Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mere apprehended danger or direct threat to the state does not, by itself
alone, warrant the employment by the state of any force against a suspected
or potential enemy. The right may be resorted only upon a clear showing of a
grave and actual danger to the security of the state, and furthermore, selfdefensive measures must be limited by the necessity and kept clearly within
it.
Grotius denounced the mere anticipation of aggression as a ground of selfdefense, his view has been eroded by the more practical consideration that
at times the best defense is offense
US Secretary of War Elihu Root declared that it is well understood that the
exercise of the right of self-protection may and frequently does extend in its
effects beyond the limits of the territorial jurisdiction of the state exercising
it. The strongest example would be the mobilization of an army by another
power immediately across the frontier. Every act done by the other power
may be within its territory . Yet the country threatened by the state of facts is
justified in protecting itself by immediate war.