Reflection Piece: Expertise For this cycle, I composed two separate documents. The first memo comprised very detailed directions and had a professional tone. The document written to the expert audience was shorter and included jargon.
Reflection Piece: Expertise For this cycle, I composed two separate documents. The first memo comprised very detailed directions and had a professional tone. The document written to the expert audience was shorter and included jargon.
Reflection Piece: Expertise For this cycle, I composed two separate documents. The first memo comprised very detailed directions and had a professional tone. The document written to the expert audience was shorter and included jargon.
For this cycle, I composed two separate documents: one for a
non-expert audience and the other for an expert audience. The first memo comprised very detailed directions and had a professional tone. I used this method so that this audience would understand the seriousness of this event that I was requesting their participation. I included very detailed information because I understood that this might be the first time that this person has been presented with this particular assignment whereas a former Legionnaire should automatically know what is expected. I used a memorandum format for both pieces but the document written to the expert audience was shorter and included jargon that I am sure they would understand. For the non-expert audience, I included alternatives to the assignments that I requested so that they had a backup plan e.g. I informed this group that they should contact the coordinator, Ms. Valerie, and I also let them know which tour script they should review and when that script was given out. The expert audience would know who the coordinator of Discover Day would be as well as which tour script (may even know the tour script by heart). All in all, both memos contained the same information but were edited for the audience whether expert or non-expert.