You are on page 1of 34
UNIVERSITY PLACE 6817 271H STW ‘984669998 19483380055 caysoreors (80276-8777 4:10 PM Product, Sale Final Description ory Price First-Class 1 $9.74 Parcel Service onesticd TACOMA, WA 98402) (Weignt:0 Lb 8.20 02> iExpected Del ivery Day) (Friday 04/01/2016) Registeren 1 $19.00 ‘dmourt $55.00) (USPS Registered Mall #) ‘RES7OS90E90U8) Return 1 $2.80 Receipt (USPS Return Recoipt #) (290340211 988246036418) affixed 1 ($16.50) Postage, att ed amour $16.58) First-Class. $3.74 Parcel Service ‘Donestic) (TACOMA, WA 98402) (Weight!0 Lp 8.40 02> (Expected Delivery Day) (Friday 04/01/2018) Registered 1 $13.00 anoure: $55 00) (USPS Registered Mall # (RESTOS90890US) Return 1 $2.80 Receipt (USPs Return Receipt #) (oSs09a021 196524500695), Attixed 1” 16.5 Postage (affixed Anount 616.54) Total $6.00 Cash $6.00 In a hurry? Sel f-service kiosks offer ‘quick and easy check-out. Any Retail Associate can show you how. Text your tracking number to 26777 {2USPS) to get the Tatest status. Standard Message and Data rates may ‘apply. You may also visit USPS. con USPS Tracking or call 1-800-223-1811 ALVERSITY PLACE 6817 2714 STW Tacota sedtboose 5483360055 03/20/2016 —_(800)275-8777 4:07 PM Product Sale Final Description ay Price: Uti Mir 10. 4 $4.76 xi6 {Unte Price:s3. 19) First-Class $3.54 Parcel Service (Domestic) TACOMA, WA 98402) (Weight:0 Lb 8.00 02) (Expected Delivery Day) (Friday 02/04/2016) Registered! $19.00 (Anourt $55.00) (USPS Registered Mail #) (RESTO5xC890U8) First-Class 1 93.54 Parcel Service (Donestic) CTACOHA, WA Bac) (Weight 0 Lb 8.00 02) (Expected Delivery Day) (Friday 04/01/2016) Registered 1 $19.00 (Anount :$55.00) (USPS Registored Mat #) (RESTOSS°903U5) Total $97.84 Cash $40.00 Change ($2.16) In @ hurry? Self-service kiosks offer ‘quick and easy check-out. Any Retail Associate can show you how Text your tracking sunber to 28777 (2USPS) to get the latest status, Standard Nessage and Data rates may apply. You may also visit USPS. con USPS: racking or call 1-600-222-1811, ‘Complete items 1, 2, and 3, 1m Print your name and address on the reverse 0 that we can return the card to you. 1 Attach this card to the back of the maipiece, ‘ron the front if pace permits. 7 Ail Aaroecd to B.dey ars rt or ae Dyes Having aiaton Ng Iniema | Revenve Sewice| Clo Amber Chamblee 120l Pac ie C Ave SUR 5% Tacoma, Wi Zl nl WA nA if eee aces mae 9402 1196 5246 03 L PR paiclg) pba (ansfer a sevice aba) ___| Cees Gobo Rano vey Crease e: KES MO8GDUS iP eg ated Oy SEE Bates PS Form 3811, July 2015 PSN 7590-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt: Ragistered No. Date Stamp RES7O590890US ais 34 Foss Ne g, i lena series Se es [Sree 61240 ma 4A Bp [seine S| HE Loreen 19:88 | # bh %, 55 Pematset 49:00 : x oe DAD Wh Ave Wet Apt m Jn wievsity PL, WA 46466 Takernal Reyenve. Service hamblee __| ‘5S Fam 3808, Registered satel Receipt ono Fon Ne ee Say lomation,vsk our webstl in dpasor AURA Re $70 590 890 us Statutory Claim in Accord with IRS MANUAL 21.7.13.3.2.2(2\/1707 Cestui Que Vie Trust Act |, April Euneice Muhammad, now known as Kalifia Nefer Nahas El, Indigenous, Autochthonous Flesh and Blood Woman of Cherokee/Creek Descent, Claim in Accord with: the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous peoples (hito/www un org/Docs/journal/asp/ws.asp?m=A/RES/66/142; hllo:/iwww.un.org/esa/socdev/unp/ii/documents/DRIPS_en.od)) ; Presidential Proclamation 7500; HJR194 - htip:/www.gp0.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-1 10hres194it/pdf/BILL S-110hres194ih.pdf; S .Con Res. 26 - http://www geo. coviTdsys/pka/BILLS-111sconres26es/pdf/BILLS-1 1 1sconres26es.p Cereers: > Espaiol Diseute > Organization 2 dob Pestings deb > Responding te a & “ean > eat Notice » Pyecrnt 2 Taxpayer Aiecate > No FEAR Act > Tidngviet > Freedom of Information > US Treasury Act > USA gov > Gontect Your Local IRS » Accsssibiity Office » BusinessUSA gov reasury Inscector > Contact Us ee H. Res. 194 In the House of Representatives, U. S., July 29, 2008. Whereas millions of Africans and their descendants were enslaved in the United States and the 13 American colo- nies from 1619 through 1865; ‘Whereas slavery in America resembled no other form of invol- untary servitude known in history, as Africans were eap- tured and sold at auction like inanimate objects or ani- mals; Whereas Africans forced into slavery were brutalized, hnmili- ated, dehumanized, and subjected to the indignity of being stripped of their names and heritage; Whereas enslaved families were torn apart after having been sold separately from one another; ‘Whereas the system of slavery and the visceral racism against persons of African descent upon which it depended be- came entrenched in the Nation’s social fabric; ‘Whereas slavery was not officially abolished until the passage of the 13th Amendment to the United States Constitu- tion in 1865 after the end of the Civil War; Whereas after emancipation from 246 years of slavery, Afri- can-Amerieans soon saw the fleeting political, social, and economie gains they made during Reconstruction evis- cerated by virulent racism, lynehings, disenfranchisement, 2 Black Codes, and racial segregation laws that imposed a rigid system of officially sanctioned racial segregation in virtually all areas of life; Whereas the system of de jure racial segregation known as “Jim Crow,” which arose in certain parts of the Nation following the Civil War to create separate and unequal societies for whites and African-Americans, was a direct result of the racism against persons of African descent engendered by slavery; Whereas a century after the official end of slavery in Amer- ica, Federal action was required during the 1960s to eliminate the dejure and defacto system of Jim Crow throughout parts of the Nation, though its vestiges still linger to this day; ‘Whereas African-Americans continne to suffer from the com- plex interplay between slavery and Jim Crow—long after both systems were formally abolished—through enormous damage and loss, both tangible and intangible, incading the loss of human dignity, the frustration of careers and professional lives, and the long-term loss of income and opportunity; ‘Whereas the story of the enslavement and de jure segregation of African-Americans and the dehumanizing atrocities committed against them should not be purged from or minimized in the telling of American history; Whereas on July 8, 2003, during a trip to Goree Island, Sen- egal, a former slave port, President George W. Bush ac- knowledged slavery and the need to confront that legacy when he stated that slavery “was . . . one of the greatest crimes of history . .. The racial bigotry fed by slavery did not end with continuing legacy in American life “HRES 194 EH 3 slavery or with segregation, And many of the issues that still trouble America have roots in the bitter experience of other times. But however long the journey, our destiny is set: liberty and justice for all.”; ‘Whereas President Bill Clinton also acknowledged the decp- seated problems caused by the continuing legacy of rac- ism against African-Americans that began with slavery when he initiated a national dialogue about race; ‘Whereas a gennine apology is an important and necessary first step in the process of racial reconciliation; Whereas an apology for centuries of brutal dehumanization and injustices cannot erase the past, but confession of the wrongs committed can speed racial healing and ree- onciliation and help Americans confront the ghosts of their past; Whereas the legislature of the Commonwealth of Virginia has recently taken the lead in adopting a resolution officially expressing appropriate remorse for slavery and other State legislatures have adopted or are considering similar resolutions; and ‘Whereas it is important for this country, which legally reeog- nized slavery through its Constitution and its laws, to make a formal apology for slavery and for its successor, Jim Crow, so that it can move forward and seek ree- one ion, justice, and harmony for all of its citizens: Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That the House of Representatives — (1) acknowledges that slavery is incompatible with the basic founding principles recognized in the Declara~ tion of Independence that all men are created equal; “HRES 194 BH 4 (2) acknowledges the fundamental injustice, cruelty, brutality, and inhumanity of slavery and Jim Crow; (3) apologizes to African Americans on behalf of the people of the United States, for the wrongs committed against them and their ancestors who suffered under slavery and Jim Crow; and (4) expresses its commitment. to rectify the lin- gering consequences of the misdeeds committed against African Americans under slavery and Jim Crow and to stop the occurrence of human rights violations in the fu- ture. Attest: Clerk. “HRES 104 EH, Lorn CONGRESS Cy H J RES 3 « Ue e ‘To acknowledye a long history of official depredations and ill-conceived policies by the United States Government regarding Indian tribes and offer an apology to all Native Peoples on behalf of the United States. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Jaxvany 4, 2007 Mbrs, Jo ANN Davis of Vinginia introduced the following joint resolution: whieh was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources JOINT RESOLUTION To acknowledge a long history of official depredations and ill-conecived policies by the United States Government regarding Indian tribes and offer an apology to all Native Peoples on behalf of the United States. Whereas the ancestors of today’s Native Peoples inhabited the land of the present-day United States since time im- memorial and for thousands of years before the arrival of peoples of European descent; Whereas the Native Peoples have for millennia honored, pro- tected, and stewarded this land we cheris Whereas the Native Peoples are spiritual peoples with a deep and abiding belief in the Creator, and for millennia their peoples have maintained a powerful spiritual conncetion 2 to this land, as is evidenced by their customs and leg- ends; Whereas the arrival of Europeans in North America opened a new chapter in the histories of the Native Peoples; Whereas, while establishment. of permanent European settle- ments in North America did stir coufliet with nearby In- dian tribes, peaceful and mutually beneficial interactions also took place; Whereas the foundational English settlements in Jamestown, Virginia, and Plymouth, Massachusetts, owed their swr- vival in large measnre to the compassion and aid of the Native Peoples in their vicinities; Whereas, in the infancy of the United States, the founders of the Republie expressed their desire for a just relation- ship with the Indian tribes, as evidenced by the North- west Ordinance enacted by Congress in 1787, which be- gins with the phrase, “The utmost good faith shall al- ways be observed toward the Indian: Whereas Indian tribes provided great, assistance to the fledg- ling Republic as it. strengthened and grew, including in- valuable help to Meriwether Lewis and William Clark on ‘their epic journey from St. Louis, Missouri, to the Pacific Coast; Whereas Native Peoples and non-Native settlers engaged in numerous armed conflicts; Whereas the United States Government violated many of the treaties ratified by Congress and other diplomatie agree- ments with Indian tribe Whereas this Nation should addre many of the more ill-conceived Federal policies that fol- the broken treaties and lowed, such as extermination, termination, foreed removal “Hy aH 3 and relocation, the outlawing of traditional religions, and the destruction of sacred places; ‘Whereas the United States forced Indian tribes and their citi- is to move away from their traditional homelands and onto federally established and controlled reservations, in accordance with such Acts as the Indian Removal Act of 1830; Whercas many N: ive Peoples suffered and perished — (1) during the execution of the official United States Government poliey of foreed removal, inclnding the infa- mons Trail of Tears and Long Walls; (2) during bloody armed confrontations and mas- sacres, such as the Sand Creek Massacre in 1864 and the ‘Wounded Knee Massacre in 1890; and (3) on munerous Indian reservations; Whereas the United States Govermuent condenmed the tradi- tions, bel; deavored to assimilate them by such policies as the redis- tribution of land under the General Allotment Act of 1887 and the forcible removal of Native children from their families to faraway boarding schools where their and customs of the Native Peoples and en- Native practi and languages were degraded and for- bidden; Whereas officials vate United States citizens harmed Native Peoples by the of the United States Government and pri- unlawful acquisition of recognized tribal land, the theft of resources from such territories, and the mismanagement of tribal trust funds; Whereas the policies of the United States Government toward Indian tribes and the breaking of covenants with Indian ony 3H 4 tribes have contributed to the severe social ills and cco- nomie troubles in many Native communities today; Whereas, despite continuing maltreatment of Native Peoples by the United States, the Native Peoples have remained committed to the protection of this great land, as evi- denced by the fact that, on a per capita basis, more Na~ tive people have served in the United States Armed Forees and placed themselves in harm’s way in defense of the United States in every major military conflict th: any other ethnic group; Whereas Indian tribes have actively influenced the public life of the United States by continued cooperation with Con- gress and the Department of the Interior, through the in- volvement of Native individuals in official United States Government. positions, and by leadership of their own sovereign Indian tribes; Whereas Indian tribes are resilient and determined to pre- serve, develop, and transmit to future generations their unique cultural identities; Whereas the National Muscum of the American Indian was established within the Smithsonian Institution as a living memorial to the Native Peoples and their traditions; and Whereas Native Peoples are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, and that among those are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness: Now, therefore, be it 1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, oH 5 Cor annunerwn 5 SECTION 1. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND APOLOGY. ‘The United States, acting through Congress— (1) recognizes the special legal and political relation- ship the Indian tribes have with the United States and the solemn covenant with the land we share; (2) commends and honors the Native Peoples for the thousands of years that. they have stewarded and protected this land; (3) acknowledges ycars of official depredations, ill- conecived policies, and the breaking of covenants by the United States Government regarding Indian tribes; (4) apologizes on behalf of the people of the United States to all Native Peoples for the many instances of vio- lence, maltreatment, and neglect, inflicted on Native Peo- ples by citizens of the United States; (5) expresses its regret for the ramifications of former offenses and its commitment to build on the posi- tive relationships of the past and present to move toward a brighter future where all the people of this land live ree- oneiled as brothers and sisters, and harmoniously steward and protect this land together; (6) urges the President to acknowledge the offenses of the United States against Indian tribes in the history of the United States in order to bring healing to this land by providing a proper foundation for reconciliation be- tween the United States and Indian tribes; and ws Cor enunewrn 6 (7) commends the State governments that have begun reconeiliation efforts with recognized Indian tribes located in their boundaries and eneourages all State gov- ernments similarly to work toward reconciling relation- ships with Indian tribes within their boundaries. ‘SEC. 2. DISCLAIMER. Nothing in this Joint Resolution authorizes any claim against the United States or serves as a settlement of any claim against the United States. ° “ay st 333 Rights Suspension and Corrupt Article 100 - Cestul Que Vie Trust ‘canon 2036 ACestul Que Vie Trust also known by several other pseudonyers such as “Tern of Life or Years” or “Pur Autre Vie" or "Fide Commissary Trust” or “Foreign Situs Trust” or “Secret Trust” isa pseuto form of trust fst formed in the 26th Century under Henry Vil of England on one of more presumptions including (but not brited to) one or mora Persore presumed wards, inp, iets, ast or abandoned at "sea" and therefore assumadipresumed “dead” after seven (7} years. Addional presumptions By linich sucha Trust may be “legally formed were added in ater statutes to include Denkruntcy, incapacity, mortgages and private comparies. Canon 2037 Interms of the evidential history ofthe formation of Cestui Que Vie Trusts: (0-The fest Cestul Que Vie Ttusts formed were through an Act of Henry Vil of England in 1549 (G2Hen.£ ¢3) and ater wholly corrupted whereby the poor people of England, after having al their homes, goods ard wealth seized in 1535 (27 Han.2 «.20) under the guise” of small ralglous estates under £200, were granted the welfare or “conenorwealt” benef. of an Cesta ‘Que Use or simply an "estate" with which fo lve, to work and vo bequeath va a written wily and i) 1666 Westminster and the ruing classes passed the Infamous “Proof of Life Act” also ‘called the Cestu Que Vie Act (28ar.2 ¢.6) whereby the poor and disenfranchised that Pad not ‘proven to Westminster and the Courts they were allve, were henceforth to be declared “dead inlaw” and therefore lost, abandoned and their property to be maraged in thelr absence. This supremely morally repugrart act, which remains In force today, the bith of Mundi and the infamous occult rtuals ofthe Braish Coutts in the wearing of Black robes and other paraphersalis nRonoring the "dead": and (a in 21707 Westminster under Queen Anne (Ann ¢.28) extended the provisions of “Proof of Life" snd Cestui Que Vie. extending the use of such structures ultimately for corporate and other ‘ranchise purposes. This wicked, profane and completely sacrilegious act in drect defiance to forms of Christian morals and Rule of aw has remained a comerstore of global banking and financial control fo the ist Ceneury, an (le) 21796, King George I (36 Geo 3.52 620) duty was applied to Estates Pur Autre Vie for the frottine; aed (\) in 1837 (2 Vict, ¢.25) and the amendments to the nature of Wis, that fa person under an State Pur Autre Vie (Cestul Que Vie) did not make 2 proper wil, har such property would be granted to the executors and adrmiistrators., Canon 2038 In terms of the evilential history of the operation ang any form of relief oF cemedy associated with Cestul Que Ve Trusts, taking into account all Statuzes reverencing Cestes Que Vie prior to 1540 976 3 deliberate fraud and proof ofthe ilegitimacy of Westminster Statutes: (0 The “fest” Act outing Cestul Que (Vie) Trusts is deliberately hidden under the clalmed Statutes of the reign of King Richard iin 1423 (1Rleh.2 e~1) whereby the act (Sutin force) states that all conveyances and trarsfors and use of property i= good, even though a purchaser may be unaware eis effectively under "costu que use” (subject to a Cestul Que Vie Trust). The Sctale gives a vague ard challenge path of reer that fone fs of complete rind, not an ark Sra not under fnanelal duress then any property under Cestul Que Vie Tsts fs rightly thet tor use: ane. (i) The “second” Act outining Cestul Que (Vie) Trusts is deliberately hidden under the eign of Henry 7th ia 1488 (sHien.7 c.17) permitted lors to render any atternpt by people classed as "waards" to Gemonstrate their freedom useless and that such leeds may use wets and other devices to “force” such people Lack to belng compliant “wards” (poor slave). The only remedy Under this act was ifa ward demonstrated the waste of the lord 38 to the property (and eneray) Seizea from the poor ignorare white Slaves): ane (W) The “third” Act outning the operation of Castui Que Vie only hidden this time as Estate Pur ‘are Vie was in1741 under 14Ge0.2 c.20) whereby one who was knowledgeable ofthe Costul (ue Ve slavery system could between the ages of 18 to 20, seek to recover such property Under Castul Que Vie and cease to be a slave. However the same act made law that aner 20 Years, the remedy for such recovery was no longer avaliable, despite the fact thet the existence 2 Cestul Que Vie Trusts is denied and Westminster and Banks are sworn to lie, obstruct, hide at Silcost the existence of the foundations of glabal banking slavery. Canon 2039 Interns of ossantial laments concerning Cestul Que Vie Truss: ().ACestui Que (Vie) Trust may only exist for seventy (70) years being the traditional accepted "We" expectancy ofthe estater and (WA sonertctary under Estate may be either a Beneficiary or a Cestul Que (Vie) Trust. When a Beneficiary loses direct benefit of any Property ofthe figher Estate placed in Cestui Que (Vie) ‘Trust on thelr behalf, they do not “own” the Castul Que (Vie) Trust and are only the benetclary of what the Trustees ofthe Cestui Quo (Vie) Trust choose to provide them and {i The original purpose and function of a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust was to forma temporary Estate forthe benef of srother because some evart. state of afats or condition prevented them fromm chiming thei status as lving, competart and presers before a compatent authorty. Merelore, ny clatrs, history, statutes oF argumonts that deviate ia terms of tho orgin and Rincon of Cestut Que (Vie) ust as pronounced by these canons is false and automaticaly nul and vai, canon 2040 ‘he Trust Corpus created by a Cestui Que (Vie) is also known as the Estate from two Latin words etstatuo iterally mearing “by vitue of decree, stature or udgmert”. However, 2s the Estate s held ina Temporary not permanent Trust, the (Corporate) Person as Beneiiciary is ented only to ‘equitable tte and the use of the Property, rather then legal ttle and therafore ownership ofthe Property. Only the Corporation, also Known as Body Corparate, state and Trust Corpus ofa Cestul ‘Que (Wia} Trust posceszes valé legal personaly. Canon 2041 “The Property of any Estate created through a Temporary (Testamertary) Trust may be regarded as under *Cestul Que Use” by the Corporate Person even another name or description fs used to Serine the type of trust or use. Therefore “Cestul Que Use ls nat 3 Parson but'a Righe and therefore 2 torm ot “property Canon 2042 11536, prior to the 1st Cestul Que Vie Act (1540), Henry VW declared the fist Cestul Que Vie type {estate withthe Act of Supremecy which created the Crown Estate. In 1604, seventy (70) years later, James 1of England modined the estate as the Crown Union (Union of Crowes). By the 18th Cartury, the Crown was viewed as a compary. However by the start of the 19th Censry around 1814 onwards ‘upon the bankruptcy ofthe company (1814/15). beearee the fully private Crown Corporation, ‘controled by European private banker fares. ‘Canon 2043 Since 1581, there has been a second series of Castul Que Vie Estates concerning the property of “persons” and rights which migrated tothe United States for admiistration Including: (i) 2651 the Act forthe Settlement of reland 1651-52 which introduced the concept of ‘settlements’, enemies of the state and restricthors of movement In states of "emergency (1) 92861 the Emergancy Powers Act 1861: an6 (dy tn 2931 the Emergency Relief and Construction Act 1931-32; and (@) in 2003 the Patriot Act 2001. Canon 2044 ‘Since 1592, there has been a thd series of Cestui Que Vie Estates concerning the property of “sou” and ecclesiastical rights which migrated to the United States for administration Include (0) 162661 the Act of Settlement 1561-62; and (i 02871 the District of Columbia Act 1871: are (ii) 91941 the Lend Lease Act 1941, canon 2045 By 1815 and the bankruptcy ofthe Crown and Bank of England by the Rothsctilis, for the Ist tne, the Céstul Que Vie Trusts of the United Kingdom became assets placed in private banks effectively becoming "private trusts" or "Fide Commissory Trusts" administered by commissioners (guardians). From 1835 ard the Wils Act. these private trusts have been albo Corsidered “Secret Trusts” whose eistence does not need to Be dlvulges. Canon 2046 From 1917/18 with the enactment ofthe Sedtion Act ard the Trading withthe Enemy Actin the United ‘States and through tho Uritod Kingdom, the citizens of te Commonwealth and the United States Dbacame effectively “enames of the state" and “allers* which in ten converted the “ide Commissary” private secret trusts to “Foreign Sus" (Private International) Trusts, ‘Canon 2047 tn 1931, the Roman Death Cut. also known as the Vatican created the Bank for berrational Seitlerients for the contro of claimed property of associated private central banks around the wort Upon the delberate barkuptcy of most eourkri, private cenkral banks were installed 2= administrators and the global Costu Que ViefForeign situs Trust systerm was implemented from 1933, ‘onwards. Canon 2048, Since 1933, when a child is borne in a State(Estate) under inferior Roman law, tre (3) Cestul Que (Vie) Trusts are created upon certain presumptions, specifically designed to deny the chid forever 2ny rights of Real Property. any Rights as a Free Person and any Rights to be town as man ard woman rather than a creature or animal, by claiming and possessing thelr Soul or Spit. Canon 2049 Since 1933, upon a new child being bore, the Executors or Administrators of the higher Estate \wilinaly and knowingly convey the beneficial enstiements ofthe chid as Beneficiary into the Ist {Costu Que(Vie) Trust nthe form of a Registry Number by registering the Name, thereby also ‘creating the Corporate Person and denying the child ary rights as an owner of Real Property Canon 2050 Since 1933, when 2 child is borne, the Executors or Administrators ofthe higher Estate krawinaly ard \witinly claim the baby as chattel tothe Estate, The slave baby corkract & then created by honoring the ancleat tradition of ether having the ink pression ofthe feet ofthe baby onto the five birth record, ora drop of its blood as well as ticking the parents to signing the baby away through the ‘decedal logal meanings on the live th record. Thi lve birth record as a promissory note f converted ito a slave bond sold to the private reserve bark of the estate and then conveyed ito ‘and and separate Cestul Que (Vie) Trust per child owned by the bank. Upon the promssory note feaching maturity and the bark being unable to “satze" the slave child, a martime Hea lawl sued to "salvage" the last property and Itself monetized as currency sued in series against the CCestal Que (vie) Tsk Canon 2051 Each Costui Que Vie Trust created since 1933 reprasarts one of the 3 Crowns representing the 3 ‘aims of property ofthe Roman Death Cut, being Real Property, Personal Property and Ecclesiastical Property and the denial of any rights to men ard worren, ole than those chosen as loyal members of the Soclsty snd as Bxecuzors and Administrators Canon 2052 “The Three (3) Cestul Que Vie Trusts are the specific denial of rights of Real Property, Personal Property and Ecclesiastical Property for most men and wornen, corresponds exactly to the three forts af kw avalable to the Gala of the Bar Assocation Cours. The frst form of aw f corporate Commercial law is effective because of the ast Cestui Que Vie Trust. The second form of law ls fmartume and trust aw is effective because ofthe 2nd Costul Qua Vie Trust. The 37d form of tw i ‘Talmudic and Rorran Death Cul low fs effective because of the 3d Cestul Que Vie Trust of Baptism. canon 2053 “The Birth Certifcate issued under Roman Law represents the modem equivalent to the Settlement Cortiicates of the 17th century and signs the holder as a pauper and effectively a Roman slave, ‘The Bith Certifeate hos ro direct felationship to the piivate Secret ests controled by the private banking network, nor can't be used to force the administration ofa state or nation to divulge the exbtence of tece secret trusts ‘Canon 2054 {AS the Cestu Que Vie Trusts ara created as private secret trusts on multiple presumptions including the ongoing bankruptcy of certain national estates, they remain the claimed private property of the Roman Death Cut banks and therelore carrot be directly claimed or wed. Canon 2055 While the prnvate secrot trusts of the private central banks cannot be directly adgressed, they are Stil formed on certain presumptions of law including claimed ownership ofthe name, the body, the ‘ind and sou of infants, men ard women. Cach and every man and woman az the absolute righ to rebuke and reject such false presumptions as a member of One Heaven and holder of thelr own title. Canon 2056 Given the private secret trusts of the private central banks ara created on false presumptions, when {2 man or worman makes clear ther Live Borne Record and claim over thelr own name, Body, ind end Soul, any Such trust based on such false presumptions ceases to have any property. ‘Canon 2057 ‘Any administrator oF Sxecutor that refuses to knmediataly dissolve a Cestul Que (Vie) rust, upon a Person establishing their status and competency, & guity of fraud and fundamental breach of thelr fiduciary dies require their immediate removal and punishment, Ti Trin a sig OT OE _SYantory Intnanent arent cred nr oie forty ti es STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 1997 No. 1778 SOCIAL SECURITY ‘The Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 Made + + = 22nd July 1997 Coming into force =~ Ist September 1997 Whereas at London on the 13th February 1984 an Agreement on social security berween the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Norther Ireland and the Govemment of | ‘the United States of America (hereinafter refered to as “the Agreement”) and an Administrative Agreement for the implementation of the Agreement (hereinafter referred to as “the Administrative Agreement”)(1) were signed on behalf of those Governments and effect was given to the Agreement by the Social Security (United States of America) Order 1984 (hereinafter referred to as “the Principal Order")@2): ‘And Whereas at London on 6th June 1996 a Supplementary Agreement between the Government $f the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Norther Ireland and the Government of the United States of America (which Supplementary Agreement is set out ia Schedule 1 to this Order and is hereinafter referred to as “the Supplementary Agreement”) amending the Agreement ‘and a Supplementary Administrative Agreement amending the Administrative Agreement (which Supplementary Administrative Agroument is st out in Schedule 2 to this Order and is hereinafter referred to as “the Supplementary Administrative Agroement”)(3) were signed on behalf of those Governments: ‘And Whereas by Article 3 of the Supplementary Agreement itis provided that the Supplementary “Agreement shall enter into force on the frst day of the third month following the month in which ‘each Government has received from the other Government written notification that all statutory and constitutional requirements have been complied with for entry into force ofthe Supplementary Agreement: ‘And Whereas by Article 2 of the Supplementary Administrative Agreement itis provided that the Supplementary Administrative Agreement shall enter into foree on the date of entry into force of ‘the Supplementary Agreement: ‘And Whereas written notification in accordance with Asticle 3 ofthe Supplementary Agreement was received by each Government on 20th June 1997 and accordingly the Supplementary Agrecment ‘and the Supplementary Administrative Agreement enter into force on the Ist September 1997 ‘And Whereas by section 179(1)(a) and (2) of the Social Security Administration Act 1992(4) itis ‘provided that Her Majesty may by Order in Council make provision for modifying or adapting that Goma. 5 @ sist isi, {@) C3374, publishes both he Supplemeetry Agremen ant te Supplementary AdaiiseatveArreeneat @ Imes came oneal: 2012.05.08 ‘iis hss rial von a wa arial made). O Story Israment re not cried n thr ese for thi he SCHEDULE 1 Arle? ‘SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT AMENDING THE AGREEMENT ‘ON SOCIAL SECURITY BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. ‘The Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northem Ireland and the Government of the United States of America; ‘Having considered the Agreement on Social Security which was signed on their behalf at London. con 13th February 1984 (hereinafier referred to as “the Agreement”); Having recognised the need to revise certain provisions of the Agreement; Have agreed as follows: Article 1 1. Article | ofthe Agreement shall be revised as follows: (2) Paragraph I shall be revised to read as follows: “1 “Territory” means, 1s regards the United States, the States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and as regards the United Kingdom, England, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, and «also the Isle of Man, the Istand of Jersey, and the Islands of Guernsey, Aldemey, ‘Herm and Jethou; and references to the “United Kingdom” or to “teritory” relation to the United Kingdom shall include the Isle of Man, the Island of Jersey, and the Islands of Guernsey, Aldemey, Herm and Jethou where appropriate;”. (b) Paragraph 3 shall be revised to read as follows: “3. “Competent Authority" means, as regards the United States, the Commissioner of Social Security, and as regards the United Kingdom, the Department of Social Security for Great Britain, the Department of Health and Social Services for Northern Ireland, the ‘Department of Health and Social Security ofthe Isle of Man, the Employment and Social Security Committee of the States of the Istand of Jersey or the Guernsey ‘Social Security Authority as the ease may require.”. (©) Paragraph 7 shall be revised to read as follows: As regards the United Kingdom: (@) “insurance period” means, ‘ contribution period or an equivalent periods (b) “contribution period” means, ‘a period in respect of which contributions appropriate to the benefit in ‘question are payable, have been paid or treated as paid; (©) “equivalent period” means, 1 period for which contributions appropriate to the benefit in question have been credited: (4) “survivor's benefit” means, acme Generate: 2012.05.08 “Sa Ts Eo TT TTS YOR Stator Inirers are ol cred nt ese for ni Article 3 ‘This Supplementary Agreement shall enter into force on the frst day of the third month following, ‘the month in which both Governments shall have informed each other by a formal exchange of notes. that the steps necessary under their national statutes to enable the Supplementary Agreement to take cffect have been taken, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being duly authorised thereto by their respective Governments, have signed this Supplementary Agreement DONE in duplicate at London on 6th June 1996, FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND: Millia Marsden, (Americas Director, FCO) FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: Timothy B. Deal, (Minister, Embassy of the United States of America) SCHEDULE 2 ‘Atle? ‘SUPPLEMENTARY ADMINISTRATIVE AGREEMENT AMENDING THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGREEMENT FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AGREEMENT ON SOCIAL SECURITY BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT (OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ‘The Government ofthe United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northem Ireland and the Government of the United States of America; In accordance with Article 15(2) of the Agreement on Social Security between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government ofthe United States ‘of America signed on their behalf at London on 13th February 1984 (hereinafter referred to as “the Agreement”) as amended by the Supplementary Agreement of this date; Have agreed to amend the Administrative Agreement for the implementation of the Agreement as rollows:— Axticte 1 1. Article 2 paragraph 1 of the Administrative Agreement shall be revised to read as follows: “1. ‘The liaison agencies referred to in Article 15 of the Agreement shall be: (a) forthe United States, the Social Security Administration, (b) forthe United Kingdom, @ in Great Britain, Forall contingencies except Articles 4 to 6 of the Agreement and the provision of United Kingdom insurance records for Disability Benefit, acumen Genero: 2012.05.08 Sm Ts ial ea aR RITE ‘Standory Intent re not carrie thir eed far i te Department of Social Security Pensions and Overseas Benefits Directorate, Tyneview Park, Whitley Road, Benton Neweastle upon ‘Tyne, England NE98 IBA; For Articles 4 to 6 of the Agreement and to provide United Kingdom insurance records for Disability Benefit, Contributions Agency International Services, Longbenton, Neweastle upon ‘Tyne, England NE98 [YX Gin Northem freland, Social Security Agency Overseas Branch, Commonwealth House, Castle Street, Belfast, Northern Ireland BTI [DX (ii) in the Tsle of Man, Department of Health and Social Security, Markwell House, Market Street, Douglas, Isle of Man IMI 287. iv) in Jersey, Employment and Social Security Department, Philip Le Feuvre ‘House, La Motte Street, St Helier, Jersey, Channel Islands JE4 SPE (¥) in Guernsey, Guemsey Social Security Authority, Edward T Wheadon House, Le Truchot, St Peter Port, Guernsey, Channel Islands GY1 3WH.”. 2. Article 9 paragraph 1 ofthe Administrative Agreement shall be revised by adding the following, sentence at the end thereof: “However, the Agencies of the two Parties may agree on a different allocation of expenses for ‘medical examinations arranged under this paragraph.” Article 2 ‘This Supplementary Administrative Agreement shall enter into force on the date of entry into fore of the Supplementary Agreament of this date amending the Agreement. EXPLANATORY NOTE (This note is not part of the Order) ‘This Order makes provision for the modification of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 and ‘the Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992 so as to give effect to the Supplementary Agreement on social security (which is set out in Schedule 1 to this Order) made between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the United States of America. The Supplementary Agreement amends the Agreement on social security set out in Schedule 1 to the Social Security (United States of America) Order 1984 to take into account changes in United Kingdom legislation, in particular as relates to incapacity benefit. ‘There are also set out in Schedule 2to this Order the provisions of a Supplementary Administrative Agreement amending the Administrative Agreement set out in Schedule 2 to the Social Security (United States of America) Order 1984, This Order does not impose any costs on business. ‘THE CESTUI QUE VIE ACT 1540 (62 Hen. 8 c. 37) [Extracted from Halsbury's Statutes of England (2nd edition), Vol. 9, p. 655] For recoving of Arrerages by Executors & Administratols. Arrears of rent, etc. not recoverable by exectitors, etc. at common law.-Forasmuch as by thordre of the comon lawe thexecutours and administatours of (tenants) in fee simple (tenants) in fee taile & (tenants) for terme of lifes of rentis services rent charges rente (seck) and fee fermes have no remedy to (recover) such arrerages of the said rentis or fee fermes as were due unto their testatours in their lifes, nor yet the heires of suche testatour nor army (person) having the reversion of his estate aftre his deceace may distraine or have anny laufull action to levye army suche arrerages of rentis or fee fermes due unto him in his life as is aforesaid; by reason whereof the tenantis of the [demayne 1] of suche landis tenementis or hereditamentis out of the whiche suche rentis were due and paieable who of right [ont 2] to pay their rentis and fermes (3) suche daies and termes as they were due, doo many tymes kepe holde and retaine such arrerages in their owne handis, so that thexecutours and administratours of the (persons) to whome suche rentis or fee fermes were due cannot have or (come) by the said arrerages of the same towardis the payment of ‘the dettis and (performance) of the will of the said testatours; for remedy wherof be it enacted by auctoritie of this (present) (parliament) that [1 Executors, etc. may maintain action of debt for arrears of rent due to testator; or distrain the immediate tenant.-The executours and administratours of (every) suche (person) or (persons) unto ‘whome any suche rent or fee ferme is or shalbe due and not paid at the tyme of his deathe shall and may have an action of dett for all suche arrerages, against the tenant or tenantis that ought to have paide the said rent or fee fermes so being behinde in the life of their testatour, or against thexecutours and administratours of the said tenantis: And also furthermore it shalbe laufull to (every) suche executour and administratour of any suche (person) or (persons), unto whome suche rent or feferme is or shalbe due and not paid at the tyme of his deathe as is aforesaid, to distraine for the arrerages of all suche rentis and fee fermes upon the landis tenementis and other thereditamentis ‘whiche were charged with the payment of suche rentis or fee fermes, and chargeable to the [distrees'] ofthe said testatour, so longe as the said landis tenementis or () hereditamentis contynue remaine and be in the season or possession of the said tenant in {demaine] who ought ymumediately to have pald the said rent or fee ferme so being behinde to the said testatour in his life, or in the season or possession of anny other (person) or (persons) clayming the said (lands) (tenements) & hereditamentis onely by and from the said tenant by purchace gifte or discent; in like ‘maner and fourme as their said testatour mought or ought to have doon in his life tyme, and the said executours and administratours shall for the same distresse laufully make avowry uppon their matier afforesaid. 3. Husband may recover rent due in right of his wife deceased.And .... if amy man which nowe hhathe or herafure shalhave in the tight of his wif army estate in fee symple fee tail] or for terme of life 1. demeane 0. 2 ought 0. 3 atte 0. 4 distresse 0. 5 other 0. 6 demeane 0. of or in any rentis or fee fermes, and the same rentis or fee fermes nowe be or herafter shalbe due byhinde and unpaid in the said wifes lif, [than 1] the said husbaund afire the death of his said wife his executours and administratours shall have an action of dett for the said arrecages against the tenaunt of the demeane that ought to have paid the same his executours or administratours, and also the said husbaund after the death of his said wife may distraine for the said arrerages, in like manner and fourme as he mought have doon yf his said wif had ben (than 1] lyving, and make avowry uppon his said matier as is aforesaid. 4. Persons entitled to rents, during the life of another, may recover the same after death of cestui que vie- .... yf any (person) or (persons) whiche nowe have or herafter shalhave any rentis or fee fermes for terme of life or lyves of anny other (person) or (persons), and the said rent or fee farme nowe be or heraftre shalbe due behinde and unpaid in the life of suche (person) or (persons) for whose life or lifes the estate of the said rent or fee ferme did depend or contynue, and aftre the said (person) or (persons) doth dye, {than 1] he unto whome the said rent or fee ferme was due jn fourme aforesaid, his executours and administratours, shall and may have an action of dett against the tenant in demeane that ought to have paid the same whan it first was due his executours and administratours, and also distrayne for the same arrerages uppon suche landis and tenementis out of the whiche the said rentis or fee fermes were yssuyng and payeable, in suche like maner and fourme as he ought or might have doon if suche (person) or (persons), by whose deathe the aforesaid astate in the said rentis and fee fermes was determined and expired, had ben in full lif and not deade, .... ‘Note: Words in round brackets represent words which cannot be reproduced locally in their original type. fer the Co Yd 10 (Sen of Decent for deals) Cestui Que Vie Act 1666 1666 CHAPTER 11 18 and 19 Cha 2 An Act for Redtesse of Inconveniencies by want of Proofe of the Deceases of Persons beyond the Seas or absenting themselves, upon whose Lives Estates doe depend. “Recital that Cestui que vies have gone beyond Sea, and that Reversioners cannot find out whether they are alive or dead. ‘Whereas diverse Lords of Mannours and others have granted Estates by Lease for one or more life or lives, ar else for yeares determinable upon one or more life or lives And it hath often ‘happened that such person or persons for whose life or lives such Estates have beene granted hhave gone beyond the Seas or soe absented themselves for many yeares that the Lessors and Reversioners cannot finde out whether such person or persons be alive or dead by reason whereof such Lessors and Reversioners have beene held out of possession of their Tenements for many yeares afterall the lives upon which such Estates depend are dead in regard that the Lessors and Reversioners when they have brought Actions for the recovery of their Tenements have beene putt upon it to prove the death of their Tennants when it is almost impossible for them to discover the same, For remedy of which mischeife soe frequently happening to such Lessors or Reversioners. “Annotations: Editorial Information 1X1 Abbreviations or contractions in the orginal form ofthis Act have becn expanded into moder Iettering inthe text set out above and below ‘Modifications ete. (not altering text) CL Shoe tle “The Cesta que Vie Act 1666" given by Ststute Law Revision ict 1948 (c. 62), Seb. 2 (C2 Preamble omitted in part under authority of Statute Law Revision Act 48 (c 62}, Seh. 1 (C3. Consin words of enacment repealed by Strinte Lave Revision Act 8 (. 3) md remainder omited ‘under authority of atte Law Revision Ac 1948 (6. 624 83 2 este He het 1006 f 11) Danner Gare: 2013 05.08 Chg TGR. TRE a IS TS FST TRI PEC {orthe Cesta Que Vi At 1666. Se nd of Document for dail) Ly u Cestui que vie remaining beyond Sea for Seven Years together and no Proof of their Lives, Judge in Action to direct a Verdict as though Cestui que vie were dead. {Lf such person or persons for whose life or lives such Estates have beene or shall be ‘granted as aforesaid shall remaine beyond the Seas or elsewhere absent themselves in this Realme by the space of seaven yeares together and noe sufficient and evident proofe be made of the lives of such person or persons respectively in any Action commenced for recovery of such Tenements by the Lessors or Reversioners in every such case the person or persons upon whose life or lives such Estate depended shall be accounted as naturally dead, And in every Action brought forthe recovery of the said ‘Tenements by the Lessors of Reversioners their Heires or Assignes, the Judges before whom such Action shall be brought shall direct the Jury to give their Verdict as if the person soe remaining beyond the Seas or otherwise absenting himselfe were dead, Annotations: Amendments (Textual) m1 FL S. H repealed by Statute Lay Revision Act 1948. 62), Sch. 1 Annotations: Amendments (Textual) wv n S. Lt opealed by S tute Law Revision et 1863 (. 125) Af the supposed dead Man prove to be alive, then the Title is revested. Action for mean Profits with Interest. [Provided allwayes That if any person or {person or} persons shall be evicted out ‘of any Lands or Tenements by vertue of this Act, and afterwards if such person or persons upon whose life or lives such Estate or Estates depend shall returne againe from beyond the Seas, or shall on proofe in any Action to be brought for recovery of the same {to] be made appeare to be liveing; or to have beene liveing atthe time ofthe “Eviction That then and fom theneeforth the Tennant or Lessee who was outed ofthe same his or their Executors Administrators or Assignes shall or may reenter fepossesse hhave hold and enjoy the said Lands or Tenements in his or their former Estate for and

You might also like