Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The French Lieutenant's Woman
The French Lieutenant's Woman
John Fowles
Victorian Ways
Influenced
of transgression
At
his
intrusive author
Old omniscient and intrusive point of view
used with grand style
I am writing in a convention universally
accepted at the time of my story that the
novelist stands next to God. He may not
know all, yet he does pretend that he does.
(Ch.13)
devices:
- brief authorial comments
- footnotes
- essay materials
- epigraphs
Victorian characteristics:
Morality
Strong emphasis on duty
Restraint
Social class distinction
The status of women
Religion
Economic Prosperity
Morality
Restraint:
Religion:
Hypocritically religious
Mrs. Poultney []she reflected on the terrible
mathematical doubt that increasingly haunted her:
whether the Lord calculated charity by what one
had given or by what one could have afforded to
give.
Vicar - was a comparatively emancipated man
theologically, but he also knew very well which side
his pastoral bread was buttered) and that he is
taking money from the rich
Charles-religion of freedom
Feminism
Sarah faintly masculinized Victorian
female
Sarah New Woman emancipated,
liberated, but considered an outcast from
Victorian point of view
Darwinism
calls into question Christian beliefs and
Victorian values
Survival of the fittest and natural selection
We must evolve to survive
Sarah-cultural missing link between the
centuries
Fowles compares Darwinism to modern
worry over nuclear destruction
Marxism
Social evolution
The path of liberation to Sam- his
determination to break free from Charles
and create the space necessary for
personal fulfillment, for emancipation.
First ending
Thoroughly Victorian ending (married pair
blessed with children, Charlesbusinessman)
Charles succumbs to Victorian conventions
This the fact that every Victorian had two minds-is the one
peace of equipment we must always take with us on our travels
back to the nineteenth century. It is a schizophrenia seen at its
clearest, its most notorious, in the poets I have quoted from so
oftenin Tennyson, Clough, Arnold, Hardy; but scarcely less
clearly in the extraordinary political veerings from Right to Left
and back again of men like the younger Mill and Gladstone; in
the ubiquitous neuroses and psychosomatic illnesses of
intellectuals otherwise as different as Charles Kingsley and
Darwin; in the execration at first poured on the Pre-Raphaelites,
who triedor seemed to be tryingto be one-minded about
both art and life; in the endless tug-of-war between Liberty and
Restraint, Excess and Moderation, Propriety and Conviction,
between the principled mans cry for Universal Education and
his terror of Universal Suffrage