COMPLAINT MAIL To: Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission Post Office Box 367 Richmond, Virginia 23218-0367 Note: The Gommission does not accept fax or e-mail complaints Namo of Judge, Location of Court Cit Date of incident Case Name or Number (if known) Current Status of Caso. Name and telephone number of persons who witnessed the judge's conduct: Geatge tt Me De pea hee Description aa a oa said or did that you believe was improper: dad + ha goytene fo Gash fa Lawred Langeds fo Hines! Sala Gs) Dea 23, Bi “ak Nant, Adurb do ae pages may be attached) D0 NOT SEND ORIGINAL COURT RECORDSISCORD Wher NOT PEAR ND Name Daytime (Please Print Cleary) Serer ne (202) 368-7178. Revised 01042014COMPLAINT MAIL To: Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission Post Office Box 367 Richmond, Virginia 23218-0967 Note: The Commission does not accept fax or e-mail complaints. Name of Judge Judae James Clark Location of Court a ri é od CHOW S. + Pth eno Date of incident Case Name or Number (f known) a Name and telephone number of persons who witnessed the judge's conduct: Current Status of Cas {additional pages may be attached) DO NOT SEND ORIGINAL COURT RECORDS/RECORD WILL NOT BE RETURNED Name Daytime (Please Print Cleary) Janice Wolk Grenadier __Telephone (202) 368.7178 Adres ia ate {| 280 Note: The Commi ‘accept unsigned complaints. Revised: 09042014VIRGINIA: ‘THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA ILONA ELY GRENADIER HECKMAN DAVID M. GRENADIER PLAINTIF®S Case No, 1:15 -me- 01540 UNA v. CASE NO City of Alexandria VA. CL. 15 - 003661 JANICE WOLK GRENADIER STATEMENT OF FACTS FOR WELLS FARGO BANK COURT ON DECEMBER 23,2015 GHV PARTNERSHIP . JAMES WARBASSE efe PADRICKELLY O'BRIEN 238 3 ARMY NAVY COUNTRY CLUB gq 8s 33. DEFENDANTS 4 § zor 323 2h COUNTER CLAIM/cRosscommaInT p| 2 4) Zed JANICE WOLK GRENADIER #2 8 83 DEFENDANT B oF ILONA ELY FREEDMAN GREN. . ENADIER HECKMAN (Ilona) GREANDIER ANDERSON STARACE. DUFFETT & KIESER (Grenadier Law et al) DAVID MARK GRENADIER (David) MICHEAL WIESER ESQ (M, WIESER) DIMUROGINSBERG BEN DIMURO (BEN) ‘ANDERA MOSLEY STATE OF VIRGINIA BWW LAW GROUP (BWW LAW), TROUTMAN SANDERS AKA MAYS AND VALENTINE WELLS FARGO BANK Plaintiffs — AS PUBLIC SERVANTS, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS AN OFFICER OF THE “OURT WHERE APPLICABLE STATEMENT OF FACTS FOR COURT DATE WEDNESDAY DECEMBER 23, 2015 KANGAROO COURT ‘That Judge Clark refused to reeu even with evidence that he had Jailed Janice from October 22 — November 12,2014 illegally and for CASH for his Lawyer friends: Miche DiMuroGinsberg: Andrea ‘Wieser, ‘Mosley, Ben DiMuro, Judge John Tran, Hillary Collyer In the Court of the City of Alexandria, Wednesday December 23, 2015 their ws Judge and the opposing side you will see had alex v8 no court reporter as the iy decided what would take place, Girgis and Judge svare she want get a Fat ‘appearance the State of Virginia. This unusual absence of ‘ecks and balances has become a “perfect tom” of unchesked pote, absence of monn oversight, 1sonar motivated professionals who operas the system—lawyers, iy couny-evel bureeerts, anc of whom are open to input from litigants. The resulting exploitation ruin the Arserioan Cities wet families while enriching attorneys, governments, elected officials and judges who scmvinices sc Panera ty and they alone, created: In 1967, Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas posed the ‘oliowing inquiry: ".. What abou the Judge who conspires with ical lan enforcementetiege allroad’ a dissenter? What about the judge who knowingly urns arial Ino a kangarce' cous? Or Sar setomingly lous the Constitution inorder 1 obtain a conviction? ..” [Plerson®. Ray, 386 US. BSE (M60). | Those very issues raised by Justice Douglas over 40 ears ago ere now nsicing Beano th ewsuit exposing the two original Plentfiand other's such actors while serving ec on example to others who migh be intentionally abusing the protected righ of selerprescnied Iisa Miche Wieatingitas lear Judge Clark had iegally uled Janice for financial gain forthe lawyers Bea neipt ett and DiMuroGinsberg: Andrea Mosiey, Bon DiMuca, Julge John Tem Hilly Colger in rents Ca sil felt he was not biased which should scare the “SHIT” out of all Ameren. hades diane wat did goto Jal for “Cash for Kids” Judge Clark ha created “Cash for Lawyess my ‘and favor with the Judiciary / Old Boys Network" ‘The Parties involved in the Hearing on December 23, 2015: argon yuan November 12,2014 to Michael Wieser “lam so sony I ean na collect ose leat oo, {2 20u, You wil need to come beck fora Judgment” Me. Wierer never went bask forse id DiMuroGinsberg and now judge Clark has given lona Grenadier Heckman the power te elec Tang tl hearing on Janice Wolk Grenadier’ home - Judge Clark is no differnt then Case tive KIDS Judge's Ciavarella etal. Ta ne Clark never reviewed the “Orders” from DiMuroGinsberg or Troutman Sanders stating“ wll sign what ever you give me ~ write your Orders how you want them pimaro Ginsburg Andrea Mosley spoke maybe 2 minutes and then told the Judge they didn't want any do i Attorney Reza S. Moshin - Troutman Sanders LLP - never spoke ~ never submitted his Order for Foren before the Judge said just write your Orders have them signed and twill sign them: he ‘sppearance was the deal between him and the Judge was made prior to walking inshe doce, sree neytisha K Glegis—Parker, Simon & Kokois, LLC -tlona Grenadier Heckman’ lawyer {luted before the hearing she wasnt going to be speaking and never spoke ~The deal nd bean ocd before she walked in the daor it eould not be more obviceejanice Wolk Greandier - Spoke ~ tied to defend offer argument but, w Negi or Judge with Jurisdiction. Judge Clark was a good litle bay forall he “OLD Rowe laa RK Ad other Sudge’s~ he did just what they wanted, The question now ashe he ted asthe sain ceanstvania Cash for Kids using the jas inthe Cy of Alexandria all nd tots Fired coe etry evidence submitted into the cour, demanding lanice be found incompaen coh fico end to Nona to drug Janie and get sexually inappropriate pictures, ora nc he ‘© plant rugs inher home or on one of her gris - the blog jwgrenadirisslin.logspeccon denied if expected Due ing, rs, iinet what all the Judiciary, the Government and the Elected Offical forget is Janice was one of Rep, Janice was a trusted party a the dinner table to keep their SECRET as fe hen the Judiciary Frade rari, The Tricks the Judges use to Bully. Manipulate the case for penonal oy wen see friends financial gain, Teis trading on Wall Street. That words, a favorite is “frivolous” “No Merit” li ie irhudge fenecuelPe “BULLIED TO DEATH” exposing Judge Bellows of Fisax vi he spree iedodge James Clark took notes. Pete Scamado the main Villain in 1968 Killed "Murder fe Horse Gia Send Sam Degeia J. He would then move to Northern Vigina and noone wosld bed reo Belo sine found out Pete wanted Chris Mackney dead and did tha with the bep cftage Echows, That Divorce Lawyer lona Grenadier Heckman would use te power ofthe esis the Wolk Gres sia did when the appearance of “Murder for Hire” on two occasion aguizo lice Grok Grenadier in September 1997 and March of 2011 was botched. But Judge Clark eatin Sena dd nt stop thei n 2012 afer mailing back all the evidence entered nto te ert court se eans fe timinl acs of Lawyer ona, they hired or as iead Mark Stuart who was dog tne ond Bet sexual inappropriate pictures, ice's home or on one of her girls, Ee spudnot do it nd amined to the scheme by ll appearance of Judge Clark. Kent and asec range were called they sated “We were told by Commonwealth Atterey Randy Senge acer ns to take any Police Reports from you" _Ditmess George MeDermott — took the stand and under Oath stated: That he was in cou and saw the BO1s a er Grund Jury on February 2012. Stated very clearly he was in cou on Novenee 2 sound fepcated what he heard Judge Clark say to opposing council.“ am so sory Team vor colin Winsett fe for you" that “you will ave to come back to court to get aJudgment™ to lager Meee Wieser eroneating started with Judge Clark denying the say and denying the moving ofthe ease to USDC of Distriet Court: Mreaatm hetook e Bully type attitude through out the court hearing taking orders fone Ratt Fined a ita you get with Judge James Clark a man who thinks Bullng« Prose Liggant for Financial gui fr his friend is the appropri of a Judge, That finds the defense of Due Process basically "Frivolous" is treason tothe courts and to all Amerie, ‘That Janice stated 1" that she would like to calla witness. 3age Clr tied refusing tling Janice to paraphrase what he Witness would sey ~ another TRICK by ‘Tudge's to make you think you are being heard when in truth they are denying you due procees Mien Janice went to try and call her witness George MeDermott Judge Clerk tied to deny such Witness and thea relented aftr it was pointed out how Janice has never besn allowed to call eines in ‘any ofthe trials that were open court where Judge Clark didnot rule fiom his chambers That George McDermott testified under oath to the following: 1. Janice bad never been given a fare hearing, 2. That he was in court the day Janice went to jil October 22,2014 + The he was in court on November 12, 2015 and say and heard the following A. Janice was not allowed to read her fll stateinent into the revere 5. That Michael Wieser atiomey that Judge James Clark stated“ I am so soy I cannot collect your legal fees for you" that he than went on to state “You will nced to eome back to cour for 8 judgment Trowel Gk made it clear ha ead ll documents oeame int the cout wih Bias slog with Tra aeGe of he criminal actions ofthe lawyers Ben DiMus, Andrea Mosey Hebs Gitta oe ota ‘Tran, Hillary Collyer. release att denied that Sudge Haddock had snything to do with his geting this job was laughable, { Fedele Jade I was the daughter in law of Judge Albert Grenadier and knew very wel ho ees the Judges play and what goes on behind closed doors That when asked what Janice defense was ofthe Four Comers of the Demure she fora moment was Pits and had forgotten some of her documents The Judge Then read from her decomene Oe ‘Due Process was her defense. He picked and chose whale wanted to share. Temes a lat made it clear Due Process was not defense to him, That he heard te heaing was 2igiee such scheme to help his friends and for him not o understand or know the laws ek ter es sper mating malor decisions on people's ives everyday. ‘That Janice could wot becee trae a ‘appropriate to hear this hearing, he reanc® state what a great country America was, We have young men and women fighting for Bans iother countries being denied to Jie. Janice then looked back Judge Cosedie eid sated “She did not believe that he would appreciate lo isude Clark ried to defend himself saying that Judge Haddock had nothing to do with his geting the Job Judas ~ which is «total joke. With out Judge Haddock and the lawyers in the court roos or tei ons ‘he would never have been siting up at the beneh, janice reminded him she knew ofthe Tricks Judges played and the system as she had been married to avid. That he had stated out with denying her end tampering with the Grand Jury et al. THAT WHEN JUDGE CLARK WAS DONE HE TURNED TO THE OTHER ATTORNEYS - GIVE ME WHAT EVER YOU WANT IN YOUR ORDERS AND I WILL SIGN THEM. Which s what he did he signed Order for Troutman Sanders that sated the folowing from Janice Wolk Grgnadier stich shouldbe considered with his endorsement as Judge Clark and the alomneys. signed the ater with no objections: The Orders Janice has are certified Orders by the Clerks inthe Cy of Alexandria, Janice Wolk Grenadier ~ Pro Se Objects to Troutman Sanders Order December 23, 2015 Bage2: To Judge not having Jurisdiction ruling in Bias, Favoritism, Cronyism, Retaliation, Retribution in favor of Divorce Lawyer llona Grensdier Heckman That “Due Process” ‘Page 3 Order: is not important to Judge Clark. That witness George McDermott whom under oath stated Judge Clark on Nov 22, 2014 sui to Michael Wieser “lam so sory I cannot collest your legal fees for You" Judge Clark then went on to stat to Michael Wieser that you will need to come back for another ‘nearing fora judament. These legal fees show more calls to Judges chambers then to his own client. It is ‘tknovm fact and Janie has seen the close friendship of Michael Wieser and Judge Clark ~ _Sadge Clark then went onto say what is your claim ~ Judge Clark does not fee! "Due Process” is something that Janice deserves ~_Tanice ried to enter documentation into the court and Judge Clark aske opponents if they had a ‘roblem ~ of course they didn’t want the documents in the court that should the collusion and the corruption ofthe parties ‘Page 4: Janice was denied entering into the courts the documents that showed 1. Judge Clark had by all appearance recused himself in Jan 2012 2. udge Clerk, with Kemler and Dewkins tampered with the evidence that had been entered into the record on October 2012 3+ Judge Clark according to Mark Stuart requested Janice to be found incompetent then Toa fixed or ass flend Mark Stuart agreed to 1. Drug Janice and get inappropriate sexual pictures 2, Rape ne of Janice’s daughters 3. Plant drugs on Janice's girls or inher home. When the police rere Called Jenice was told “Randy Sengel the Commonwealth attorney told them they were not allowed to take any Police reports. 4. Judge Clark is aware of and party tothe blog jwgrenadiersalair blogspot.com age Si Judge Clark further illegally Jniled Janice from October 22 November 12,2014 having her tortured in ~ _Tn-court today Judge Clark made it clear Due Process was not important to himeels wo years he has made ita patter and practice to coverup all eriminal acs cf Divorce lawyer Iona grenadier Heckman and Judge Donald Haddock IWG ‘Janice Wolk Grenadier ~ ProSe objects order DiMuroCinsborg Objected to as Judge Clark does not have jurisdiction, Wi Judge 188 George MeDermott stated under Oath Rage 2s had stated to Michael Wieser“! am so sory I can't collect legal fees for you" The Bllying of ‘udge Clark to favor Judge Haddock, whom he would not have this jab is obvious ~ that to goto the ‘xtreme of 1. October 2012 removing the information that shows his buas by mailing back documents probally submitted into the court 2 Wanting me to be found incompitant hiring of Mark Stuart to drug and get several appropriate pictures oF raping one of my girls or planting drugs on them or in our home 3, Mlegaly jailing for legal fees that are obvious using the jails to futher bully me 4. The legal fes are not judgesments / Orders 5. Ignoring the motion to recuse shows Due Provess our Cons {important to Judge Clarke § The statement in itself to Michael Wieser on November 22, 2015 (should be 2014) says itll “I am so sorry I can’t collect your legal fees” 7. When Janice asked for Due Process Judge Clatk stated tional rights toa fie ial is not fearing Over” to opponenss Page 3: To opponents lawyers: Give me your Orders I will sign them ‘The eppearance is clear “Due Process” ignoring the criminal acts of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman is in direct conflict with the judicial Canons and Obstruction of wus junice, ‘hat Judge Clack had been served by a third party, « Writ of Mandamus and Prohibitioa to his right to act 35,8 Judge in these hearing as been fled. A police report and FBI reports have been fled agains hie judge and he is aware of them as well as law suits. Yet he fels he is not Bias? The Alecants Poles have chosen to ignore his actions 1 Janice Wolk Grenadier, am the Defendant in this action. I personaly st forth the allegations of {actin this Answer and Counter Clim Cross Complain, and I hereby declare under penalty of perjury ‘hat each of said allegations is true and correc. Date: December 28, 2015 15 West Spring Street Alexandria, Virginia 22301, Telephone (202) 368-7178 ‘Email jwgrenadier@gmail.com 6vincIMA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA TLONA LY GRENADIER, eat, Plage, * Case No, CL1S003661 JANICE WOLK GRENADIER, ef al, Defendams, ORDER ‘This matter came before the Court on the Demurrer, Plea in Bar, and Motion to Ske the “Counter Claim end Cross Complaint” fled by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, ax ‘Trste for Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-2, Aset-Backed Certificate, Series 2008-2 (Well Fargo"), Upon consideration ofthe Demurrer, Plea in Bar, and Motion to Ste, fr the easons stated from the bench, itis hereby ORDERED that the Demurer, Pea in Bar, and Motion to Strike are SUSTAINED; further ORDERED that each and every claim asserted ageinst Wells Fargo in Ms, Grenadier's “Counter Claim and Cross Complain ie DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Entered this <3 day of December, 2015. ons Monta OME Lonm % Bvary DHL a mah eS ramaWEASK FoR THIS; WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ‘AS TRUSTEE FOR OPTION ONE MORTGAGE ‘LOAN TRUST 2005-2, ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-2 By: S, Mohsin Reza (VSB W7S347) ‘TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP 1850 Towers Crescent Plaza, Suite 500 ‘Tysons Comer, VA 22182 Telephone: 703-734-4334 Facsimile: 703-734-4340 E-mail: mohsin eza@jroutmansanders.com Counsel fr Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, 1s Truste for Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-2, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-2 ‘SEEN AND : TLONA ELY GRENADTER DAVID M.GRENADIER 2 272 Bersaall Diva, ay ‘VSB No. 18784 Andrea L. Moseley, Esq. VSB No. 430¢7 DiuroGinsbere, PC 101 King Ses Suite 610 Alecanin, VA 72314 Counsel for Plas WALK-GRENADIER Flim ng dit , ip a Fi | t- ‘pda et Oe Ba0 holed net lux des Ube. Under Obtp Hott d Wate Meopined apekesing to tHe “i at (G4 rod ay le danlee ee id Hs ariabarey Peaches harel ate A fs erat Wo do Nhwk Heed oats Uae a bn Be cl pet "a Bone wee a Go & penne’ Pf Hale. ei ee sr Sings ieenmvacls A oe “tune they pe nl allowed “0 lee apo? « Bbae Vow u dwore of * Be | 88, she blog \ enadsaeb ar SS a en‘anle Wolk Grenadier ~ Pro Se Objects to TroutmanSanders Order December 23, 2015 £Eage 2; To Judge not having Jurisdiction rating in Bias, Favoritism, Cronyism, Retaliation, Retribution in favor of Divorce Lawyer flona Grenadier Heckman That “Duc Process" age.3 Order: not important to Judge Cask. That witness George MeDermott whom niet enh sated Judge Clark on Nov 22,2014 said to Michael Wieser" am so sors | to say what is your claim ~ Judge Clark docs not feel “Duc Process” is something that Janice deserves, ~ _jatice tried to enter documentation into the court and Judge Clark aske opponents it they had a problem ~ of course they didn't want the documents in the come ties ‘should the collusion and the corruption of the parties Pare 4: Janice was deniod entering into the cours the documents that showed 1. Judge Clark had by all appearance recused himself in Jan 2012 2. Judge Clark, with Kerler and Dawns tampered with the evidence that hed been entered into the record on October 2012 + fudge Clark according to Mark Stuart requesied Janice tobe found incompetent then Hone fixed or as a friend Mark Stuart agrood to I. Drug Janie and ge late Sexual pictures 2. Rape one of Janice's daughters 3. Pant drugs Bags S: Judge Clark rhe illegally Jailed Janice from October 22— November 12,2014 having her tortured in jail + Tncourt today Judge Clark made it clear Due Process was not important to him ‘Te last two years he has made it a pattem and practice to coverup all criminal cls of Divorce lawyer Ilona grenadier Heckman and Judge Donald Haddock awVIRGINIA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA Tlows Grenadin, eff wales Grenadin, ef Fraiadtt vs Case Number CL 10 ~ 00366) ORDER This cause came on this dey upon_ Plains" Die mverer ae Defemdenth 10 /13)IF Counterclaim AND IT APPEARING that__-Hu_Deprurcers_¢ ev td c ngented Cbesens Spo. jn leading filed 6 Ventilfs ; Wis therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that__he. CovmterAninn led on ye M3pir is Asmined with prejsdica - if FORE SPAOMAN CHER al a rary cin rye NEC al ENTERED this 23“ dayot__Decom bine 2015D a D) Wher ict Gphed Cbd Woe Huled™ Hall, Dooe pf a tn auaa lass piben's wu Tt ge es . a tos ne feo a at [oorler? Tora. a de Hebi ip lu, deteot, ee pthetetio 4, pee | That Pc ta st & ak ph, a Wau dans te talent ba ag Oe eadJanice Wolk Grenadier - ProSe objects order DiMuroGinsberg Objected to as Judge Clark does not have jurisdiction. Witness George McDermott stated ‘under Oath Judge Page 2: had stated to Michael Wieser “I am so sory I can't collect legal fees for you" ‘The Bullying of Judge Clark to favor Judge Haddock, whom he would not have this job ‘is obvious — that to goto the extreme of 1. October 2012 removing the information that shows his buas by mailing back documents probally submitted into the cour. 2. Wanting me to be found incom fof Mark Stuart to drug and get several inappropriate pictures or raping one of my girs or planting drugs on them arin our home 3. Illegally jailing for legal fees that are obvious using the ails to Further bully me 4. The legal fees are not judgesments / Orders 5. \gnoring the mation to recuse shows Due Process our Constitutional rights to. tral is no important to Judge Clarke 6. The statement in itself to Michael Wieser on November 22, 2015 (should be 2014) says itall “Lam so sorry I can't collect you legal fees” 7. When Janice asked for Due Process Judge Clark stated “Hearing Over” to opponenis Page 3: To opponents lawyers: Give me your Orders I will sign them acts of Divorce Lawyer ‘That Judge Clark had been served by a third party, a Writ of Mandamus and Prokibition {his righ to act asa Judge in these hearing has been filed. ‘A police report and FBI reports have been filed against this judge and he is aware of them ‘The Alexandria Police have chosen to ignore his actionsIN THE ; ‘SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA IN RE: JANICE WOLK GRENADIER PETITIONER / PLAINTIFF — PRO SE POOR PERSON v. NRE: (JUDGE IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA VIRGINIA RESPONDENT / DEFENDANT EMERGENCY PETITON FOR WRIT OF MAMDAMUS — PROHIBITION FOR IGNORING THE LAW THE ACTS AND ACTONS OF JUDGE ARE NO DIFFERENT THAN THE “CASH FOR KIDS” IN PENNSYLVANIA THE JUDGE JAILED JANICE WOLK GRENADIER FOR FINANCIAL GAIN FOR HIMSELF AND HIS FRIENDS — STATED VERY CLEARLY “DUE PROCESS” WAS NOT A DEFENSE IN HIS COURT ROOM That the Orders attached Exhibits 1 and 2 state this and the Judge signed the “ORDERS” knowing they said this - which should be taken as the “TRUTH” and his confirmation for these criminal acts — the appearance is he believes he is so above the law that acknowledging his criminal acts believes it will not matter because he is Policed by his peers and his peer will support his criminal activity ~ due to the lack of integrity — lack of Due Process in the Court Room and on the Bench GOMES NOW Janice Wolk Grenadier petitions the above Court for a Writ of Mandamus and Prohibition to stop the criminal acts and action of JUDGE JAMES CLARK and to VACATE HIS Order's OF DECEMBER 23, 2015 AND 1ALL OTHER ORDERS BY HIM Since 2012. DUE TO LACK OF JURISDICTION FOR RULING IN BIAS, FAVORTISM, CROYNISM, RETALIATION, RETRIBUTION AND FOR PERSONAL AND FRIENDS FINANCIAL GAIN. That when there is no Due Process there is no Statute of Limitations, That it is apparent to even a lay person Judge Clark does not believe in or follow the Law, the Rules of the Supreme Court and of the United States Constitution or the nia Constitution which he is ignoring. That Petitioner requests Oral Argument to present further evidence. That the Petitioner comes to this court to have a Stay on the Case in Virginia Case No. 15- 003661 AND the case opened appro) as it should have been in the District of Columbia where Petitoner_moved this case due to the lack of Intearety in the Vis judiciary. The other choice is to Dismiss this case with Prejudice against Divorce Lawyer llona Grenadier Heckman, That the USDC of the District of Columbia Court is unique in it is the court of "HATE" crimes throughout the United States, but not only that this. is the court when there are multiple jurisdictions as this case has. As well as the main Plaintiff llona Grenadier Heckman being a resident of the District of Columbia since on or around 1987, THAT THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNTIED STATES OF AMERICA IS SUPPOSDLY MORE THAN ANY COURT ‘THE COURT OF THE PEOPLE NOT OF THE JUDGES AND THEIR FRIENDS TO Rule in Bias, Favoritism, Cronyism, Bias, Retribution, 2Retaliation, and for personal or friends financial gain. Petitioner: further reminds the Court she is Poor Pro Se Litigants and the Law: Many prose litigants will use this in ther pleadings; "Pleadings inthis case are being fled by Plaintiff In Propria Persona, wherein pleadings are to be considered? without regard to technicalities. Propria, pleadings are not to be held tothe tame high Standards of perfection as practicing lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner 92 Sct 504, also ‘See Power 914 F2d 1459 (11 Cir1990), also See Hulsey v. Ownes 63 Fid 354 (5th Cir 1995). also Seen Re: HALL v, BELLMON 935 F.2d 1106 (10th Ci. 1991)." Jn Pucketv. Cox, it was held tha a prose pleading requires less stringent reading than one drafted bya lawyer (456 Fad 233 (1972 Sixth Cireult USCA). Justice Block in Conley-v. Gibson 355 U.S. 41 at 48 (1957. "The Federal Rules rejects the aperoach that pleading is a game of skill in which one misstep by counsel may be decisive tothe outecme and accept the principle that the purpose of pleading ito failtae a proper decision on the merits." According to Rule 8() FRCP and the State Court rule which holds that all pleadings shall be construed to do substantial justice" ‘That Petitioner is asking this court for Relief that Judge Clark has violated Several Judicial canons including not limited to Canon 2(A), which states that “lal judae should conduct himself at all times ina manner that promotes ublic confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the ju lary." That it is obvious and even his acts or lack of acts from the bench are obvious along with denying open court hearings and ruling from his Chambers in Janice Wolk Grenadier Divorce case, whom Divorce Lawyer llona Grenadier Heckman had intervened in. That he is not alone his supervising Judge — Judge Lisa Kemler Supports this type of behavior and Judge Nolan Dawkins contributes to it. That 3yreme Court of Virginia needs to step inimmediately. That an injunction to Stay the Orders of December 23, 2015 should be immediately put into place by this court as Judge Clark has not got the integrity to follow the law, the Judicial Canons, the rules of the Supreme Coutt of Virginia or the United States of America, That Judge Clark was very clear ‘Due Process” was not a defense to him That using the Jails to collect money for his friends was not a problem 1. Judge Clark is no different than a soldier of Hitler taking Orders from lawyers and other Judges to protect one of their own and himself for his personal criminal actions. As he did from Lawyer Andrea Mosley when she didn't want documents submitted into the court record that showed the criminal acts of this court and Divorce Lawyer llona Grenadier Heckman, 2. Judge Clark is no different than Judge Bellows who bullied Chris Mackney to suicide — | call it MURDER ~ you can read about it in Mike Volpe’s book — Bullied to Death 3. Judge Clark is no different than Judge Ciavarella from Luzene County PA who went to jail for Cash for Kids for when he stated on November 22, 2014 to Michael Wieser “I am so sorry I can not collect your legal fees for you. You will need to come back for a Judgment” Mr. Wierser never went back for a Judgment nor did DiMuroGinsberg and now Judge Clark has given llona Grenadier Heckman the power to foreclose with no real hearing on Janice Wolk Grenadier’s home - Judge 4Clark is no different then CASH FOR KIDS Judge's Ciavarelta etal That on December 23, 2015 George McDermott under oath that Judge Clark stated to Lawyer Michael Wieser “/ am so sorry / can not collect. your 's for you — you will need to come back for aj ent That the City of Alexandria court has shown a pattern and Practice of denying Due Process to protect one of their Own Divorce Lawyer llona Grenadier Heckman since 2012 by Judge Clark and from ‘September of 2007 by Judge Donald Haddock, Lisa Kemler, Nolan Dawkins, Fortkort, J. Howe Brown, James McGrath all chosen for favor by Judge Donald Haddock, ‘The issues with the facts are: Issue 1: Lack of Jurisdiction by the Judge: That in order for the Judge to have Jurislction they must not show Bias, Favoritism or Cronyism, Retaliation, Retribution. That Judge Clark has shown all five with the appearance of ex- Parte communications, the lack of respect for a ProSe Litigant. On its own initiative, the court has ignored the laws and rules ‘when they did not hold Judges accountable for violating the Judi Canons and denying Petitioner denying any fair hearing in the court where a Judge was chosen fairly. Where all Judge's have been chosen for as stated in May of 2008 by Judge Donald Haddock who stated "You can’t win this we ‘LOVE" llona’” Judge Donald Haddock for his LOVE of Divorce Lawyer llona Grenadier Heckman has Violated all the Judicial Canons,Petitioner has been denied all due process and equal protection guaranteed to other citizens. Based upon the history Circuit judicial conduct, and the involvement of court judges in serious misconduct being exposed by Petitioner, it would be a virtual impossibility for Petitioner to have the constitutional and statutory access to federal court and to the protections and defenses guaranteed by the U.S. form of government, Objection is based upon multiple bases, including the pattern of Court refusal to provide relief from hard-core civil rights violations; the aiding and abetting of these violations; blocking Petitioner from reporting serious state and federal crimes implicating state and federal personnel, including state and federal Judges; due process and equal protection rights. Refusing to address the issues raised by Petitioner, refusing to issue findings of fact and conclusions of ‘aw, has been standard practice of these court judges. ‘The reason for denying Petitioner protections was due to a convoluted series Of corrupt judicial acts associated with a scheme to silence Petitioner's reporting of serious crimes implicating judicial officials, and to block her Constitutional state and federal defenses against the retaliatory acts judicially taken against her. That Petitioner is seeking relief from the order to judicial seizure of her home and looting of Petitioners life's assets after she was forced to exerese Bankruptcy remedies with her divorce where she now realizes Divorce Lawyer llona’s actions were criminal from February 14, 1986 6with Petitioner with Lawyers along with Divorce Lawyer llona Grenadier Heckman lying in all court's shows the pattern and practice of the Federal and State Judiciary of "Scratch my back | will Scratch yours" Petitioner to obtain relief from an ongoing pattern of criminal activity of Divorce Lawyer llona Grenadier Heckman, the banks, the government and the lawyers in judicially- inflicted civil and constitutional violations, 'ssue 2: Lack of Discovery, Admissions and Depositions : That without a Falr hearing, time for Discovery, Admissions and Depositions how can a Plaintiff / this Petitioner put a full ase together. That the Bill of Complaint Clearly States the Claims, Clearly gives evidence of Divorce Lawyer liona Grenadier Heckman et al the Criminal Acts and Actions thru e-mails letters, documents filed in the courts with forged signatures, perjury. That the case Should be Judged as requested by a Jury and not a Judge who is ruling from Chambers and ignoring the Law, denying all fair access to the Courts, Issue 4: Due Process for a Pro Se Litigant: The Judge did not give the Petitioner the ‘ight to argue and show evidence of the “TRUTH”. When the Judge afier Lawyer Andrea Mosley stated “we don't want other information in the record” and the Judge then shut down the hearing basically showed a Collusion to deny Due Process. Which he had already stated “Due Process 7was not an acceptable defense" That it is obvious the Petitioner has been denied Due Process in favor Lawyers and to protect other Judiciary members that have dirty hands. But, not only due process was denied in all hearings, the lawyers lied in documents, and in court. ‘The constitutional and statutory provision directly and indirectly involved in this Petition, each of which is being judicially violated, includes: 1. Due Process protections as guaranteed by the statutes and Constitution of the United States. Fifth Amenciment io the Constitution: No person shall be deprived of Iie, oerty or property, without due process 2. Equal protection ofthe law as available to other citizens, 3. First Amendment right to petition for redress of grievances. Circuit judges / Viginia Legislators / Federal Legislators /JIRC / Virginia State Bar have repeatedly blocked Petitioner's attempts to exercise this right, and when he has exercised it Fourth Circuit judges have retaliated and inflicted great and irreparable personal and {nancial harm upon her. 4 i nt right ted against taking of liberties 7 swithout due process of law, These protections were and are being repeatedly violated by federal judges, destroying - Petitioner's Fifth Amendment rights to be ‘secure in life, liberty and properties, to be free from FEAR of government persecution, and quality of life, wth the additonal violation of inflting great fear ‘upon Petitioner from the corrupt acts. 5, Tille 28 USC Sections 1331, 1343, guaranteeing to a citizen the right to federal court access and protections. Federal judges have repeatedly violated these statutory ‘rights, unlawfully and unconsttutionaly aismissing each and every action, ‘fraudulently placing a frivolous label on the fing to “support” their dismissal actions. Since 2007, state and federal judges have unlawfully and unconstittionaly dismissed every action which sought declaratory and injunctive relief, and which ‘Sought to report the federal crimes.6. Title 28 USC Sections 2201, 2202. State and Federal judges have repeatedly ‘dismissed every action in which Petitioner sought a declaration of Petitioner's personal and property rights, to defend against the taking of his assets in a sham, with 10 hearings. That this court in supporting Judge Clark et al has denied al FAIR ‘access to the courts. 7, Title 42 USC Sections 1983-1966. patter of judicialy-infcted civ rights violations, ‘perpetrated initially in the District of Columbia Court, then the Eastem Division of Alexandria courts, City of Alexandra Circuit Courts and then expanded by the ‘Supreme Court of Virginia who in Petitioners 1# and 2°¢ appeal denied law used in Tue, Dee 24, 2013 at 2.05 PM. Want to hear something more scarier contacted IlonaEly Freedman Grenadier Heckman your witch hunt is over Fromm: Leahbast2M-asheon Tue, Dee 24,2013 ‘To: jwrendier gmail comm ‘pps rest YOU DOT Hu" ews YOU ARE THE KIND THAT WOULD TURN. FTHEMIN fecauSe ONE PERSON SOMETHING TOYDU Ma Was vee ols aee Nee EO AND YOU LEON LNs FAMLY REJECTED YOU FORNOT GENO JEWISH You Tun cov, YOU WERE REJECTED... cer nitr nro Your Tex Sk. NOWYOU ARE Wand UP STORES ND eraBADNO uss! BLAMING ALL JEWS LIKE HITLER FOR NOT LIVINGON EASY STREET neu crror your 0 coon vovtosrs vou over wuss ounseus wo o0:0 YOU ARE THE NAZI WORSE A MUSLIN LOVING NAZI isso, YOUSELP TTS WHY OU ANTE DWE REE RNSThat Judges and Lawyers to ignore the above e-mail is a disgrace and should be an embarrassment to the United States of America. That the Jewish community Supports an e-mail such as that with Billions in support going to that country should be a wake up call for all Americans. That fact we send our Young men and women to fight for rights Petitioner does not have in her own country is a disgrace to the United States of America. JUDGES LACK OF JURISDICTION TO VOID STATUTORY AND CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS Obviously, judges, entrusted to uphold the laws and Constitution of the United States, lack jurisdiction to: * Void the rights and protections quaranteed under our form of government, laws, and Constitution, © Deny to any citizen the right to a declaratory judgment and injunctive lief for the hard-core violations of federally protected rights stated in the complaints ar an by reference to cour Virginia Circuit Courts running as A Racketeering Enterprise - Federal offenses related to refusing to perform a duty: Judges have the Fesponsibiities, the duty, to receive testimony and evidence of the state and ‘federal crimes that Petitioner discovered, and to provide declaratory and injunctive relief from the gross violations raised in Petitioner's state and federalCauses of actions. Refusal to perform these responsibilities violate federal statutes, including, inter alia: A. Title 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Jurisdiction and duty to provide a federal court forum for relief from violations of federally-protected rights, B, Tile 28 U.S.C. § 1343, Makes any person who fails to prevent or aid in the prevention of civil/constitutional violations, who has the power to do 80, financially liable to the party that suffers the harm, ©. Title 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 through 1986. Financially liability for refusing to prevent the harm associated with civil rights violations FAILURE TO PERFORM A DUTY TO PROVIDE RELIEF D. Culpable omission of a fiduciary duty to receive evidence of federal crimes and fallure to provide relief. Itis a federal offense for any officerjiudge to refuse fo Stated herein. Failure to perform a duty constitutes an assault or battery, a federal offense, when a federal official fails to perform a duty to act. See W. LaFave & A. Scott, Criminal Law 21011 (2d ed. 1986). in People v. Burden, 72 Cal App.3d 603. (1977) similar analysis was utlized. The principal of culpable omissions is no stranger to federal law. For instance, Tile 28 USC § 1343 makes any person lable for damages when that person fail to prevent or aid in the prevention of cv ight violations, and the victim suffers harm. In Califomia, for instance, See Barclay’s Oficial Calitomia Code of Regulations, Tite 11, 1081 (1991), the law requires, ‘among other things, that officers prevent crime, protect life, ensure equal justice, and ‘blow the whistle on unethical fellow officials. Califomia Government code section 1222, approvingly cited in People v. Pringlo, 151 Cal.App.2d 754, 858 (1984), allows ‘punishment of afcers for faliag to pertorm their duties ‘where no special provision is: ‘made for the punishment of such delinquency.” defendants wilfuly falled, and refused, to protect Stich, knowing that Stich was ‘suffering great and imeparable harms, and that these harms would continue to occur. BDefendants‘ failure and refusal to act occurred with the full knowledge ofthe criminal ‘nature of their refusal, Defendant's guity mens rea is clearly establishod, F. Guilty of betrayal of a trust. Federal judges have the duty to uphold the laws and Constitution of the United States; to provide constitutional and statutory protections to « person suffenng from the violations of federally protected rights. Violating these protections, aiding and abetting those committing the violations, makes the federal Judges quity of a betrayal ofa trust. G. Duty to report criminal acts under California Penal Code. California Penal Code section 387, requires a corporate manager or executive who had actual knowledge of 4 serious concealed danger to notify the appropriate regulatory agency within 15 ‘days. Failure to do so constitutes a felony. This would include reporting criminal acts. H. Guilty of felonies, including: {aficting harm upon a vietim or informant (18 USC § 1512, 1513) * Inficting harm upon a citizen in retaliation for exercising rights and protections under the laws and Constitution of the United States. * Misprision of felonies, obstruction of justice, becoming an accomplice, and other federal crimes, Petitioner would classify the Virginia Circuit courts as a racketeering enterprise. This group of judges have consistently blocked the reperting of major criminal activities implicating state and federal officials. it has persecuted concemed citizens seeking to expose this corruption. In Petitioner's case these Judges have inflicted enormous personal and financial harm through a pattern of record-setting civil right violations through misuse of the federal judiciary. JUDGES HAVE, AND ARE, INFLICTING, AND CAUSING To BE INFLICTED, GREAT HARM UPON PETITIONER AND THE UNITED STATES of AMERICA CITIZENS‘The actions by judges ignoring Petitioner's attempts to report criminal activities by state and federal officials and others make possible the Continuation of the criminal and subversive activities discovered by Petitioner ‘and other present and former federal and state personnel and investigators. ‘These same judges ere blocking Petitioner's attempts to expose the judicial Corruption in proceedings that impoverish thousands of people yearly, and is denying Due Processto the Petitioner, Petitioner has attached as Exhibit 3 the Statement of Facts for the Appeal as to ‘What took place on December 23, 3016. SUMMARY ‘The issues are serious. They are of great national importance. With the nation’s increasing attention to crimes, these crimes by state and federal judges (and the underying crimes being covered up) are of far greater gravity, and sets the mindset for government and nongovernment conduct throughout the United States. No reasonable person could fail to recognize the aravity ‘of this rampant judicial corruption occurring under the auidance of the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court RELIEF REQUESTED State and Federal law dictates prompt and meaningful relief, which should include: That all Documents that Plaintiff has fled should be used in assessing these issues,Relief requested: A stay in the State of Virginia on any and all hearing as well as an immediate Judge assigned to this case who will hear it on its merit, the documents, the discovery and all "TRUTHS" supposedly your best defense. Wherefore this court should on it's calendar as soon as possible schedule Oral Arguments in regard to the above allegations, or a Trial by Jury if applicable should be had by Petitioner Janice Wolk Grenadier, Exhibits Attached: Exhibit _| Description Pages 7 ‘Order for Diviurolnaberg — te lal page ea ped page of what |g Janice wrote by hand for easier reading z Order for TroutmanSanders ~ the lasl page i a ped page of what 1G Janice wrote by hand fr easier reacing 3 ‘Siatoment of Facis from Court Daled December 3, 2075 as vo Cour L Reporter present for Appeal to Supreme Court of Virginia 4 Matin for Judge Clark o recuse himself denied on Dec 23, 2078 5 ‘cle outine on some of he eininal acts - Murder for Hire eal [4 a) 1, Janice Wolk Grenadier, am the Defendant inthis action. 1 personally set forth the allegations ‘of fact in this Answer and Counter Claim Cross Complaint, and I hereby declare under penalty of Perjury that each of said allegations i true and correct. Date: December 252015 ‘Alexandria, Virginia 22301 ‘Telephone (202) 368-7178, Email juprenadier@pmailcom Subscribed swan before me 28 Fy ot eager, 2015 ei Ce aaa PR He My commission expies: ___/@ !5/, eres tes SE aye@ COMPLAINT MalL To: sludicial Inquiry and Review Commission Post Office Box 367 Richmond, Virginia 23218-0367 "Note: The Commission does not accept fax or e-mail complaint, Name of Judge Location of Court Date of incident Name: (printedypaa) “ * aT Pa Tay SRSERSAY Mitel WE Grenada cones Telphone: Ait 208 7/797 Address: Note: The Comnission does not accept unsigned complaint, Revied: 0405 05,‘Janice Wolk Grenacfer «15 West Spang Street ‘Alexandra, Virginia 22901 \arenacior@ gmail.com 2-368-7 178 August 20, 2014 ‘Ms Katherine B. Bumett Judicial Inquiry and review Commission ‘Apo 100 North Ninth Street Corporate Headquarters Florence Building 111 North Figgins Ave, Suite 200 Missoula, Mt 50802 Richmond, Viginia 23219 Judge James Clark 520 king Strest Aerancia, Viginia 22314 ‘ie: Janice Wok Grenacer Pro Se, Plantit— ‘morrow Jane 2014 KATHERINE 8. BURNETT. LE: Ration and Fetaatn ning a enderce of Detencant, nee ater Hora Ey Freedman Greader Heckman wo mit her, Michael Waser and he cham oe ole Car eee chosen 10 meace Judge Haddock who LOVED ILONA™.lgaing the lao Horest Socs ne Sona Zuma society, you scratch my back, wih the beleve Thowe’s nothing you can do?" jour went eee ar ie ne Roe ftiniate Bulle lit wth fl tne as aprox. $3000 in leg oes sanctioned lor nyo ea hs ved ‘On September 12,2007 ona Grena La Gmc tt hs ut won my aoe no Aue Mas a ony ing to iin cout The Skapay Seon ee Teas sere eects of Eau tates, ue Process, Bind Jus. Honest Series and the despane resi oaNas ans os Do ss a kee peony cl Krona ore nan Hoe wy, hugh gee may + S307 mnt, a constenal nd opis, anpetng wih dees, mal Wl, Sen Sony oe ex pare communicators, hansame a abelian a his ren ad cnc ans ots ey on. Accoing tue Cla th FAC asied hm ha was ws Mo tno mcle ae cece ene Wok Girma aye natin sen ae eng mene rasa hed, along them an coun, tem cout dour. The atorays hae teen pas nha Sat eae inawer coses and cuts and the Supreme Couts when ol niuenced by Fatriism and Cromiam ci hold due accountable when thc knowing anc wing actions fl outside the Boundaries” ol thei fob deserilon, Theil et {ollow simple quielinesof thelr fost makes a Judge's action na ongera judicial act but an indviduel net ae act represents their own prejudices and goals. Case Law also state tha when a Judge acs a's besoensa of te tow, when a Judge does rat flow the law, he then loses subject matter Junsdiction and Ihe surges ordere'ee COS ot rae | docuneriod, an oeraheing amour of dence of dudlal Misconduct; Criminal Misconduct, deny of Honest Services nat ited to Conpacy; Collusion: Obstnicton of Justice. Tampering win Evers Malt Feane Honest Senes Fraud; Exorion; Harassment; Gang acy: Racketeeang, Retaition, Disrimination, a. Misconduct [Eile In Ofice ot wit decisions mado in bad ah fora compl purpose, deliberately and tertenaly fae tolow the law Extra aud Egreius legal amor; Vian of Procedural Pee: Valen ol Dee Proven Vee of Consitutena tts pr Tile 42.5.0, 1981, 1983, Tle 18 US. C. 241 & 242; Vigna Cade 1? ios Tee Cannons of sudcil Conduct and ies of Professanal Conduct have been ignered by all This nace gran eth the ght Koad others ata later cate, TOR aaHONS ne lst you mmunty andthe pretecien of yourjb, as my complaint was not neste, and aconting {2 tue Cart he was ghen the go med by youto sentence mot al and Frito legal les mit fh gun tne et nimi and Buly. Tat uke Car Questioning the honesty or Paintin Cou shows he ed nt red sy of Sts Baguners an evcerce wich shows Paiit hes ho “TRUTH on her sdethe beet daores coe cay raw Janie Wolk Grenadier aoooteri7e ‘arenadiee@amat cam “The appearance of Justice is just as important as Justice itself “ Judge Kloch in his letter of apology and to recuse himself. \d Review Commission. vs eee ara, Neh govern the conduc and cons of al jstes and judges ofthe Commanweath, retired jules and Frame ale fr real jul sevice, subst judges and spacel juste, judges po tempore nic sete ‘doe pro tempore and all mambers ofthe State Corporation Commision and Vina Werkrs’Compenceton {mison, cn be fou in Fart 6, Secon I ofthe Rules ofthe Supreme Couto Vigna, Rules tte eal URS governing proceedings before de Juco Iauky ard Review Commission § 17-202 Powers and dierop Commision conn: The Common veel withthe per and albeit ns rewicce hoger aco azarae ice which wold be the bass fr eetiemen, ensure remelofaiadee aedec AG We Gon 10ofthe Consiaon of Vireia and the poisons is chaptercven though abet ade aa re ce ce teow aie The Conmssion. fer such inves ctiomasitdcens neces, mat atderindcondhetheaeiine ek occ slur the Commonscalthaxit shlldcremine. the Commision fs the chars whe well fanloduad afer e heats reine censor remial of leit mafia nal compl beret Seprone Cour tn Goa Sul have haart mec mot confi withthe provirus haplersrof cemioinn ee em ee Hyriteninercombucted es. No utof the Coumsio sabe validuntesccamturel ets beemipat aria a Se. ISK IG 2072195, 215760500 ed)@ @ @ Exhibit 3 JUDGE JAMES CLARK 1) The Ceult Couto Azania id ot fl te paper work rough roger haanl fhe Supreme Court of Vega is beleved Refers Bowen Pet wa chosen wen he suppor fhe Supreme Couto Vinita e work in cason wih tne sthr Detendan 2) November 21,2011 Order sppiing ssge Rar Bowen Pot by The ‘Supreme Count Chet Justes Cynthia. Keer “To preside over tan ay ‘Proceedings on Monday, February 12,2012 2) Novombor 21,2011 Latter hon Paci G. Davo dg Rchard Pot at habe presi oe the regu season othe Ged Say “Tete one Pete M shesied atthe ‘Niges Fave ocesed terns ar Bare 4 Swot onto ay: Bp fi rts Cg ek Bare Fake cor oom, Savoie eet ou Pasa Fro a 73-7464829 5) January 4, 20%2 Lote Randy Song Conmonvestn Amey 6 ge Potee informing hen refuse JG i Font of the Grand uy ae Pai intone hi ‘wines’ (ator can be ound under Extib 16) 5) Pitt conics Supre Court egatng tera ord anyone cn we {o 14uoge Quaaton Vinen Par wooo te Che! dation he eter wr, ew gvento hen te Plat had twee the Cento Gut Pata Herengton wo ore her 7) sanwary 4, 2012 eter fom Meghan 8 Raber testing Pirie og ‘ton ver S200 For acons of code a pum RY pated my deny, Callen wit Randy Senge in wtp scaiitmcete Pai 8) sanwary 7, 2012 Lott JNG to Meghan. Roberts naneton eying nd ‘eaton iy that se ad epoke wen he Cade Enforcement and he ead st fatim wean was dora 8) January 8, 202 Lett Th Honarabe Cyto Kinser hit ustewo ‘gins Supreme Cour «Paint aa not vend oer conversation wt ecg Robelon ha anyone can wre a udge aloe. Thelsaua bark ne Ce Courtard mut be salwn inti Grout Cour *0}Janwary 8, 20%2 Fed Men fr sanctions aps Randy Senge conmonesth ‘tomoy fr ita go Pater, ERRNO peepee a mmen@ ‘1 Janary 1,202 race tobe hear on any 25,2012 +12) .anwary 24,2012 Leber tor Law Ga Chev Court ot Anantha my Maton for Saniora aga ir Sengel woul be hear by hdge Pat. Once agen he Cot Court ot Asana dows tt fotow ha nde '9)January 24 2012 Judge Clark say ston is Docket Ne was unaware ot ‘Wh bere hin. The Corpn iso inthe Cou Hause Tha he has ne* ‘eeu hina snd wae goat “Webrusr 1.2012 - Maton flee canard E¢ Somoran Clk Court answor ‘ipl qt about Grand uy Sie Alara has shown fe pt Neto ‘otow the Ue of be curs Hwa reasoner Pai ask Dai uestons which he reuse answer, Moe! ay he dosn't naw th Basi nes Pare fd on Feb for Motion be ad on Fabry 8, 2012 bythe new ope Judge Cla who had no recived ha rm eating te ese Yel "eted tear Moto aganst Randy Senge 18) February 2.2012 Leter Gs Couto Alexandra Moton Sanctons apn! Ea ‘Semonantabeheat a Sam Febnary 13,2012 by. tuge Pater 0) February 7.2042 Ltr to Crt Curt Judges & Eat Semonian Plat planed on bong in cout on Fabry, 2012 fat udge Cake nt rove Nea ‘TFebruary 8, 2012 Judge Carin court cons he has not recused meet ‘rom tho mat and tat tian’ on his dock. Yet Judge Clark thon hrm end saya yo Lam gong thar tis even hough la nat on my dosha 8 Judge Poter as Judge inthe Stata of Vigna took the ftowing Oath 22 Tawyor thon again tude under Rae § 4 aie yo gt hand, lease “Do you cll Sar aie tat yo wl ‘pper e Corataon af the United Sses tne Ganstsion oe ‘Sores of Vg, nd te You wl ety, nono prteasonly, tnd courteously damenn youre te prac oftaw an ee your oe of ‘Stormy sw othe bet four abit, sop you Gas?” ‘hla ae oxth than by newt arta Imam ach yor a the Supreme Courter nha ‘Ax 3 Judge the flowing Ont § 40, Fom of general oat regu of fee ‘ne Thera ae Txte very pron before entring upon te carpe fay futon aan fear ft Conmerweath shal ke and aubscrne te ose cet 2 slo sa (afi) at wt spp he Conan oo ‘Ary person rerponied toa ‘abaequen! om bog ‘ide Cin needed acne Nose the pt wanoharmy maton. The ws ‘dno tthe Cou ar vr car. By ha recuning Hack ty secon he ‘Suppose comup banaue th ahr Delenans, nines Anacne 1 Oametotee RRR ne Ca nceo: | sll we (oe) wl go 8 Conn fe Uni Ste he Cima of Common Vin ant yagi eh tne athe Cel Cot th ight ua Ct scien fay ty. ete al) York er — Tsisteer JAMES: CLARK eS 1, ha td et ied by he ls Be (common Vip quay barb dca eat Adee @ LZ the Cea Court ight Set Ct Ft ey Carts Ts elec Sere ceo weer Bee IMEDLATLY usc of some Sean Bu Sree Ca Do) ‘rab sy ands el gosh Saray be Cones etek ‘CtiotrPink us fie fas 2 canon Pine SENS slate ots 111 Be mo Soe Pr ndeOveez, Maye Ho. foe hide Jones C Coe Fivesvinons, 'NUTHE CIRCUIT COURE FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA JANICE WOLK GRENADIER Paint * ae No.cHoIOKS4 (GRENADIER INVESTMENT CO.,LTD eta Defedans ORDER "Having raion he Pat Oppo t Orr by Jug Ck on Stement of st Spon 26,2012 hited yh Pion Dace 17,202 ope ‘ox mid Oppsiton dors conn eva informatica sit peri te ine mate, eb ‘ORDERED th the Sof Pos Oppiono Onder by fulgs Cu on Steet of Fat or Sepa 25,201 i denied FNTERED is ¢ 2. dey of Deere, 202. tah Copies ted Jisice Wak Grea, 15. Sp Suet. ‘Nenana S01 Mitel 1, Woe, Eagie Alceniis,VA' 2316 John MT, sie HOI Klag See Sete 10 Alec, VA 2314 ere |vinemnia: |THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA JANICE WOLK GRENADIER Phin : case No. Hoos nEUADIER EET CO, LTD. ORDER ving ction he Ps Oppson wo Onder by Jue Chee Sateen ctf Spebe 25, 22st by he Pinion Deen 17, 2012 ad aperng "td Oppsition docs tent eva iafeaton it pris theta er is ry ‘ORDERED ht th ig of Pins Opps o One by Budge ik on Stsemest of Fae fo Beptomb 26, 2012 i doe FNTIRED is £7 ay of Decent, 2012. Bac a an Pc Lia eee aa . ated ete Sift ‘Alexa, VA' 22514 meunacnels tot ay Sica Se io Aennd, VA 2314 ones |VIRGINIA: INTHE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA JANICE WOLK GRENADIER, Phin, ” Case No. CH 010654 GRENADIER INVESTMENT CO, LTD, etal, Defendants, re one fit THIS MATTER cae hve he Cot is 2h dy of Saete, 202 pon ‘AMidavit submited by counsel for Defendants Grenadier Investment Cox Lid and ona Grenadier and it ‘storey’ fe incured by those defendant itis hereby APPEARING thi copy ofthe Advi an Notice ofthe eter Orders rng sen ‘oe Pain by couse fr Defendants Greater Investment Ca, Ll and lona Gratien, ORDERED that ht james be ented guns Janice Wolk Grenadier infvor of Dende Grenade Investment Co, Li, and Homa Grenier and th aie Wolk Grenadier Se witin 0 days of ety of this Onkr pay wo Hon E. Grenadier co the fim of DiMuroGinsberg, F.C. 1101 King Street, Suite 610, Alexandria, Virginia 22314 the sum ofoe: Jo2e = as and for her atomey’s fees expended as « result of the motions and opposions decided thie days AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADIUDGED and DECREED that the endorsement Of this Onder and atached Order ate dispensed with under Ve. Sup. C. Rule 1:13 and tha he Clerk ofthe Court provide a copy of tht Onder to the pres inthe seladdessed stamped envelope provided hereto, AND This CRDER Is Finsa— ENTERED this_27 day of September, 2012 -———__— JANICE WOLK GRENADIER John M. Tran (VSB #24349) 15 W. Spring Street DiMuroGinsberg,P.C. Alexandria, Virginia 22301 1101 King Street, Suite 610 Jwolkgrenadier@aol.com ‘Alexandria, VA 22314 (703) 684-4333 (telephone) Plaintiff pro se Counsel for Iona Grenadier (708) 548-3181 (fesimile) ‘and Grenadier Investment, Co. | Michael 1. Weise, Esq (VSB #17630) 510 King Street, Suite 416 ‘Alexania, Vigiria 22314 (703) 836-7003 (telephone) | (703) 548-4742 (fesimile) Counsel for David M. Grenadier e Ome eae@ vinci: INTHE CIRCUMT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA JANICE WOLK ORENADIER Print, * (case Ne, cHo1oG5s |LONA ELY FREEDMAN GRENADIER ‘Aka LONA HECHUAN, and (GFENADIER INVESTEMENT CO, LTD etal, bot DAVID MARK GRENADIER Dotendants ‘Opposition to Order by Judge Clark on Statement of Facts for September 26, 2012 ‘de Cnt oes ou aco what has recent comet the Pitt strton the elu between tudes and Defeat lana Grenier tet ty were oon for ’sonnatin on Pato decare her ncorpetent fe ry futher norco gentomen asa arco Defendant ona wan to dg Panu getter oe Wiles@ ‘Plt can show ew pattem ofthe Cteut Court of Ateanda ag hse tht ‘reno apa of tho Ole Boy Network Example reer 1 ‘ke Feil - The court ofcias known at thie time are: the Clerk of the Court Edward Semeonian J, the Commissioner Chancery Michael Wetser, the Honorable Chief and Presiding ludge Lise & emir, and attorney aS. Soul The proceedings referenced by this Pettion ere: 09-001130, cH 04001230, and CL.05-001284- £586 17- Of Michael Fils Petion fr Wit of Mandamus & Prohibition tothe Supreme Court of Virginia Reads site court offi’ improper conduc i not limited to Mr. Fe andthe rete soughtin the Petition is of significant pubic Imponance. For example had the cour officials performed their mandated ministerial, utes in these proceedings, the bankrupty of General Motors andthe government's subsetuent mut-billon dollar balou ofthe "reser ond the “old” GMAC would have been avoided, Instead Mr. Feld and his counsel have been obstructed from seeing {ele and dened acces tothe records atthe Cult Court for the City of ‘Alexanca by threats of physical harm and the unethical behavior evidence inthis Petition, g 2 (3 2 Hf EE aia oS, OU HG a na ESAT a ‘Setaand ean by commit Chey Wea tami oie a ha.@ Pape on nario steno it Lt adr or wh asertiv Wesng Tne, ‘pase oat ont ost te ea ene ag Ss a eka Oe ino an tie Sagas ‘Sent nd even Ge cna este tT 6(phono vas ait yaar Atay et Eso Oot Meza Tin Buea neato ye Cancale See oe Sce = ‘igor Ba ny tn don At srg etry trip ites As Tes a ow eee een Gd ar mere emacs Ace ce ripen tear ape ae Panetta amt ‘rcp cang pra lab ~pr we From tn ene Spe Deron ead pce Fgeeaan12c¥.0) OC Facer Cu nl pen OC a eto ieprn eae ycroyexsend ds pasa yee rg sow upto once tg th nh say uaon. Roce bre Te ine errs of tees aie, Mater pratt Coa casera ing mths Mein for Reiwerent he Cid ihe eset of nest eal dion ‘np byte blather who en $0 milion et worth welcooneced ‘Washing DC tgs wye i evence ins bed DC, VA. nd MD jes ‘od ofits chee his nw cog 6 ea Lidmpiag ei coecalnce cog ‘Scpopr frum spn ack ator sre the Potomac Rie tag bn, neta cases with promise of plo vers inching wane with ‘scmoendntons orig ounppinonet. Evidence was un ote ste cout and fica of te ilies pate rc of oto ead ‘ead po cours te rimialesvy, bt tht evdeace war cooley noe ‘tigi king lak of pay fo he Mather and Ci who re ti of Interest seul retin and ape, cacy ext timo, nd harmed yor ‘fal to be core no songs Cid by Wika Ea Walle. “Jug Ca further des not go ht te at hat he had recused ims by a ‘anpaarace inthis case on 1. January 25, 2012 not hearing 8 Maton ed appropiate Wi he Gorse conradMSBE VIRGINIA: ® INTHE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA JANICE WOLK GRENADIER, : Pinu, Cove No, HL OL0654 GRENADIER INVESTMENT CO., LTD, et al, Defendants. it. ORDER Fi THIS MATTER came before the Court this 26th day of September, 2012 upon the Affidavit submitted by counsel for Defendants Grenadier Investment Co., Ltd and tlona. Grenadier and it @ APPEARING THAT by two separate Orders entered earlier in the day on September 26, 2012, copies of which are attached and incorporated into this Order, the Court found in favor of all Defendants and furher found that Plaintiff had violated Va. Code § 8.01-271.1 and awarded atomey’s fees to the Defendant David M. Grenadier and further granting leave to counsel for Defendants Grenadier Investment Co., Lid and Hlona Grenadier to submit an Affidavit for the atiomey’s fees incur by those defendants, itis hereby [APPEARING that a copy of the Afidavit and Notie ofthe earlier Orders are being sent ‘othe Plait by counsel for Defendanss Grenadier Investment Co. Ltd ad lon Grenadier; ORDERED that that judgment be entered against Janice Wolk Grenadier in fvor of Defendants Grenadier Investment Co.,Ltd. and lana Grenadier and that Janice Wolk Grenadier stall within 30 days of entry of this Order pey to tlona E. Grenadier c/o the firm of DiMuroGinsberg, P.C. at 1101 King Street, Suite 610, Alexandria, Virginia 22314 the sum of @a sZoce. as and for her ‘attorney's fees expended as a result of the motions and ‘oppositions decided this day; AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED thatthe endorsement oF this Order and attached Orders are dispensed with under Va. Sup. Ct, Rule 1:13 and thatthe Clerk of the Court provide a copy of this Order to the partes in the self-addressed stamped envelope provided hereto. AMO Ts OPE 1s ude ENTERED this 27 day of September, 2012 DiMuroGinsberg, Pc. 101 King Street, Suite 610 Alexandria, VA 22314 (703) 684-4333 (telephone) (708) 548-3181 (facsimile) Counsel for Iona Grenadier ‘and Grenadier Invesment, Co. Michael J. Weiser, Esq. (VSB #17630) 510 King Stret, Suite 416 Alexandria, Virginia 22314 (703) 836-7003 (telephone) (703) $48-4742 (facsimile) Counsel for David M, Grenadier mah uit Court for the City of Alexandria Alexandria, Virginia 2301 Ls Plaintiff pro se JANICE WOLK GRENADIER John M. Tran (VSB #24349) 15 W. Spring Street@ VIRGINI IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA JANICE WOLK GRENADIER, Plainti, ™ ‘Case No. CH 010654 GRENADIER INVESTMENT CO,, LTD, etal, | Defendants. ee Fintt, OnpER THIS MATTER came before the Cour this 26th day of September, 2012 upon the AMidevit submited by counsel for Defendants Grenadier Investment Cox Lid and tona Grenadier and it ‘APPEARING THAT by wo separate Onder entered cali in the day on September %6, of which are atached and incorporated into this Onder, the Court found in favor Ai Defendants and futher found that Plant had Volated Vo. Code § .01-271.1 and avaned ‘storey’ fs the Defendant David M, Grenar and frthr grating leave to counsel fe Defendants Grenadier Ivesinent Ca, Ld and Hons Greater o submit an AMiavit for the sttomey’s ees incured by those defendants its hereby APPEARING tat «copy of the Afidavit and Note ofthe eater Orders are being set ‘ethe Pain by counsel for Defendants Ornate lnvesinent Co, Li. and llona Grenadier ORDERED that that judgment be entered agains Janice Wolk Grenadier in tor of Defendants Grenadier Invesnent Co, Lid and ena Grenadier an hat Janice Wolk Grenadier ‘tall within 30 days of entry of this Onder pay to Mona E. Grenadier clo the firm of DiMrodinsher, P.C. at 1101 King Steet, Suite 610, Alexansia, Virginia 22514 the sum ofsZeee. ‘oppositions decided this day; 85 and for her auomey’s fees expended as a result of the motions and AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the endorsement of this Order and attached Orders are dispensed with under Va, Sup. Ct, Rule 1:13 and that the Giek ofthe Court provide a copy ofthis Order tothe pares in the seltadressed stamped envelope provided hereto. AWD TEs OPE Is Fut ENTERED this, 5? day of September, 2012 ma ‘Cour for the City of Alexandria >" John M. Tran (VSB #24349) DiMuroGinsberg, PC. 101 King Street, Suite 610 ‘Alexandria, VA 22314 (703) 684-4333 (telephone) (703) 548-3181 (facsimile) Counsel for Mona Grenadier ‘and Grenadier Investment, Co. anaes Sic couse Bee cn | counselor Dovid M Grenadier 15 W. Spring Street ‘Alexandria, Vi Plaintiff pro se oo JANICE WOLK GRENADIER@ VIRGINIA: INTHE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA JANICE WOLK GRENADIER, Praia, . (Case No. CH 010654 GRENADIER INVESTMENT CO, LTD, etal, ; Defendants, ee ‘ORDER THIS MATTER came before the Cour this 26 day of September, 2012 upon Defendants Mona Grenadier and Grenadier Investment Co, Lid. Motion to Quash the Lis Pendens, for an award of Attomey's Feet Pursuant to Code § 8.01-271.1 and an Order Saring Plinit from FurherFvolows Fins. Upon consideration of memoranda fied in ‘PPer and in opposton the Moon, argument of counsel an saements by Plain and for ‘he reasons stated in cour iis hereby ORDERED thatthe Motion is GRANTED; nd its furher ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED:@@ ENTERED this °2¢ day of Setember, 2012. ‘SEEN AND AGREED: oa John M, Tran (VSB #24345) OL King Stet, Suite 610 ‘Alexandria, VA 22314 (703) 684-4333 (telephone) (703) 548-3181 (foesimile) Counsel for Hona Grenadier ‘and Grenadier Invesiment, Co, MICHAEL J, WEl R, ESQ, By: — Michaels Weiser, Big, (VSB FI7650) 510 Ki Suite 416 ‘Alexandria, Virginia 22314 (703) 836-7003 telephone) (703) 548-4742 (fcamile) Course for David M, Grenadier SEEN AND OBJECTED TO TOR ‘CTED TO FOR REASONS | ‘STATED IN COURT: JANICE WOLK GRENADIER ‘15 W. Spring Steet Alexandria, Virgin wolkrenaiier@solcom Plaintiff prose 2301 a@ VIRGINIA: INTHE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA JANICE WOLK GRENADIER, Prati, (Case No. CH 010684 GRENADIER INVESTMENT CO.,LTD, etal, Defendants, ee ORDER THIS MATTER came before the Cout tis 260 dey of Sepemben, 2012 pon Defendants Hone Grentcier and Greater Invesinent Co, Lid. Motion tp Quash the Lis ‘aor snd ston te Motion pune’ of oul and sateen by Pn and the esos sed in cour, seh ORDERED thatthe Motion is GRANTED; anit futher ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED: et HE Cuete oF ae cower Renae Me Funes mn Wises eh EL tes tk tee Us Asean Inerney 2, Fi Mt, he Ne. tot. Guarantee a@ENTERED: é day of September, 2012, nae Coan Tore Ciy of Alexandria ] SEEN AND ORFECTED TO FOR RENSONS ] ‘SEEN AND AGREED? SraTebneount omen JANICE WOLK ORENADIER ae Sh "a ran 08 aS BW paps tit Rape Alcon 2901 dese : Cae eS clon) tr seeier coe Petar oust fr tone Grender Po cscs ® acHzt WEISER E50 ‘tana Wagiatt Gopasetootemss [ese om or Did M. Greate > Wade Soe@ VIRGINIA: INTHE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA JANICE WOLK GRENADIER, Plain, (Case No. CH 010654 GRENADIER INVESTMENT CO.,LTD, etal, Defendants, Se ‘ORDER ‘THIS MATTER came before te Court this 264 day of Sopember, 2012 pon Defeats Homa Grenadier and Creates Inesment Coy Lid. Moin to Quuh te Lis Pendens, fran award of Atomey’s Fees Pusu © Va. Cade § 801-2714 and an Onder ings. Upon consideration of memoranda filed in “oper sale opposition te Main, amen of oun and satemens by Pini and for Barring Plaintiff fiom Further Frivolous the reasons stated in cout itis hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED; ed itis further ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED: Tie WE CLR 0 me Conte Rene Me Funes m thsétee Aint Fite. Eutls_A_eemtiet A. Aneanver Inerrenr es, ch BM le Me. ont Courant Reem Fieing eM Lite 8 De Cate Neon te La Beas ee —— A PeR ES Wired We Le Popes tee Rect) RL Rat—Tte_ Ls Peaen oe THe lever ce ie Quer 5 Deere Fame —_ a ——There_foreniea Fitinos Be Fist sutmebleot. hte. Ln Cone, vit Po.ENTERED ths 26 day of Seprember, 2012. 15 W. Spring Sect John MTran (VSB #34345) 1101 King Steet, Suite 610 “Alexandria, VA 22314 (703) 684-4333 (telephone) (703) 548-3181 (facsimile) Counse for lona Grenadier ‘and Grenadier Investment, Co. MICHAEL J, WEISER, ESQ. Weise, Esa, (VSB FIT7630) i Suite 416 ‘Alexandria, Virginia 22314 (703) 836-7003 (telephone) (703) 548-4742 (facsimile) Counsel for Davie M. Grenadier wAS Court for the City of Alexandria ] SEEN AND OBJECTED 70 FOR REASONS STATED IN COURT: JANICE WOLK GRENADIER Alexandria, Virginia 230) iwolkerenadier@soL.com Plain prose 1D ote SeVIRGINIA: INTHE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA JANICE WOLK GRENADIER Plain, “ Case No. cHot08s4 ILONA ELY FREEDMAN GRENADIER etal . And GRENADIER INVESTEMENT CO,, LTD et al, eae And Gaya DAVID MARK GRENADIER 5 - Defendant —" 1g on September 26, 2012 in the Circuit Court of the City of Alexandria Filed to perfect Order by Judge Clark on October 12, 2012 approving Plaintiff's Appeal Notice Sates NOW JANICE WOLK GRENADIER, PLAINTIFF fles Statement of Facts from the ilegal Orders by Judge Clark — wna had recused himself rom hearing Plaintiff's Motions in the past ~ Paning ad received in May of 2012 a letter stating he woud oo arty to legal action against him by Paint. that his actions on September 26, 2012 were wat Prejudice and that Piaintf has stil not had her day in court according to Brody v. Connecticut, That ie Judges have been ruling on Favoritism and Cronyism not the Law and the Rules ofthe Supreme Got ererRtamber 26,2012 the foliowing piture shows the Notebook of evidence that was summited (ian Judge and copies tothe Defendant's attorneys with ms Objections by Defendants attomey's Wer, fed by Judge Clark. Judge Clark allowed al evidence rest Notebook to be put into the recordThe Judge never had thom on the bench - which is unture ah Clerk from Judge's chambers then gave Plalntif the choice of taking Plainttrs Exhibits destroyed ~ or they would beOn October 13, 2042 in the Mail Pl laintiffrecei Opened from the Circuit Court of. Alexandria Fesponse to the request the following Order Ce 2007. Plaintif was served in 1 Plaintif was served this Order as she walked into the ‘ourt house an ar around Ootober 10, 2012VIRGINGA: 'N THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA JANICE WOLK GRENADIER Plainitt CASENO. CHoia6s¢ ORENADIER INVESTMENT CO., LTD. eral Defendants ORDER Fading ht al mater pending hele his Cou pein tthe mater nen, ‘tron Greer tse Ca LD, aCe No. CHOI oc 4 “ot Pali Jace Wolk Greets ed Nac of Apa ome One cme “enh 26 2012. dyin ils Mono Roper Cie Du rate ng xdons, Chane of Ven, Tl by ry, Aditona Defendant is ORDERLD Wa tie Wak Grader bad hey pia em abit Seating kav ort communications hat atin any ote mater ones We Cenaler GrenakerIcimenCa, 17D, oCa No, COLO cern pen, » ‘te yeh or tonic eonmasicaon, th Crt Cou forthe iy of An ap ul further onde ofthis Cour, ad itis FURTHER ORDERED tthe Shes sl oh seca copy otis Oxon da ts Wolk Grenaticrat 15 W. Spring Set, Alexandia VA 22301 Page 1 of 2 Onder dated October {2.2012jie enter ti (TAs reat 2012 bee ga Wage DGB Keil Wren BC Neb. aides Nol Dawe ~Lore — iee 2 of 2. Onder entered October 122012jrese two examples since September 26, 2012 shows the extremes the Judges are going to jeep the truth fom being head since September's 2007" te Plaintiffs fundamental right to Bue CraWlednesday Septerber 26, 2012 inthe Cty of Alexandtia Circuit Court room with Judge Ciark. Fr luge Clark cid a rol call to see who was there sod ee long they would take. The docket Wa full. When Grenadier v. Grenadier was called Delerdana attorney's asked to go last - Plaintiff WeUuhe dudges and lavners work together. From athe picts ¢ tor ‘magazine of them, dining, Ponting. once or twice a month together = how mary ives of Vici decided at these parties? ange, have the Power that these sludges have over our being gee the decisions made at Gattis or by ifyou are part of the Old Boy Network i degustinn Many times Plaintif said a mistake and her pete yee instead they went to another Party and thought Newnan further ruin Plaititf and her gis lives. ‘a Ml others ad been heard and several dd go past the 30 minutes with the Judge being patient {olgants, The only Rigant Judge Ciark was rude to besides Plaaa a another Pro se litigant Ter eiarvone had ict ard Grenadier v. Grenadier was heard — the Shere Were standing outside ‘he Court Room to make sure that no one was alowed into watch ite Proceedings. On the Plant side you had pro se Janice Wolk Grenadier mre Refendants side you had John Tran fr liona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman et al, and Mehsel Weser for David Grenadier. (Defendant la attomey wee coon et switch as Ben DiMuro and Hillary were involved inthe Fraud onthe Court inthe fing wih he Server f Virginia) Plaintif stated out with asking that Judge Clark recuse himselt for the following reasons. 1. Refusing to hear 2 Motions filed by Plaintft 2. The leer delveredin May that Paint planed on naming him in a suit she plans to file Hacause by all appearance Plait believe him to bein colusion with he cheer en Court ~dges to rule in Defendant's favor. Because she ie part of thei elte Old Bere Nowa group. 6crn neh discussed the issue of John Tran being disingenuous and ot servicing Plaintiff properly and althe grief from the court Ptaintif received with any type of fling or service ana (84 120K up and tothe Judge said he had mad the fing to Plaintif. Which as red as he tuned ~ Plaintiff believes there is lite truth to that? Chen Nels had complaints about the names on the Fling - of not his client but, John Tran's lent. llona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman. Paint than tol the Judge she had a notebook or him and Defendant's lawyers and would like to Gave them entered into the court record -Plainlif handed ene Notebook (pictured above) to the sate ro then handed it tothe Judge. The Paint then heron ook attomeys each a notebook gna Me sans Judge Clark asked Defendants they had an ‘objections ~ which both Mr, Weiser and Me Tran Said no, The documents then were entered info he sere Paint had planned on stating in the begining of the Notebook and taking the Judge through — "ruling only on Favoritism, 2 ele Clark made it clear he didnt care about the money he wanted to know about the Fraud, Which Plaintiff went into. as follows: Pint to date has never hada Judge with Jurisdiction to hear her case ~ Mo Judge has been properly appointed 2 Thalllona Grenadier a lawyer when she mislead and fed tothe Court ‘on September 5, 2007 about being served al the Circuit Court Judges atthe time ~ Judge Kioch, Judge Semler. Judge haddock recused themselves. Nol fing the ‘appropriate paper work with the jarame Court of Virginia - Being disengeonus to Planifor errors occasions telling her the complete opposite of the rulet7, git then went into the folowing facts with Judge Clark at one point ssaying he didn't lunderstand — just move on = you have used your 1 minute OO bana Fatt ed with hw Arana Crout Court 2 Moton for Retttement of the Bil of Complant Sherine Av Parnes. Atte tne | hough best or ntteabon eRe ‘2r¥ed through the ‘Seis offex, The court date forthe Maton was on Seplember 12 200 sonra 007 - Motor Day ge Koch isthe judge that hears th case. This rested a ‘he Motion for Defauit court cing cease ame 21, 2007. Aste Moto fe etal goes ia mare dena on singenuous in cried cant aan ena: Bu, he cult have aoun ofthe cour date nto ‘She Deas a aoe Koch at Dav Grenadiers atomey, lr Michael Weise aero the cour date oo hates ate te oman Whim. Juge Koch kept pens ove gee ee the chance to show nor We Fea Sk ow" Se Sher ofce Wat came back and ancorangic bene nether ona to Judge Klochcena a wan down fo te hes fica, They gave Pia copy floras sevice. Mr Weise papers TEE Pinte box his fess inthe same buksing a tne Shes ofices, they couldnt say whether he na ot seved or net. September 21, 007 - JWG ted Maton for Default. and The Moton to Reneat usin case for October 10,2007, - Saplember 22,2007 Alte Alexacia Judge's recuse them tom heating the 380. This he san of hem benging in Sges ore nse Cau whee the econ s made priori cour. This the slat of colison ore sede acer lon & Davis sie, Nona woul ag about her elaonship wih he gc nog a and she would give tree legal advice, Soto any Later fom Diane Flake — Aer ering Pint ha he Judges had recuse thersehes she wkd cine caer as so earth case, sudge Frank A Hoss was avable fo November 28, 207 a oGben yes ofthis letter the Judges were 1 Awoge Donal M Haack We eam in th Spring of 000 neh eC860 nso Kom hear he case 2° Je John E: Koch ona ade te him in court on September, 2007 — He cous have herd he Moton for Default ashe knew the th Bu. the buh is ol what he was leokng fr. Ji is Bondaret Kemer Her Father was ou pedaican fr our gi, beeve Dad had gone to Hebvew ‘School wan her, Mis father and her father were good tends had shown her anc her husband Real Estate Decamber 8, 2007- Judge Tomas A Fortkon heard Moton. Denied Panis Maton fr Defouk The Motion for Coan "2% Ho lona Grenaiar an attomey, officer ofthe court ying to Judge Kich incout Haws oc oe Court Caan 007 Gueton Diane Fiske aout a Fai Judge ~ se informs Pant the ony way ayone cise (Supreme Court coses Juggs) they can' ed one. Which is incarect~ tne ue ste complete oppo In accordance with §17.1-105(8): Learn of June of 2010 Trai kes of any cou of ecod are so situated in respect to any case, cil or cna, pending inthe court ao by te ear ion, or hem to preside athe ta unless the caute or roceting i emoves we nevoed 2008 a, 8008 Later tom Hon on he aw rm tatonay fo Pin ona asserts omnarahp of 75% oa propey Known 38 8 East Bellefonte Ave, lexan, VA 22305. Pani also fel threatened by te leer ohch e ake ‘misleading and decetul statements, She then pus itn wring - February 12,2008 - Judge Brown hears Motions *lonais not in cout Healer Jenquen represented her Motions to compel Febniay 26, 2008 - Fed wih Ciek of Court folowing leer Because keepin mind al Judge's had recuse themsewves “tga, Moton Hato 90 though Dane Fiske 25 she needed to find ajudge or khad tbe on day ey hada vohee de ‘Teja asks ona fx dates to get back to Oane Fiske fea Motion ano Motos could be fed without everyone's ‘29ehng on the date before Diane found a Judgesrcatines lone = Defendant tons Ely Grenadier, denies that Paint owns orowned 50%ot East Betetonte” Novara rave, Souan/27; 2008 by ona Ey Grenacer a lawyer was aed wih Lies- The VSB. The edges ‘Nexancria and her good frend - Judge Brown Nad no problem wih thot crc tached up wt nformatonidoeumentation fom Admission staterents rom ona Grenater which had ove by tana Tagasements, The arcu of money lon pt no the propery ca be etabished oy serene Sram tana. Te Accounting shows the 25% down payment hal wos Corovied a heaton en Sen Caan 2008 File 2" Motion for Default to be heard March 12,2008 forthe follwing reasons: Fraud onthe Court by a Lawyer For athe reasons as slated n Motion for Defaut Dated September 21, 2007 Fane tuts tod in the Answer to Blof Complaint by defendant and Counlerisim and Cross-Complant fled on February 27,2008, Trats lators Delendant sent buling, threatening atached tothe February Response lo ona Ey GrenoletGIC Moten to Quash Plentifs Amended Complaint From February 8. 2008, ‘4. For the non-response to letters to ty and seta new dat for depositions oo seta ial dte atch 6, 2008- Filed Motion to Change Date for: Notice of Deposition and to Set Dat for Till - As Defendants would ‘not spond to any correspondence March 11, 2008 - Plait fles ~Praecipe- Remove Motions for March 12 no visting Judges. ‘Clark ofthe Court wil please remove rom the docket on March 12, 2008 Plaintite Mation to Compel as here ent 2 visting jadge avalabe to hear 2. Ths again show s thatthe Circult Court Judge's had recused themseWves. That Pint though out the case ‘woiced her cancer on geting afer Tal. To the deaf ears of the Circ Cou ot esanohie whe tone a ‘arrogant view of ding whatever they wanted fo do, ‘e-fie to have Motion for Deteut heard as Diane Fiske has founda dae that works forthe es of Alexandria to find a Judge of ther choice for May 7, 2008, ay 7, 2008 Motos heard by Judge Brown llona afer cout informs me ae he has edn her avr allowing hero fic false papers as an atomey in the Alexandra Gicult Cour of law what good fiends she and Judge Brown any ‘and how he called her al the tine for egal advice. - Fraud on the court by a Judge eing Fie favor ofa lawyer who has on several times committed FRAUD ON THE COURT May 7, 2008 after Court -ecu sores ans aouthe reaiontip wih fe Judge's- Which she hasin he pa & continues ogve {ree legal advice to Judge Brown, 2. ona Grenier explains to Pani why no one has anything do to wih Paint them Cathohe. In $9 years she has saen the gris once by Ras eae 3. That Pini should be gratetl to her or the sting on Hed ne Frm mane plete Dav Stole the money fom th Sonia Grenacie’s Tht wich one ona ang her ew {ent steal over $95,000.00, er evade ers to Judge Hadeock ater he speaks wth Hana ~he expan to Plt“ cous never get a fatto, ve fora’ um to Dae Fike shocked bye atone and exese can re og fs Chidren are because Plainif raised 6. Again Paint asks Diane Fiske about goting Judge's that aren ends of ona, ‘May 13,2008 - Letter from Diane P Fiske thatthe case would be heard the folowing Judge's inthe eter head: 4. Donald M. Haddock 2 John E. Kioch (Retites were working together. 3. Usa Bondoret Kemer by Judge John J. McGrath. This eter shows which means atthe ime Judge McGrath was chosen Judge Koch and Judge McGrath June 18, 2008 ~ Paintit Fes ‘1. Motion for Default - Defendant ona has led in the Admissions. Fa lona ving in court to Judge Kioch on September 12, 2007 - Motion for Detaut © mim ana or Oetau fed n February for Lyng nthe Answer io Bt Compl! by defendant and Counter claim and Cress Compliant . For losin Admissions ° For the leters Defendant sent Buling & Tivestening Plan Plant didn't crop suit 2. Motion for Teal by Jury - Due to comments made by Judge Haddock & lone Grenadier ‘A: sige Haddock teling Plain she coud never get fa ial a they af" LOVE” tong FT arming Plant ah Judges were tends o ers & she gee hen fee age advice when they caled hor uly 2, 2008 - Motion to be heard July 9, 2008 to inciude: 1. Motion for ial by Jury 2. Matin 1 Compe 3° Motion for Defaut July 8, 2008 - Judge Howe Brown ~ rales 41. Denies motion for Detaut 2 Denies motion for Trial by Jury ‘3. Ad makes bot sides werk on responses in the Maton to Come! Fee aa clan Fiske aan acces Pint the ony way anyone se wou choose aug was they couldnt Freeper tou go ote Supreme Cou and they woud then chose the Judge. Whi ane necmeet Tae ony 10because they loves lana”. - That the Paint -FRAUD ON THE COURT. ‘Circuit Court of Alexandria on several occasions was disingenuous with September 1, 2008 ~ Tal with Judge don McGrath as our ude, September 22,2008 -F te Mation for Reconsider leter thal David Elsberg the Satoment attorney for Nona Bawa / GIC 1. The 1* issue | have is how frst thing he di that mornin 's education. This was mi maney, not my daughters. fed to elev this was @ While this was going on Judge Kich lingered inthe had ‘3. Then when t wes my tie to question David and tna, | wasn! (Grenadier Trust up in any way. Judge McGrath said he was ‘nd he realy didnt understand i. |asked to explain io haw ow they hae brought it up fe ust went on fo say he was allowed to queston them or beng The Sona going to alow it brought no hs cout room ‘and he wouldn'thear of &. When | mentoned allowing iti his cout room, ‘4 David Grenadier tied under oath, Judge McGrath was jst move on. 5 stim lowed the torneys hammer on me. When Mrs. renal got on the sad wos WARNED on Tracks cnet rena and what questons | asked her. started astng Ms Gress nee ‘he broke down cyng. tasked for recess to ive her a chance to compose Nese aches wee & He McGrath thn went and had avery fiendly Lunch wih Judge Koch a Jackson 20 a now restaurantin ld Selmong” 89" Kech to be dscusing gong to work wih Judge McGrath ond nis coreenn tse Solitons 7s ep cf cmurse found vor of ona ang David which | woud not have hada problem with thee been a with ecg alee at had inteary. Judge McGrath was tantod and had grcinseeine eee se ee ‘umeny "22" 8d posse other Judge's inthe chambers. The ord wos wien por cone arguments September 23, 2008 2 3 Diane Fiske - Question: Protocol (Judge was out of own fast week) She wil mal cal Judge see ihe wants maied to him orin reat stop by Plait ~ Need to know take to net level eraiae 708-424-4557 Commonwenth Atomey's Oto Randy Sengel explained fo me at Judge McGrath dd aot ‘of workin the Creut Court of Alexandra and wa well Known with he lado Sentember 24, 208 ~ Diane - head rom Judge sent him Mton-but he dnt want Exhibits So basicaly didn't leven consider the facts of the Motion 41. Diane Fske-21 days hopeful something today Judge has everything u2. Diane Atemoon received order from Judge in mail sent on 24" - denying and he never looked at Exhibits ‘contre by Diane 3 Randy Sengel— Commonweath Atomey tes me the IRC Commissions where | need to go Randy Sengel — ‘Commonweal’ Atorney — Informs me that Judge McGrath has dane a lot of work Alewahute Chose oo ‘4 Calo Juscial ing & Review Commission Donald Cury informed Plant that Judge MeGrath was tom the ‘Arington Area and thatishowhe knew about Burke & Herbert Bank -had done extensive work iy Recconons Cours, 5. Plant eakzed tat the fact he was from Hanisonburg was mute twas a farce. Wh this new knowledge Pint ‘akzed tne folowing was tue ~ Type of Complaints the commission invesigaloscomos undes |) Alowing Family, social or other relatonshis to inuence this judgment 8} Engaging in private conversations which may influence jul actions CC Faling to isquaty ina proceeding n which impartiaity reasonably might be Questioned, because of his actone Under A&B December 18, 2008 — Pian leans from the nlernet that Judge John Kloch ss now working with bg ohn Math J wat frm called Judicial Solutions’ PC "in Letter rom Judge John Klach= he may have already artes at Judelat Solutions athe time of my tal ort may have been agreed opinion at that tne. Ths made it more ofa confit of terest. Not an arm's length station. fitisnt enough to have the Commonweal Attorney fll you Judge John McGrath hes done alt of workin the Alexandria Cours February 2009 - Washingtonian top 26 Divorce attomeys intudes ana and is referred to a8 “A tough cooki {hat miaht not be amicable, she can mix itup in a tate where the old boy network fe st.cna ose March 2008 ~ Alexandra Bar Thanks tona/law fr for heir geerosty table sponsors ‘April 47, 2008 ~ Letter from Ben DiMluro threatening Plaintif that she was trying to extort money from ilona ‘April 29, 2009 ~ 2" VSB complaint response was FU our lawyers can li steal or cheat and if they are part ofthe Od ‘Boy Network we along wih JIRC and the Supreme Court of Vigna are going to protect them uly 7.2008 - Ben DiMuro, Davis sisters RobivRacil, Andrea & Karen eal caling Pope a" Wanker Best descnpton ‘of e-mails flo Bul shit On or around October 8, 2009 LM for Detective Pak about geting together I had been advised not to meet wth hum, | choose to Paint knew | had the truth, October 29, 2009 - Conversation to meet with Detective Pak October 20, 2009 - Mec with Detective Pak and a woman at my home —for afew hours. | ask fo have recorded, tis ‘ecorded, Yet when ater asked Detective Paki there would be charges — I was informed t was up to Randy Sengel ‘andy Sengel had personaly requested the investigation. Thore is no insistent report or any record withthe Alexandra Police of such investigation, 2010 June 24, 2010 Letter Ms. Patricia L. Hartington Re- VSB ‘August 2010 Viginia Attorney ~ Calls Diane Fiske — she confims athe Judge's in The Alexandta Cut Cut had recuse themselves 2etd oh op Sac Oeenionts tat Part wa ing Notion for Dtaulto behead on September 1 2010-to be ‘heard on July 28, 2010, “July 13, 2090 — Fie Motion ibe pena poston - werent we supposes be ncuron te 28° When dl sh now that Michael ‘Wiser would be ting wah the court the conic? cry ne tet bin reprimanded by the Cut Court about conacing everyone =| being treated rasely now Ste tive Pott cals th Alera Creut Cour fe Mono be Remon ae st Se ‘August 11, 2010 Judge Koch ~ visting Judge is 100% Disingenuous 1. Judge Noisn B Dawkins precedi December §, 2007 by Judge Frank A Hose © Fee xe Jdna Dawkins a eter Dated October 172010 sting te dae fr Noverbe 28,2007 toed Nass Cour of ASexacia writen by Dine Fike Court Adminsrage Sate er eee yee Dive Fake aici hae Jugs Mado reschedie to December 8, 2010 Bath eho eee ete ty Diane Fiske cout Administrator 210, Paint then presented eter dated May 13, 2008 that Judge John J. McGrath had been chosen a the Judge for ‘ral, This ete was also written by Diane Fiske who Rad informed Platt all Alexandria Great Cour Judges had recuse themselves rom nearing any Motions or Trl 11. Plan hen adsressed the rues ofthe Alexandra Ccut Cour and that Motions are normal heard the ‘4° Weaesday ofthe month andthe Molion’s neaded tobe fied by the Tor 3 iy mation tok almost 3 months to be heard 12 Paintin infrmed Judge Dawkins how after the Mao's would be heard by visting Judges Defendant na Grenadiet an offer of the Court woul brag about what good fends sho was with the udge and how the Judge's would ca defendant ona Grenater when they had legal questions. 18. Pant woud then go to Judge's chambers and request Judge's thet were chosen at ans kngth. Paint explain io Judge Dawkins that she was informed tal the Alexandta Circ Gout sudgescheave the ge unless they cout find @ Judge. The Alexandta Gait Cour choose the Days Motions & Ha! o behest a cinede wh the dates they could fin the Judge ofthe choose. 14 Pint then alco presented to Judge Oawkins letter thatudge Kioch had writen on August 12, 2010, at which time Pini ponted out Judge Koc’ statement “urther | beleve avongly that tne appearance of sice {equally importa as justee ial” it was Judge Kloch that defendant had been disingenuous September 12, 2007. Which ist tht point the Judge's had recluse themselves 18, Judge Dawkins acknowledged having seen te ltr pit to cout at which tine Pani asked Judge Davin to ‘recluse hime. Paint fl as a Judge working with Judge's who had been disingenuous in hs cour he Could ‘not Judge this situation fairy. Judge Dawkins refused fo recuse himself saying he wasnt a Gut Cou Judge at the time this case was heard, On or around August 13, 2040 t was agreed by the Alevandra Cicut Cou, Defendants & Faint after Alexandria Circuit Court giving the Plant much gel scheuled 8 new Rearing or (October 13, 2010 at 2pm. an ‘Wednesday of the month. That 16. Judge Dawhinsthen went on to reference that Judge John MeGrath was fom Harrisonburg, Visa. Which ‘Judge Jono MeSrat is rom Harrisonburg, Vtg? 17, Paint then wert on to inform Judge Dawns that Judge Jahn MeGrath now ved in Harrisonbur, but, was "alse in Aringon which she leamed fom Donald Curry aiomey forthe JERK commnftee wn a6 fiend of Judge John MeSrath and refused a complaint to be fled. When complaint was fread on him rejected ft wth no {alow up onthe farts. That the Commonwealth States Atorney Randy Sengel had informed Pat! that Judge etn McGrath had Gone extensive workin The Cicut Court of Alexandra as a Judge, Plant tren informed Judge Dawkins what had taken pace the day ofall wth Judge John MeGrath on Septembet 11,2008 ‘October 13, 2010 Judge Dawkins Ordor reads: 4) Denied Motion fr Default tobe heard by a Judge wth Jnsdcton 2. Denied Sanctons 3. Denied action fo Recluse Himsett October 13, 2010 Pine calls Alexandria iru Court to sat up a date fora Moton tobe heard. Panis tld she ‘must not just e-mail defendants; she must tak to them as well before date canbe set. Paint lows the rules put to her ‘by the Circuit Cout of Alexandra October 14, 2010 Plains informed The Alexandna iru Court wil not allow any other Motions on this case Lo be ‘ied October 14, 2010 Plain fies wt the court Facts of wha the Paint has claimed and what the acions were ofthe Alexanda Circuit Court to have tom fe ‘October 19, 2010 Paint es wih the court Motion for Reconsideration of Order Dated October 13, 2010 Plainti in ‘researching information or Appeal to the Supreme Court finds the flowing information that had beer fied with the Crt ‘Courtot Alexandra, wich Paint ft proved Plaintiff had noted in cour as Judge Dawkins had accused Pani of ‘0g, 1, March 14, 2008 Plait Filed a Praecipe inthe Alexandra Crcuit Court that states the Aleandia Cut Court wouidn hear the Mation onthe date fst fled because there wasn’ a siting cudge , atthe only way ‘Noton’s would be heard if there was a sng Judge “Maton fr Tal by Jury the afc offing Motions as coud ony be deo Painok ie amen as a elerenced” Since te sat of ts he Judge's n Nexandna a ee Paint he cticuites of boing able lo er the matons ot fay Joage tee sae ‘October 20, 2010 Order by Judge Nolan B. Dawkins Set Ponsdeation Ode slong his cases missed wih prejudice an be placed among the ended November 4, 2010 Pia x int devers tothe Wal Judge acopy Whiten Statement of Facts to the Alexandra Crcuit Court harbors zon January 2, 2011 ~ JWG Appeal to Supreme Court ~ Record #110166 February 2, 2011 ~ Leter Ben Dimuro Give nlc fe dismiss of Petton for Appea! Fanalat 3.2017 Responders Jom Maton to Dismiss Peston or Appeal Duel Pati noting Sateen! of Facts -Disingenuous February 8, 2011 Petioners 210 J tos ‘Order o Made a part of Record in accordance ‘Supreme Court Rule §:11 (ef) an FRUAD ON THE COURT BY — LAWYERS =: WEISER, BEN DIMURO & HILLARY COYLER — WHICH ‘Wet THE BAIT ANO_ SWITCH WITH HAVING JOHN TRAN IY COURT ON SEPTEMBER sesso? February 19,2011 Respondents ted wih te Surere Gout - Joint Bren Opposition to Ptton fr Appeal May 4.2011 Letter tom Supreme Gout of Vii o Pint May 26,2011 Oral Arment May 24,2011 Pini Oral Argument in Rebmanin ont ofthe Supreme Courtof Vigiia ‘June 20,2011 Supreme Couto Viinia Denies Pettion, ignores the lw. June 27, 2911. Pleintit Peto for Reconsiteraton Sentember2011. ona Grenaler& Bon Duro generous donation othe Judge Donald M Haddock Porta und Srotember 15, 201% ona Grenadier trough er law frm Brows a pry onthe Miss Mary a Asani, Vigne, by all appearance a $100,000 + pat, September 20, 2011 Supreme Court Deny Petition for Reconsideration, once again ignores the low November 24,2011 JWG Learns abou! the Magistrate can also bring charges - Calls Cy of Alxandra Mapstate {ram al he requees a Pole Report ~ JWG hen cls Detective Pak to ak for Police Roper 8 he gnores pone cals, ‘emails when Plsintif gets him onthe phone frst excuse is Computers are down, next excuse notto give me the nore as'S he hasnt rad time to took up. When asked where Pain tif can call to get ithe sounds nervous on phone and ols Pant he wil gett for Plant. Paint eaves several me wessages etc, To never hear back fron Detective Pak Point Cas Records in Atexancia to eam -Thave fs no Police Report # fr ts “January 18, 2012 Proeope to be heard on January 25, 2012 January 20,2012 Letter from Law Clerk Chu Court of Alexand ‘would be heard by Judge Peter. Again the Crcult Curt of Alona sie delayed s Juste denied, ra that my Motion for Sanctions against Me. Senge) rca does net flow the ules or the ows ofthe court answer Smple questions about Grand Jury - aueshons ane rence Be ps cio otow te eso he courts twas seeonale fo Severn ac ‘wastons which he reuse to answer. Most ely he doesn't krow the basi sles February 1, 2012 -Parecipe fled on Fb 1 for Motion tobe heard on Febru lary 8, 2012 by the new Judge - Judge Clark who had not recused himsel rom hearing his ease Feeaiy 2 2012 Leter Creat Cour of Atxandra Motion Sarctons against Ed Semeonian tbs heard at Sem February 13,2012 by Judge Potter Fav hes Gent tro Celt Cout Judes & Ed Samonian Pant planed on beng In carton etry 8 2012 that Judge Clark had not recused himsale. Feta eng dada Clark court cons he has no recused inset a the mater and at tint ons docket ‘Yet Judge Clark ten tums and says yes am gong to hear this even though ts not on my ose |i the End what wo have is - & Judge that blocked Defendant lona from taking the stand after Paint had gone tothe time aero), an trouble to have her subpoena ~ and, by all appearance the Judge's and Clerk of Court Fano planned for the Sherif to serve her. Itwas the dligence ofthe Plaintif hat got the Defendant served, Zhe Defendants attomeys defense was 8. Something the Judge wouldn't explainit when Plant asked and when Plant looked it up - It is a Rule that you can use to Rule in Favortans ent Cronyism instead of the Law and the Rules of the Supreme Court Gena Pent proved over and over again - Defendant Hona a lawyer mislead and ed in cout in documents filed in the court, Fraud on the Court on several occasions - (That Defendant's Lawyers Michael Weiser, Ben DiMuro & Hillary Cole fled false statements in the ecuments fled withthe Supreme Court of Virginia on February 3, 2012 that Piatt Ned nat Mes a Statement of Facts — which was untrue, FRAUD ON THE COURT 16That Judge's Lawyers, Elected Officials, Government employees, have lied time and time again to Tre Layee another = That the Judicial system in Virginia is about Favoritiam and Cronyism not the Law and the Rules - That the Piaintif sited the following in court Read the Judicial Cannons ~ soon ti 8 JUDGE SHALL UPHOLD THE INTEGRITY AND INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY, CANON 2.A JUDGE SHALL AVOID IMPROPRIETY AND THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY IN ALL OF THE JUDGE'S ACTIVITIES, CANON 3, -A JUDGE SHALL PERFORM THE DUTIES OF JUDICIAL OFFICE IMPARTIALLY AND DILIGENTLY. OF CONFLICT WITH JUDICIAL OBLIGATIONS. SanON §: be a judge” and “the judge must be the judge of the particular court with power over the particular case." When only one eq is challenged, a court which examines a different leg has enaaged in ial malpractice. The consequence of a judge acting without “authority” or “jurisdiction” over a case or court, he loses judicial immunity. He had no authority, He had no power, and His only duty was to not act. Treason ~ whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason. U.S. V. Will, 449 U. S, 200, 216, 101 S. Ct, 471 66 L.Ed.2d 382, 406 (1980); Cohen v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 wheal) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821) When revi ing a pro se pleading, itis prudent to follow the federal practice of liberally construing the allegations set out in the pleading to determine whether the pleading asserts any valid causes of actions. See e.g. Hartison v. U. S, Postal Service, 840 F.2d 1149, 1152 (4° Cir. 1988). The factual alegations should be viewed in the light most favorable to the pleading party Davis v. City of Portsmouth. 579 F. Supp. 1205, 1209-10 ( E.D. Va. 1983), affd, 742 F.2d 1448 (4" feur. 1964) |lam not a lawyer since 2007 - | have been fighting for a Trial with a Judge with Jurisdiction - | didn't graduate from college - A lot of people don't know why | didn't graduate from College - Its because a year after Ted Bundy had killed a gil from my high schoo! in Tallahassee. | was being stalked by a local boy in Statesboro Ga. - | reported it to my RA, that this boy made me nervous, | had an ‘partment on campus - One Friday night —in the middle of the he broke into my apartment and hurt ‘me — he went to jail for 6 years. | was on trial for the way | lived my life— just as he was on trial for ‘what he had done to me, | understand Justice — | understand the Old Boy Network — A mistake was ‘made in 2007 — the Slippery Sloop of injustice started with a lot of people not knowing the whole truth about Defendant llona ~ and that included Plaintiff, What | have learned about Defendant liona and ‘any have leamed is horrid. This is just one of many things llona used to control me in helping her Cover her mess with the Theft of the money from the Sonia Grenadier Trust. lam Never Never Never ‘bing to give up —1 have gone from being a victim of liona & David's to being a victim of ya'l Judge Clark in his Order has taken away all my rights as a citizen in the United States of America by saying | cannot fle anything without his permission. He didn't write t once he wrote it 3 times. The question is how premeditated was it. He has created a Trustee type situation that he must take into consideration when reading this and in his decision to sign this or not sign this. But, it should be date Slamped November 20, 2012 showing | had met the requirements to perfect my Appeal to the ‘Supreme Court of Virginia, Plaintiff has proven more than once that she has not had a Judge with jurisdiction, that there has been Fraud on the court by Defendant's and their attorneys. It should not be held against, 2Plaintif thatthe Cld Boy Network doesn’ like her or she is nota part oft. Attached copy of Exhibits {hat Paint is assuming isin the Box sent back from the Circuit Court of Virginia that has not been opened by Plait Exhibits 1 -4 Show the Money tlona owes Plaintiff for this suit and other m jones for the purpose and reason of Lis Pendens — Exhibit § ~ Documents that back up all other Fraud on the Court - The information on the Bellefonte Property ~ The Decumens that llona fled and lod in - the documents that prove Judge's didn't have Jurisdiction, the decuments that show Attomeys Motion to Supreme Court that Plaintif had not filed 2 Statement of Fac. November 20,2012 Janice Wolk Grenadier erse 15 West Spring tract ‘Avexania, Virginia 22901 Jvarenacier3@20lcom "703-836-9658 202-368-7178 Cortineate of Service Documents have been devere to Judges Chambers on November 20,2012 for Judge Clare's approval as caled for in Orders. Copies have been delivered to Defendants lawyers (ll Defendants dludge James Clark shall notily all party's that Statement of Facts was datvered wih the Rulesot bi Soren eeu of ‘aging and hes bees fled to and wil have it fed stamped and sen to al partes invwed as Tse te PoniNiges es Grenadier GC Grenacer, Anderson. Starace, Duet & Kesler PC to en imuro at DinuroGisburg 10} Keg Steet, Suite 610, Alerania, VA 22314 & David Grenatir lo Mcnael J. Welser, 510 Kang St Sule 216 Aaa ore Ga 234 November 20, 2012 20