A typical adolescent has mastered their fine and gross motor skills and much of the basic reading and writing skills. Observing adolescents is a little different than observing preschoolers. This framework is applicable to a variety of subjects including English / language arts, history and even science.
A typical adolescent has mastered their fine and gross motor skills and much of the basic reading and writing skills. Observing adolescents is a little different than observing preschoolers. This framework is applicable to a variety of subjects including English / language arts, history and even science.
A typical adolescent has mastered their fine and gross motor skills and much of the basic reading and writing skills. Observing adolescents is a little different than observing preschoolers. This framework is applicable to a variety of subjects including English / language arts, history and even science.
Since my goal is to one-day work with adolescents I wanted to develop
a framework that would allow me to observe and document the behaviors and skill of that age group. I think that observing adolescents is a little different than observing preschoolers because a typical adolescent has mastered their fine and gross motor skills and much of the basic reading and writing skills. The observation framework that I am creating is targeted at a typical adolescent (by typical I mean not a special needs class) class, either junior high or high school. I would use a variety of methods to observe adolescent development and behavior including: tallies, work samples, anecdotal notes. Im interested in working with adolescents because they have more language and the capacity to express them selves. Also by this age many of their basic skills are developed so you arent checking to see if they can feed themselves or coordinate their movements, which in my opinion can make it difficult to use checklist and charts. For my observation framework I would create a matrix similar to the one in our book The Power of Observation (Jablon 2007, p.80). Instead of rating the quality of participation like Jablons (2007) example I would make a tally mark next to each persons name each time they contributed to the discussion. Then in the final column I would write notes about what each student said. I think that this framework would be useful in determining the frequency and quality of each students contribution. Upon reviewing the date the instructor can determine which students are participating and
Observation Framework
hopefully develop ways to illicit participation from less active students. I
think that the column of notes is also helpful because the instructor can review comments to ensure that students are grasping the content intended. If the conversation is not reflecting the learning objectives then the instructor ask open ended questions that prompt students to think more deeply on the matter. The comments can also be used to highlight important/interesting contributions from students. This framework is applicable to a variety of subjects including English/language arts, history and even science. I think that this framework may be difficult for observing math skills because there isnt usually much discussion around math concepts since the are pretty set in stone.