You are on page 1of 14

3102 / The Journal of Administration & Economics/

((
* ..

**

:




,





.

Abstract :
The study of the correlation between economic
growth and human development index are of great importance as
a means to know the effect of each one on the , and the
relationship between the economic growth and-geta human
development is a direct correlation can Observation through
the side of human development in the development of human
capacity and use it to achieve economic growth, and benefit
from the fruits of economic growth in expanding people's
choices, and have included research three sections where
included first topic on the conceptual framework of both
economic growth and human development, while the second
section
has included measuring the relationship between
economic growth and human development in Iraq ,to be mentioned
third topic to draw Futuristic Relationship between economic
growth and human development in Iraq, has reached search there
was
no
correlation
between
economic
growth
and
human
development index, to adopt economic growth on exports of
crude oil, and thus be Quartz depends international policies,
while human development does not constitute aside impetus for
growth the extent that the economic aspect dependent upon only
to keep up with the economic situation as well as data that

lacks precision and communication.

. / *
. **
3102/0/9
(54)

The Journal of Administration & Economics/ 3102 /

:









.

:

.

:

.

:
)(2010-1990
-
.

:

.

:



.

)(54

The Journal of Administration & Economics/ 3102 /

: ) (The Concept Of Economic Growth




( ) ).(0



)(3

)(GNP
).(2


).(5






) . (4
.
). (4

)(GDP



) . (4

.

1 - C.S Benson, Perspestives on the economics of education , Houghton on


miffin,Com , 1963.p8.
, , 1999,9 .3 - D.C.Rogers and H.S. Ruchlin , Economics and education , New York ,
1971.p12.
, , , ), ( ,1 , , 2004 ,277.
, , , , , ,, 1,, 2006,44-43.
, , , , , ,1982,44. , , , , ,1975,80.
)(54

The Journal of Administration & Economics/ 3102 /

) .(0




.

:
-1







).(3
-2
).(2
).(2

: )(Human Development Concept



1990


) . (5
.
.





). (4


.
:

, , , , , , , 2007,77 .
, , , ,3 , , 2008,51-50 . , , , , 1 , , 2003 ,59.
, , , ,59.
, , ( ( , , , , ,2009 ,.43
)(54

The Journal of Administration & Economics/ 3102 /

-1 :
). (0
-2 :
.
-3 :


). (3





) (
:

: :

) (
. .
) HDI =f(G
HDI =B0 +B1G+u
:
= HDI ( )
= G ( )GDP ( 1988 )
=B0 GDP
=B1 GDP
=U

:
Eviews.5

OLS
:
)HDI=f (G
1-2
HDI=B0 +B1G+u

) ( , ,274.
, , , , , , 2006 ,365 .
)(59

The Journal of Administration & Economics/ 3102 /

) (1


HDI

Dependent Variable:
Method :least Squares

Date :08/19/12 Time:06:05


Sample :1990 2010
Included observations:21
Std.Error

t-

-3.436298

Coefficient

0.205442

1.046408

0.007475

-0.025685

Mean dependent Var

0.383280

S.D.dependent Var

0.350821

Akaike in fo Criterion

0.883468

Schwarz criterion

14.82979

F-Statistic
)Prob(F-Statistic

-26.14492
1.171771

Variable
Statistic
Prob.
C
5.093442 0.0001
G
0.0028
R- Squared
0.802476
Adjusted R- Squared
1.096499
S.E.of regression
2.680468
Sum Squared resid
2.779947
Log likelihood
11.80814
Durbin Watson Stat
0.002768

: )(1)(2
,
)(0.03 . )(GDP ,
)(1.05 .
t )(3.44 t
)(2.101 5% (19) .
, .
(Prob ) (0.05) .
( )
)(R2 )(38%
(62%) .
(F) . F (11.81) .
F )(4.38 )(19,1
5% . , R2
.
D.W )(1.1 7 )(d1=1.22 )(21 .
5%
. , ( )
.
. GDP
. HDI
( )

)(41

The Journal of Administration & Economics/ 3102 /


.
)G=f(HDI
3-3
G=B0 +B1(HDI) +u

)( 2
GDP )(14.9
.
t
, F R2
. D.W .
)(2

Dependent Variable:G
Method :least Squares
Date :08/19/12 Time:06:07
Sample :1990 2010
Included observations:21
Std.Error

t-

5.808259
-

4.342478

Mean dependent Var

Coefficient
21.47147
-14.92205
0.383280

S.D.dependent Var

0.350821

Akaike in fo 46

21.29418

Schwarz criterion
F-Statistic
)Prob(F-Statistic

8615.404
-92.97395
1.800575

Variable
Statistic
Prob.
C
3.696714
0.0015
HDI
3.436298 0.0028
R- Squared
0.802476
Adjusted R- Squared
1.096499
S.E.of regression
Criterion
9.045138
Sum Squared resid
9.144616
Log likelihood
11.80814
Durbin Watson Stat
0.002768

: )(1)(2

.
.
( , (

.


.
)(40

The Journal of Administration & Economics/ 3102 /





.
.

: :



.
).(0

.


) . (3







) .(2

).(5



) .(4



).(4

, , ( ), , , ), )31 , ,2011 ,55.


, , , , , ,2009 , 76.
3 - United Nations Development Program (2003) ,Human Development Report
2003,p111.
, , , , ,2008 ,6.
5 - United Nations Development Program (1993) ,Human Development
Report1993,p31 .
6-United Nations Development Program (1992) ,Human Development
Report1992,p19 .
)(43

The Journal of Administration & Economics/ 3102 /

: :




.
)(1990 )(76 )(130
).(0



)(3
.




.


).(2

.
:
-1


,
.


).(5
-2



) )

.


).(4

(2011), 2011,157 . 2008 2009 , .41


3-United Nations Development Program (1996) ,Human Development
Report1996,p94.
, , () , ,,2008,14.
, , , , , ,2006,119.
)(42

The Journal of Administration & Economics/ 3102 /

:
-1
,
( ) ,
,




.
-2

.(0) -3
)(35%
)(1990-1988 )(27%
,
( (

1988
)(53%
)(47%
.

).(3
-4
70%


.
-5
)(15.3% 2008
,
( , , (
.


).(2

-6


)(5

, , ( ( , , , 1 ,, 2002,224 .
, , , ,, 3 ,2007 ,42.
, , 2012 , , )(28
,2011 ,137.
, 2014-2010 ,120.)(45

The Journal of Administration & Economics/ 3102 /







).(0
-7

1000
.


-8

2006
2007 ).(3

.

)(31.2%
)(58.2% )(55.1%
)(20.1% (20.7%) .
).(2


:
-1

.
-2


.
-3

-4


.
, , , , , ,(, 2006 ,)42.65
, " " 29/10/2008.
, , , , : ( (2006-1976 , , )(28
.2011,
)(44

The Journal of Administration & Economics/ 3102 /

-5
.

:
-1

.
-2


.
-3




.
-4
.

:
:
-1
1 . 2003
-2 ( (
.2008
-3 3 . 2008
-4 , , , , , , 1 ,
,, 2006.
- 5
.2008
-6 .1999
-7 . 1975
-8
. 2006
-9 ( (
1 . 2004 .
-10
. 2007
-11 ,1982.

:
-1
.2006
-2 ( (
.2009

:
-1 ) (
1 . 2002
- 2
, (.2006 )42
)(44

The Journal of Administration & Economics/ 3102 /

3 2012

).2011 (28
- 4 (2011) .2011
-5
3.2007
( )
6
) ) 31 .2011
7
.2009
8
29/10/2008.
-9 , : ( ( 2006-
1976
).2011 (28
-10 2008
.2009
-11 2014-2010 .

:
1-C.S Benson," Perspestives on the economics of education" ,
Houghton on miffin,Com , 1963
.
2-D.C.Rogers and H.S. Ruchlin ,Economics and education , New York ,
1971.
3-United Nations Development Program (2003) ,Human Development
Report 2003.
4-United Nations Development Program (1993) ,Human Development
Report1993 .
5-United Nations Development Program (1992) ,Human Development
Report1992 .
6-United Nations Development Program (1996) ,Human Development
Report1996.
)(1
) (2010-1990 )(100=1988

1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002


( ))(1


) ) )(2

55926.5
42451.6
115108.4
321646.9
1658325.8
6695482.9
6500924.6
15093144.0
17125847.5
34464012.6
50213699.9
41314568.5
41022927.4

29711.1
10682
14163.5
18453.6
19164.9
19571.2
21728.1
26342.7
35525.0
41771.1
42358.6
43335.1
40344.9

)(44


(3)%

57.817
-64.04
32.592
30.289
3.854
2.120
11.020
21.237
34.857
17.58
1.40
2.305
-6.900

The Journal of Administration & Economics/ 3102 /

2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010

29585788.6
53235358.7
73533598.6
95587954.8
111455813.4
157026061.6
130642187.0
158521511.5

26990.4
41607.8
43438.8
47851.4
48510.6
51716.6
54720.8
57925.9

-33.100
54.2
4.4006
10.158
1.372
6.608
5.808
5.857

:- )(1) (2

).)2011-2010
) ( 2
) (2010-1990

0.751
0.582
0.589
0.589
0.614
0.617
0.599
0.531
0.538
0.586
0.538
0.530
0.520
0.524
0.521
0.552
0.515
0.512
0.512
0.565
0.567

1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010

(2000-1990)United Nations Development Program


:
)(1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000
.
Human
Development
Report,
New
York
.
) (2010-2001 (Spss) .
..

)(44

You might also like