AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE PARTIES ON NOTICE NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT Applicable to all successors and assigns Re: Purported indictment number : 201SBX030402 I, Neil Rodney did serve the attached copies of these documents upon the following individuals: 1 Affidavit of Corporate Denial and Non Corporate Status 1Certified Negative Corporate Search 1 Affidavit of Denial of Impartiality... 14 Pages 5 pages Cristina Roberti d/b/a. (Assistant District Attorney) BRONX DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE 198 E161 Street BRONX NEW YORK 10451 All hts Ress — Pursuant to UCC 1-308 Without PrejudiceAFFIDAVIT OF DENIAL OF IMPARTIALITY = NOTICE By and from: Neil Rodney Introductory Certification ‘The Undersigned, Neil Rodney, hereinafter “Affiant,” does herewith solemnly swear, declare, and state that: A. Affiant can competently state the matters set forth herewith, B. Affiant has personal knowledge of the facts stated herein, C._Allthe facts stated herein are true, correct, complete, and certain, admissible as evidence, not misleading, the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, in accordance with Affiant’s knowledge and understanding. Plain Statement of F: “Utley v. Donaldson” Every intendment is to be made against the construction of a contract under which it would operate as A snare Uttley v. Donaldson 94 U.S. 29 24 L. LEd54 Affiant have seen no evidence or record, to contravene, “Eads v, Mark “... No civil or criminal cause of action can arise lest there be a contract. See Eads v. Marks, 249 P. 2d 257, 260. Affiant have seen no evidence or record, that the following is not true... There have not been any Judges in ‘America since 1789, There have just been Administrators. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v PE 261 US 428 Stat. 138-178) Affiant have seen no evidence why The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 52, is not relevant as it applies in Civil and Criminal actions with equal force and effect, because criminal is always civil in nature, Aiffiant have seen evidence or record, that contravenes, “Floumoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport”..“A Code’ or Statute” is not a Law.” (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248), Affiant have seen no evidence or record, that United States does not mean a Federal corporation as defined U.S. Code, Title 28 ~ JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE, (Chapter 176) Section 3002 45) @, b, & 0); Affiant have seen no evidence or record, that the court and its agent are not operating under... CFR 27 run Affiant have seen no evidence or record, that the following is not true...The word “person” is according to several references and: 22 USC Sec. 1621 -EXPCITE- TITLE 22 CHAPTER 21 SUBCHAPTER I -HEAD- See. 1621. Definitions -STATUTE- For the purposes of this subchapter - (a) The term ‘person’ shall include an individual, partnership, corporation, or the Government of the United States ‘The United States is located in the District of Columbia.” ~ (California Commercial Code 9307 h) Affiant has seen no evidence or record to contravene, “Woodward v. Livermore Falls Water Dist” ,..very corporation formed for governmental purposes is a municipal corporation. (Woodward v. Livermore Falls Water Dist., 116 Me 496) ‘The UCC has been adopted in whole or substantially by all states. Blacks 6"Affiant have seen evidence or record to contravene ...he idea of sovereign power in the government of a republic is incompatible with the existence and foundation of civil liberty and the rights of property. Gaines v. Buford, 31 Ky. (1 Dana) 481, 501 Affiant have seen no evidence or record to contravene, “U.S. vs. Cruikshank", It is quite clear then, that there isa citizenship of the United States, and a citizenship of a state. Slaughter House cases 83 U.S. 36, pg. 408, U.S. vs. Cruikshank 92 U.S. 54: ‘Affiant have seen evidence or record to contravene ..Sovereignty itself'is, of course, not subject to law for it the author and source of law;” [Yiek Wo v. Hopkins, 18 US. 356 (1886)] Affiant have seen no evidence or record to contravene “Tashiro vs. Jordan”... A citizenship of the United States and a citizenship of the state, and the privileges and immunities of one are not the same as the other, is well established. Tashiro vs, Jordan 256 Pae.545, 549 Affiant have seen no evidence contravening lansing v Smith...Our government is founded upon compact. Sovereignty was, and is, in the people"1829 US Supreme Court case Lansing v. Smith: Affiant have seen no evidence that the party of the people of new york were brought into action ...The People” does NOT include you and me. (Barron vs. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore 32 U.S. 243) Affiant Have seen no evidence or record to contravene that ....."Natural Person, means human-being, not an artificial, or juristic-person”. Shawmut Bank, N.A. v. Valley Farms, 610 A. 2d. 652, 654; 222 Conn. 361. Affaint Have seen no evidence or record to deny that for the court can and will operte impartially... ‘The law does not compel impossibilities Boyden v United States 13 wall 17, 20 L.ed.527 Affiant Have seen no evidence that... Rodriques v. Ray Donavan, U.S. Department of Labor Would and should not apply to Neil Rodney, - Natural Person’ or American citizen Immune from such jurisdiction of legalism.(Rodriques v. Ray Donavan, U.S. Department of Labor, 769 F.2d 1344, 1348 (1985)) Affiant in this court, has been a vietim of Spoilation by Cristina Roberti d/b/a Assisant District Attorney and/or Cristofer Schiavone d/b/a Detective...and have seen no evidence or record to contravene that... Spoilation...“The intentional destruction, mutilation, alteration, or concealment of evidence, usually a document. If proved, spoliation may be used to establish that the evidence was unfavorable to the party responsible Black's Law Dictionary (7* ed. 1999): Affiant have seen no evidence that Cristina Roberti d/b/a Assisant District Attorney did not operate as a MISUSER... an unlawful use ofa right. 2. In cases of public officers and corporations, a misuser is sufficient to cause the right to be forfeited. 2 BI. Com. 153; 5 Pick. R. 163. A Law Dictionary Adapted To ‘The Constitution And Laws Of The United States Of America And Of The Several States Of The American Union by: John Bouvier Revised Sixth Edition, 1856 Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 2 Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any ind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self- governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty. Affiant have seen no evidence or record to contravene the Maxim ...TRUTH IS EXPRESSED IN THE, FORM OF AN AFFIDAVITAffiant have seen no evidence or record to contravene that one can overturn or disregard or abrogate somebody's Affidavit of Truth. Affiant have seen no evidence or record to contravene the Maxim ...AN UNREBUTTED AFFIDAVIT STANDS AS TRUTH IN COMMERCE Affiant has seen no evidence or record that makes the Rights abused are still rights (cf. abusus non tollit usum). Note: many references will be made towards Blacks Law Dictionary. "Black's Law Dictionary is the most widely used law dictionary in the United States. It was founded by Henry Campbell Black (1860-1927). Itis the reference of choice for terms in legal briefs and court opinions and has been cited as a secondary legal authority in many U.S. Supreme Court ...Wikipedia Evidence By way of Maxims Affiant have seen no evidence or record to contravene the Maxim ...under commercial law, Natural and Moral Law are binding on everyone, and no one can escape it. Commerce, by the law of nations, ought to be common, and not to be converted into a Monopoly and a private gain for the few. -Maxims on Commercial Law Suppressio veri suggestio est falsi. Withholding the truth suggests falsehood Officium nemini debet esse damnosum, A duty should be injurious to no one. {In criminalibus probationes debent esse luce elariones. In all criminal charges the proofs should be as clear as day. Executio juris non habet injuriam. The execution of the law works no injury. Actus legis neminem est damnosum. The act of the law is hurtful to no one . Contractus ex turpi causa, vel contra bonos mores, nuUus. A contract arising from a base consideration, or against morality, is void. Actus curiae neminem gravabit. The act of the Court shall prejudice no man. Acta exteriora indicant interiora secreta. Overt acts make known latent thoughts, or Acts indicate the intention. -Quod ab initio non valet, in tractu temporis non convalescere~ What is not good in the beginning cannot be rendered good by time. Quae malasunt inchoata in principio vex peragantur exitu- Things bad in the commencement seldom end well. Evidence By Way of Attorney and Attorney Client Relationship Affiant Have seen no evidence or record that contracting with an Attorney would not be injurious to Affiants Freedom, Life and Liberty as evidenced in 7CJS § 4 and § 2. Affiant denies being a Client as defined in... Corpus Juris Secundum, Attorney & Client, Sec. 4, pg 802.: § 4 ATTORNEY & CLIENT 7 C.J.S. “His first duty is to the courts and the public, not to the clients, andwherever the duties to his client conflict with those he owes as an officer of the court in the administration ofjustice, the former must vield to the latter. Affiant denies being a Ward of the court as defined in... Corpus Juris Secundum, Attorney & Client, See. 2 8.769. Clients are also called wards of the court in regards to their relationship with their attorneys Affiant denies being a ward as defined in Black's Law Dietionary 6th Ed., or in any capacity. Ward of the court infants and persons of unsound mind placed by the court under the care of a guardian, Affiant denies being a ward ofthe court and can see no benefit in that capacity ..Ward of the court as defined in Black’s Law Dictionary 6th Ediditon ward a person especially a child or incompetent, placed under the care and supervision of a guardian or conservator. Affiant sees no reason why with the Attorney having dual duties with the Attorney owing a superior duty/obligation to the court that this kind of relationship could be anything other than ineffective Assistance of counsel. Every intendment is to be made against the construction of a contract under which it would operate as A snare Uttley v. Donaldson 94 U.S. 29 24 L. LEd.54 Evidence By Way of Persona Person, n. per'sn. [L. persona; said to be compounded of per, through or by, and sonas, sound; a Latin word signifying a mask used by actors on the state.} In law, an artificial person is a corporation or body politic." = Webster's 1828 Dictionary, D. Webster (1828). "Person” ‘Aman considered according to the rank he holds in society, with all the right to which the place he holds cntitles him, and the duty which it imposes. It may include [limited to] artificial beings, as corporation, territorial corporations, foreign corporations, relating to taxation and revenue laws. XIV Amendment “persons” A county. aslave. An estate of a decedent, a judge holding court, an infant [Ward of the Court officers, partnerships, and women, participants in the forbidden aets ("defendants” & "plaintiffs"] agents, officers, and members of the board of directors or trustees, or their controlling bodies, of corporations, tthe legal subject [subject-matter] or substance [rem; res] "- Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 8th ed., pg- 2574. being a person as described in... BLACKS LAW DICTIONARY 5TH EDITION PG 1028 Person. In general ‘usage, a human being (i.e. natural person), though by statute term may include a firm, labor organizations, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptey, or receivers. ‘Affiant Denies being a Personas Defined in Wilson v. Omaha Tribe..." common usage. the term ‘verso the (word person) are normally construed toexcinde the sovereign people. Wilson v Omaha Tribe, 443 US653 667, 61 L Ed 24153, 99 SCt 2529, (979 Affiant denies being a person as defined in... 26 U.S. Code § 6671 - (b) Person defined The term “person”, as used in this subchapter, includes an officer or employee of 2 corporation, ora member or employee of a partnership, who as such officer, employee, or member is under a duty to perform the act in respect of which the violation occurs.Affiant denies being a person as defined i 26 US. Code § 7343 Affiant denies being a person as defined in. 26 U.S. Code § 7701 (1) Person ‘The term “person” shall be construed to mean and include an individual, a trust, estate, partnership, association, company or corporation Artificial person” Asubject of duties and rights which is represented by one or more natural persons, generally, not necessarily by more than one but does not coincide with them. It has a continuous legal existence not necessarily depending on any natural life; this legal continuity answers to some real continuity of public funetions or of special purpose recognized as having public utility or of some lawful common interest of the natural persons concerned. - Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 8th ed., pg. 252. Asttificail - Created by art, or by law; existing by force of or in contemplation of law.” - Black's Law Dictionary, 2nd ed., pg. Every intendmentis to be made against the construction of a contraet under which it would ‘operate as A snare Uttley v. Donaldson 94 U.S. 29 24 L. LEd.54 Evidence By Way of Corporate Name Fictitious and corporate names are spelled in all Roman (CAPITAL) letters. 1S PaCSA 5303, 5306 “The omission of the Christian name by either plaintiff or defendant in a legal process prevents the court from acquiring jurisdiction, " -Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 8thed., pg. 2287 Affiant objects to the attempted conversion, by Jdem Sonans, of the Living Soul Neil Rodney into a ‘corporate entity or legal fiction entitled "NEIL RODNEY” (or any derivative thereof), a Nom de Guerre, ‘Afiant have seen No evidence to contravene that the STATE is misusing the identity of Neil Rodney's proper Name to the STATE'S exclusive advantage both commercially and otherwise; with the lack of ‘consent to craft a likeness of my birthname for commercial purposes and to the extreme prejudice and ‘ongoing injury to Neil Rodney. Affiant declare’s:.. that Unlike a registered trademark, Affiants proper name cannot be deemed abandoned by Affiant throughout this possessor’s life, despite any failure to use it, and continue to use it, privately and or commercially... Montana v. San Jose Mercury News, Inc. 40 Cal.Rptr.2d 639, 34 Cal.Appl.4th 790 Affiant have seen no evidence that the STATE is not guilty of. - Capitis inutio (meaning the diminishing of status through the use of capitalization) In Roman law. A diminishing or abridgment of personality; a ‘s status or aggregate of legal attributes and qualifications Blacks Law Dictionary — Revised 4! Edition 1968, Affiant denies being a .."Nom De Guerre (F: war name): a fictitious name: Pseudonym - Third New International Dictionary of the English Language, Merriam-Webster, pg. 1534. Affiant denies being a ENS LEGIS Person Novation It must be evident to every person that a published notice, using the name by which the defendant is commonly known in the community, will as readily attract his attention as ifhis real name were used, particularly where the initials are the same, and that the use of the name as commonly known will much more readily and probably attract the attention of his acquaintances and friends by whom information might be communicated to him than if the publication had been by his real name by which he was not commonly known. Webster v. Heginbotham, 23 Colo. App. 229, 129 P. 569 (1913), aff'd, 58 Colo. 351, 145 P. 1165 (1915). Affiant denies having received full disclosure of the benet legal fiction (NEIL RODNEY). and liabilities associated with the creation of Affiant denies being the all CAPITAL lettering PERSON [NEIL RODNEY] and declares Neil Rodney is a living breathing Sentinent Man of the Family of the Rodneys with the Neil Rodney being the living man with the NEIL RODNEY being the Artificial/corporate/ non christian named/ Nom De gueere, created name by artifice. Every intendment is to be made against the construction of a contract under which it would operate as A snare Uttley v. Donaldson 94 U.S. 29 24 L. LEd.54 Evidence By Way of Quotas, Secret Agreements, and 32 Published News Articles quota a specific amount or number that is expected to be achieved Meriam Webster Dictionary Affiant have seen no evidence that in light of the evidence that Quotas is not a number games and if the focus is on numbers than someone's rights have to be subverted. ASffiant have seen no evidence that the suing of the state by the Private Prison's is not do to a breach of ‘contract and that breach is the promise to keep them coming, and that the only way the state can keep them coming, is ifthe state has a factory that makes criminals, if not than someone's rights have to be subverted. Articles Prison Quotas Push Lawmakers To Fill Beds, Derail Reform Posted: 09/19/2013 11:54 am EDT Updated: 09/20/2013 4:14 pm EDT huffingtonpost How Private Prison Firms Use Quotas To Fill Cells And Coffers BY NICOLE FLATOW SEP 20, 2013 3:28 PM Private Prisons Demand States Fill Their Empty Beds ‘The industry has contracts requiring states cough up a certain quota of criminals to be imprisoned. By Frederick Reese Follow @FrederickReese @FrederickReese | September 25, 2013 How private prisons game the system Corporate jails are corrupt, violent and costly. And they're lobbying hard to get more people behind bars RANIA KHALEK, ALTERNET 6 Shocking Revelations About How Private Prisons Make Their Money Private prison companies are striking deals with states that contain clauses to guarantee high prison ‘occupancy rates. By April M. Short / AlterNet September 20, 2013 Lockup Quotas Help For-Profit Prison Companies Keep Profits High and Prisons Full By Brendan Fischer on September 20, 2013 - 9:26am_ States Guarantee High Prison Populations for Private Prison Industry's ProfitsBILL BERKOWTIZ FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT Private Prison Companies Want You Locked Up Press Release Published: June 22, 2011 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, June 22, 2011 Contacts: Zerline Hughes ~ 202.558.7974 x308 / zhughes@justicepolicy.org Jason Fenster ~ 202.558.7974 x306 / jfenster@ justicepolicy.org, Private Prison Contracts Are Forcing States To Pay For Empty Beds Erin Fuchs Sep. 19, 2013,6:12 PM 3,633, AT&T Exploits Prison Labor Loaded on APRIL 15, 1993 published in Prison Legal News April, 1993, page 8 Filed under: Work, Prison Industries. Location: United States of America. Prison labor on the rise in US By Alan Whyte and Jamie Baker 8 May 2000 Prison Labor: Outsourcing's "Best Kept Secret" By Stephanie Overby CIO | May 27, 2010 8:00 AM PT US PRISONS TURN TO CALL CENTER JOBS FOR INMATES, EARN MILLIONS IN LABOR COSTS January 12 2012 THE INQUISITR NEWS. Crities claim Bronx District Attorney Robert Johnson's office fosters an atmosphere that rewards convictions, leading to misconduct by prosecutors. taken from EXCLUSIVE: Bronxproseritor bashed and ‘bared from courtroom for misconduct NEW YORK, DAILY NEWS REPORTER DENIS SLATTERY Sunday, April 6, 2014, 2:01 AM. Prison Labor: Three Strikes and You're Hired posted on JUNE 27, 2013 by Caitlin Seandel Ella's Voice Immigration Detention Bed Quotas: Private Prison Corporations, Government Collude to Keep Contracts Secret; Undue Corporate Influence Seen in FOIA Redactions, Attorneys Say December 23, 2015 press@ccrjustice.org NYPD set arrest quotas for minority cops in their own communities: By Selim Algar and Josh Saul September 1, 2015 | 1:59pm New York Post Police Quotas Are Terrible, And The NYPD Still Seems To Be Using Them Posted: 10/02/2014 1:48 pm EDT Updated: 10/02/2014 5:59 pm EDT Christopher Mathias@huffingtonpost.com ‘Stephen Anderson, Ex NYPD Cop: We Planted Evidence, Framed Innocent People To Reach Quotas trymaine.lee@huffingtonpost.com Posted: 10/13/2011 5:55 pm EDT Updated: 12/28/2014 9:59 am EST Slowdown Sanctions: NYPD Orders Cops to Meet Arrest, Summons Quotas Or Lose Vacation Time, Sick Leave By Barry Donegan - Jan 12, 2015 TRUTH IN MEDIA. Police in Brooklyn Used Illegal Ticket Quotas, Arbitrator Decides By KAREEM FAHIM Published: January 20, 2006 NYPD Cop Thrown In Psych Ward For Exposing Arrest Quotas Wins $600K 8nye 349 clarification : Police State Daily September 30, 2015More NYPD officers join ‘quota punishment lawsuit By Dana Sauchelli and Antonio Antenucci New York Post March 5, 2015 | 1:39am Leaked audio: Police union set arrest quotas with NYPD NATASHA LENNARD SALON News, TUESDAY, MAR 19, 2013 01:49 PM PDTw New York's Police Union Worked With the NYPD to Set Arrest and Summons Quotas ‘Wednesday, 20 March 2013 10:09 By Ross Tuttle, The Nation | Report and Video EXCLUSIVE. Cops ‘lied’ to reach arrest quotas By Tara Palmeri and Kirstan Conley October 14, 2013 | 5:01am New York Post ‘Sandra Day O'Connor decries letting ‘cash in the court’ with judicial elections BY LESLIE LARSON NEW YORK DAILY NEWS Friday, July 11, 2014, 2:17 PM ‘Sandra Day O'Connor warns against ‘politicians in robes' May 31, 2013 at 9 AM upi News ‘Justice Is Not For Sale’: Sanders Leads Charge Against For-Profit Prisons Published on Thursday, September 17, 2015 byCommon Dreams ‘Sandra Day O'Connor Argues for an Impartial Judiciary BY JONATHAN BLACK Elmhurst College News JUNE 10, 2013, Courting Corruption: The Auctioning of the Judicial System NORM ORNSTEIN The Atlantic OCT 15, 2014 Exclusive: bashed prosecuter bashed and banned for misconduct Assistant District Attorney Megan ‘Teesdale was banished from Bronx Judge John Wilsons Courtroom after failing to reveal evidence that would have freed a man held at Rikers Island on bogus Rape charges. By DENIS SLATTERY NEW YORK DAILY NEWS, Sunday, April 6, 2014, 2:01 AM. We cannot fix our criminal justice system if corporations are allowed to profit from mass incarceration.” —Senator Bernie Sanders Keeping human beings in jail for long periods of time must no longer be an acceptable business model in America.” Senator Bernie Sanders "By treating prisoners and detainees as a means toa profit margin, we're ineentivizing jailors to lobby for ever more inmates, and for inmates to be denied even the basic staples they're entitled to." Representative Ratil M. Grijalva {Mercis appeliatione homines non contineri; Under the name of merchandise men are not included Every intendment is to be made against the construction of a contract under which it would operate as A snare Uttley v. Donaldson 94 U.S. 29 24 L. LEd.54. Evidence By Way of Peonage/ Slavery/ and Involuntary Servitude inversal Declaration of Human Rights Article 4 No one shall be held in sla ude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.‘tis amaxim of law that peonage and involuntary servitude are forbidden, and immunity is denied to any party,real or imagined, person or public official who would or conspire to traffic in slaves or participate in aiding orabetting, Clyatt v US, 197 US 207 (1905), Plessy v Ferguson, 163 US 537, 542, "Whoever [Title 18 U.S.C. See1581 (a)] holds or returns any person toa condition of peonage, or arrests any person with the intent of placing him in or returning him to a condition of peonage, shall be fined not more than 20 years, or both. 18 USC Ch. 77: PEONAGE, SLAVERY, AND TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS $1993. Benefitting financially from peonage, slavery, and trafficking in persons ‘Whoever knowingly benefits, financially or by receiving anything of value, from participation in a venture ‘which has engaged in any act in violation of section 1581(@, 1592, or 595(2), Knowing or in reckless disregard of ‘the fact that the venture has engaged in such violation, shall be fined under thisttleor imprisoned in the same ‘manneras a completed violation of such section. (Added Pub. 1. 110-457, ttle Il, §222(4)), Dee. 23, 2008, 122 Stat 5070) These acts give rise to Involuntary servitude and peonage $1590. Trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, or forced labor (a) Whoever knowingly recruits, harbors, transports, provides, or obtains by any means, any person for labor or services in violation of this chapter shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 vyears, or both, Citing as a maxim of law that "Any agreement ot contract that is contrary to the public welfare is void and inenforceable asa matter of law,” Accord Dalton, 412 F. Supp. At 1007 (holding that, where a contract is unenforceable, all claims arising out of or directly connected with this illegal contract are equally tainted.” ‘Thus a contract that would make the American people the personal property and indentured slaves of the state is null and void. Slave Trade: the traffic of buying or selling for slaves for profit Bl lacks 2 Another cause of slavery is corruption on the part of people willing to do anything for financial gain. Slave labour and human trafficking often require the complicity of intermediaries, be they law enforcement personnel, state officials, or civil and military institutions. “This oceurs when money, and not the human person, is at the centre of an economic system. Yes, the person. made in the image of God and charged with dominion over all creation, ‘must be atthe centre of every social or economic system, When the person is replaced by mammon, a subversion of values occurs” Slaves No More , But Brothers and Sisters- Pope Francis Declaration ‘The Bible in Harmony with PUBLIC LAW 97-280—OCT. 4, 1982 96 STAT. 1211... H be not ye the servants of men. I Corinthians 7:23 Stand fast, therefore, in the liberty with which Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage. Galatians 5: Every intendment is to be made against the construction of a contract under which it would operate as A snare Uttley v. Donaldson 94 U.S. 29 24 L. LE4.54Evidenee By Way of denial of Due Process of Law Affiant have seen no evidence that failure to provide full disclosure would not be Fraud. as well as violation of Due process of Law. Impartial (ad) able to judge or consider something fatty without allowing your owen i erestto influence you... Cambrddge Dictionary Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 10 Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him. Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 7 All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination Withrow v. Larkin, 421U.S. 35,46-47,95S.Ct. 1456,43 LEd.2d.385(1975) (Concededly a fair trial in a fair tribunal is a basic requirement of due process in re Murchison, 349U.S. 133,136, 75 S.Ct. 623, 625, 99 LEd. 942(1955). ) Affiant have seen no evidence to contravene that: ... the law does not compel impossibilities Boyden v United States 13 wall 17, 20 L.ed.527 ‘The Due Process Clause entitles a person to an inpartial and disinterested tribunal. in Jivil and criminal cases. This requirenent of neutrality in adjudicative proceedings Safeguards the two central concerns of procedural due process, the prevention of unjustified or mistaken deprivations and the promotion of participation and dialogue by affected individuals in the decisionmaking process. See 1020Carey v. Piphus, 435 U.S. 247, 259-262, ine 266-267, 98 S.Ct. 1042, 1043, 1050-1052, 1053, 1054, 55 L.bd.2d 252, (1916). The neutrality zequlrenant helps to guarantee that life, Liberty, or preperty will not be taken on the basis of an erreneous or distorted conception of the facts or the law. See 1020Mathews v. Eldridze, 424 U.S. 319, 344, 96 S.Ct. 893, 907, 47 Lisd.2d 18 (1976). At the sane time, it preserves both the appearance and reality of faimess, “generating the feeling, so inportant to a Popular government, that justice has been done, "1020Joint Anti-Fascist Camittee v. McGrath 341 U.S. 123, 172, 71 S.Ct. 624, 649, 95 L.Ed. 817 (1951) (Frankfurter, J., concurring), by ensuring that no person will be deprived of his interests in the absence of a proceeding in which he may present his case with assurance that the arbiter is not predisposed to find he requirenant of neutrality has been jealously quarded by this Court, In Tumey v. Ohio, Supza, the Court reversed convictions rendered by the mayor of a town when the mayor's salary was paid in part by ‘and costs levied by him acting in a judicial capacity. The Court stated that the Die Process Clause would not permit any “procedure which would offer a possible temptation to the average man as a judge to forget the burden of proof required to ‘convict the defendant, or which might lead him not to hold the balance nice, clear and true between the state and the accused.” 1020273 U.S. at 632, 47 5.Ct.y at 444. ‘The most important political office is that of the private citizen. ~ Louis D. Brandeis“The government is the potent omnipresent teacher. For good or ill it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a lawbreaker, itbreeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare that the end justifies the means ~ to declare that the government may commit crimes ~ would bring terrible retribution, — Louis D. Brandeis Every intendment is to be made against the construction of a contract under which it would operate as A snare Uttley v. Donaldson 94 U.S. 29 24 L. LEd.54 Evidence By Way of Fraud Affiant Neil Rodney have seen no evidence that 37 Am Jur 2d does not apply: Fraud: 37 Am Jur ad at section 8 states: "Fraud vitiates every transaction and all contracts. Indeed, the principle is often stated, in ‘broad and sweeping language, that fraud destroys the validity of everything into which it enters, and that it vitiates the most solemn Contracts, Documents, and even Judgments.” Affiant have seen no evidence why Fraud should not appy in all of the following forms: FRAUD IN THE INDUCEMENT: “... is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, ‘or make an agreement... The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”, Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron's Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’ FRAUDULENT DECEIT... The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury...”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron's Educational Series, Inc., 2003, 8.v.: ‘Deceit’. FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT... The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose... New York Times v, Alberto Gonzales, 04 Civ. 7677 (RWS) (USDC S.Dist. N.Y. 02/24/2005) . Secrecy may ‘well be seen as the enemy of freedom when it conceals facts important to public understanding Evidence By Way of Contract Eads v. Marks, 249 P. 2d 257, 260...No civil or criminal cause of action can arise lest there be a contract Pacta privata juri publico derogare non possunt.Private contracts cannot repeal the public right— Afiint have seen no evidence or recor. that any contract that has with the court would not be an adhesion contract of ‘which Affant has not been given fl disclosure and that would not injure Affiant, fiat have seen no evidence, that there is the eontract wherein I knowingly and willingly, with full disclosure, consented or otherwise agreed to, Aliant has seen no evidence or eeord, why other than Threat , Duressand Coercion why Affiant, Neil Rodney would contract his living breathing Sentinent Person into such a contact.Affiant have seen no evidence that failure to provide full disclosure would not be Fraud. as well as, violation of Due process of Law. Affiant has evidence that Affiant is not a CORPORATION, and, further is not registered with any Secretary of State as a CORPORATION Pursuant to 12(b)(6) the prosecuting Attorney Catarine Roberti has failed to state a claim for which relief can be granted, Affiant makes this Affidavit in Harmony with Federal Rules of Evidence, R.go1 Agreement by Acquiescence.... “R ule 301 of the Federal Rules of Evidence States” ..a presumption imposes on the party ‘against whom it is directed the burden of proof of going forward with evidence to rebut or meet the presumption. See 556(d) In Harmony with Maxims: AN UNREBUTTED AFFIDAVIT BECOMES THE JUDGMENT IN COMMERCE IN COMMERCE FOR ANY MATTER TO BE RESOLVED MUST BE EXPRESSED ‘TRUTH IS EXPRESSED IN THE FORM OF AN AFFIDAVIT Notice to agent is notice to principal and notice to principal is notice to agent ‘Time sensitive document, estoppel conditions will apply upon default. All addressed parties Jointly and Severaily and applicable to all Successors Nominees and/or assigns. Counter Affidavit should be rebutted or contravened by way of Affidavit in like manner (7) days after verifiable reciept of this instrument, at the adress provided else default shall be had.E_ The Undersigned Affiant, Neil Rodney, does herewith declare, and affirm that Affiant executes this Affidavit with sincere intent, that Affiant can competently state the matters set forth herein, that the contents are true, correct, complete, and certain, not misleading, and the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth in accordance with Affiant's knowledge and understanding, Date: The Twenty Second Day of the First Month in the Year Two Thousand and Sixteen Verification BRONX COUNTY) DAS. New York State ) Neil Rodney having firsthand knowledge of the facts in the foregoing Affidavit attached hereto and being to testify holds the facts to be true correct to the best of Neil Rodney's belief and Knowledge so help me God, Neil Rodney hereby’ places his signature hergon and holds himself tothe penalty of Before me a Notary Public for the state of New York, personally appeared Neil Rodney who after properly Identifying himself to me has sworn to and subscribed in my presence the foregoing Document on this day of O0— enascend — ___, 2016 29-201€ My commission expires: 2 ‘OnDE GEORGE Ni fc. State of New York, eeAcknowledgement wf Onthe 22 day of January 2016 AD, Neil Rodney personally appeared before the Notary Public in the Onganic State of New York with an Affidavit of Truth and acknowledge upon the contents thereof of Affix My First Hand and Seal Thereon 9.2 Qamaory{, 20/ Notary Public Date PRISCA CONDE GEORGE Notar Site of ew York,