a.

) No, invitation by the police officers does not necessarily mean it the persons
involved are under arrest.
First and foremost there was no warrant of arrest to speak of nor did the
police officers
b.) Yes, it is clear that the suspects were read their Miranda rights and
acknowledge the fact that they understood everything and willingly gave
their statements. Mainly due to the fact that their conscience was in dire
restlessness brought about by their cumbersome guilt.
c.) Yes, it is quite apparent that the confession was made to a private citizen
thus it is admissible as evidence. When the radio reporter interviewed the
two suspects they readily admitted the same exact statements they
confessed. Citing a similar case of People vs Ordoo the confession to the
radio reporter does not violate the constitutional rights of the accused.
Regardless of the fact that there was no counsel present. Therefore the
confession is admissible as evidence wherein it seemingly validates the guilt
of the accused.
d.) Yes,