AR
TRG nn ener Omen ER
rue ee
Paar CCL
doer
OB Ae aansite TUR Ua cco con ae eet UT ee TR eS NCR eT
thot snaied through mountains and desert washes, we sat by streams, we skippod rocks across lakes. & In al this outdoors
experience my parents tanght just one ethic: Always leave a place better than you found it. & A simple enough rufe but it
changed a few smull things in the world, I've never counted how many pieces of tralside trash my mother has quietly slipped
ino her pocket, nor the pop-tops and cigarette butts
‘ve cleared from campsites, nor the lowers we've leit unpicked, +
Midian eesmore, we grew up feeling a sense
iy toward the earth, spiritual
connection with God's creation, And nov in
the mountains, when I see my fourteenyear
old daughter grow quiet and walk away to sit
alone for awhile, I koow she feels i to. 1
thinks we all feel it, we children of the God
‘who pronounced His creation good.
Environmentalist, That's @ word so emo
tion charged to many people that I hesitate 10
use it. Itconjures up images of the whole
unsetdled upheaval ofthe Sixties, of people
Iying before bulldozers or of boats coming
between whaling ships and their pres.
Maybe I should use a different term, like
‘Stewards othe Earth, or Earthkeepers.
But terminology doesn't matter, really.
What matters is that the people we call env
ronmeataliss are net alone in their ep love
forthe eacih. There isa thread of “environ-
mentalism” that runs deep and strong in our
religion
T's & value that sometimes gets lost in
‘modern lie, Buta spiritual eonnecton with
the earth is at the heart, really, of Mor-
rmonism. We Mormons have felt Bnoch’s bit
terness of soul, we have heard him weeping
forthe earth’ pans, we have heard the earth
cry, "Wo, wo is me, the mother of men, Tam
pained, I am weary, because of the wicked-
ness of my children, When shall Tres, and
be cleansed fm the fithiness whichis gone
forth out of me?
What an astonishing, even revolutionary,
pasage of seripure tut i) There's current
ly a scientific theory—the Gaia theory—that
the earth is 2 complete and living organism,
“Most scientists scoff at that. But the concept
of the earth as alving creation has been a
part of Mormon philosophy from the frst.
Brigham Young called the earth our
mother, and said, "There is fie in all matter,
‘throughout the vast extent of all the eter
ties This in the rock, the sand, the dust, the
water, the aie”
Echoing the earth's own grosnings, he
taught that pollution is not just a physica)
problem, but a spiritual one. “You are here
eummencing anew” he tld the sels inthe
It Lake Valley. “The soil, the ait, the water
are all pure and healthy. Do net suffer them
to become polluted with wickedness, Stive
to preserve the elements from being contami
nated by the Bllby wicked conduct and say-
ings of those who pervert the intelligence
God fas bestowed upon the man family”
Brother Brigham’s reverence for le and
for all of ereation went far beyond the norms
ot his day, He told the brethren during the
trek West to kill ony the buffalo needed for
food—when in later years bufialo hunters
would liter the plains with the careasses
‘Das Peowte
‘elle for sport. He admonished the Saints to
be particularly earful not io set the pratie or
‘woods on fire. At the 185) 24th of July cele
bration at Brighton, he himself remained
bebind as darkness fe, the last 0 leave, to
malke sure the fires had been well extin-
guished. Contvast this withthe eareless ate
tudes ofthe time, Mark Twain in Roughing It
fells how he purposely set the forest ablaze
snd then sat in a canoe on Lake Tahoe—a
front cow seat—co watch the awesame specta:
‘eat fre destroying everything in sight
‘Hugh Nibley says that Brigham Young
‘was uid in is views of nature by a con
stant awareness of being in the presence of
the Divine. To the Brighton pienickers he
ssid “Here are the stupendous works of the
God of Nature, though all do not appreciate
His wisdom as manifested in his works...
‘oul sit here for a month and reflect on the
mercies of God”
‘That I can understand. ‘The mountains
have always been a symbol of Gol, They
seem bathed in His presence. But there's
ore about Brigham Young's attitudes that
are harderto relate to, Crickets or insta
Brigham seemed to reverence even crick
ets, He told the saints, “Last season when the
‘grasshoppers cane on my erops, I said, ‘Nib
‘ble away, I may as well feed yon as to have
ny neighbors do its Thave sown plenty, and
you have not raised any yourselves.” And
‘when the harvest came you woul not Tave
‘known that there had been a grasshopper
there”
Some years later, he said, “According to
present appearances, next year [1868] we
Imay expect grasshoppers to eat up neaty all
‘our crops, But if we have provisions enough
to last us another year, we can say to the
srasshoppers—aihese creatures of God—yoru
are woleome. I have never had a feeling 10
die them from one plant in my garden; but
Took upon ther 2 the armies ofthe Loed.”
[can't quite comprehend that degree of
reverence for creation, And yet there is
Principle hereof the sort tha holy men aod
‘women abide by, and that someday maybe I,
to, might be haly enotgh to fallow.
{find that principle echoed in the ives
and statements of other holy people. We
have, for instance, the story of the snakes
Joseph Smith found during tne Zion's Camp
‘march, When the brethren wanted to Kill
them, Joseoh forbade it, saving thatthe Tion
would never lie down with the Iamb xi
“pen lose their vicious dispositions and cease
to destray the animal race."
Joseph F Smith longed for that day.
“When I visited, afew years ago, the Yellow
stone National Park, and saw in the streams
‘nd the best lakes, birds swing que
God never gave
us the right to
exploit the earth.
The LDS Church
teaches that
stewardship, not
domination, ts
mankind’ charge.
fearless of man..and when T saw droves of
Dental deer feeding] along the sie of the
roa, as earless of the presence of men as
any domestic animal, eed my heart with a
degree of peace and joy that seemed to be
almost 2 foretaste of that period hoped for
‘wien there shal be none to hurt and none to
‘molest i ll the land... never could see why
‘aman should be imbued with a bloodthirsty
desire to kill and destroy animal life.”
‘That’ all very well forthe saints to hear
80 years azo, but when Spencer W. Kimball
spoke tp this issue in modern times, 2 shock
ran theough the Church, President Rimbsll
prefeced the hunting season of 1978 with
same direct words “Nov, [also would like to
aid some of my feclings concerning tt
unnecessary shedding of blood and destruc.
tion of life-It isnot only wicked to destroy
[innocent birds), itis ashame, in my opinion.
| think that this prneiple should extend not
only o the bird life but to the ie of all ani
mals”
President Kimballs concern forthe envi
ronment was even broader and deeper,
"Those of us who listened to the general con.
erences ofthe 70s knew we would escape
‘without hearing President Kimball plead for
1 to fix up, clean up, beautify our properties.
“We recommend to all people thet there be
‘no uncle pollution,” he said, “thatthe land be
taken care of and kept clean, productive, andDeautifal”
Clean up, fi up, Beautify: these are prop:
er aims in a religion that teaches that all
things are ade “forthe benefit and the use
‘of man, both to plese the eye and tn gladien
the heart; yea, for food and for raiment, for
taste and for smell, ta steengthen the body
and to enliven the soul” Note that eye and
heart come first, Beauty and joy are not
‘mere byproducts of nature, of value only to
“tnadstool worshippes.”_ Nor is the world’s
‘bounty only for our bodily comfort itis for
‘ur sos as well
Religion sometimes get a bad rap when it
comes to the environment. Many waiters
have blamed certain Judeo Christian teal
ings for the vast environmental destruction
that currently faces us. They say, for
instance, that Adam's God-given dominion
‘over ereation has been used as justification
for exploitation
But God never gave us the right to exploit
the earth, The LDS Church terches that
stewardship, not damination, is mankind's
charge. Beigham Young taught that steward
ship means responsibilty for improvernent.
*Progeess, and improve upon, and make
beautiful everything around you. Cultivate
the earth and cultivate your minds. Build
‘tes, adorn your habitations, make gardens,
orchards, and vineyards, and render the
earth so pleasant that when you look upon
Your labours you may do so with pleasure,
‘and that angels may delight to come and visi
your beautiful ations”
‘The Western concept of property rights
has also een blamed for environmental
destruction, But the principles of steward
ship and consecration teach that nothing
‘belongs to us; it belongs to God, and we are
to share equally.
ugh Nibley points out that Joseph Smith
hanged the name of Commerce, ions, to
Nauvoo, “the Beaute” and rebuked speew
Jators at Far West: “Brethren, we are gah
ered to this beautiful land to build up
on... since Thave ees. here [have pee
cvived the spirit of selishuess...}ere are
those beginning to spread out, buying up all,
the land they are able to, fo the exclusion of
the poorer ones who are not so much blessed
vith the world’s goes thinking to ay fou
ations for themselves, only looking to thelr
snvidual families and those who ate to fle
Jow thes.”
This tatement indicts me, How often are
any choices based on the bereft to my own
‘smal family, without weighing the effects on
the larger world? And yet my calling a3 &
‘Christian demands more thooght, more con
sciousness of the effets of my ations,
‘Again, the ezrih s threatzned by another
“
modern precept: the gioriGation of profit
Beck in the ‘5s, economists predicted that
the emercing techology would free people
la work two: and three-day weeks. The
remaining time could be spent, presurbly,
‘on education, recreation, self-betterment,
helo,
‘What no one foresaw then was the ability
‘of industry and marketing to create in con
‘sumers an almost endless appesite for acquis
‘ions, an appetite that would dive ws to work
Drarder than ever. New inventions, new cn
veniences, new fashions, new toys: Ithas
Become necessary to acquire the latest. That
‘which no longer ices our fancy, we discard,
to jin the heaps of trash in our overtlowing
dumps.
All this ignores yet another LDS serpture:
“But its not given that one man should pos-
se35 that which is shove another, wherefore
the word eth in sin”
The world lieth in sin. ‘That's true
‘enough, and easy enough to see, But what
‘we don't always pay attention to is whet i the
cotrelary of sin: the destruction ofthe env
ronment
‘We know that
#19 billion tons of carbon dioxide were
spewed into the atmosphere in 1989, exacer-
bating a predicted warming trend with ive
versie and longterm damaging effects
‘An immense and unfixable ozone “hole”
“It is as if someone
had scrimped and
saved his entire life
anal then spent every-
thing on one femtastic
week's debauch.”
‘peas up over the South Pole esch fll, per
mitting harmful radiation to reach the earth
“Acid rain sling northern hemisphere
forest, streams and lales
‘40 million acres of forests are lost yearly
due to logging, fuel gathering, catle ranch
ing, snd eroplnds,
‘Due to wopieal deforestation at the cur
rent rate of 76,000 acres per day we can
‘expect, over the next 30 years an average of
100 species/ay to go extinet—along with the
loss of mach of the earths capacity to eon
vert carbon dioxide to lifegiving oxygen.
‘While the world’s population has mare
than tripled inthis century, industrial produc
tion and consumption has grown fiyfld in
that same length of time,
‘As William McKibben writes, “tis as if
someone had serimped and saved his entire
lie and then spent everything on one fantas-
tie week's debauch.”
Some have accuse! Mormons, along with
‘other Christin groups, with being uncon-
‘corned with this frantic debauch. “In the
[modern] Mormon mine,” writes Don Snow,
“the earth as we know it isa temporary sate
‘of alfairs, soon to be cleansed ina ‘twining
fof an eye" by the Redeemer. If indusiry
smukces a mess of air and watersheds, thats of
Title consequence”
‘And yet it is of consequenee—to Mor-
mons perhaps more than anyone. For
aithough our tenth Article of Faith teaches
thal when Christ return, “the earth il be
renewed and receive its paradisiacal glory.”
wwe are not absolved of our responsibility to
be part of the process that brings that hapoy
event to pass.
In MeKibben's frightening words,
mankind has become *God’s equal, or at
Teast, His rival—able to destroy creatiun.”
Bat Brigham Young would haw us tur from
being God's rival, and instead work with Him:
“Salar never owned the earth; he never
made a particle of i: is labor is aot to cre-
ate, but to destroy, while, on the other hand,
the labor ofthe Son of God is to create, pre-
serve, purify, build up and cxalt all
things—be earth and is falness—to his stan
ard of grestness and perfection.
“Lot the people be holy, and the earth
under thee feet wil be holy. Let the people
be boly, ad fled with the Spet of Gd, and
every animal and creeping thing will be filled
with peace; the snil of the earth will bring
forth in its strength, and the fruits thereof
vel be meal for man*
‘A woman T met only receatly mused oa
the state of affairs where technology has
rade us Go's rival, “In our religion,” she
said, “we know that God created us to
‘become gods. Is just happenicg a lite eal
Seve 1980certhan we thought itwould. And we need to
>be alle more urgent about it" In other
‘words, that future paradisiacal word is not
something we can sit around tviddling our
‘thumbs and waiting for, itis for us, in com
cert with the powers of heaven, to work
toward.
Some say thet technology, which created
the problem, wi solve it, Thats fly com
focting view, When T think in those terms, 1
sigh in rebel; [im absolve of any respons
Dilty forthe indignities we have inflicted on
the earth, But it aso seems a rather cavalier
View, one that doesn't recognize God's erc-
ation, ss He created it, 8 hebing any intrinsic
‘value. And it seems to inply that we ean con-
tinue, headlong in our consuming ways.
IF Tread the Book of Mormon right, those
exces of pride and wickeviness and destruc-
tion are not historical curiosities, They are
Here, and now, and an a macro seale. AST
write that, it sounds apocalyptic, hysterical
almost. And yet where can endless material
aulvancement lead us?
‘The profit motive, the drive for advance.
meat over other humnan beings, is neither
(Christan nor environmentally sound. “Ihave
{old you a great many times" Heber C. Kime
‘all said, "that our falthfulness and goodness
sand oneness would hive an effect upon the
crops, [twill have aa effect upon our stock,
and upon the earth, the ar, che mountain,
Beauty and joy are not
mere byproducts of
nature, of value only
to “toadstool worship-
pers.” Nor is the
world’s bounty only for
our bodily comfort; tt is
for our souls as well.
the valeys; and that is aot all. it will extend
to the uermost parts ofthe earth. There is
nota branch that belongs to this kingdom but
will feel the power. I know that by exper
ence, hy knowledge, and by inteligener”
have bombarded you with quotes. Tim
sory, Ws just that etter poopie than have
‘thought co much more deeply about the
earth, Tircasure my encounters with mature,
whether casual or intense, but I haven't yet
comme to terms with my Bfetyle and ts effects
cn that nature, We inthe West can fel ther
isolated from such issues as acid rain and
tropical deforestation, We may not recognize
that the greenhouse effect is already chang.
ing the word. Bat our indifference must not
take avay the spiritual hunger within us toe
‘ne with God and His creations; nor does
absolve us of the duty—and privilege—to
leave tis work better than we found it
Tleave you with 0 more quotes, diverse
in origi, yet remarkably similar in pit
‘The fis. rom Gordon B. Hinckley:
“Here is declared the Creator ofall that is
od and bezuifl, Thave locked al majestic
mountains rising against a blue sky and
‘thought of Jesus, the creator of heaven and
‘earth, Ihave stood on spit of sand in the
cic and watched the dawn rise like thu: