The Supreme Court approved the Special Master's report regarding Shell Oil Company and The Texas Company. The amended bill of complaint was dismissed against Shell Oil Company according to a stipulation between Illinois, Indiana, and Shell Oil. The amended bill of complaint was also dismissed against The Texas Company according to a stipulation among Illinois, Indiana, East Chicago, and The Texas Company. Costs against Shell Oil and The Texas Company will be determined later based on the Special Master's recommendations.
Original Description:
Filed: 1947-02-17
Precedential Status: Precedential
Citations: 330 U.S. 799
Docket: 9, Original
The Supreme Court approved the Special Master's report regarding Shell Oil Company and The Texas Company. The amended bill of complaint was dismissed against Shell Oil Company according to a stipulation between Illinois, Indiana, and Shell Oil. The amended bill of complaint was also dismissed against The Texas Company according to a stipulation among Illinois, Indiana, East Chicago, and The Texas Company. Costs against Shell Oil and The Texas Company will be determined later based on the Special Master's recommendations.
Copyright:
Public Domain
Available Formats
Download as COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The Supreme Court approved the Special Master's report regarding Shell Oil Company and The Texas Company. The amended bill of complaint was dismissed against Shell Oil Company according to a stipulation between Illinois, Indiana, and Shell Oil. The amended bill of complaint was also dismissed against The Texas Company according to a stipulation among Illinois, Indiana, East Chicago, and The Texas Company. Costs against Shell Oil and The Texas Company will be determined later based on the Special Master's recommendations.
Copyright:
Public Domain
Available Formats
Download as COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The Special Report of the Special Master as to Shell Oil Company,
Incorporated, and The Texas Company is approved. The amended bill of complaint is dismissed as to Shell Oil Company, Incorporated, pursuant to the stipulation entered into by and between the State of Illinois and the State of Indiana, City of East Chicago, City of Hammond, and Shell Oil Company, Incorporated, and as to The Texas Company pursuant to the stipulation entered into by and among the State of Illinois and the State of Indiana, the City of East Chicago and The Texas Company. Costs against Shell Oil Company, Incorporated, and The Texas Company to be taxed hereafter in accordance with the recommendations of the Special Master.
R. M. Edwards and Dorothy Edwards v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Loyd W. Disler and Joy Disler v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 415 F.2d 578, 10th Cir. (1969)
Gemini Shipping, Inc. v. Foreign Trade Organization For Chemicals and Foodstuffs and Syrian General Organization For Maritime Transport, 647 F.2d 317, 2d Cir. (1981)
Northern Natural Gas Company (Helex Group) v. Ralph Grounds (Landowners Group), and Socony Mobil Oil Co. (Lessee-Producer Group), 666 F.2d 1279, 10th Cir. (1982)
City of Arlington, Texas, A Municipal Corporation v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Etc., First Gibraltar Bank, FSB, 963 F.2d 79, 1st Cir. (1992)
In Re: Gaston & Snow, Debtor, Alfred J. Bianco, As Plan Administrator To The Estate of Gaston & Snow v. Robert A. Erkins & Bernadine Erkins, 243 F.3d 599, 2d Cir. (2001)
Mercantile Bank & Trust Co., Ltd., Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Fidelity and Deposit Company, Etc., Counter-Claimant v. United States of America, Counter and International Energy Corporation, Counter-Defendants, 750 F.2d 838, 11th Cir. (1985)
Larry Miller and Kimberly Miller v. Long-Airdox Company, A Corporation, Defendant-Third Party v. Amax Coal Company, Third Party, 914 F.2d 976, 3rd Cir. (1990)
Mugged at the Courthouse: An Analysis of the Decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims in Alaska V. United States, 35 Fed. Cl. 685 (Ct. Cl.1996) and Subsequent Petition of Certiorari