COATS
Diastereospecific Synthesis of an Epoxide
An Introductory Experiment in Organic Synthetic and Mechanistic Chemistry
James A. Ciaccio
Fordham University, Bronx, NY 10458
‘The role of epoxides as a synthetically useful class of
‘compounds has been widely established (7, 2), and epoxide
chemistry is presented in all modern undergraduate or-
‘ganic textbooks, However, neither their reactions nor their
Preparation are common subjects of undergraduate or-
{ganic laboratory experiments.’ This paper describes an op-
rationally straightforward, two-step epoxide synthesis,
that ean be presented to students in the form of two
‘mechanistic “puzzles” that probe the stereoselectivity of
‘two important reactions: halohydrin formation from alke-
res and epoxide formation via intramolecular Williamson
‘ther synthesis, It complements the increasing number of
puzzle-oriented undergraduate experiments combining
synthesis and mechanistic discovery that continue to ap-
pear in this Journal (4).
‘Alkenes are the most common starting material for the
preparation of epoxides, Treatment of an alkene with
aqueous N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) affords a bromohy-
drin (1) that, upon treatment with base, eliminates HBr to
{form an epoxide (2) via intramolecular nucleophilic substi-
‘ution (eq 1).
base
‘The first question posed to the student asks whether or
not the bromohydrin formation is stereoselective. In the
present experiment, ¢rans-stilbene (3) is treated with NBS
‘and Hy0 in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (eq 2) to afford one
of two possible diastereomers:
+ erythro 2-bromo-12-diphenylethanol (0, mp 83-84°C 6)
1+ threo bromo-,2-diphenvlethanal(S),mp 61-52°C (6)(eq2)
Ho Pt wes.Ho Spe Hy
o=C owso” eH Hep on
py DMSO” pt . mg
3 a 5
@
[Because the melting point ranges for the two possible dias-
tereomeric products are separated by 30 °C, only a melting-
“There are suprisingly few pubished undorgradua
involving epoxides, daspte thor extensive use in research (1). For
texample, searching through issues of this Joural dating trom 1989
to the presen, | found only si undergraduate experiments () that
involve etter the preparation 0” reaction of epoxies.
point determination is noeded to establish that the product
is the erythro bromohydrin (4) (Analogously the threo bro-
mohydrin (5) can be prepared from cis.stilbene (6)
"The second question asks whether the nucleophilic dis
placement of bromide that occurs when 4 is treated with
base proceeds with inversion of configuration, to afford
(b-trans-stilbene oxide (6) (mp 65-87 °C), or with reten-
tion of configuration, to afford (+-cis-stilbene oxide (7) (mp
38-40 °C) (eq 3). Again, the diastereospecificty of the reac-
tion can be established simply by determining the melting-
point range of the product.
oH
Pr 2 9g
HER RO eouen of He OH
preg COHORT pH pen
4 6 7
®
Experimental Procedure
'* Caution: Students should be required to wear gloves when
‘working with either NBS or DMSO because bth are skin
lrrwante
‘This experiment was carried out by 62 students enrolled
in the first-somester organic chemistry laboratory course
at Fordham University. A single 4-h lab period was sched-
uled for the synthesis and isolation of the crude bromoby’
din, and the crystallization was carried out as an addi-
tional task along with the following week's experiment.
‘The conversion of the bromohydrin to epoxide was carried
out by 11 students during an additional 2-h period.
‘All the reagents for this experiment were used as re-
ceived from the supplier (Aldrich) without additional puri-
fication, TLO analyses were carried out using Hard Layer
Siliea Gel GHLF Uniplates with inorganic binder (Anal-
tech). The protocol for the bromohydrin synthesis was
adapted from a procedure reported by Langman and Dal-
‘ton in Organic Syntheses (5).
Synthesis of (:}-erythro-2-Bromo-1,2-diphenylethanol (4)
trans-Stilbene (1.0 g, 5.5 mmol) was placed in a 50-mL
Erlenmeyer flask followed by water 10.5 mL! and DMSO
(15 mL) to afford a clear, colorless solution. Additional
DMSO may be added or the solution may be warmed over
1 steam bath to dissolve the alkene. Students then treated
the DMSO solution of the alkene at room temperature
with 2 molar equivalents of NBS (requiring a calculation
‘on their part) in small portions over several minutes,
"The resulting clear, bright-orange solution was gently
swirled over 30 min, then poured into a large beaker con-
taining 50 mi. of ice-cold water. The resulting milky white
slurry was transferred to a separatory funnel where it was
diluted with 20 mL. of water and extracted with 40 mL of
‘diethyl ether. Any undissolved solid was removed by vac-
Volume 72 Number 11 November 1995 1037vum-fltering the contents of the separatory funnel
through a thin layer of Celite. Enough ether may evapo-
rate during vacuum filtration to cause the product to pre-
cipitate, and some students had to add more ether to redis
solve it
‘The layers were then separated, and the aqueous layer
‘was extracted with an additional 30 mL of ether. The com-
bined ether layers were washed once with 50 mL of water,
once with 50 ml. of saturated brine, dried over anhydrous
‘MSOs, and gravity-filtered into’a 100-mL round-bot-
tomed flask, Because our labs are not equipped with rotary
evaporators, the ether was removed by simple distillation
until less than 5 ml remained in the pot.
Removal of Solvent
‘The remaining solvent was removed as follows. Once
cooled to room temperature, the distillation apparatus was
disassembled, and a ground-glass thermometer adapter
‘was connected to the pot. The narrow tip of a medicine
Gropper was inserted through the rubber portion of the
adapter, and the other end was connected by vacuum tub-
ing toa water aspirator via a water trap. The vacuum was
slowly applied to full strength while gently swirling the
flask. The average yield of erude erythro-2-brome-1,2-
Giphenylethanol students received was approximately 1.0
(66% yield); if earried out carefully, yields approaching
1 g can be obtained. Reerystalization from a minimum
amount (20-40 mL) of high-boiling petroleum ether af-
forded an average recovery of 0.37 g (24% yield); melting
points ranges were nearly all around 81-82 °C (83-84 °C
Tit), Invariably, @ small amount of solid remained undis-
solved during the reerystallization, and hot filtration or de-
canting the hot solution was often necessary. Students
should be warned of this undissolved solid in advance so
they would avoid treating the crude bromohydrin with Wo
much petroleum ether
‘Synthesis of (t)-trans-Stlbene Oxide (6)
‘The dry, purified bromohydrin (150 mg, 0.54 mmol) was
placed in a 20 x 150-mm test tube followed by anhydrous po-
tassium carbonate (125 mg, 0.90 mmol, powder, ~825 mesh)
and methanol (2 mL). The resulting turbid solution was
mixed at frequent intervals by vigorously agitating the
corked tube. TLC on silica gel (elution with 20:1 (vx) petro-
Jeum ether: ethyl acetate) of an aliquot taken directly from,
the reaction mixture after approximately 6 min clearly re-
vealed spots at R 0.85 (epoxide) and Ry 0.20 (bromohydrin),
Both spots are visible under UV light and ean also be visual-
ized by briefly submerging the platein a 20% solution of phos-
‘phomolybdic acid in ethanol (Aldrich) followed by heating the
plate with a heat gun or hy placing the glass TLC plate face
‘up on a hot plate standing in the hood,
‘When the reaction was complete by TLC, 3 mLof water was
added to the tube followed by 7 mL of petrcleum ether. (When,
diethyl ether was used to isolate the epoxide from the reac-
tion mixture after water treatment, a small amount of water
‘was extracted along with the epoxide, affording a damp prod:
‘uct upon removal of solvent. Extraction of the epoxide into
petroleum ether avoided that problem),
‘The layers were then thoroughly mixed by rapidly and
repeatedly drawing them into a long Pasteur pipet and re-
Teasing them back into the tube. The top, organic layer con-
taining the epoxide was then transferred to a second 20 x
150-mm test tube using a Pasteur pipet and treated with
anhydrous MgSOs. After filtering away the drying agent,
the solvent was removed under vacuum to afford trans”
stilbene oxide in an average yield of 60 mg (55%); reerys-
tellization was unnecessary because the melting point
ranges of the crude epoxide samples were all around 64-65,
°C (65-67 °C lit
1038 Jounal of Chemical Education
Results and Discussion
Both reactions are diastereospecifi, affording accept-
able yields of solid products whose melting points are
‘widely different from their respective diastereomers, The
students experienced little difficulty in carrying out either
of the preparations, so all of them correctly identified the
bromohydrin as ()erythro-2-bromo-1,2-diphenylethanol
(4) and the epoxide as (t-trans-stilbene oxide '6) by virtue
of their products’ melting-point ranges and, for the epox-
ide, "H_ NMR analysis in comparison with’a commercial
sample of 6, The majority of erude bromohydrin samples
were somewhat impure (melting-point ranges varied from
78-79 °C to 55-61 °C) due to the presence of DMSO and
possibly some unreacted 3.
Vigorous washing of the combined ether iayers with
water before treatment, with MgSOs was effective in re-
‘moving essentially all of the DMSO. Apparently. most stw-
dents wore a bit careless in recrystallizing their erude bro-
mohydrins (the average percentage recovery was 37%); if
carried out carefully, up to 70% of the original mass can be
recovered. The more assiduous students concentrated
down their mother liquors and obtained 50 mg or more of
comparatively pure bromohyéirin as second crop.
TLC Monitoring
‘The progress of the epoxide formation is easily moni
tored by TLC analysis. The reaction is usually complete
within 10-16 min, giving the student enough time to carry.
ut a single analysis before all of the bromohydrin is con-
sumed, The R/s of the bromohydrin and epoxide are far
enough apart to allow an easy distinction, and students
were instructed to co-spat the reaction mixture aliquot,
along with their bromohydrin and a commercial sample of
6 on the same plate in order to identify the spots.
NMR as a Stereochomical Probe
In order to rigorously establish the relative stereochemis-
tuy of the epoxide, students obtained HNMR spectra oftheir
products on a Varian EM-360 60-MHe instrument, under the
supervision of an instructor who prepared their samples. Be-
cause the epoxide protons are homotopic and the chemical
shifts of the pheny! protons are fortuitously equivalent, the
NMR spectrum consists of two singlets, The chemical shift of
the epoxide-ring protons are the most diagnostic feature; the
trans epoxide protons appear at 3.85 ppm, whereas the cis,
epoxide protons appear at 4.35 ppm.
Further analysis using “C NMR would serve notonly as
another stereochemical probe (the epoxide earbons of 6 ap-
pear at 63 ppm, whereas those of 7 appear at 60 ppm) but
also as an excelient example of the effect of molecular sym-
metry on C spectra. Students should try to explain why
their 14-carbon bromohydrin, which has 10 peaks in its
SC NMR spectrum, affords # 14-carbon epoxide with only
five "¥C peaks. It is not necessary for students to obtain
spectra of the cis epoxide themselves because they appear
(along with that pf the trans epoxide) in The Aldrich Li
brary of °C and 'H FENMR Spectra,
Course Convenience
‘This ‘project” is particularly suited to a large lab course.
+ Both stops can be run on a very small scale, reducing mate
rial costs and increasing lab safety
+ Common lab glassware and equipment are used
‘No sophisticated instrumentation is needed; melting point