Economic Update

January 2016

It is often said there are two types of forecasts....................lucky or wrong!

Institute of Operations Management

In the main, there are two types of forecasters: hedgehogs and foxes. Hedgehogs know
one big thing; they have an all-encompassing world view and look for facts which confirm
what they already know to be true. Foxes know many little things; they are eclectic in their
data sources and nuanced in their judgements. Hedgehogs command more attention but
foxes make better forecasters.
We humans long for certainties but we know we cannot have them. I will make some
guesses for 2016 and show you how lucky, or wrong, I was for 2015. I am a hedgehog.
I have copied and pasted the italic pieces below from my February 2015 update.

Forecasts made in Jan 2015

There will be no increase in interest rates in 2015 - CORRECT .
I forecast 2.7% UK GDP for 2015. WRONG :
LATEST REVISIONS SUGGEST GROWTH WILL BE 2.3% BUT I EXPECT FURTHER
UPWARD REVISIONS WHEN THE ONS HAVE SORTED OUT THE CONSTRUCTION
SECTOR DATA.
I forecast the OIL price at $35-$40 for 2015. WRONG: - AVERAGE $46 for 2015
I forecast -$ in the range of $1.50-$1.60, CORRECT. - AVERAGE $1.52
I forecast 1 = 1.26 but with volatility. WRONG - AVERAGE 1.33 .
I forecast a sharp Chinese slow down. CORRECT. CHINA OFFICIAL FIGURE OF 6.8%
IS A LIE. USING ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION DATA 3% MUCH MORE LIKELY.
I forecast strong USA recovery, it will strengthen to 3.4%. WRONG: LIKELY TO BE 2.4%
I forecast 1% GDP growth for the Eurozone. THIS WILL PROVE TO BE CORRECT
WHEN ALL THE DATA IS IN.
I forecast UK inflation at 1.8%. WRONG: GOODS AND SERVICES +0.85% FUEL AND
FOOD -0.8% OVERALL CPI +0.2%
I forecast UK average house prices at 3-5% - WRONG : ACTUAL 5.2%

A look around the World

The Conservative Party will win an outright majority of between 4 and 10 seats in the UK
WRONG IT WAS 12 SEATS
The hottest growth region will be ASEAN countries averaging 6% - CORRECT
The Middle East will slow sharply as a consequence of social unrest, low oil prices, and
war - CORRECT
Brazil will struggle. Its offshore promised oil bonanza now in question. CORRECT GDP 3%
Venezuela will implode. CORRECT
Russia will shrink 5% WRONG GDP -3%
China will continue to slow down, settling at around 4-5% GDP and punch its weight in the
South China Sea CORRECT
India should see a surge in growth to 6-7% CORRECT
Australia much slower growth, a weakening dollar, but shell still be right mate! CORRECT
Mexicos GDP will grow around 1.7%, the fall in the price of oil is the main depressant.
WRONG GDP +2.3%
Companies who borrowed cheap USA Dollars are faced with a significant increase in
financing cost as the US Dollar rises against the basket of world currencies. The IMF say
1.8 trillion dollar loans are affected. There will be significant weakness in the Indonesian
Ringit, the SA Rand, the Argentine peso, the Brazilian real. ALL CORRECT
The collapse in commodity prices is hurting companies in the value chain, and the banks
who have lent to them CORRECT

Overall Conclusion
The US and UK banking systems are now fixed. The EU system will mend more quickly
with QE but it will take a couple of years.
Oil importing countries will grow faster than the big macro models forecast, oil exporting
countries will contract by more. Notice that for China and the USA the effect is broadly
neutral. WRONG ON OIL IMPORTING. CORRECT ON OIL EXPORTING COUNTRIES.

Headmasters Report
It has been a patchy performance: welcome progress in some areas but underperforming
in others.
The following is a quote from my 1961 grammar school report: For most pupils there is a
strong correlation between ability in music and maths. Martin-Fagg has proved to be an
exception.
I scored 100% in music and 7% in Algebra. Both subjects were taught by an inspirational
music teacher who was unable to teach us Algebra! He couldnt answer any sensible
question such as what is the point of algebra and who invented it. Like so many 12 year
olds, I switched off completely.

Now for 2016 forecasts

The UK
Although earnings growth slowed in November, I expect earnings (i.e. wage growth plus
overtime and bonuses) to be between 3% and 4%. This is because there are now two
vacancies for every unemployed person. Employers will want to keep good staff, and will
raise salaries to do so.
Please note that if CPI inflation stays below 1%, then earnings growth at 2.5% or more will
increase real wages at least in line with long run trend.
I expect CPI inflation to be +1.5% by the end of the year (domestically produced goods
and services rising by +2.5%), but Chinese origin goods falling by 5% due to a further
devaluation of the Rnb.
The reason is straightforward: with the higher minimum wage, labour shortages, and autoenrollment pension contributions, labour costs will be increasing at around 6%-9%,
depending on the sector. It is doubtful whether efficiency can be increased enough to
compensate. So prices will be raised.
I expect real GDP to be +2.2%. However if there is an early referendum in July with a vote
to stay in, then I expect 2.6% as post-vote investment spending will pick up again.
I expect nominal spending to grow by +3.7%; within this consumer spending will be +4.5%,
investment spending by big corporates will slow sharply because FDs, after an unusual
surge in optimism, are now reverting to type and have become more cautious.
The external trading account (the balance of payments) will continue to be a drain on our
flow of spending. And the uncertainty over Brexit weighs on funding and investment
choices.
3

I expect base rate to rise in April by 0.25% and in October, again by 0.25%. The reason is
this: assuming the velocity of money is reasonably stable( i.e. consumer confidence
doesnt collapse) then the rate of growth in liquidity today will drive nominal GDP within
nine months, and price increases within two years. I expect the Bank of England to argue
in April that they are increasing Base Rate because liquidity growth ( i.e. money held in
current and deposit accounts plus national savings) will drive spending.
They will also state that the weakness of sterling, particularly against the dollar represents
monetary loosening, and that an increase of 0.25% will strengthen sterling sufficiently to
offset this. And as the economy moves towards full capacity, prices will increase. The
chart below shows liquidity growing at 6.2% in August last year; we await new data due in
February.

Sterling will be $1.40 until March; then $1.48 before reaching $1.50 by year end.
Sterling will be 1.30 up until March then 1.36 before reaching 1.38 by year end.
(assuming the ECB continues its programme of QE)

Please note the above assumes the Government is able to show the nation that the future
of the UK is best served within a reformed EU. If it fails in this and there is a media frenzy
for Brexit, we should expect a sterling crisis.
House prices; nationwide average +5%, London sub 3 million +7%, but top end
speculative property prices I expect to fall by another 10%, the bubble has been pricked by
changed expectations from Russia, China and Hong Kong.
Government revenues should rise by 30Bn and its spending by 20Bn, thus the deficit
will fall by 10Bn, but the Government will still be spending 50Bn more than it is earning.
This is still an expansionary fiscal stance, in no way can it be described as austere.
The press is full of care stories concerning the growth in credit: personal debt is growing at
8% per annum; 2.63 million new cars were sold in 2015. Ford say that 94% of all new car
sales were bought using Personal Finance Contracts. Credit is money, it drives activity.

Europe
Apart from Greece all Eurozone members are now growing again. Spain and Ireland are
doing really well, France is not. The whole migration issue has clouded the fundamentals
which have improved. The Brussels-based European Systemic Risk Board is operational
with a remit to limit systemic contagion if a bank fails. It requires banks to hold more capital
if their loan book is viewed as risky. It is of interest that at present Norway and Sweden are
the only countries with banks required to hold an extra 1% under the new rules. The UK
has its own rules which are tougher.
There is a tendency to forget that the EU is the biggest, richest single market on the
planet. Per capita nominal GDP is $35,000 (China is $ 7,500 and the USA is $52,000)
Because it is rich and aging its growth rate will never be above 2.5%, but it will consume
the broadest range of goods and services.
The ECB continues to create new money by purchasing bonds from the market which has
reduced bond yields to below zero for countries like Germany. And the Euro has
weakened, particularly against the US dollar. A weakening currency automatically boosts
the margins of exporters which will boost share prices. It is all part of the monetary
expansion feedback loop designed to raise the inflation rate vs growing confidence,
spending and output.
It is clearly working.
Stockmarkets
Over the past six years monetary expansion through quantitative easing in the USA, UK,
EU and China has driven share prices above earnings growth ( the evidence is higher
than long run average P/E multiples). Apart from China and the EU, no further QE is
expected. Thus share prices will either stabilise and wait for profits to rise to justify the
price or will fall to match the current level of profits. Given that the return on bonds is so

low it is likely that share prices will pause, rather than crash. The FT 100 is down 5% for
the year 2015, but this is almost all due to oil and mining stocks which have crashed.

So far this year we have seen Chinas failing economy and stock market crash infecting
other stock markets. This is absurd. The Chinese stock market does not reflect the
realities of Chinas economy, it is merely a casino driven by credit availability. We can
expect it to be volatile and on average, significantly overpriced.

The FT 100 P/E since 1990 compared to the average P/E

The Footsie is on a P/E of 16.7 compared to 15 long run average this implies an
overvaluation of 7%. But if we take the cyclically adjusted P/E which averages company
profits over 10 years (the cycle is typically seven years) it has averaged 20.8 since 1983.
Today it is 14.9. This suggests the market is undervalued!
As 80% of Footsie profits are earned in dollars, a further weakening of sterling against the
dollar will boost reported earnings and is another reason to suggest that rather than fall
further, it will stabilise around 6000. The yield is 3.4% which is better than most if not all
cash deposits.
Please note that the most frequently traded shares are traded by machines which are preprogrammed. This always causes a decline in price to gather momentum until a floor is
reached, at which point the machine issues buy instructions and the momentum is
upwards. The major stocks are not moving based on human assessment of risks and
6

realities. All the algorithms will be out of date, based on assumed, historic drivers of share
prices. Hold tight; the markets will recover as quickly as they crash.
The major stockmarkets have been valued beyond fair value for years. And it is
reasonable to expect low or no growth from levels established in the middle of last year;
that is until corporate earnings rise to catch up with the valuation. Personally my SIPP is
mostly in equities and I am sitting tight.

China
My regular readers will know that I have been bearish on China for quite a long time. The
evidence is now clear, China is finding it difficult to transition from a capital investment led
growth economy to a services based system where human capital rather than physical
capital creates the added value we call economic growth. Every country in history has
found this transition difficult; we should not be surprised.

However the Chinese authorities are going to inflict pain on the rest of the world as they try
to mitigate the impact on themselves. They will probably devalue their currency by 1015%, they will allow state owned enterprises to sell at prices close to marginal cost, they
will prop up failing financial institutions, and they will get VERY upset when the west
begins to raise tariffs to protect domestic producers from dumping.

This is a major risk to the global economy. I would have expected the EU to react more
quickly by raising tariffs. And I would have expected it to be a keynote session at Davos
this week.
An angry and upset China could do some stupid things in the South China Sea this year.
These are known, unknowns!

The Rest of the World

The rebalancing of the global economy continues in favour of the more mature economies.
This trend has been underway for nearly 5 years and it is continuing. Overall I expect the
world GDP to grow at 3%. The pessimists think the Chinese slowdown, plus falling
commodity and oil prices will cause the global system to struggle. Spending power in the
global system is shifting back to the old mature economies. This will be sufficient to keep
global growth going.
I do not understand the establishment view that falling oil prices are bad for global growth.
Yes there will be real problems for Aberdeen, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, and the
banks, over-exposed to US frackers. But there are much bigger opportunities as cheap oil
boosts real incomes. Spending power is shifting from oil producing countries who tend to
save in huge sovereign wealth funds, to countries who are living beyond their means as
indicated by the size of their Government deficit and usually their balance of payments
deficit. The UK is such a country. Low oil prices are, on balance, a sizeable stimulus via
increasing real incomes.

The low or no-growth economies are Brazil (-3%), Russia (-3%), South Africa 0.3%, China
+3% and Saudi Arabia.
The growth stories will be the USA (2.5%), Japan (2%), Europe (2% including the UK),
India 7%, Mexico 2.5% and Indonesia 5%
The oil price will stay below $40, unless there is an unforeseen collapse in supply from the
Middle East due to Sunni v Sharia v Isis, or some other peculiar unknown!
Some commentators are using the oil price as evidence of a sharp drop in demand due to
faltering growth. They are wrong. Oil consumption in the USA rose 6% in 2015. The price
drop is due to excess supply which is in turn due to Saudi Arabia determined being to
keep its market share. Eventually, the Saudis will see their plan is a mistake, but I guess it
will take time. Meanwhile enjoy $30 a barrel!

The biggest risk to the UK this year.

The biggest risk is the run up to the referendum on EU membership and a possible exit.
8

In my judgement this is top of the risk-to-growth list. It has the potential to cause a
recession and then a lower rate of growth thereafter.
In brief.
The UK runs a trading account deficit with the rest of the world. This has to be financed. It
can be financed by stable long run capital investment in the UK from international
companies, (something we have enjoyed since the early eighties because we are inside
the EU external tariff wall). Or, by spending our reserves of foreign currency (we have
about 6 months supply). Or by attracting short term financing (requires higher interest
rates). Or by devaluation. Or a combination of the above.
If we lose long term investment inflows to other EU members then we have to resort to
short term financing and interest rates have to be used to keep the flow up. This would be
a disaster for growth. Imagine interest rates rising to 5% in 2017.
On the street, people believe that if we leave we can control our borders. This is only true
if we no longer wish to sell to the largest market in the world (currently 15% of our GDP is
derived from selling to the EU).
If we want to have access to the EU markets, we have to abide by the Four Freedoms,
one of which is the free movement of labour.
Norway is not a member of the EU but it has access to EU markets. It has 7.38 EU
migrants per 1000 population.
Switzerland is not a member of the EU but is also has access to EU markets. It has 11.33
EU migrants per 1000 population.
The UK is a member of the EU it has only 2.48 EU migrants per 1000.
These facts will never be written in the Mail and probably not in the Mirror or the Sun. Their
combined readership (paper and online) is 33.5 million.

If we vote to leave.
Firstly we would have to adapt most of our legislation to remove the EU directives. EU
treaties with the rest of the world would cease to apply to the UK. This would take up to 10
years.
Secondly we would need to negotiate with the EU on the future of the 2 million Brits who
live there. Thirdly under WTO rules we would have no right of access to EU markets our
goods and services would be subject to tariffs. We would have to make significant
payments as do Norway and Switzerland to gain access.
Fourthly we would have develop trade with the rest of the World. Current EU trade deals
cover 60 countries and 35% of world trade. These would no longer apply to us, we would
have to start from scratch and we would be up against the EUs much bigger bargaining
power. It could take 20 years.

Given how long it takes to agree trade deals on a bilateral basis, I guess we would have
years of economic misery before the deals were in place to allow us to trade.
Over the next six months, if the UK press and media report that an exit is a growing
likelihood, then we must expect a sterling crisis.
This would take sterling to $1.20 or below and 1.10 or less. I do not usually recommend
buying currency forward, but if you are exposed, do it now.

Roger Martin-Fagg
rmfagg@aol.com
Prepared January 2016

Roger Martin-Fagg
4th Floor, Grays Inn Chambers, Grays Inn.
London, WC1R 5JA
T: +44 20 7242 8556
E: info@jsacs.com

rmfagg@aol.com

W.: www.jsacs.com

10