Project 1 with Discourse Analysis

Reflection and Self-Assessment

by Monica Nair

FILE

MONICA_NAIR_PROJECT _1.PDF (219.82K)

T IME SUBMIT T ED

02-FEB-2016 12:37AM

WORD COUNT

2630

SUBMISSION ID

626765196

CHARACT ER COUNT

14000

Project 1 with Discourse Analysis Reflection and SelfAssessment

GRADEMARK REPORT
FINAL GRADE

GENERAL COMMENTS

13

Instructor

/15

PAGE 1

Comment 1 |

Genre

good, straightf orward introduction. I encourage you to work on being a bit more succinct in the
f uture

Comment 2

Analysis

interesting! What does this mean? And how is the representative of the academic discourse and
how it understands itself as a discourse?
PAGE 2

Comment 3 |

Analysis

good--specif ic evidence of the kinds of discourses you learned in this class would be helpf ul.
What was the methodology, f or example?

Comment 4

Genre

this is f ine, but a deeper analysis of what it means to be "global interpreteres of human
interaction" is necessary. T hat phrase seems very vague and somewhat empty to an outsider
so explain how these concepts help to def ine the discourse community of communication in
academia.
PAGE 3

Comment 5

Analysis

good evidence here, but even more analysis of the language is necessary

Comment 6

how so? in what way?

PAGE 4

Comment 7 |

Analysis

good observation here--what kinds of tabs are there on the website? What do you need to
know to be able to navgate it? What does this tab tell you about the discourse community of
hte prof ession?

Comment 8

Genre

is this representative of the prof ession, do you think?

PAGE 5

Comment 9
great!

Comment 10

Analysis

ok, so what kinds of language knowledge did you have to have to do this job?

Comment 11 |

Analysis

You make some important observations about globalization both of these sites and you
choose interesting representations, but I'm not sure you really go into a deep analysis of the
language used and the discourse community of each.
PAGE 6
PAGE 7
PAGE 8

RUBRIC: PROJECT 1 DISCOURSE ANALYSIS

GENRE (25%)

4.25 / 5

5/5

Ef f ectively identif ies modes of writing in academia, in the prof ession, and in the discourse community.
Shows ef f ective use of citation conventions. Ef f ectively demonstrates your sense of the discourse
communitys perspective on globalization. Demonstrates anticipation of genre and audience expectations
in your own writing.
DOES NOT MEET
REQUIREMENT
(1)

does not meet any of the requirements

NEEDS SIGNIFICANT needs signif icant work to meet the requirements

WORK
(2)
ADEQUATE
(3)

adequate, but needs signif icant work

GOOD
(4)

good, but could be improved

EXCELLENT
(5)

excellent, very little revision necessary

RHET ORIC (25%)

4/5

Demonstrates understanding of rhetorical situation and audience needs in the specif ic discourse.
Ef f ectively locates the writers own relation to the modes of writing within the prof ession.
DOES NOT MEET
REQUIREMENT
(1)

does not meet any of the requirements

NEEDS SIGNIFICANT needs signif icant work to meet the requirements

WORK
(2)
ADEQUATE
(3)

adequate, but needs signif icant work

GOOD
(4)

good, but could be improved

EXCELLENT
(5)

excellent, very little revision necessary

ANALYSIS (25%)

3/5

Demonstrates caref ul reading of the artif acts/texts chosen f or investigation. Demonstrates analysis of
genre, author/s, purpose, audience, context, sources, content level, f ormat, language and visuals. Uses
suf f icient examples. Demonstrates your sense of the discourse communitys perspective on globalization.

DOES NOT MEET

REQUIREMENT
(1)

does not meet any of the requirements

NEEDS SIGNIFICANT needs signif icant work to meet the requirements

WORK
(2)
ADEQUATE
(3)

adequate, but needs signif icant work

GOOD
(4)

good, but could be improved

EXCELLENT
(5)

excellent, very little revision necessary

ST YLE (25%)

5/5

Demonstrates caref ul craf ting, including structure, with respect f or his/her primary audience. Is suf f iciently
developed. Demonstrates clear writing and is grammatically correct
DOES NOT MEET
REQUIREMENT
(1)

does not meet any of the requirements

NEEDS SIGNIFICANT needs signif icant work to meet the requirements

WORK
(2)
ADEQUATE
(3)

adequate, but needs signif icant work

GOOD
(4)

good, but could be improved

EXCELLENT
(5)

excellent, very little revision necessary