Professional Documents
Culture Documents
B5 - 00
SPECIAL REPORT FOR STUDY COMMITTEE B5
(Protection and Automation)
Rodney HUGHES (for PS1) and Mladen KEZUNOVIC (for PS2)1
Special Reporters
The CIGRE Study Committee B5 covers within this scope principles, design, application and
management of power system protection, substation control, automation, monitoring,
recording and metering including associated internal and external communications and
interfacing for remote control and monitoring.
Two Preferential Subjects are presented in this Special Report:
o
o
Keywords:
Future Networks, IEC 61850, Architecture, Process Bus, Protection Algorithm, Control
Algorithm, Asset Management, Setting Management, Data Analysis, Smart Grid, Distributed
Generation, Power System Protection, Automation, Islanding, Power System Stability,
Automated Analysis, Cyber-security, Fault Disturbance, Fault Location, Intelligent Electronic
Device, Metering, Power Quality, Remote Access, Standards, Substation Automation.
____________________________________
1
on
The last thirty years (significantly less than the lifetime of a substation) has seen a massive
swing in the types of technology applied within the protection and control industry. Several
stages of evolution over this time frame has resulted in the single fixed function
electromechanical devices being replaced by comprehensive multi-function devices now
operating with ever higher degrees of capability, and even reliance on communication
systems.
The power industry is now awash with the requirements for driving efficiency,
responsiveness and flexibility of the power network whilst delivering higher reliability and
lower costs. These drivers combine under the concept of Future Networks that demands
new solutions which themselves demand new technologies to provide them.
This rapid change (at least in power systems terms) in operational requirements and
technology solutions is complex and requires a vast range of new skills associated with
systems and communication engineering. Not surprisingly this leads to discussions on
maturity of the technology, or perhaps more accurately, how quickly the vendors bring
products with uniform compliance and easier interoperability to the market as well as how
quickly the market invests in the new skills to be competent in the use of the new
technology.
This Preferential Subject gives the opportunity to explore both existing and potential
solutions for how Protection and Automation Systems must continue to evolve to encompass
the new requirements brought as a result of Future Networks.
Specifically the industry has been challenged to present experiences and future directions in
the areas of:
Local and system wide coordination of protection and control for FACTS / SVC /
Power Storage and DER
Communication requirements
B5_PS1-2: What examples can be presented of the type and extent of new
organisation, documentation systems and skill developments required to support
higher and more integrated UAS functionality?
CIGRE Working Group B5-39: Documentation requirements from design to operation to maintenance
for Digital Substation Automation Systems
http://www.cigre-b5.org/Site/WG/pa_wl.asp?IDWG=641
2
CIGRE Working Group B5-40: Education, Qualification and Continuing Professional Development of
Engineers in Protection and Control.
Terms of Reference: http://www.cigre-b5.org/Site/WG/pa_wl.asp?IDWG=642
those with series compensated lines. Somewhat disturbingly these simulations have
identified that in some cases, particularly where MOV are used with the series compensation
capacitors, Zone 1 elements would need to be switched off being somewhat counter
intuitively against providing high speed fault clearance. The solution suggested uses over
current elements to supervise the Z1 element.
B5-117 (UK) describes the testing requirements to prove appropriate response of adaptive
protection schemes. Adaptive protection is a concept that has been discussed for many
years but always with a limitation of how these systems are easily tested. The paper
discusses the range of adaptive protection systems from predetermined Setting Groups
through to the potential for dynamic setting calculation. Among the core criteria of
protection is security and dependability. Traditional systems were designed with a single
fixed solution or at least predetermined Setting Groups of very precise conditions. The
increased range of variability based on information provided by communication systems does
introduce new criteria on telecommunications system reliability and performance on each of
the duplicated systems in order to ensure there is no mal-operation of the X or Y system.
This CIGRE forum has often discussed the increasing need for comprehensive system wide
and, in some cases, IED modelling in order to optimise protection settings. These papers in
particular indicate changes to traditional Zone 1 and Zone 3 distance protection philosophies.
Of course whether the model is a small section of the power system or a wide area model,
the results are only as good as the model of the individual elements of the system. Prior to
any consideration of whether IED models are available, accurate models of generators,
transformers, SVC, Statcoms, wind farms etc. are often reported as difficult to obtain.
However, such modelling reported over the last several years almost invariably concludes
that traditional 3-zone distance protection is inappropriate in its own right. The solution
often is simply to switch to line differential provided a suitable telecommunications link is
available, which in itself is far less of an issue than say 30 years ago. This then challenges
the cost/benefit justification of system/IED modelling if the general objective is primarily to
validate distance protection based systems, versus the obvious simplicity of the line
differential solution. As the networks become more complex, it remains to be seen if
changing utility policies signal the end of the era of the distance relay as the general
transmission protection technology.
There is already a wide body of experience of modelling these new power system elements,
arguably the precursors to the formal concept of Future Networks, which confirm there are
system wide phenomena that havent existed previously. This suggests the purpose of
modelling is likely to change from purely validating a specific distance relay setting to more
control related issues where wide area automated control systems may be required. This is
already happening to some degree at the transmission level as reported in the papers
grouped under the first theme of this Report.
The sub-transmission and distribution networks are also changing from simple radial supply
systems to more meshed systems, embedded generation, 2-way power flows, variable fault
levels and many complexities associated with Distribution Automation Systems with
automatic switching and restoration. This may lead to complex modelling requirements of
distribution networks and indeed may have results that reflect to the transmission network
models.
B5_PS1-3:
What examples can be shown of the cost (effort)/benefits
justification of wide-area/multi-voltage system modelling leading to alternative
individual protection solutions or generic policy changes?
Two of the fundamental requirements for protection systems are Security (not operate when
not required) and Dependability (must operate when required). Traditional fixed system
designs have therefore provided appropriate solutions to both these requirements but are
increasingly giving cause for concern as the networks do become more complex themselves.
Due to the inherent dynamic behaviour, it is much harder to verify correct performance and
potential settings of on-line adaptive protection and control systems under all operating
conditions. This is further affected on the reliance on the communication systems (local and
wide area) and their effect of failures on the protection system security and reliability.
B5_PS1-4:
What other examples can be presented of on-line adaptive
protection or control solutions along with the necessary mechanisms to validate
their dynamic behaviour?
B5_PS1-7:
What examples of Sampled Value CT/VT applications can be
described that would indicate this area of technology is both technically and
commercially viable and available?
On the broader scale of Process Bus covering all interfaces to primary systems such as
intelligent Switchgear, Condition Monitoring and even the specific Logical Nodes associated
with Wind Farms, Hydro Power Plants, Distributed Energy Resources all suggest much larger
systems will evolve with specific protection and control functionality becoming just one
amongst many applications essential to the operation of Future Networks.
B5_PS1-8: What are the benefits and requirements for replacement of hard
wired trip signals to the switchgear (IEC 62271-3 interfaces) as a complete
digital substation?
forgetting the fundamental principles that have guided safe, secure and reliable power
system operation to date. This requires an open mind to the new requirements and a
willingness to investigate how the new technology will provide even better results than we
have previously achieved.
The papers submitted in response to this Preferential Subject cover a wide range of issues
that will serve as a good reference in their own right. Certainly there are dozens of matters
arising which can be further described in response to this Special Report.
Application requirements,
SAS Solutions Using IEC 61850,
Cyber-security issues
Standardization
10
Almost all the papers make reference to IEC 61850 requirements or design features except a
few involving utilities that did not have 61850-based installations available yet. For each
category, an introductory discussion points to the main trends expressed in the papers
followed by the questions raised by the special reporter. The questions relate to both the
issues raised in the papers and the ones formulated in the PS2 call for papers.
Since some papers submitted for this session address several topics from the list above,
questions raised in this report may refer to the same paper multiple times when discussing
various topics.
11
B5_PS2-1: What the issues are when integrating data from IEDs embedded in
61850 solutions and standalone recording systems consisting of digital fault
recorders?
B5_PS2-2: How automated event analysis solutions may be transported from one
generation of fault disturbance equipment to the next without major redesign or
additional investment?
B5_PS2-3: What specific type of asset and software version control management
applications the user should embrace to take full advantage of the remote access
capabilities?
B5_PS2-4: How one deals with large number of relays (hundreds and potentially
thousands) if failure monitoring and setting coordination are to be managed
through remote access?
B5_PS2-5: How the IED triggered non-operational data can be integrated with
real-time scanned (SCADA) or streamed data (PMUs) for operational purposes?
B5_PS2-6: What other experiences of remote access applications are and how
61850 may be used to solve various application issues of remote access?
While this section focused primarily on the application requirements for the use of the
remote access and utilization of SAS data, the next section deals primarily with the papers
and related questions on the implementations using IEC 61850.
12
B5_PS2-10: How the physical and cyber security protection policy needs to be
implemented to prevent vulnerabilities to both cyber and physical compromises
of the remote access?
B5_PS2-11: What the best guidelines for designing a proactive cyber security
model are, particularly what standards besides CIP 002-009, IEC 62351 and
NISTIR 7628 are recommended for the remote access?
2.4 Standardization
In several papers IEC 61850 is mentioned or an IEC 61850-based implementation is
described. While the use of IEC 61850 substation SAS standard is widely spread and pretty
well documented, several issues still remain unanswered. Some papers also mentioned
extensive use of COMTRADE standard for transient data representation. It would be
interesting to know the extent of use of other similar standards. It was somewhat surprising
that the use of remote access to communicate GPS synchronization signal according to the
13
IEEE Standard 1588 (profile C37.238-2010) has not been mentioned by any of the papers. A
few papers mentioned the need to resolve data semantics incompatibility between IEC
61850 and IEC 61970.
Based on the discussions in the papers the following question is raised:
B5_PS2-12. Is the IEC 61850 standard fully specified when it comes to high
resolution recording triggered by faults including the time stamping, sampling
rates and data formats?
SAS solutions using IEC 61850. This prevailing SAS communication standard has
many advantages that are illustrated in several papers when it comes to remote
access. The implementation of the transfer of GPS time-synchronization signal from
a remote site, cyber-physical security policy and requirements for time stamping and
high resolution recording remain subject for further implementation evaluation
Cyber-security issues. The remote access has become of particular concern when
cyber-security issues are considered. Many practical solutions that can remove such
concerns exist but life-cycle model and standard recommendations are not widely
available.
Standardization. A major requirement for standard solutions is that they meet
interoperability criteria. The remote access assumes that interoperability between
SAS systems and solutions that are provided at the remote site are met. It is not
entirely clear what are the best practices for achieving interoperability of end-to-end
solutions.
14