Running head: INTEGRATIVE REVIEW
Managing Delirium with Haloperidol in Palliative Care: An integrative review
Kelly Ryan
Bon Secours Memorial College of Nursing
‘Nursing Research
NUR 4222
Dr. Perkins
December 1, 2015
On my honor, I have neither given nor received aid on this assignment or test, and I pledge that
Tam in compliance with the BSMCON Honor System.” - KRINTEGRATIVE REVIEW
Abstract,
The objective of this integrative review is to offer a summary and analysis of available
research concerning the use of haloperidol to treat delirium in the palliative care
population. Delirium is particularly concerning in the palliative are population as it is
stressful for the patient, their families and their caretakers, and ultimately makes the
patient’s end-of-life experiences less peaceful (Agar et al., 2011; van den Boogard et al.,
2013; Bush et al., 2014; Crawford et al., 2013; Gongalves et al., 2015). The research
design in an integrative review. The literature search was conducted using two computer-
based research databases, Pubmed and the Wiley Online Library database. A total of five
articles met the overall inclusion criteria, The findings and results regarding the use of
haloperidol in the treatment of delirium were marginally significant, which may be due to
the difficulty providers experience in identifying delirium early. Further education needs
to be implemented to all healthcare providers on how to recognize delirium, so that
appropriate treatment can take place. Significant research limitations inchide time
only five articles and a
constraints due to other assignments, a restriction to the use of
novice researcher.INTEGRATIVE REVIEW
Managing Delirium with Haloperidol in Palliative Care
The purpose of this integrative review is to search available literature relating to
the use of haloperidol to manage delirium in palliative care patients. Delirium is
characterized by changing mental and neurobehavioral actions, including changes in
sleep patterns, motor activity, perception and overall impaired awareness (Bush, et al.,
2014). Additionally, delirium is often misunderstood and mismanaged, delaying overall
treatment of the disorder (Crawford, et al., 2013). Delirium is often under diagnosed
which contributes to stressful end-of-life experiences, morbidity and increased mortality.
Haloperidol, an antipsychotic, is currently the standard treatment of delirious symptoms
in the palliative care population. The effectiveness of haloperidol, however, has not been
thoroughly investigated. This topic is interesting to the researcher because of her
experience in working with palliative care patients. Consequently, the proposed PICO
question by this researcher is as follows: Is haloperidol administration an appropriate
treatment for delirium for patients who are receiving palliative care in an inpatient
setting?
Research Design, Search Methods & Search Outcomes
‘The research design is an integrative review. ‘The search for research articles was
conducted utilizing the computer-based search engine PubMed, specifically the Wiley
Online Library database. Key search terms included, ‘agitation’, ‘delirium’,
haloperidol’, ‘palliative’, ‘palliative care’, ‘qualitative’ and ‘quantitative’. ‘The article
search was also filtered to include only articles written from 2010 to 2015 in an effort to
focus on current literature. The search yielded 19 articles from Pubmed, indicating a
of literature on this topic. Articles reviewed were further limited to peerINTEGRATIVE REVIEW
ive, quantitative and systematic journal articles written in English. The
reviewed, quali
is haloperidol
articles had to identify with the researcher's PICO question, “
administration an appropriate treatment for delirium for patients who are receiving,
palliative care in an inpatient setting?” The articles were then selected based on the
following inclusion criteria: palliative care patients, symptoms of delirium and treatment
with haloperidol. Articles that did not meet given criteria were excluded from the review.
tration to manage
The screening produced five articles regarding haloperidol adm
delirium symptoms in palliative care patients, including three quantitative, one qualitative
and one systematic review.
Findings/Results
The findings and results of the five reviewed articles indicate that haloperidol is
an overall appropriate treatment for managing delirium symptoms in palliative care
patients (Agar et al., 2011; van den Boogard et al., 2013; Bush et al., 2014; Crawford et
al., 2013; Gongalves et al., 2015), A summation of the assembled research articles is
presented in Table 1. The researcher framed the review according to the following two
categories: recognition of delirium for treatment and the statistical significance of
outcomes.
Recognition of Delirium for Treatment
Throughout the articles surveyed there was an agreement reached that quick and
accurate assessment of delirium in the palliative care population can be difficult (Agar et
al., 2011; van den Boogard et al., 2013; Bush et al., 2014; Crawford et al., 2013:
Gongalves et al., 2015). An integrative review by Bush, et al.. (2014) identified studies
that pointed to various therapeutic interventions for delirium. Research was completedINTEGRATIVE REVIEW
for the review by combining multidisciplinary input from 31 delirium experts with a
literature review over multiple databases. Ultimately, the search produced 430
potentially applicable articles, of which 55 were included in the appraisal. Data analysis
involved grouping the main findings into the following categories: the unique contextual
issues in palliative care, pharmacologic interventions, non-pharmacologic interventions
W offered several studies showing that
and recommendations for future studies. The re
it is vital that delirium is appropriately recognized shortly after symptoms occur. This is
important because the overall phase of delirium in palliative care has been negatively
associated with short-term survival (Bush, et al., 2014). All studies likewise point to the
fact that delirium needs to be diagnosed in a timely fashion because its occurrence is
stressful to the patient, their family, and their caretakers (Agar et al., 2011; van den
Boogard et al., 2013; Bush et al., 2014; Crawford et al., 2013; Gongalves et al., 2015).
A qualitative study by Agar, et al., (2011) conducted semi-structured interviews
for 40 nurses in the fields of palliative care, aged care, aged care psychiatry and oncology
about their experiences in managing delirium. Potential participants were approached by
their nursing managers and were then given information on how to further participate in
the study if they desired. The interviews were audio-taped and transcribed verbatim, and
participants were given the opportunity to make any corrections before the data was
analyzed using the NVivo 8 (QSR International 2008) analysis software. Four main
themes were identified, superficial recognition of delirium as a syndrome, confusion on
how to approach a nursing assessment of delirium, maintaining dignity and reducing
ium and its effect on others. It was discovered that there is
chaos and the distress of deliINTEGRATIVE REVIEW
limited knowledge of the features of delirium across all of these specialties, indicating the
requirement for delirium education across all fields of nursing.
Statis
cal significance of haloperidol in patients with delirium
The quantitative study by Crawford et al. (2013) examined overall haloperidol
benefits and risks in 119 palliative care patients with delirium. The National Cancer
itute’s Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events was used to evaluate overall
benefits and harms. Data was recorded at baseline, 48 hours after the start of haloperidol
treatment and 10 days after the start of haloperidol treatment, Data was analyzed using a
univariable logistic regression model. A net clinical benefit was observed with
haloperidol treatment as 1 out of every 3 palliative participants saw overall reduction of
delirium symptoms after 10 days. Additionally, it was discovered that the average
haloperidol dose of 6.5mg/day can be reduced to 2. mg/day and still be effective in
managing symptoms of delirium,
To accurately catch and assess for delirium in one study, van den Bogard et al.,
(2013) screened a total number of 177 patients using the Confusion Assessment Method,
hereafter referred to as CAM tool, three times a day. Additionally, medical and nursing
files were screened to search for trends signaling delirium. Delirium symptomology of
patients who received haloperidol was compared with the symptomology of patients not
treated with haloperidol. Data was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier curve. Van den
Boogard, et al., (2013) identified a 10% decrease in delirium with patients treated
prophylactically with delirium compared to those untreated.
A quantitative study by Gongalves, et al., (2015) also studied whether haloperidol
is an effective and safe treatment in managing delirium. This study included 135INTEGRATIVE REVIEW
inpatient participants on a palliative care service. Haloperidol was used a median of three
times on each patient, with a total number of uses being 584 times over a six year period,
To evaluate the effectiveness of the haloperidol it was recorded when the treatment was
controlled and the number of doses needed to control
initiated, when the situation wa
. however this
agitation. Researchers used statistical analysis to analyze their data
fe and effective treatment
procedure is not specified, Haloperidol was deemed to be a
of delirium symptoms as 534 (91%) of agitation episodes were controlled with one dose.
Discussion/ Implications
ically asks whether the administration of haloperidol in
The PICO question spe:
the inpatient, palliative care setting is an appropriate treatment for delirium. All studies
point to the fact that delirium needs to be diagnosed in a timely fashion because its
occurrence is stressful to the patient, their family, and their caretakers (Agar et al., 2011;
van den Boogard et al., 2013; Bush et al., 2014; Crawford et al., 2013; Gongalves et al.,
2015). The findings of the integrative review suggest that haloperidol administration in
palliative care patients for the treatment of delirium is beneficial, however the benefits
‘ation of delirium is needed so that
may only be marginal. Ultimately, quicker identi
haloperidol can be administered. Therefore, the findings of the integrative review are
a whole.
relevant to the PICO question and support it a
The implications of this review suggest that more education is needed on the topic
of delirium, and how providers can better recognize and diagnose its occurrence in
patients receiving palliative care. The nursing community can be more proactive in
receiving education about symptoms of delirium and how to manage the condition. This
will in turn promote faster identification of patients at a high risk for developing delirium,INTEGRATIVE REVIEW
such as patients receiving end-of-life care. Haloperidol can be an effective treatment in
this population, however its benefits depend on providers diagnosing delirium rapidly.
Limitations
The researcher identifies this integrative review does have limitations which
influence the review as a whole. The integrative review is a class assignment being
conducted exclusively by the researcher. Additionally, the
ignment was limited to 5
Journal articles written within the last five years. The project
s additionally affected by
the inexperience of the researcher as this is the researcher's first effort in completing an
integrative review.
Conelus
on
An integrative review of 5 articles shows that haloperidol continues to be the
cornerstone in the treatment of delirium symptoms in the palliative population. Overall,
the researcher identified haloperidol use is benefii
| in the management of delirium
symptoms. The consensus of healthcare provides report difficulty in assessing and
diagnosing delirium, further complicating its pharmacological treatment. To be able to
appropriately detect and assess delirium in the palliative care population more education
is needed on the subject. Additionally, significant limitations imposed on this researcher
could have affected the integrative review.INTEGRATIVE REVIEW
References
ar, M., Draper, B., Phillips, B., Phillips, P., Collier, A., Harlum, J., Currow, D. (2011).
Making decisions about del
m: A qualitative comparison of decision making
between nurses working in palliative care, aged care, aged care psychiatry and
oncology. Palliative Medicine, 26(7), 888-894. doi: 10.1177/026921631141988
van den Boogaard, M., Schoonhoven, L., van Achterberg, T., van der Hoeven, J.,
Pickers, P. (2013). Haloperidol prophylaxis in critically ill patients with a high
risk for delirium. Critical Care, 17(1), 1-11. doi: 10.1186/ee1 1933
Bush, B., Pereira, J., Currow, D., Rabheru, K., Wright, D., Agar, M., Gagnon, P.,
Breitbart, W., Lawlor, P. (2014). Treating an established episode of delirium in
palliative care: Expert opinion and review of the current evidence base with
recommendations for future development. Journal of Pain and Symptom
Management, 48(2), 231-245. doi: 10.1016.2013.07.018
Crawford, G., Agar, M., Quinn, S., Phillips, J., Litster, C., Michael, N., Doogue, M.,
Rowett, D., Currow, D. (2013). Pharmacovigilance in hospice/palliative care: net
effect of haloperidol for delirium. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 16(11), 1335-
1340, doi:10.1089/jpm.2013.0230
Gongalves, F., Almeida, A., Pereira, S. (2015). A protocol for the control of agitation in
palliative care. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, \-4,
doi: 10.1177/10499091 15598929pouiodos 10) BHAI
kept anowpEN ABojoutuuso suey pue
TZ} — suoyduids oun siyauaq,
| Aepjauic'9 umutjap aimansuy Jo sui} ut
woy | ut aseazsp sdnosSqns | sou jeuonen, parenyeas
paonpar p sem poynuapr | =AVOLOION| — stowao| suimdussg
| aqueo | azayp jjezoag | sauayy Ajnuapt | —_uoissaxBax qua1yIp
| umuyjap jo oruresdoid | jeonsi8oq- | gv ION OW la -squtod
suionduixs sdep g1 | erep zomduroo 01 pappe quiod | noygnoxp ys ¢ |
| aonpaa | saye 1youaq P pos) pasn pue| | =uueyyN| —squaned | 1 papiosar
0) popaou [er padojaaap | aneo vied (102)
| jopuodojey | you poured ZI WoISI9, sem 001} JVOLOION uo | eanened spomouteyy a
joasop| sjuedionsed snewesd | uononparjuiod | —jeardsoy pms 9} aiqeynuapt | “propawa3
| amp ‘san, unt aS VIVLS mou y-| 1 =110uaq IN 611 | Anenueng, ON.
j (wopruyp ayy 4
aonouad pur) parprys domaunsy | (4894)
| on yuoay, , Salquite A, Bung pomp 1 Joyny
yesieaddy | s8urpuny shyeuy tye | WouToAnseayA, EON Pidutes enydaou0g | asayy
AMAIATY AALLVYDALNI
ot
ae| sujmeneur
| SreauTTeaH | | pue
he | susouserp
| uoneonps | _umnutjap jo ee
errs | in
paynuapy | quowsieueu i =a
i pue au0[dxo 01
| poSeueu | quauissasse Bumes sums | SMaLAIOIUL
| -z9pun pue Suismyy aatdsoy ‘area | poumonss
paraiap | poorsiapun | Jo ames wmnutjp | aanerred “1U12§
| -tepun |