FreeSpeech in the Classroom: should free speech be restricted? Poster presentation on Free Speech that cover philosophical views of Applebaum and Callan.
FreeSpeech in the Classroom: should free speech be restricted? Poster presentation on Free Speech that cover philosophical views of Applebaum and Callan.
FreeSpeech in the Classroom: should free speech be restricted? Poster presentation on Free Speech that cover philosophical views of Applebaum and Callan.
Under WHAT CONDITIONS
SHOULD Free Speech Be Restricted?
ans
Even though CHILDREN are viewed as
boing under the protection and authority of
Adults io) 270 also autonomous, rights bearing
Individuals. When i it appropriate to restrict ther
free speech, should ibe restricted at all?
CASEA
WHO? E84, baled igh schoo student
ven? 2004
WHERE? Tapw Secondary School, Ontario, GA
WHAT? E.B.J. was arrested and jailed fora month.
He felt left out: he couldnt enjoy extra-curricular
‘activites or interact with people his age; he was
Suspended and was forced to be homeschooled
WHY? A story he wrote had violent content: &
bullied character seeks revenge by bombing the
school His arrest was based on gossip created
by students. Rumors led the Police to search his
home: they found no real evidence and charges
were eventually dropped
RESULT? Even though the School Board decided
it was in everyone's best interest for EB.) to be
home schooled, there is evidence of “irreparable
hharm from the exclusion caused by involuntary
homeschooling’ cy 205)
con the student’ ite.
Liberal vs Radical
Multiculturalism
DEMOCRAT
ritttutenony OTTERS
“The schools took action with the best intentions and
withthe safety ofthe majority of the students in min.
‘The authority figures did not focus on the right aspects missed
{an opportunity to discuss the issue. instead of encouraging @
dialogue on violent content and the effects itcan have, they forced
the problem ourside ofthe school and eaused a negative impact
CBs g
\WHO? Daniel Schmunk: high schoo! student wih
ambitious goals.
WHEN? Apri 29° 1999, morning ater schoo shooting
WHERE? High Schoo! in Alberta, Canada.
\WHAT? Daniel was found asphyxiated by carbon
monoxide in a garage owned by his tamiy:
Suspected suicide, bu later ruled as an accident.
WHY? As a prank, Daniel distrbuted around
school a cisturbing and threatening note his riend
had writen, The prank, as well a warring from &
teacher about a pellet gun Daniel carried in his car
trunk, led the principal to ealing the police, Daniel
was. suspended and taken into custody.
‘Students spread rumours about him being the next
school kis. The principal later announced that
there was no real threat, but Daniel never went
back home,
RESULT? Suspending and excluding Danie! from
the rest ofthe student body cismissed the idea that
teachers and students could've benefited trom this
incident and used it as a learning opportunity by
allowing Danie back in schoo! to take oes,
iain Tg aeringa of e aaee alcwctorg
Ino a learning experience, the schoo! alled to give Daniel he
chance to express his apologies. Addressing) violence by
Silencing and censoring misses the opportunity to engage in
dialogue about serous issues.