Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Lawrence E. Gray, Edward J. Murty, Jr. and Peter MCC Giesey v. Office of Personnel Management, 475 U.S. 1089 (1986)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views1 page
    The Supreme Court denied a petition for writ of certiorari in a case where the D.C. Circuit held that the Civil Service Reform Act's comprehensive remedial scheme precludes judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act of claims that could have been reviewed administratively under the CSRA. Justice White dissented from the denial of certiorari, noting that the First Circuit had reached the opposite conclusion, and that he would grant certiorari to resolve the conflict between the circuits.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1986-03-24 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 475 U.S. 1089 Docket: 85-969

    Original Title

    Lawrence E. Gray, Edward J. Murty, Jr. And Peter McC Giesey v. Office of Personnel Management, 475 U.S. 1089 (1986)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The Supreme Court denied a petition for writ of certiorari in a case where the D.C. Circuit held that the Civil Service Reform Act's comprehensive remedial scheme precludes judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act of claims that could have been reviewed administratively under the CSRA. Justice White dissented from the denial of certiorari, noting that the First Circuit had reached the opposite conclusion, and that he would grant certiorari to resolve the conflict between the circuits.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views1 page

    Lawrence E. Gray, Edward J. Murty, Jr. and Peter MCC Giesey v. Office of Personnel Management, 475 U.S. 1089 (1986)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The Supreme Court denied a petition for writ of certiorari in a case where the D.C. Circuit held that the Civil Service Reform Act's comprehensive remedial scheme precludes judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act of claims that could have been reviewed administratively under the CSRA. Justice White dissented from the denial of certiorari, noting that the First Circuit had reached the opposite conclusion, and that he would grant certiorari to resolve the conflict between the circuits.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    475 U.S.

    1089
    106 S.Ct. 1478
    89 L.Ed.2d 732

    Lawrence E. GRAY, Edward J. Murty, Jr. and Peter McC.


    Giesey
    v.
    OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT.
    No. 85-969

    Supreme Court of the United States


    March 24, 1986

    On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for
    the District of Columbia Circuit.
    The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
    Justice WHITE, dissenting.

    In this case the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
    Circuit held that the comprehensive remedial scheme established by Congress
    in the Civil Service Reform Act of 19781 (CSRA) indicates a congressional
    intent to preclude judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act2 of
    claims that could have been reviewed administratively under the CSRA. 248
    U.S.App.D.C. 364, 771 F.2d 1504 (1985). While eight other Courts of Appeals
    have reached a similar conclusion, the United States Court of Appeals for the
    First Circuit has held to the contrary. Dugan v. Ramsay, 727 F.2d 192 (1984). I
    would grant certiorari to resolve this conflict.

    Pub.L. 95-454, 92 Stat. 1111 (codified as amended in scattered sections of 5


    U.S.C.

    5 U.S.C. 701 et seq. (1976).

    You might also like