Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Radwin Vs 80211 PDF

    Uploaded by

    akemi
    27 views1 page
    Radwin wireless solutions provide more reliable, accurate, and guaranteed connectivity compared to 802.11-based solutions. Radwin has a lower packet error rate, more accurate timing, faster automatic repeat requests, minimal fixed layer 2 overhead, guaranteed bandwidth up to 100Mbps, lower delay of 3msec, inherent support for TDM, longer range up to 120km, full flexibility in mixed services, no single point of failure topology, and scalability with a pay-as-you-grow model versus high initial investment of 802.11.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    radwin_vs_80211.pdf

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Radwin wireless solutions provide more reliable, accurate, and guaranteed connectivity compared to 802.11-based solutions. Radwin has a lower packet error rate, more accurate timing, faster automatic repeat requests, minimal fixed layer 2 overhead, guaranteed bandwidth up to 100Mbps, lower delay of 3msec, inherent support for TDM, longer range up to 120km, full flexibility in mixed services, no single point of failure topology, and scalability with a pay-as-you-grow model versus high initial investment of 802.11.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    27 views1 page

    Radwin Vs 80211 PDF

    Uploaded by

    akemi
    Radwin wireless solutions provide more reliable, accurate, and guaranteed connectivity compared to 802.11-based solutions. Radwin has a lower packet error rate, more accurate timing, faster automatic repeat requests, minimal fixed layer 2 overhead, guaranteed bandwidth up to 100Mbps, lower delay of 3msec, inherent support for TDM, longer range up to 120km, full flexibility in mixed services, no single point of failure topology, and scalability with a pay-as-you-grow model versus high initial investment of 802.11.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Tlalnepantla, Edo.

    de Mxico a November 24, 2009

    Comparison Radwin vs. 802.11 based Solutions

    Radwin

    IEEE 802.11

    PER (Packet Error Rate)

    0.10%

    5.00%

    Timing

    Accurate radio frame


    Based on distance

    Carrier Sense

    ARQ (Automatic Repeat Request)

    Fast retry per radio frame


    (Based on service)

    Multiple retries per packet

    Layer 2 overhead

    Minimal and fixed

    High with small packet size (e.g.


    64Bytes)

    Radwin (Multiple Point-Point)

    WiMAX / WiFI / Point to


    Multipoint

    Bandwidth

    Guaranteed (up to 100Mbps)

    Shared

    Delay

    3msec

    30-100msec

    TDM support

    inherently supported

    no

    Range

    up to 120km from BTS to client

    limited (sectarian antenna)

    Mixed services

    Full flexibility.
    Each user gets the required service
    (Ethernet, E1/T1s or a mix) with the
    relevant channel BW

    No flexibility.
    Ethernet only, same channel BW to all
    users

    Robustness

    No single point of failure

    One single point of failure, many CPEs


    to one antenna

    Topology

    Star, daisy chain, cascade and a


    mixture of the above

    Star only

    Scalability

    Pay as you grow

    High initial investment

    You might also like