.................

SQ4R)

( SQ4R)

***

**
****

16/6/2014 :

23/12/2013 :

(SQ4R)


125 .
2012/2013
. 60 65 :
(SQ4R)
26
.
(SQ4R)

:
.
(SQ4R) :
.

Abstract
The impact of using (SQ4R) strategy on developing the first secondary grade female students'
self- awareness as skilled readers in 'Islamic Education' subject in Jordan

This study aims at investigating the impact of using (SQ4R) strategy on developing
the first secondary grade female students' self- awareness as skilled readers in the 'Islamic
Education' subject in Jordan. The study sample consists of 125 first secondary female students in
humanities and scientific streams in the second semester of the academic year 2012/2013. The
sample subjects are distributed to two groups: a control group of 65 subjects, and an experimental
group of 60 subjects. To achieve the objective of the study, the researcher uses (SQ4R) strategy
and applies it to the 'Islamic Education' subject. To that end, a questionnaire consisting of 26 items
is designed in order to measure the degree of the students' self-awareness as skilled readers. The
results of the study indicated that there is a statistically significant effect of using (SQ4R) strategy
on developing the female students' self-awareness as skilled readers in favor of the experimental
group. On the other hand, the results do not show any significant effect attributed to the stream:
humanities vs. scientific, or to the interaction between the two streams and the strategy used in
teaching on developing the students' self-awareness as skilled readers.
Key words: Islamic Education, Reading Comprehension, (SQ4R) Strategy, and Skilled Readers
.
*
. **
. ***
. ****

:
:

165 /2

).................SQ4R

.

:

].[5-1:









) .(2007211
) (200247 :

.
)Littles,2007,290
(yang,2006,317
)
.(Solheim,2011,3


) (2009254

:
.

) (Fountas & Gay,2006,34

.



.
:
) (2006221


.

) (SQ4R



)& Loewen,2006,163;Manyak
.(Bauer,2008,433;Fagan,2010,94
) (SQ4R :
-1Survey:
) (Skimming

/2 166

).................SQ4R

.

) (Scan-whipple



.
-2Questioning :
) (predication
)Carter et
(al,2000,23
.



) (Focus on picking ideas
.-




.
-3 Reading and Re-Reading :

.

) (sentence key

.


.

)
(Automatisation
).(Selectively Reading
-4 Record or Write :


.
/2 167

).................SQ4R

(Reduce)-Record

.




.
-5 ) (Recitation :



) (Recall
.




.
-6Review:



.




.



.

:



) (SQ4R
.
:
) (SQ4R

/2 168

).................SQ4R

.
:
: =0,05

) (SQ4R

: =0,05

) : ( .
: =0,05

) SQ4R ( ) ( .
:
:
-1
- )
(SQ4R
.
-2
.
-3
.
-4

.
:
)(SQ4R

2012/2013
.

) (30 ) (14
.
:
-1 :
133/2007
:
.
-2) :(SQ4R
:
.
-3 "" :

/2 169

).................SQ4R

.
-4 :

26.
-5 :

27 .1989 .16
-6 :


.
:
:

) (SQ4R

:
O1 X O2 O1 O2
) (O1 )(O2
) (X
).(SQ4R
:


:
.
125
)( :
65
:
60.
:
) (SQ4R
.
) (SQ4R
30
. 0,87
:
- ):(SQ4R
14
) (SQ4R :
/2 170

).................SQ4R

.




:
.
- :

31 .
10

%80
26
. 1
)Internal
(Consistency ) (Cronbach Alpha

0,88
.
:

SPSS

.
:
:
=0,05

) (SQ4R

.1

1

/2 171

SQ4R

).................SQ4R

33,78
3,85

33,93
3,92

36,66

35,08

87,51

89,222

88,28

4,54

4,38

4,83

5,632

5,23

27

60

33

27

60

34,75

34,33

37,21

38,219

37,70

2,14

3,17

5,030

4,427

4,73

32

65

33

32

65

35,62

34,69

62,36

61,559

61,98

3,55
59

3,80
125

25,81
66

26,105
59

25,84
125

33

33,86
3,85
66

33

130
1
)
(SQ4R 88,28
. 37,70
1
) (ANCOVA 22
=0,05
. 2
2

30,70
78098,19

1
1

30,70
78098,19

)(
1,24
3167,01

0,267
0,00

35,59

35,59

1,44

0,232

1,32

1,32

0,05

0,817

2959,18
82855,96

120
124

24,66

) (ANCOVA

2 =0,05
) (SQ4R
/2 172

).................SQ4R

)( 3167,01
. 0,00


. 3
3

SQ4R
87,63
0,87
88,95

37,31
0,86
38,21

0,98
88,29
0,64

0,87
37,76
0,61

3

) (SQ4R
88,296


. 37,763 : ) (SQ4R
.
) (SQ4R
-




.


- - .
);Carter et al, 2000; Selart, 2008; Dermitzaki, et al, 2008; Feldt & Hensley, 2009
(Carlston, 2011
3 )(SQ4R


. 4
4

/2 173


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

).................SQ4R

.
.

.

.

.
.

.
.

.

.

.

.

.
.

.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

/2 174

3,97

0,991

3,95
3,93

1,155
0,656

3,91

0,651

3,89

1,209

3,85
3,83

1,212
1,159

3,82
3,80

1,206
0,949

3,78

1,034

3,77

0,717

3,75

1,210

3,74

0,879

3,72
3,71

1,001
0,834

3,69
3,68

1,101
1,003

3,67

1,073

3,65

1,199

3,17

0,915

3,16

1,074

3,10

0,953

3,09

0,970

2,94

0,990

2,90

1,197

2,81

1,084

).................SQ4R

4
) (18-1 ) (8

.
" : "
":
": " " :
" ,
) (SQ4R





,
) (Span attention


- - Carter),
et al, 2000; Selart, 2008; Dermitzaki, et al, 2008; Feldt & Hensley, 2009; Carlston,
(2011
":
" ":
"



.
:
=0,05



): (.
2 =
0,05
)( 1,44
. 0,232


) (SQ4R

.
:
/2 175

).................SQ4R

=0,05

) SQ4R ( ) ( .
2
=0,05
)( 0,054
. 0,817

2


): (
.
:
-1

.
-2
) (SQ4R
.
-3 ) (SQ4R
.
:

.
-.236 -209 (1) 20073
./
1 : .2002


. -(2) 4 2009
.276-253

.
.230 -219 (4 )20062
) .(1989
:.
:
Carlston, David, Benefits of Student-Generated Note Packets: A Preliminary Investigation
of SQ3R Implementation. Teaching of Psychology, 2011, 38(3), 142-146.
Carter, Carol; Bishop, Joyce; Kravits, Sarah, Keys to effective learning. Second edition,
Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA.
, 2000.

/2 176

.................SQ4R)

Dermitzaki, I; Andreou, G; Paraskeva, High and low reading comprehension achievers

strategic behaviours and their relation to performance in a reading comprehension situation.
Reading Psychology, 2008, 29, 471-492.
Fagan, Melinda .Social Construction Revisited: Epistemology and Scientific Practice.
Philosophy of Science, 2010, 77, (1), 92-116.
Feldt, Ronald; Hensley, Rober, Recommendations for use of sq3r in introductory
psychology textbooks. Education, 2009, 129, (4), 584-588.
Fountas, Irene; Gay, Pinnell. Teaching for comprehending and fluency. Heinemann, USA,
2006.
Littles, E, Reading motivation and reading comprehension growth in the later elementary
years. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2007, 32, 282-313.
Loewen, Susan, Exceptional intellectual performance: a neo-Piagetian perspective. High
Ability Studies, 2006, 17(2), 159-181.
Manyak, P; Bauer, E, Explicit code and comprehension instruction for English learners.
Reading Teacher, 2008, 61(5), 432-434.
Selart, A, Effects of Reward on Selfregulation, Intrinsic Motivation and creativity.
Scandinavian. Journal of Educational Research, 2008, 52(5), 439-458.
Solheim, Oddny, The impact of reading self-efficacy and task value on reading
comprehension scores in different item formats. Reading Psychology, 2011, 32(1), 1-27.
Yang, Yu-Fen, Reading Strategies or Comprehension Monitoring Strategies Reading
Psychology, 2006,27,(4), 313-343

177 /2