v. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF the STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al. No. 377.
Supreme Court of the United States
October 21, 1929*
Messrs. Roy V. Reppy and W. C. Mullendore, both of Los Angeles, Cal.,
for petitioner. Mr. Arthur T. George, of Los Angeles, Cal., for respondents.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of California denied.
The Supreme Court of California filed the following memoranda:
S. F. 13461-Southern California Edison Co. v. Railroad Commission. By the Court on petition for rehearing: The questions presented by the petition for the writ (review) as to the validity of the proceedings under the Constitution of the United States, and all such constitutional objections, were considered by this court and decided adversely to the contention of the petitioner. The petition for a rehearing is therefore denied. Dated June 10, 1929.
Report of the Decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, and the Opinions of the Judges Thereof, in the Case of Dred Scott versus John F.A. Sandford
December Term, 1856.
Gary T. Seyler, in No. 71-1655 and Deborah A. Seyler, His Wife v. Steuben Motors, Inc. and Volks-Wagen America, Inc. Appeal of Deborah A. Seyler in No. 71-1656, 462 F.2d 181, 3rd Cir. (1972)
Intercontinental Transportation Co., Inc., Owner of The S.S. Natalie v. States Marine Lines, Inc., and Arrow Steamship Co., Inc., 297 F.2d 249, 2d Cir. (1961)
Eugene J. O'neil, Paul T. McCusker Gordon MacSmith C.C. Alexander, Gustaf A. Johnson, Byron Evans and J. Arthur Krauss v. O.A. Cargill and Harold F. Westcott, 381 F.2d 726, 10th Cir. (1967)
Southern Railway Company, Defendant-Petitioner v. Honorable George C. Templar, United States District Judge, and United States of America, Plaintiff-Respondent, 463 F.2d 967, 10th Cir. (1972)
Southern California Edison Company v. Federal Power Commission, El Paso Natural Gas Company and Transwestern Pipeline Co., Intervenors, State of New Mexico, Intervenor, 387 F.2d 619, 3rd Cir. (1968)