Professional Documents
Culture Documents
09 - Biomedical Waste Management
09 - Biomedical Waste Management
Dr Rohini Kelkar
M.D., D.P.B.
No one was
ever really
taught.
Each has to
teach himself.
Swami
Vivekananda
The Reality
Ignorance
Commercialization of science
Apathy
The Concerns
Occupational
Public health
Environmental
The Science
Hospital waste
Hazardous
Noninfectious
Non-hazardous
Infectious
Kitchen
Cytotoxic drugs
Recyclables
Toxic Chemicals
Radioactive
Non-sharps
Patient
contaminated
waste
Laboratory
waste
Specimens
Plastics
PVC, PE PET, PS
Equipment
Non-plastics
contaminated cotton
waste, gauze, linen
Anatomical
C
1.
A
E
L
D
Y
RL
N
I
EF
E
H
T
E
O
R
P
M
E
BL
Radioactive Waste
Sharps Disposal
3. INSTITUTE A SHARPS
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Waste Audit
About Sharps:
The only documented transmission of infection from waste to HCWs is
through sharp injuries. Thus safe disposal of sharps is the first priority.
Sharp injuries:
Before or during use (17%)
After Use but before disposal (70%)
During or after disposal (13%)
(Our Experience: Majority of sharp injuries occur due to improper disposal
and waste handlers are the victims)
Collection network.
.
6. PROVIDE
SECURE COLLECTION
AND TRANSPORTATION
Infection
Awareness
Week
8.
E
V
IN
T
S
IN
A
R
T
I
IN
G
N
Street
Play
1. Demonstrated
Performance
Category
1.1
Stage of Development
1.2
1.3
Rating
Weight
Score
2. Technical &
Performance Criteria
Category
2.1
Process Capacity
2.2
2.3
2.4
Weight Change
2.5
Volume Change
2.6
Recognizability / Disfigurement
2.7
Decontamination
2.8
Performance Data
Rating
Weight
Score
3. Vendor
Qualifications
Category
3.1
Number of Vendors
3.2
Vendor Resources
3.3
Rating
Weight
Score
4. Environmental &
Permitting Issues
Category
4.1
Air Emissions
4.2
Liquid Effluents
4.3
Treated Residues
4.4
Permit ability
4.5
Public Perception
Rating
Weight
Score
5. Occupational
Health & Safety
Issues
Category
5.1
Routine Exposures
5.2
Rating
Weight
Score
6. Facility: &
Infrastructural
Requirements
Category
6.1
Space Requirements
6.2
Construction Requirements
6.3
Utility Requirements
6.4
Rating
Weight
Score
7. Economics
Category
7.1
Capital Costs
7.2
Annual Costs
7.3
Life-Cycle Costs
GRAND TOTAL SCORE
Rating
Weight
Score
On September 10, 1999, well before the first dead line set by
the Ministry of Environment and Forest, 31 December 1999.
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005 2006
2007
Max. medical
waste collected in
a day
341
394
350
362
396
530 429
514
Average no. of
loads required/day
217
224
176
241
250
Average medical
waste collected in
a month
5,498
5,643
5,266
5,917
6,284
Percentage down
time of the system
1.6
5.7
4.8
5.8
8.2
Average medical
waste treated in
kgs/day
4 4
289 253
7,225 6,369
0 10
4
277
6,959
1.2
2009
Max. medical
waste collected in
a day
447
505
Average no. of
loads required/day
Average medical
waste treated in
kgs/day
298
304
Average medical
waste collected in
a month
7,623
7,674
Percentage down
time of the system
0.33
Hazardous Waste
Environment News
Greenpeace
March 7th, 2001
KODAIKANAL, India -- Greenpeace
today accused Anglo-Dutch
multinational Unilever, owners of
Lipton Tea and Dove soap, of double
standards and shameful negligence
for allowing its Indian subsidiary,
Hindustan Lever, to dump several
tonnes of highly toxic mercury waste
in the densely populated tourist resort
of Kodaikanal and the surrounding
protected nature reserve of Pambar
Shola, in Tamilnadu, Southern India.
Landfill
CH4,
Composting
Incineration
Recycling
Transportation
Emission
of
CH4,
CO2;
odours
Emissions
dust
of
Emissions of dust
NOx, SO2, release of
hazardous
substances
from
accidental spills
Air
Emission of
CO2; odours
Water
Leaching of salts,
heavy
metals,
biodegradable and
persistent organics
to groundwater
Deposition
of
hazardous substances
on surface water
Waste water
discharges
Soil
Accumulation
of
hazardous
substances in soil
Landfilling of slags,
fly ash and scrap
Landfilling of
final residues
Risk
of
soil
contamination from
accidental spills
Composting
Incineration
Recycling
Transportation
Landscape
Soil occupancy;
restriction
on
other land uses
Soil occupancy;
restriction
on
other land uses
Visual intrusion;
restriction
on
other land uses
Visual
intrusion
Traffic
Ecosystems
Contamination
and
accumulation of
toxic substances
in the food chain
Contamination
and
accumulation of
toxic substances
in the food chain
Contamination
and accumulation
of
toxic
substances in the
food chain
Urban areas
Exposure
hazardous
substances
to
Exposure
hazardous
substances
to
Risk
of
contamination
from accidental
spills
Noise
Risk
of
exposure
to
hazardous
substances from
accidental
spills; traffic
E-waste
How green is your Apple?
Aug 25th 2006
From The Economist print edition
God proposes,
man disposes
Class D
Class E
86,704 Kilograms
7,225 Kilograms
2,917 Kilograms
243 Kilograms
300 liters
Liquid Wastes:
Total effluent per month
3 lakh litres
140 litres
588 litres
260 grams
Sr. No
Chemicals / Reagents
10% Formalin
Xylene
Basic fuchsin
Haematoxylin stain
Nitric Acid
50.5
Anhydrous Aluminum
Chloride
.005
Hydrochloric acid
.800
Diamino benzidine
20.0
Hydrogen peroxide
53.202
10
5.225
11
Gluteraldehyde
12
Ethidium bromide
.001
13
Propane / Butane
2.500
14
15
Benzoin tincture
16
Lugols Iodine
17
18
Ammonia solution
.050
19
Lactic acid
.045
20
Sulfuric acid
.100
Total
Lits.
100
190.1
1.17
1.0
150.500
2.00
10.00
0.42
1.000
588.19
Hazardous liquid
waste / month:
Chemicals / Reagents
Benzidine dihydrochloride
Naphthol phosphate
Pararosaline hydrochloride
Sodium-fluoride
8.500
8.500
Benzidine G.R.
Zine sulphate
Barium chloride
13.00
10
Phenol crystals
40.00
11
Naphthylamine
16.50
12
Naphthol
16.50
13
Sodium-polyanethol sulphonat
45.00
14
45.00
15
Sulfonilic acid
45.00
16
Trichloroacetic acid
Total
Weight (Grams)
0.5
.060
1.0
.200
1.0
16.5
2.1
259.36
Waste audit
Waste monitoring systems
Elevation of safety standards by all healthcare facilities
All HCWs must have hygiene in their genes.
Thank You