice Wolk Grenadicr sunt fteebook,com/boutguety wow facebook comfamerzapae ‘eles: ace mellesape apeExnibit 28 Michael Weiser, Eea, 1, Michael Weiser 10 the Rowing oath to join the VSB. alee your right hand, please: “Do you solemnly swear or aff that you ‘will euppert the Conattuton ofthe United State and tn Conaution or ‘the Commonweal of Virginia, and that you wil ftuly, honest ‘rofeaslonaly, and courtaously damean youreoln the practic of law and ‘xecute your ace of attorney at iw tothe best of your ait, so help you Goer “This i tho oath takan by nowy admin lawyers each year at the Supreme Court ot virgins, 2, Michael J. Weiser repesontad David W. Grenaier 3 Ao a lawyer ho saw and supported the unprofessional, llgel way Judgos ‘wore chosen and wae in calusion withthe ges, ayers and {government employees, to prevent due process n cours ‘4 July 26, 2010 Mice! Weser ted wn the COA Grout Court an Opposton to ‘Motion 454 seconds before Sm wih never resting slo AWG at hore ‘as an sue wi the date or cout be anne wth the daa of July 26,2041 for Maton be heard ly 30, 2010 lena Grenadier les her opposition - ‘Question: Michal Wolser,lona Grenadier and the Judges wore in caution to ne asin prevent ue proces, naeaeirle te. suns Seljedfoooe ria 7. February 3, 2011 Respondents’ Joint Moon to Dismis Plaon fr Appeal wth Siprone Cort of Vigia =r Wes engeruous wena upc Cot won na states on ‘ome wh Vigna Supreme Court Rule 5.11. Former Rule 6:11) (2010) oe Provide. In pertinent pat that "when ne spnetiant fai to enslre tht the Perl reschsion of appeiina saves, any assignments of ect atected by exnibia: 1 Opposition t Motion for Dataut fied on September 21,2007 tobe heard bya Judge wth durnaeon™ 2. Evmall July 26,2010 4 page, 3. E-mall July 28° July 282010 -4 pages 4 mall Juy 27° Aug 13" 2010 «2 pages5. Addondur to Motion date July 13,2010 & Opposition to Ceendant’s, Opposition {6. October 6, 2010 Motion for Sanctions again Atomey Mistoe J Wiser, Esa. counal or Dav Groner, ona Groner eound (DrGinsburg and te iyo Alexandra Creut Cour 1. February 3 2011 ~ Responders Jont Maton to Dimas Peon for Appel ichee! Water in collusion with Judges, lawyers, and government empoyo0s, acted nto, wlly, warty, and acoso hs olan rote ona nd Dav wl ad von of a pact ge pat cf te network. Mr Weiser’ tant ‘busiv gard tothe Unt Sats of America Coathton, Vignia Coston, Ci Rights, Ralpous Rights of Plait, ehuld be puns. Fraud onthe Cout ris sngensous alegatons Panta adr ed «Statement of Fact fo Siprere Gout ‘pet.‘owt INTHE CIRCUT COURT OF THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA. JANICE WOLK ORENADIER, : CASENO. CHOIOSsE (GRENADIER INVESTMENT CO.,LTD. et, Defeais, ‘OPPOSITION TO “MOTION FOR DEFAULT FILED ON SEPTEMBER 21,2007 "TO HE HEARD BY A JUDGE WITH JURISDICTION" Detenan David M.Gresaies,bycounsl in option oP Marin fr Df Felon Sper 71,2007 Be Herd by aude with rion ste he alin. ature t Comply with Rule 15 Raed the Rae of te Supreme Cot of Vigna eines “Coan of caso ae resonable fot confer before ving note mono ele te act of he on 2 | coeminea msl agcale sing dle an tie” ‘Below ign coal or Davi M,Grnacir wa it cont hy Pal tier dese sh substance ofthe moo sorte a tally peal earn dad ine.” Counsel or David M. Gerais preva schala ening tthe same te and ie st Pls maton over which hes ping a Came sone porn toa Decree of Reece tr the Cour, Heiss unable preset Phin snoton eens sched hr cbjec the Cou eaingte motion aly 28,200Defendant hn Meritorious Defoe” Plait Alepaont Defendant Dav M, Grenier mie “fest Pils pecius and cles ain edhe Maton and Addendum Ber: |. The Sal Onder inthis cae was nr bythe Hono ohn MeGrah, eon Steer 11,2008 tera fl nd complete il before the Car. Sbsantly mora 2 ayshave elapsed since ce ona Grenadier sigonacien@alamivaw com> David Grenalor sronevet@mn cor Mon, J 26, 2010781 From what ous read fom my pone your response yos fel shuld Fave roaches oi fst and ted o sata Sore fing. you fet er is 2 way {eset the lam ! wu lve to hear Your suggestions Janice Sent trom my Phone (On Ju 28, 2010, at 4:4 PM, Michael Weiser wets: Please see atached Opeoston fle today he sfrementoned cae... Menae J Weiser Aomey-ALaw 510 Kr Sven, Sue 418 Alexansra, Va23te oar. 700%, 7048-4742 (ax) “Th meesage sities any fo the nviuloenty to wich it deed and ‘may contain meaion that priopes, content, nd excmpt rm dose tide appeable at you are a! be rianded apart. or ths empyecclgent Tesponsibi fr deiveng ths message fo he rdandea reper, au ate heey nti Ihatany dissemination etbuon, or epying of tus communication ity lone and you a requested to please nay us mmedas=y by Telephone and ‘elie ts message. Thank you for our antplea cooperaion, 2010.07, 286024@ Michal Weise ens abou ©0icaton of Opposition o Main to be heard ‘Dag July 26 ~ uly 28,2010, Re JWG. EG etal From Michael Weiser ‘bate We 36 2040 104 pan Ms Grenadier, sed you a8 $00n a | wae cet coud na appar you choose no to bolove me, bef (on 7282010 8:30AM, JWG wrote: Mahoe, eate ace me why you dn norm be en Jy 14 tat Ps ate ot wok for you. cova th Your Font desk ana spec ase you we own Janice Walk Grenadier From: Michael Weleor cmivesa@erols.com> ‘To! JWG siuolkarenadiertsol com> Ce: lara eneafamiviow com: bdimurogdimuro.com: David Grenadier tenovotigimen com> Sent: Tuo, 27, 2040 1:25 pm Subject: Re JWG v.1EG, eal Wich Asana Cult Court Judge tl you that you "wou get fa ta" and ‘athe a he Alorandia Creut Cout sages towed ona Gren Those aro very serous agaton an shai tbe made bith ‘Wl you be remoting yourmation for 11 August? 101 77271201 1:07 PM, JWG wrote: "wi tien prt back onthe motions or Aupus 10. My understanding rom youre:Oo rls hat everyone is avable at thi ine ‘Asyourstalement goes these a ats of Judges, ys which wil get his reears. and ‘Devi going to have lo efendtve tne a he che he made ou lo Nan te Balefonie bark accouit as hey appeared al my house. Along wi the ftir that Was lof. Ofcourse ae wrte ne hne ie could be considered felony and tere sno thei enthat, Maybe | shoud press charges fr he funds he ook out of Bafta Dive. This tne his istry wih the Gona Grenadier Trust and how delngenuous he tno hears ‘As ar he Porte cate gos. They had fied withthe Suprame Court. they had not {oid the Pat tat thy ale wth te Supreme Cour tay cn nd ane af he ‘nds to hea the case. Appewonae and Rules are gong gael Davi & Yona. The ‘Geut Cour tdge's mace tcear Pow much they tved loa, are wou gel 3 far ‘nal Dave & Hora were happy lo se at happen, and now ne & tna may Bay fr ‘This das gve me a chance al ting with the ACLU. Because everyone deserves an pial age, ance Wok Geenasir Original Messago— From: Michael Welse cmiwesneterots.com>, ‘ForaWe dwotkarenadierdiae com> ce; Nona Grenadier ; David (Grenadier cronavetdiman.com> ‘Sont Tuo, JulZ7, 2010 12:45 pm ‘Subjoct Far JWG v-1EG, at. Ms, Grenades, ‘As my eral to both you and Ms. Grenadier incated, lam avaabe eter August srtvor 250 Had Ikaoan Me, Grenasiersavaaby a hat tme, would have e59 in respons omy intial ematto oth you and Ms. Grenade. Me, Grenadier, responded tat sh a vain sn 3 Augen “Ke you saab for August Ht? Setleman’? Your ategatane 3 regaring purported netaous ace of various Iudges, not David Grenadier. Please read te fotaty Rule 15, (on 72772010 12:02 PM, JWG wrote: Mr Wess, ‘re you speaking fr everyone tha Hoa ander counsel ae vet ieee ates? Aagust 11 825th@ Now you mentioned in your pleading tying ose his. | have responded with 2 male what woud you suggest, and have hears noting back om you O° was Dat ust Buti yourmoton o suppor you delay? Because am going to point at his othe Janes Wolk Grenadier —Original Mossage— From: Michael Weiser ‘TorWG (Ce arnadterivatamivlewecom ‘Sent Tuo, Jul 27,2010 11:42 am ‘Subject fo: JWG v. IEG, otal Me Crenadier, ‘Dose Ove risa you aeere not avalabe on ether August 11 oF 256°? (0 712772010 11:29 AM, JWG wrote: Me. Weer, How convent, | sce they expand to you ta yu had not made ay pint to ntact me. They also explains to me youred ced ther ie morning, Tearacied Yess by ermal ince you ing your motion, As sid nm lastesmai, | am going to request ha th cout have you exlin ao wy fer 2 weeks of having the dae hat you never contacted re. Aang wh ekg theme have yeu produce poo! aso hen jou became unavalabe. ‘This elomaten fn dale was Qe to you on July 1, 2010. Ashley at your ot eck sad you wore here. There is no exeue far his ther thon ying dey Iw be nga moto ‘esponce la your motion madly. Ax expe’ by te outs You ae saying you ae avaiable on the 11t& 25th, does hat mean you also cntmed that lana s avasabe thc dae? {am alo thinking thie cace shouldbe on You Tube, So ater fod shoud have ne out am no longer going tobe faken avanage of by the Ckcut Cour of Axara Janice Wolk Grenadier Origin! Mossage— Frome Micha! Weiser ‘Tor danice Wolk Grenadier ; Nona Grenadier igronadior@vafamiviaw com>@ Ce: David Gronadier renovoiman com> ‘Subject JWG ve, etal received a teeptone eal rom one af the ges lw lots to info ne the cue has been ake of doket for tro 28 sy uo omy uravatabuy ety ‘Spposton, copies which were proved to you yesterday. am sure you ecoved ‘irl ealls ra be wee. Tagroed to aterp to gels ral avaiable dat & Simo fr Psintitsmaton: am valle oar molars day in Augus 110.25 Pa vio asf your avaiably fo hese das or alomtive posses. Menae J Weiser Atomey ALL 510 ing Soot Suto 418 Nevanda, VA 2254 oar826 704, 7035484742 (ax) ‘This message is intend aly othe vidal or erty to which tis aderossed and ‘may colon fermen thal piveged, confers, and exept rom Ciscoe Under appoable ln. you arena he ended Yeapient. othe embajenetagent ‘eaponsible fr gotering this message fo he intended respi you are needy noted ‘hat ary dssemmnaton, ction, oF copying of is commmuncation fie Dechbts and you se fequates 1 plosa ntl Us inerodaoly by tloponé and oiler maneape Tank you for you encpated cooperation 20enn er eats 27 aug3 200 ‘Ae wat know Judge Klch hs rocks hima. ‘lease etme knoe te tt mations day Sapt works Foryourschedue As awayetfu woul i aye what u ave ken wa ores we can soto this. Teetove ts wil be een Sent tom my Prone ss 25 PM, Michael Weiser wrote: Which Alexandia Cee Court Judge tld you tat you "wou get fait and that heal the Alesana Creat Cou Judge's ved lon’ Grenadar™ "Tne ao very serious alegatone and shoul no! be made bly "you be ve-esang your atin for 11 August? (on 7272010 1:07 PM, JWG wrote: Me Wee, (on 27, 2010, {wal then putt back onthe motons for August 11th. My understanding rom youre ‘malls tat everyone avaale a ths time [As your staterant goes those ato acs of ues, yes which wil got this ve-heard. ae Davi going a have to defend tsi al tho chocks he mace outta rect te Betetote bark accourt as they appeared a my house. Aung wih tho er tal was fot Ofcourse ast wine. ei tha cou be considered felony and teria no teint on that Maye | shoul press charges forthe fons he took out of Botetonic ‘Rv, Tht his ony wit the Sonia Grenada Tus na how dsingenuous Nes ‘lee roar [Astor a the Porter cate goes, Thay had fled wih the Supreme Court, hay had ot toto Pain Tat thy oi fl wih the Supreme Cout thy ca nd ene ofthe trends to hearth case’ Appearance and Rue ae gong aganst Dav & ona. The (eet Cour Judges made tele how uch hey eve Hons, afd wou gal 9a tral Daw & hona were happy ose hat happen and aom he & lon ayy ‘This des give me a chance at geting wah te ACLU. Because everyone ceserves on cempieal ge. nMeat eser mats 27 Aug 9% 200 Janice Wolk Ganator original Message— From: Mchae! Weser miwesaerotecom> ‘lwcligranadieciealson™ Sent Tuo, Ju 27,2010 12-49 pm ‘Subjct fe: JWG. IEG, otal Ma, Grenadier ‘As my emslto bot you and Me. Gronadior incited, | am avaatle ether August ‘ttvor sh Had known Ma Granasers avait at atte | wold Fave Sa in response omy hii e-mailto both you and Ms. Grenadier, Me. Grenier rexpondes tat shelsavalale on 11 August Tre you avatar August 118? ‘Setiomant? You sogatons ae regorting pupotd ntaraus acs of various ug, not Daw Gronati, Pleas feed he teal of ul 415 (on 712712010 12:02 PM. WG wrote: Me Waser, ‘Are yoo speaking ar everyone that ona and her counsel re avaliable hase ater? Aogust 11428 Now you mentioned in your pleading tying to ete his. have expanded wih 2o Irate what woud you sage, and have Rear nab back Hom you OF wos hal st Butt yourmotn fo sper your delay? Because lam going to pot ou thi tthe Janice Wok Grenatler —oviginal Message — From: Michael Woter a.com ‘ror awe. Ce: laronacienfataniviaw.com Sent: Tuo, Jul 77,2090 1142 arm ‘Subject Fa: JWG. IEG, otal Ms Grenacie, ‘Doos this mean you araare not avaiable on ether August 1th oc 27 (on 72772010 11:28 AM, WG wrote: 2@ etl er math 27 hag 3 2010 How corvenient Iam sure they explained to you that you hd nt rade ary poi o Eentact ne. Tey also oxpaned to me You had ead them he maing. | soars You wie by ema snc yur Mig your oton, ‘Assad in ylast ena, 1m golng wo request hat the court have you explain ao ‘ay air wooks of hang he date at you never comaced neon wh asking Thom fo nave you produce prea as fo whan you pacar unavalable, This inlormaton fad date wa gon fo Yu or July 18,2010. Ashiya your font desk snd you wow hate. Thee sno excuse fortis oho hen tying ta delay. Il bing @ maton responce lo your tation mediate. As expaed by te courte You arsayng you are avaible cn te 11% & 250, does tht moan you also ‘onfimed that lon a avatable hove dates? am al thinking this cate shouldbe on You Tube, Solar day Ishouls have one {tam onger gong lobe taken advantage ofby the Gut Court ol Axara Janice Wok Grader —Orignat Mossage— From: Nichao! Weiser smiwesg@erale. com> Tot dance Wolk Grenadier ; Nona (Grenade carenadion@vatanivaw.com> (ez David Gronacier Sent Tue, tl 27, 2070 141 am Subject JWG IEG, eta | rece a telphone cl rom ane fhe agas aw clarks oi me the case nas been akon ofthe ver tmoow 25 ny au oy neal ay erm ‘Spposton, copes which ware prowded fo you yesteray. wm sue you receved ‘Shr ct rom hea cr Tagied 1 attempt to get a mutual avatablo date & tre for Plats mation: am vaiale other maton day in gst N28 Ps. ace as to your avalabty for thas dates or aternatve posites, ™ Monae Weiser Atiomey At Law S510 King Steet Sut 416 Alexa, VA 22346 7088067603, 70306484742 (ax) a@ STATEOF VinGINIA ineTHE CRCUTT COURT OF THECTTY CITY OF ALEXANDRIA ‘OF ALEXANDRIA (CASE CHDI0656 TARICE WOLK GRENADIER ILONA BLY FREEDMAN GRENADIER ax (GRENADIER INVESTMENT COLTD DAVID MARK GRENADIER Daten ADDENDUM TO THE MOTION DATED TULY 13, 2010/4 OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITION ADDENDUM TO THE MOTION DATED JULY 13,2010 OPFOSTTON TO. DEFENDANT'S OFFOSITION DEFENDANT DAVID MARK ORENADIER’S COUNCEL MICHAEL J. WEISER AT,34 on Monday Jly 6.2010 male Pai an Ne eeppoion tie Macon bee rn Wednesda ly 28,2010" Pit had emo he ay Stree Moon to David Mik Grenade Me Wener wat sored ly 12010 a Pl wal ews tom. te Weer mer made sy tempo cnt Pl th date dc wer or ‘Nu Mi. Weer. Fad nave pues tine when Pn woud tbe clo pond lathe our ow Mi Wee: haat cnacedPleafintht? wek ine fame Ie Coal ad evil Sched s ering why ak cts 2 wes fom Pl? Pai ed te Mato fo Detail on epee 21, 2007+ PP iad he Alara Sheil deer evict Delonas lan Grenade was sere and showed. We wate 4 mine for Mr West (erp mind Shei aslo ‘tives alos ese bldg a Me Wes) oa Gems fin ary ob oe ‘tht Mi. Weher was cong ase fae him he frm. The she ae ‘Sul find the pps. ey Ra them onc, ut te Sh wo dle th ha oo ted he pape saying ey aa ben ele. ‘n Oppesitin to Defends ape defen iif lleatons: 1. Thin seri vod doe me 17.1 106: here ws sompoat it woud 2 Pll tamed he ul a Jane of 2010 fom he Supreme Cat Clerk, That he Alea Jlge'shad neve ied ith he Supreme Cont ayo the app aps, u“5. Pint was send y she Alanna Cis Court on he re: ao den the Aetna fudge’ cose he Je ely ey ou fd one ily ‘tthe Sue Cait Pino rao thin ober th Ci Coun ‘rl ee dengsmuou. Defend sould eng be Cot hs ee, Pini as flowed liar. Pl hsbc at bly by Df the Cwcut Gout Pere exampcis Me Weher wating? werk fo nfm deta uted wes fri Mle Weiner nmin ona, Gems ws gg 1 ‘eincou an jt nt owing pn Sete 207 Pl would lok point oo an Por v Comoe in wt elon i de ‘whch of venue nd paper rh wid wih Sate Ca. Pi nl ike opin ou his a niu ston nth the Celt Cau we Sings wih Pals when te lores Pi he ennt oppo 17.1 Sb, Tha Pl da ies so a the epee Coun rma Pal he srr ae ware usd ts Aug 2010, hell ica All SOF "HERBY CERTIFY ha copy fe freeing ws hd delivered this day Ann 2010 ‘2 lena By Grenade esha Glen Ben Bra a BercroGserg 208 King ae 2AM, Alexandria, Vas, Abd easel fer Dae M. Grea Mich Wee s10 Ring Su Alenia, Vas 2351 ied E> 5vineinta BUTE emRcuEr coURL OF THE Cty OP ALEXANDRU COURT DIVISION fale # CHOI065: TRICE WOLK GRENADIER. Peat LOMA ELY FRIEDMAN GRENADIFR HECRNAS AND CGRENADIER INVESTMEN.COLTD DAVID MARK GRENADIER. Dated 0; ‘1a CLERK OF COUNT wit pen lace hi coo he dhe fr int ‘COURT Wea ty te I sayed Auge ONO oT) nam sot he ‘inthe {tayo Anan 200 at Wilh ‘sje: Wolk Greater | 1SWeespongsie Liainelanass vette com I MERERY CUIETIFY THAT ATRUF COPY OF THETOREGOING WAS HAND OLLIVERED THIS 1d of Aare. 1010 oa ly Gre: Hecken Grea: Insets Ga Laie Diao. Jn Trina Danie, 5 Rg St Se ‘kaon, Va22018, Ado coenel or Dav M, Gels. 4510 Ki Se Ac Vs aa@ = ‘Monon FoR SANCTIONS CorewaDin eves 0,19 [MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST ATTORNEY MICHAGL.WESER, £54, COUNCEL FOR reasoners contr before ping nt ofa motion reset bic ie Pant sent tached emai on 2, 203.040 tans GrevaerOav Gena, Ben Dime ad oh Tenn there was no wor bok Fam anyone ston tothe dt forthe et, ‘Motion was fe on 0/33, 2010 ana nand dated Michel Wee fe an Ha ‘Maton ano nav fo be 21, 201010 be ee on ly 28, 2010. ”3158 PN on 26,2010 fed with he Cet Cour that Past had comple withthe nt comact mei 485 FA though heme. Whe responded. teachesov to {leu Cout of Aandi contacted Me Weer anatoihimorespondta me, Alenia te ‘ered her Opposition only 3, 2030 wie? doe ser Motion wast ‘Tre Gre Cour of Aandi has ated st a ganna nd woul ot be stat ‘The Creu our Aleandra woul at put my Motion’ down on the clea am th | ‘ad snt aio the Defendants Thay nite el eengants prt puting dts on he Ciena eae defendants and hata wat 2ehoursto gh delondant# chance get back {ven oth it's and Deteneansin the Cy of Alana, ‘hat on age F725 ons Gana“ Atough cok for cases tht night nat be scale, brobem win ths station. The Ol Boy networhas mc elon Grenade & David ‘renaleralong wth thar councdort Rove lo the sander ae the ae ene ast nudge ae eter of aut 12,230 whe rendered it nproper shove teardhemotion. Iau tues im “ure, Blewett tha th soe Dad October, 2018 bio ——— ‘huecsSpine Brantena, sina 2804 036239655 ‘nero eat that ts copy fh oaging was hand dle th aya cba 2030 toons Grenade and a Ben Ormroat murinberg it 908 King Set, Sue 200 Stree, rnd, Vigna 22516 ae bdo Bow —— Grenier@ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA. JANICE WOLK GRENADIER, (ait? Petitioner, Record No. 110155 ILONA ELY FREEDMAN GRENADIER, et al, Respondents. 01 ION TO DISMISS PETITION FOR APPEAL Respondents Grenadier Investment Co, Ltd, Nona Grenadier Heckman, and David M. Grenadier (collectively, "Respondents", by their respective counsel and pursuant to Viginia Supreme Court Rules S14, ‘5:4, and 5:11, hereby move to dismiss the pttion for appeal submited by Pelioner Janice Wolk Grenacir (‘Petioner’," Pursuant to Rule ‘5:4(aX(1), Respondents have informed Petitioner ofthe intention to le this ‘motion? +" peltones fed an eiginal pettion for appecl, as wll as a “Replacement Petition for Appeal on January 20, 2077. The only aifference between the two documents appears to be that he font inthe Replacement Petition for Appeals larger an inthe criginel patton. The Replacement Petition fr Appeals relerred to herein asthe Peiton ‘Because Potioner is nc represented by counsel, Respondents are not required to Indicate whether Petloner consents tothe granting of this ‘motion or inion to fle response in oppostion, 2oS “The Petion should be dsmissed on account of Pltioner's flue to comply wth Virginia Supreme Court Rule 5:11, Former Rule §:11(b) (2010) provided, in pertinent part that{vinen the appellant fli to ensure that the ‘record contains ranserpto ora wit statement of facts necessaryto permit resolution of appellate sues, any assignments of error affected by the omission shal not be considered "* Here, Peltloner has fled to ensure that the record contains either ‘eanscripts or a writen statement of facts. Specifically, Petonerfalled to fie the transcript of any proceeding inthe underyng case wih the clerk of ‘he tial cour within 60 days ater erty of judgment pursuant to Rule 5:11(0) Likewise, Pettioner fled to comply with former Rule 5:1(cVe (now Rute 6:11(¢) requirements fr filing avetten statement in eu of ‘wanscrip. Peltione’s flue lo ensure that the record contains either 9 ‘transcrip or a writen statement of facts necessaryto permit resolution of ‘The current version ofthe rle now states that itis the obligation ofthe pettionerappeliant to eneure that tho eco is suffciont to enable the Court to waluate and resolve the assignments of error. When the appaliant fais to eneure thatthe record contain ranseripts ofa witen statement of facts necessary to permit resolution of appellate issucs related to the assignments of err, any assignments of err atfectes by the omission shall no: be considered Rule S:11(a) (2011), Fy@ -appelate issues is fatal o her appeal. Accordingly, the Pelion should be dismissed for Pettoners noncomplance wth Rule 5:11 WHEREFORE, forthe reasons stated herein, Respondents Grenadier investment Co, Lid, ona Grenadier Heckman, and Dave M ‘Grenadier respctuly sok this Honoree Court dismiss Petitions Janice Welk Gronader’s Replacement Pein for Appeal Respectuly submitted, GRENADIER INVESTMENT CO., LTD., ILONA GRENADIER HECKMAN, AND DAVID M. GRENADIER ‘By Counsel Bemard J. ONG Esq. (VSB #TE704) Hillary J. Golyer. £59, (VSB #50852) DIMURO GINSGERG, P.C. 808 King Street, Suite 200 ‘Alexandria, VA 22314 “Te: (703) 684-4339, Fax; (703) 548.3181 (Counsel for Respondents ‘Gronadir Investment Co, Lid. end ona Gronadiér Heckrasn ‘Wchael J Wgher, Esa. (VSB FTES) Sute 416 ‘Ter (703) 626-7003 Fax: (703) 548.4742 Counsel for Respondent David Gronacor 2OF sERVICE | hereby corti that a trus and accurate copy ofthe foregoing was, delivered by first-class 2017, to the foregong: ‘mal are elecronic mal his 3rd dayot February, danice Wolk Grenadior 115 West Spring Street Alexandria, VA 22301 ‘wolegrenadier@aol.com Paiitioner pro se Pettangd Cote, 2@ ® > ‘SUMMONS TO ANSWER INTERROGATORIES ein ve vue [REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ANSWER INTERROGATORIES deere ey Soko Rew epuni ccoonten wi een ice els as aSattne Tort stan OFF EE: enn is mene th Coat ot Corminiea Ory eas ow sr who Reese Sin PONENT Wi FF yt da me ar ini) apt Detar OE A Renee yn ety cm aero emoemn feet one qn pew rte as Soc Says Gers Se pntVIRGINIA [BYTE CIRCUTT COURT OF THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA \WSTREET ONE, LLC Jadgaent CraitPhini {BFFREY W, EPPERSON JIngent DetowDetendat. DECREE OF REFERENCE {UPON CONSIDERATION of he request ofthe Judgment Ceduna, W Stet ‘One LL ad the rca re ot appenig tte Cos th thei gped ene the ranesed rit, (ORDERED, tat Michel. Weise, Eq let a 510 King Set, Site 46, ‘Aladin, Virginia 2514 ieee pine s Commisionen Cnet preside ovr ee pi ts prrene tis_O%eeyor dye 2010. i hot Aju. 410 pm o- ee 2s\WEASK FOR THIS: ogee: By iD. Gata VSB HIE Ein E Hoye, VSB 478608 S10 King te, Sule 416 Po bex 106 ‘Nao, Vigna 2231-1946 “Tekephooe: (703 64-3260 Fails (105) 48-4742 (Cou forthe slpnent Crt antt 26