Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Oran Murray Young v. United States, 397 U.S. 97 (1970)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views1 page
    The Supreme Court granted the petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari. The Court vacated the judgment and remanded the case to the Court of Appeals, directing them to appoint counsel for the petitioner. If counsel is unable to present any non-frivolous issues, the Court of Appeals may then dismiss the appeal as legally insubstantial. The Chief Justice dissented and would have denied the petition for writ of certiorari.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1970-03-02 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 397 U.S. 97 Docket: 579, Misc

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The Supreme Court granted the petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari. The Court vacated the judgment and remanded the case to the Court of Appeals, directing them to appoint counsel for the petitioner. If counsel is unable to present any non-frivolous issues, the Court of Appeals may then dismiss the appeal as legally insubstantial. The Chief Justice dissented and would have denied the petition for writ of certiorari.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    11 views1 page

    Oran Murray Young v. United States, 397 U.S. 97 (1970)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The Supreme Court granted the petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari. The Court vacated the judgment and remanded the case to the Court of Appeals, directing them to appoint counsel for the petitioner. If counsel is unable to present any non-frivolous issues, the Court of Appeals may then dismiss the appeal as legally insubstantial. The Chief Justice dissented and would have denied the petition for writ of certiorari.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    397 U.S.

    97
    90 S.Ct. 819
    25 L.Ed.2d 80

    Oran Murray YOUNG


    v.
    UNITED STATES.
    No. 579, Misc.

    Supreme Court of the United States


    February 27, 1970

    Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice


    Rosenberg and Roger A. Pauley, for the United States.
    On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals
    for the Eighth Circuit.
    PER CURIAM.

    The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of
    certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
    United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit with directions to appoint
    counsel for the petitioner. If thereafter counsel is unable to present any
    nonfrivolous issue on appeal, the Court of Appeals would then be free to
    dismiss the appeal as legally insubstantial.

    THE CHIEF JUSTICE is of the opinion that the petition for a writ of certiorari
    should be denied.

    You might also like