This document is a summary of a Supreme Court case from 1903. The case involved a stockholder suing to prevent a corporation from paying certain taxes. The corporation and its president and treasurer were named as defendants. The court dismissed the suit because the complaint did not show that the directors resided or that the stockholder had asked the directors or officers to try to relieve the tax burden. The Supreme Court affirmed the district court's dismissal.
This document is a summary of a Supreme Court case from 1903. The case involved a stockholder suing to prevent a corporation from paying certain taxes. The corporation and its president and treasurer were named as defendants. The court dismissed the suit because the complaint did not show that the directors resided or that the stockholder had asked the directors or officers to try to relieve the tax burden. The Supreme Court affirmed the district court's dismissal.
Copyright:
Public Domain
Available Formats
Download as COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
This document is a summary of a Supreme Court case from 1903. The case involved a stockholder suing to prevent a corporation from paying certain taxes. The corporation and its president and treasurer were named as defendants. The court dismissed the suit because the complaint did not show that the directors resided or that the stockholder had asked the directors or officers to try to relieve the tax burden. The Supreme Court affirmed the district court's dismissal.
Copyright:
Public Domain
Available Formats
Download as COURT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
v. WASHINGTON & ALASKA STEAMSHIP COMPANY et al. No. 13. Argued December 8, 1902. Decided January 5, 1903.
Messrs. S. M. Stockslager, George C. Heard, John R. Winn, and John G.
Heid for appellant. Solicitor General Richards and Assistant Attorney General Beck for the United States. No Counsel for appellees. Mr. Justice Brewer delivered the opinion of the court:
This case resembles the preceding, in that it was a suit by a stockholder to
restrain a corporation from paying certain taxes. The corporation, its president, and treasurer, were made defendants. The bill alleges that the two officers reside in the city of Tacoma, in the state of Washington; that to them is intrusted the general control and management of the business of the corporation. Where the directors reside is not shown and there is no averment of any application to the directors, or to the president and treasurer, to take action to relieve from the burden of the taxes. Under these circumstances, cumstances, the District Court properly dismissed the suit, and its judgment is affirmed.
The CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the decision of this case.
Estate of Saida G. Selby, Deceased, and Estate of Myron C. Selby, Deceased, Victor M. Selby, Personal Representative v. United States, 726 F.2d 643, 10th Cir. (1984)
United States v. First National Bank & Trust Company of Fargo, North Dakota, Trustee of Travis Bros. Body Works, Inc., Bankrupt, and State of North Dakota, 386 F.2d 646, 1st Cir. (1967)