The Supreme Court dismissed the writ of certiorari sought to review a judgment, finding that the judgment rested on adequate nonfederal grounds to support it based on prior cases establishing that the Supreme Court will not review a case if the decision is based on adequate and independent state law grounds.
The Supreme Court dismissed the writ of certiorari sought to review a judgment, finding that the judgment rested on adequate nonfederal grounds to support it based on prior cases establishing that the Supreme Court will not review a case if the decision is based on adequate and independent state law grounds.
Copyright:
Public Domain
Available Formats
Download as COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The Supreme Court dismissed the writ of certiorari sought to review a judgment, finding that the judgment rested on adequate nonfederal grounds to support it based on prior cases establishing that the Supreme Court will not review a case if the decision is based on adequate and independent state law grounds.
Copyright:
Public Domain
Available Formats
Download as COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
v. Rollin A. WILBUR and the National City Bank of Cleveland, Ohio, Cotrustees, etc.* No. 215.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 16, 1938
Mr. Herbert S. Duffy, of Columbus, Ohio, for petitioner.
On writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga County, State of Ohio. PER CURIAM.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as it appears upon argument that the
judgment sought to be reviewed rests upon a nonfederal ground adequate to support it. Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U.S. 300, 33, 304, 37 S.Ct. 643, 61 L.Ed. 1153; Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. Meyer, 265 U.S. 30, 32, 33, 44 S.Ct. 432, 433, 68 L.Ed. 885; Lynch v. State of New York, 293 U.S. 52, 54, 55, 55 S.Ct. 16, 17, 79 L.Ed. 191.
Emma Taylor, 1 Administratrix of Frank Taylor, Deceased, and John P. Kirby, in Error v. Drainage District Number Fifty-Six of Emmet County, Iowa, 244 U.S. 644 (1917)