Scribd
Upload
51 views1 page

2016-02-28 State of Israel v Roman Zadorov (000502-07) – Serious Crime - in the Nazareth District Court: Presiding Judge Avraham's “Post-it decision” on Repeat Request (No 125) to Inspect all decision records, issued as paper records (as received by fax)// מדינת ישראל נ רומן זדורוב (000502-07) – פשע חמור – בבית המשפט המחוזי נצרת: "החלטה בפתקית" של נשיא בית המשפט אברהם אברהם על בקשה (מס' 125) חוזרת לעיון בכל כתבי החלטות שהונפקו בנייר (כפי שהתקבלה בפקס)

ש

Uploaded by

Human Rights Alert - NGO (RA)
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
51 views1 page

2016-02-28 State of Israel v Roman Zadorov (000502-07) – Serious Crime - in the Nazareth District Court: Presiding Judge Avraham's “Post-it decision” on Repeat Request (No 125) to Inspect all decision records, issued as paper records (as received by fax)// מדינת ישראל נ רומן זדורוב (000502-07) – פשע חמור – בבית המשפט המחוזי נצרת: "החלטה בפתקית" של נשיא בית המשפט אברהם אברהם על בקשה (מס' 125) חוזרת לעיון בכל כתבי החלטות שהונפקו בנייר (כפי שהתקבלה בפקס)

ש

Uploaded by

Human Rights Alert - NGO (RA)
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
28/02/2016 09:03 846887799 PLILIMEHOZINAZA PAGE 61/81 REGENED 15/62/2016 21260 eM6ue7se9 wec1 MUSPAT ASF 2646 21115 Powered hy [Link]. il waiagtae-co.i] BS regarding the importance of the right to access court records relative to public crust in government authorities: “The importance of this principle is in generating public trust in the public authorities in general, and in the courts in particular, since it contributes to generating the appearance of the process of justice in a manner that promotes such trust. The importance of the common law Right to Inspect and to Copy Court Records, is likewise justified in a landmark ruling of the US Supreme Court: “to fulfil the Citizen's desire ‘to keep a watchful eye on the workings of public agencies”. [*] . Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty (1992) is voided of meaning absent the ability to materialize the right to inspect court decisions and judgments. d. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 10, states the right for “fair public hearing,” ¢. The Requester has been engaged for years in academic research regarding IT systems of the leracli and US courts, and administration of public access to court records. His research on such subjects has been published and presented in international academic conferences in the relevant fields, subject to anonymous, international peer-review. His reports on such subjects have also been incorporated into UN Human Rights Council Reports pertaining to the United States (2010, 2015) and Israel (2013), following the Council's Professional Staff review. g, Inspection of the records in “Net-HaMishpat” - case management and public access system of the Nazareth District Court - shows that instant court file was in part administered as a paper court file. Therefore, instant request pertains to inspection of the decision paper records ~ original court records in instant court file. 5. Relationship of the requester to the court file (direct or indirect) None, except for academic interest. Dd Berk Today, February 19, 2016 Joseph Zernik, PhD “0 IAN Ww nite Down ZY Ww? DN 1 "7 [I Wy Wann 7w NWI NNTIA Mw? [ey wratt nyoTN? No? want -D'non3

You might also like