SECTION-I: KRAs (Key Result Areas) SETTING

PART I: Personal details in columns below shall be filled-in by the HR department

Name

Mr.N.Ananth

Function

Edible Salt -Operations

Designation

Dy.General Manager

Sub-Function

Operations

Grade

Appraiser

Assessment Yr. 2008 - 09

Location

Edible Salt - Chennai

Reviewer
S.Ramesh

HOD

PART II: The employee has to list 4-5 KRAs, set targets for the year and assign weightage
in weightage column in order of importance of a KRA in discussion with the appraiser. The
sum total of assigned weightage MUST BE 100.
Target
Key Performance Indicators
(KPls)

Key Result Areas

1.To reduce power

Consumption in
Refined Salt (
Avg.yearly production
vis-a visa vg yearly,
poer consumption)

Absolute reduction (Unit per MT of

refined salt production)

(Timeline, Cost,
Quality, Quantity or
Asset utilization
Frrom 32 to 27 units
per MT of refined salt

2.To reduce & save

EB Power cost by
reduction from
RS.1.08 lacs per
month to RS.0.95
lakhs per month from
Oct.08 onwards

Savings in Rs.

RS.0.78Iakhs

20

3.To Control Capex

expenses of
Thiruporur plant by
not overshooting the
total approved
expenses.

As per Budget

RS.53.50 lakhs

30

4.10 Control FIXED

OVERHEADS AT
Thiruporur Plant

Rs.

RS.600 per MT of
Product.

20

(KRAs)

As against last year of Rs.

Total KRAs Weightage

Signature of Employee
With date

Weightage
30

100

Signature of Immediate Manager

with date

I Name of Employee: N.Ananth

SECTION -II: MID TERM PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

(To be filled in by the Appraiser & Appraisee)
The individual and the appraiser have to assess the performance for the period of last six
months (April-September) and the appraiser has to provide improvement guidance !counseling
to the individual employee.

Performance
10

Excellent

Very Good

Good

Fair

Poor

111%

101-110%

91-100%

81-90%

Rating Point
Rating

Rating Scale & Parameters

Achievement%

Self-Appraisal

KRA
s
No.

Achievement
%

NIL

NIL

100

81

KRA Score (KS)

Weightage
(W)
30

80%

Appraisal by APpraiser
Rating
Point
(R)
0

WxR

Achievement
%

Weightage
(W)

Rating
Point
( R)

WxR

20

30

240

20

140

100

3.8

380

100

Improvement Quidance. if any by the Appraiser

The objective is to re-align the efforts of the employee if the achievements made so far, are not
as per the desired level! standard. (Attachsheets,if required)

Signature of appraiser with date