PRESUMPTION

WHEN WE GET A COURT ORDER WE MUST REBUTT THE PRESUMPTION !!

SO WHAT IS A PRESUMPTION? Presumption n. a rule of law which permits a court to assume a fact
I true until such time as there is a preponderance (greater weight) of evidence which disproves or
outweighs (rebuts) the presumption. Each presumption is based upon a particular set of apparent facts
paired with established laws, logic, reasoning or individual rights. A presumption is rebuttable in tht it
can be rebutted by factual evidence. One can present factual evidence. One can present facts to
persuade the judge that the presumption is not true.
WE NEED TO KNOW WHO WE ARE THEY CAN NOT CONTROL US THEN!!!
WE DO NOT WANT TO MAKE A CLAIM WE ASK QUESTIONS AND THEY MUST PROVE
IT!!!! THESE ARE ALL OFFERS THAT STAND IF WE DO NOTHING!!!!
REBUTTAL IS EVIDENCE INTRODUCED TO COUNTER , DISPROVE OR CONTRADICT THE
OPOSITIONS EVIDENCE OR A PRESUMPTION, OR RESPONSIVE LEGAL ARGUMENT!!!
NOW WE NEED TO READ THROUGH THE LETTER FOR NY PRESUMPTIONS WE NEED TO
REBUT FOR EXAMPLE You were advised that a judgment had been entered against you at leeds
crown court on .2014 so here the judgement was not entered against the natural person it was
against you so now we rebut the presumption!!!
THE LETTER WAS ADDRESSED TO THE LEGAL FICTION HOWEVER, THE FIRST
SENTENCE ADDRESSES YOU BECAUSE THE JUDGMENT WAS NOT ENTERED AGAINST
THE ALL CAPS NAME IT WAS AGAINST YOU IE You were advised that a judgment was entered
in the Leeds crown court against You on the ..2014.
Is this the legal fiction? No its plural yet we believe its to US!!!
We are required to accept the judgment as the all caps name which is NOT US!!! We must rebut the
fact that we are not You we must write to them privately as below and get two witness signatures on
the letter!!!! Google legal accord and satisfaction!!!
Should we:
Ignore
Argue
Or fail to rebut
Any of their kind offers?
Then we are in big trouble
Private
Dear Sir,
We, thank you Mr registrar for his/her correspondence which we received today the 4th August 2014.
There appears to be a mistake as although the correspondence was sent to JOHN DOE the judgment
was against You
Would Mr registrar in his private capacity kindly inform who You is and/or forward this
correspondence to you
NOTICE
Failure by Mr Registrar in his private capacity to respond within ten days from receipt of this
correspondence shall constitute legal accord and satisfaction of all claims.
By reasonable accommodation
CROWN DOE (De facto) .
Sovereign: John Henry (CD))De Jure)..
Private Persons Personal Representative (AB) Christian..

In front of Householder date

In front of .. Householder date
CD AB GH JK all come out of the bill of exchange Act !!!
An adhesion contract Now takes effect between the real man and the John Doe trust
Adhesion contract (contract of adhesion) n. a contract (often a signed form) so imbalanced in favour of
one party over the other that there is a strong implication it was not freely bargained.
There is nothing unenforceable or even wrong about adhesion contracts say the courts
Once they have adhesion contracts
They can proceed to prosecution
As by our failure to rebut the claim that john doe was you the court now sees John Doe and you as
one and the same.
The first letter or presentment that the courts, councils, debt collectors send
Is the adhesion contract to bind the parties as one.
Once we accept that we are you they then send the second letter or presentment
Is to make the claim that you are causing them damage.
The third letter or presentment
Is the judgment, they may now proceed to go to court and enforce judgment.
Unless we do something at this stage and rebut all there presumptions
All they need to show the judge is that they have observed all the right process!!!
Do not be afraid to use the same process against them
It is lawful and is your right to do so!!
What the courts rely on is our lack of knowledge and fear
Empower yourself with knowledge and the belief that what you are doing is right.
European Convention on Human Rights. (ECoHR) Article 13. "EVERYONE whose rights and
freedoms as set forth in this Convention that are violated SHALL have an effective remedy before a
national authority not withstanding that the violation HAS BEEN committed by persons acting in an
OFFICIAL CAPACITY".