Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Collections Reviews
160,000
140,000
120,000
100,000
Acquisitions
80,000
60,000 Disposals
40,000
20,000
0
Glasgow Horniman Ipswich Leeds London's Manchester Maritime
Transport
Acquisitions & Disposals from sample
museums, 1990-2004
N Merriman 2004
Sustainability
Sustainability
Systainability
Dynamic Collections
A methodology
An officer
A professional scrutiny panel
A peer reviewers network
Money
(But not much)
A regional response
A Methodology
Element 1: Curatorial Review
Element 2: Use
Element 3: Significance
Element 4: Collections Care
Element 5: Museum Context
A regional response
A professional scrutiny panel
The Collections Review Board shall:
Act as a ‘safe environment’ for the museum community to
discuss issues surrounding and arising from the disposal of
museum objects. To facilitate this the board should act as a
‘critical friend’ to museums. It should help museums develop
methods of responsible museum disposal (including promotion of
MA’s Disposals Tool Kit, using peer review, developing criteria
for museum disposal, developing methods for assessing
significance of objects and collections). It should also review the
disposal policies, the procedures and the decisions of museums
at the museum’s request
A regional response
A regional response
Hub Museums
National Museums
Museums with direct DCMS Funding
A regional response...Funded Projects
Egyptology Review
A regional response...Funded Projects
Gallery Oldham
Print Loan
Collection
Review
How does this help us?
Safe environment for discussing difficult
issues
Gets underused collections looked at
Gets specialist opinions
Makes qualitative assessments that can
balance the financial arguments
Gets objective opinions
Promotes the dynamic collection OR
enhances use