This piece appeared on Harvard University's Center for International Development web site. I wrote it after participating in the International Conference on Biotechnology at Harvard in 1999.
Original Title
The Human Genome as 'common heritage of mankind'
This piece appeared on Harvard University's Center for International Development web site. I wrote it after participating in the International Conference on Biotechnology at Harvard in 1999.
This piece appeared on Harvard University's Center for International Development web site. I wrote it after participating in the International Conference on Biotechnology at Harvard in 1999.
Commentss4
The Human
Page 1 of 2
Center for International Development
at Harvard University (CID)
Genome as 'common heritage of mankind’
Gerald Graham, Ph. D., geraldgraham@attcanada.net
Sn
International Environmental Consultant
‘Ottawa, Canada
The third millennium s rapidly approgshng, and nt fr beyond that the
scheduled rene by the Human Genome Project of a working draft ofthe human
tenome. Ths sx month window present th international emu with
Bolden oppomuity to declare the human genome the common hetage of
mankind” The commoa heritage concopt has precedent in pubic iterations
Tawi the form ofthe 1982 Utd Nations Comention o the Las ofthe Sea
‘Whats good forthe seabed anit resources shoud a fori, be good fr the
sorclled book oF if, the gente Bueprin: or humanity whch embeded
inside each and everyone of us.
‘The community of nations has already toyed with this tmely idea. Two years
‘go, the Uriversl Declaration onthe Human Genome and Human Rigs was
‘opted by concen (UNESCO, 1997), Article silts thal "The buna
‘senome underies the fundamental unity ofall members ofthe human fai, as
‘well asthe recognition of tha inherent dignity and diversity” The sane article
toes on fo sy that "In a symbolic sense, (he human genome) isthe here
fthumanity” Arle 4 ges more specific: "The human genome ints tral,
‘sate sal ao give se fo fancial gains
‘This declaration, portant milestone though itis, has its tations For one
thing. the United States of America, which undraes the bulk ofthe worlds
sensi esearch isnot a Member State of UNESCO, ts sponsor Furlermors
‘he deletion i now-bining om signatories. Also, i Seems gratuitous say that
‘he genome sal pot givers to franc gins in its tral sate, since vo get
fat gone you basally fst have to alter ts natural state andr saat or he
Funan bos
Genes for more than twelve hundred human disorders have ben ented so fr
(National Geographic, 1999 There are alfeay afew thousand” buman gene
patents worldwide ( Ottawa Citizen, 1999) Since ony 25 percent of he
100,000 or so human genes have been mapped to now, then nls he rules are
hanged. many more patent canbe expected inthe coming years
Inthe meant, the sce community sels incensingly concerned. As the
Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics has observed. "The human genome is
sen by many a belongs to everyone, and allowing privatisation of certain gene
Sequences by patting isen as private ake-over of Ou como heise" (
FIGO, 1997), As forthe American Collegeof Medial Genetics, tells for aban
‘on human gene patenting. cing exorbitant use fes and monopole Hcensing
‘naa Citizen, 1999
http:/Aww.cid harvard.edulcidbiotech/comments54.htm o7/toris99Comments54
Page 2 of 2
Responding to thes and other worrying developments, the US an UK
_goverments being responsible for the bulk of genome research, ae sad to be
patning an agement o prevent the 100,000 human gees being patented by
private compaies( BBC News, 1999 One wonders whether existing patents
‘Would be panda under his acord. Ako, what ito pevent a pavate
‘company such as Celera fom moving is computer operator to Bangalore, sy,
‘thereby escaping jursition?
Extending the principe ofthe common heritage of maskin to genes would 0%,
‘po focto, rosribe the patestng of drags of procedares lowing fom the map
‘ofthe human genome Rather, it wou ensure that acess the secrets fe
Fe a open to al who Sek it, ow and orever
Sources
Universal Declaration onthe Human Genome snd Haman Rights, UNESCO
General Conftence, 11 November, 1997
James Sheeve,"Seres ofthe Gene", National Geographic, Val. 196, No.4
an MacL.go, "Human genes, private property, Special Report, Otawa Citizen,
PAIS, 28 September 199,
Patenting of Human Genes, The FIGO Comite forthe Study of Ethical
‘Aspects of Human Production, Bas, 30 May, 1997
"Plant block patenting of human genes", BBC Online Network, Sept 2, 1999,
http:/www.cid harvard.edu/cidbiotech/comments54.htm o7/oigs9