Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Alan McSurely v. Thomas B. Ratliff, 389 U.S. 949 (1967)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views1 page
    In a 3-0 decision, the Supreme Court granted emergency relief in the case of Alan McSurely et al. v. Thomas B. Ratliff et al. The Court ordered that documents seized remain in custody pending further proceedings in the U.S. District Court for Eastern Kentucky. The applicants were given 5 days to present any objections to the validity of a subpoena duces tecum to the District Court, and the order would remain in effect until the District Court ruled on any objections.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1967-11-10 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 389 U.S. 949

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    In a 3-0 decision, the Supreme Court granted emergency relief in the case of Alan McSurely et al. v. Thomas B. Ratliff et al. The Court ordered that documents seized remain in custody pending further proceedings in the U.S. District Court for Eastern Kentucky. The applicants were given 5 days to present any objections to the validity of a subpoena duces tecum to the District Court, and the order would remain in effect until the District Court ruled on any objections.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    10 views1 page

    Alan McSurely v. Thomas B. Ratliff, 389 U.S. 949 (1967)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    In a 3-0 decision, the Supreme Court granted emergency relief in the case of Alan McSurely et al. v. Thomas B. Ratliff et al. The Court ordered that documents seized remain in custody pending further proceedings in the U.S. District Court for Eastern Kentucky. The applicants were given 5 days to present any objections to the validity of a subpoena duces tecum to the District Court, and the order would remain in effect until the District Court ruled on any objections.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    389 U.S.

    949
    88 S.Ct. 313
    19 L.Ed.2d 358

    Alan McSURELY et al.


    v.
    Thomas B. RATLIFF et al.
    No. ____.

    Supreme Court of the United States


    November 10, 1967
    1

    Arthur Kinoy, William M. Kunstler, Mortion Stavis and Dan Jack Combs, for
    applicants.

    Solicitor General Griswold, for the United States.

    The application for emergency relief presented to Mr. Justice Stewart, and by
    him referred to the Court, is granted to the extent that the seized documents
    shall remain in their present custody pending further proceedings in the United
    States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky. This order is
    conditioned upon the applicants presentation, within five days, to such District
    Court of any objections they may have to the validity of the subpoena duces
    tecum issued by the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the
    Committee on Government Operations of the United States Senate and shall
    remain in effect pending the ruling of such District Court upon any such
    objections as may be presented.

    You might also like