Professional Documents
Culture Documents
906
98 S.Ct. 3125
57 L.Ed.2d 1149
Bobby L. CARGAL
v.
State of GEORGIA
No. 77-1426
Petitioner, convicted of distributing obscene materials under Ga.Code 262101 (1975), asks this Court to decide the question:
In Bal ew v. Georgia, 435 U.S. 223, 98 S.Ct. 1029, 55 L.Ed.2d 234 (1978), we
granted certiorari to consider, but did not reach, precisely this issue. See Pet. for
Cert. in Ballew v. Georgia, O.T.1977, No. 76-761, p. 2. I see no reason to
suppose that this issue is any less worthy of consideration on certiorari now
than it was when we accepted it in Ballew. For this reason, I would grant
certiorari. See also Sewell v. Georgia, 435 U.S. 982, 98 S.Ct. 1635, 56 L.Ed.2d
76 (1978) (BRENNAN, J., dissenting from dismissal of appeal); Teal v.
Georgia, 435 U.S. 989, 98 S.Ct. 1639, 56 L.Ed.2d 79 (1978); Robinson v.
Georgia, 435 U.S. 989, 98 S.Ct. 1640, 56 L.Ed.2d 80 (1978) (BRENNAN, J.,
dissenting from vacation of judgment and remand). Barring this, I would grant
this petition and summarily reverse. See Ballew, supra, 435 U.S., at 246, 98
S.Ct. 1042 (opinion of BRENNAN, J.); Sanders v. Georgia, 424 U.S. 931, 96
S.Ct. 1145, 47 L.Ed.2d 340 (1976) (dissent from denial of certiorari).