...............................................................................................................................

2
.............................................................................................. 4
............................................................................................. 4
[2] ................................................................................................................ 4
[3].................................................................................................................... 6
[4] ............................................................................................... 9
[5] .......................................................................................................... 10
[6] ............................................................................................................ 12
[7]............................................................................................................... 14
[8] ............................................................................................................ 18
..................................................................................................................... 21
........................................................................................................... 21
.................................................................................................................. 39
.............................................................................................................. 42
............................................................................................. 43

(
)
.

, .

,
, .

,
ERSO 5 SafetyNet (Bjorkman et al.
2008.).
2003.

( ) 2000-2003. .
,
, On- The-Spot accident research,
.
1975. ,
, ,
. SUPREME
(European Commission, 2007.) ,
,
.
,
,
. , ,

, .

,

.

,
, 156.

2009. .

,

.

.

,



.
,
.

,
.

.


, .
,

, .

,
.
,
,
,

.

1.

, , ,
,
, , , , ,

.

[2]
2002. , ,
Peter Larsson , 0,
.
,

. , ,

. ,
. ,
.
,
.

1. 1997. ,
, ,
, :
-

.

.

,
.

,
. ,
, .
,

.

, ,
.
,
,
.


. ,
(
, ...).

,
(, ).
.



( ,
,...).
.

,
,

( ,
, ,
30 km/h
,...). ,
,
.

,
.
.
,
.
.

[3]

. ,
, ,
. ,
.

.

4 :
-

P .
,
1 4, i
Xi
.

2004-2010. :
-80,502 49,405
-
,
.

:
-
-
-
- 1.0 ( )
-
- ,
.
-

1.

-
-

2.
-

-
.

.

.

.
,
.
,
.

2.

[4]

300000 ,

,
(Rospa road safety manual)
.
,
, .
.

. 95%
, 75%
.

,
. ,
:

- ( ,
,...),
- ( , ,
, , ), o
(, ,...)

- ,
.

- , ,
.
On the spot
-

1 -
. , ,

2 2-3 -
. : ( ),
, .
3 -
. : .

, ,
.
, .
( ,...) ,
,
, 95% .

[5]

(RARU)


.
,
.

. :
,

1990 .
236
1. 1998. 29. 2000. .

1998.
.

.
.
,

.

( 100km ) .
.


- .

10

.

, .

.
:
1.
2.
3.
4.

5. ,

6.
7.
8.

44

.
22,9 . (65
) 100
km/h. .
,
( ).
. 56
. 74 .


. 40

. ,
10 .
373 .
.
60 , , ,
. 56 19
.
14
.
,
.

.
,

11

,
.
,
.
: , ,
.
,
.

.


.
,
.

. 236
55
.
,

:
1.
2. ,

3.

4. 9 ,
., 80 km/h
,
,
,

.

[6]

.

,

12

.
:
1.
2.
3.
4.


.
.
.

1-
24- . ,
, .

, .

.

.

.
, .
.
.
,
. 4
, 6 .

.
,
. : , ,
.
.
:
1. , ,
....
2.

3.

13

4. , : ,
. ,

.
.
. ,

.
.
. :

. .
23
. 32 , ,
75 .

.

,
.
.
,
,

.

[7]
GIDAS - .
GIDAS ?
GIDAS
. ,
.
1999., 2000
() GIDAS .

(BAST) (FAT).

14

( )
( UN-ECE, EEBC )
( GTRS )
: , .


,

GIDAS :

.
, , 2005.
2007. . 4 076
.

,
, .
.
1000 , 1000 2000
.

19 000 , 34 000
, 22 000 47 000 .

:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. ()
6.

15

,
.
50
,
.


. ,
16 ,
, .

3.
2 000 .
,
.


.

.

,
.
.

. ,
, ,

16

.

. ,

.
, ,
6 . .
,
. ,
, ,
.
.
. 2000
. :
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8. ,
, , .

, ,

.

500 3000 .

. .
4 076 , 762
.
, , .

20 0,52 ,
.
.

17

[8]

2005. .
2004..
2004..
2005..
.

,

.
, ,
24
, ,
.
,
, ,
.
:
. : ,
, .
,
.

, 2005. .
.
2009. ,
2005. 2008..
2005. 2008.
875 955 ,
13 , 40
, 33
.

. :
1.
2.
3.
4.

18

5.
6.
7.
8.
9.

.
.
.
,
,
.

.

19

1.

SAFER

On the Spot

VD

SWOV

GIDAS

KFV

NPRA

,



.

(
,
)

,

,


,
95% .


.

.


.



.









.

2005. .

236



55
.

.

.

.

20

, ,
, 2001. 2012. .
:
, (, ,),
, , , ,
, , .
: , (,
), (,
, ), ,
.
.
,
, ,
2001. 2012. .
, 1016
, 627 , 272 , 59
, 21 32 .

.
, :
-

;
;
(, , );
;
;
;
;
;
;

;
;

21

,
. ,
1016 , 94% 1 ()
, 6%.
, , ,
, . ,

.
28-44 .

1. 1

2 84 % , 16 % .
1, 28-44
.

2. 2

22

,
(/, /),
( 16h 20h),
3.

3.

( 4.)
(, ,
), (, , , ).
,
(, ),

.

4.

23

5.

6.
-.
,

.
,
. .

( ,
) .

6.

24

,
,
, , ,
.

.

7.

30 60 km/h 60 90km/h.

.

8.

25

.

.

,
.
, ,
( , , ),
,
. ,
,
,
.
,
,

,
.

9.

,
( 30-60 km/h) .

.
, ,
,

26

.
, ,
,
,
(), .
,
, , ,
.

10.

.
9.
.
,
.

11.

27

12.

13.

28

,
( )
.
.

.
.

14.

( 14.)

.
.

.


(30-60 km/h) (60-90 km/h).
.
30 km/h 90 km/h.

(30-60 km/h).


,
.

29

15.

,
15.
30 60km/h.
( 310
)

16.
, .
.

,

.
-.

.

.

30

16.

(, ) 17.

30 60 km/h.

17.

31

18.

N .
(, , , ,
). 18.

.

19. (48%) 24% .
(
).

3.

32

19.

.

()
.

20.

33

21.

22.

34

60-90
km/h. 60-90 km/h.

(
, ,
, )
22.

23.

30,84% -, 41,12%
. 60%
, 33,33% .
44,90% .
, ,
. 40,22% ,
33,33% , 23,99%
.

.
,
.
32,17%
. 52,47 %
.

(55.56%).

35

24.

25.

36

26.

, ,
.
, .

,
.

27.

37

, , .
50%
20% .

,
. , ,
, 20 % .

60 km/h : , .
60 km/h , ,
, . ( 90 km/h)
,

38

, , ,
(28-44), (/,
/), ( 16-20h). ,
, j
, ( , ),
( ).
, ,
, (84%), ,
16 %. , ,
, ,
. ,
.
,
.
.

30-60 km/h.
.


, ,
.
, .

, .
50%
20% . 40,22%
, 33,33%
, 23,99% .

.
,
.
32,17%
. 52,47 %
.

(55.56%).

39

, ,

. ,
,
, ,

, ,
.

, .

, ,
,
.
, ,
,
,
(), .
, ,
, , .
,

. ,
,
. ,

. ,
,
.
, .
.

. ,
:
-

() ,

.

() .
,
, .
, , , .
,
.

40

, .
.

, .
,
(
, .)
.

41

[1] , ., , . (2002), II ,
, .
[2] , ., , ., , . (2015),
,
, , .

[3] Rich J., Prato C., Lyckegaard A,(2013) Analyzing the relationship between car
generation and severity of motor-vehicle crashes in Denmark,
[4] Hannah M., Alex B.,(2008) Analysis of the On the Spot (OTS) Road Accident
Database,
[5] Baldock MRJ., Kloeden CN., McLean AJ.,(2003) In-depth research into rural road
crashes,
[6] Galiano, F.,(1999) Dutch in-depth accident investigation: first experiences and
analysis results for motorcycles and mopeds, .
[7] Schttler, Nehmzow, ., Joachim O., (2010) Accident Research Unit, ,
www.bast.de; www.gidas.org
[8] Marianne, S.,(2009) In-depth accident analyses in Norway,

42

1. 1 ...................................................................22
2. 2 ...................................................................22
3. ....23
4. ...................................23
5. ........................................................24
6. ..................................24
7. ..................25
8. .............25
9. .............................26
10. .............................27
11.
... ...................................27
12. ...................................28
13. .......................28
14. .............29
15.
.. ...............................................................................30
16.
. ..............................................................................31
17.
. .................................................................31
18. .....................32
19.
. .....................................................................33
20. ....33

43

21. ..34
22.
... .................................................................................34
23. ....35
24. ..............................36
25.
.. .........................................................................36
26.
. ..................37
27.
. .....................................................................37

44