Results Evaluation for teachers France Mobility

Learning / Teaching / Training Activities of the Erasmus+ Project

Power up! Get active for your future
th
11 17thOctober 2015 in Chtel-sur-Moselle / France
A. Mark your opinion about the meeting and your participation
1. The meeting was wellorganized

2. The teachers meeting was

well-organized

3. We had enough time to

discuss all important issues

4. We made progress in regard

to the contents of our project

B. Mark the main difficulties you had during the meeting

C. Mark your opinion about the activities during the meeting

Monday
1. Official welcome ceremony in
the assembly hall

2. Ice breaking activities

3. Tour of the school

4. Breton Lunch at school

cafeteria

5. Workshop : stress and

relaxation

6. Workshop : indoor rowing

7. Workshop : a healthy
breakfast (posters)

Tuesday
1. Breakfast at school

2. Presentation on eating
disorders

3. Presentation of a Podcast

4. Presentation on dangers of
the web

5. Workshop on expressions
about physical sensations

6. European quiz

7. Lunch at school cafeteria

9. Visit of FraisBaril fish

breeding company

Wednesday
1. Bus trip to Strasbourg

2. Tour of the European

Parliament

3. Lunch in Strasbourg

4. Walking in Strasbourg

5. River boat tour in Strasbourg

6. Touristic sights in Strasbourg

Thursday
1. Visit of the Egger company
, wood panels

2. Gerardmer, sights and lake

3. Gastronomic lunch in
Gerardmer

4. Digestive hike in the

mountain

5. Summer sledge rides

Friday
1. Attending a class

2. Workshop : danceWell in
body and soul

3. Workshop : music Well in

body and soul

4. Basque lunch at school

cafeteria

5. Visit of Nancy

6. Official farewell ceremony in

the assembly hall

7. Buffet with students,

teachers and host families

D. Mark your opinion about the accommodation, the service and the food
1. The accommodation at
the hotel was satisfactory

2. The staff in the hotel was

friendly

4. The dinners in Epinal

were satisfactory

5. Other comments:

E. What was the best part of the visit? Why?

F. What was the least successful part of the visit? Why?

G. What should have been added to the programme to improve it?