Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Productio N and Costs: The Short RUN
Productio N and Costs: The Short RUN
N AND
COSTS:
THE SHORT
RUN
Production
An entrepreneur must put together
resources -- land, labour, capital -and produce a product people will
be willing and able to purchase
PRODUCTION
FUNCTION
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE
AMOUNT OF INPUT REQUIRED
AND THE AMOUNT OF OUTPUT
THAT
CAN BE OBTAINED IS
CALLED
THE
PRODUCTION
FUNCTION
LAW OF DIMINISHING
RETURNS
IT HOLDS THAT WE WILL GET LESS
& LESS EXTRA OUTPUT WHEN WE
ADD ADDITIONAL DOSES OF AN
INPUT
WHILE
HOLDING
OTHER
LAW
PROPORTIONS.
OF
VARIABLE
COMBINING RESOURCES
THERE ARE MANY COMBINATIONS
OF RESOURCES THAT COULD BE
USED
CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING TABLE
SHOWING DIFFERENT NUMBER OF
MECHANICS
AND
AMOUNT
OF
CAPITAL THAT THE HYPOTHETICAL
FIRM, INDIA INC., MIGHT USE
PRODUCTION IN THE
SHORT RUN
THE SHORT RUN IS A PERIOD JUST
SHORT ENOUGH THAT AT LEAST ONE
RESOURCE
(INPUT-INDUSTRIAL
PLANT,MACHINES)
CANNOT
BE
CHANGED -- IS FIXED OR INELASTIC.
THUS IN THE SHORT RUN PROUDCTION
OF A COMMODITY CAN BE INCREASED
BY INCREASING THE USE OF ONLY
VARIABLE INPUTS LIKE LABOUR AND
RAW MATERIALS.
LONG RUN
THE LONG RUN IS A PERIOD
SUFFIECIENTLY LONG THAT ALL
FACTORS INCLUDING CAPITAL CAN
BE ADJUSTED OR ARE VARIABLE.
THIS MEANS THAT THE FIRM CAN
CHOOSE ANY COMBINATION ON
THE MANUFACTURING TABLE -- NOT
JUST
THOSE
ALONG
COLUMN
LABELLED 10
No. of
workers (N)
THREE STAGES OF
PRODUCTION
Total product
Marginal
TPL (tonnes) Product (MPL)
Average
Product (APL)
Stage of
production
(5)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
24
24
24
72
48
36
138
66
46
216
78
54
300
84
60
384
84
64
462
78
66
528
66
66
576
48
64
10
600
24
60
11
594
-6
54
12
552
-42
46
I
INCREASING
AND
CONSTANT
RETURNS
II
DIMINISHING
RETURNS
III
-VE RETURNS
MARGINAL PHYSICAL
PRODUCT
AVERAGE
PHYSICAL
PRODUCT
INCREASES &
REACHES ITS
MAXIMUM
IS DIMINISHING AND
BECOMES EQUAL TO ZERO
STARTS
DIMINISHING
BECOMES NEGATIVE
CONTINUES
ISOQUANT
AN ISOQUANT OR ISO PRODUCT CURVE OR
EQUAL PRODUCT CURVE OR A PRODUCTION
INDIFFERENCE CURVE SHOW THE VARIOUS
COMBINATIONS OF TWO VARIABLE INPUTS
RESULTING IN THE SAME LEVEL OF OUTPUT.
IT IS DEFINED AS A CURVE PASSING
THROUGH
THE
PLOTTED
POINTS
REPRESENTING ALL THE COMBINATIONS OF
THE TWO FACTORS OF PRODUCTION WHICH
WILL PRODUCE A GIVEN OUTPUT.
Labour
(Units)
1
Capital
(Units)
5
Output
(Units)
10
10
10
10
10
SLOPE OF ISOQUANT
THE SLOPE OF AN ISOQUANT HAS A
TECHNICAL NAME CALLED THE
MARGINAL RATE OF TECHNICAL
SUBSTITUTION (MRTS)
OR THE
MARGINAL RATE OF SUBSTITUTION
IN PRODUCTION. THUS IN TERMS OF
CAPITAL SERVICES K AND LABOUR L
MRTS = Dk/DL
TYPES OF ISOQUANTS
1. LINEAR ISOQUANT
2. RIGHT-ANGLE ISOQUANT
3. CONVEX ISOQUANT
LINEAR ISOQUANT
IN LINEAR ISOQUANTS THERE IS
PERFECT SUBSTIUTABILTY OF INPUTS.
FOR EXAMPLE IN A POWER PLANT
EQUIPED TO BURN OIL OR GAS.
VARIOUS AMOUNTS OF ELECTRICITY
COULD BE PRODUCED BY BURNING
GAS, OIL OR A COMBINATION. i.e OIL
AND GAS ARE PERFECT SUBSITUTES.
HENCE THE ISOQUANT WOULD BE A
STRAIGHT LINE.
RIGHT-ANGLE
ISOQUANT
CONVEX ISOQUANT
IN CONVEX ISOQUANTS THERE IS SUBSTIUTABILTY
BETWEEN INPUTS BUT IT IS NOT PERFECT.
FOR EXAMPLE
(1) A SHIRT CAN BE MADE WITH LARGE AMOUNT
OF LABOUR AND A SMALL AMOUNT MACHINERY.
(2)
PROPERTIES OF
ISOQUANTS
1. AN ISOQUANT IS DOWNWARD
SLOPING TO THE RIGHT. i.e
NEGATIVELY
INCLINED.
THIS
IMPLIES THAT FOR THE SAME
LEVEL OF OUTPUT, THE QUANTITY
OF ONE VARIABLE WILL HAVE TO
BE
REDUCED
IN
ORDER
TO
INCREASE
THE
QUANTITY
OF
OTHER VARIABLE.
PROPERTIES OF
ISOQUANTS
2. A HIGHER ISOQUANT REPRESENTS
LARGER OUTPUT. THAT IS WITH
THE SAME QUANTITY OF 0NE
INPUT AND LARGER QUANTITY OF
THE
OTHER
INPUT,
LARGER
OUTPUT WILL BE PRODUCED.
PROPERTIES OF
ISOQUANTS
3. NO TWO ISOQUANTS INTERSECT OR
TOUCH EACH OTHER. IF THE TWO
ISOQUANTS
DO
TOUCH
OR
INTERSECT THAT MEANS THAT A
SAME AMOUNT OF TWO INPUTS CAN
PRODUCE TWO DIFFERENT LEVELS
OF OUTPUT WHICH IS ABSURD.
PROPERTIES OF
ISOQUANTS
4. ISOQUANT IS CONVEX TO THE
ORIGIN. THIS MEANS THAT THE
SLOPE DECLINES FROM LEFT TO
RIGHT ALONG THE CURVE. THAT
IS WHEN WE GO ON INCREASING
THE QUANTITY OF ONE INPUT SAY
LABOUR
BY
REDUCING
THE
QUANTITY OF OTHER INPUT SAY
CAPITAL, WE SEE LESS UNITS OF
CAPITAL ARE SACRIFICED FOR THE
ADDITIONAL UNITS OF LABOUR.
Now, lets
just
consider
the
column
under 10
capital
60
0
TPP
50
Output 0
,
TPP
40
0
30
0
20
0
10
0
Number of
Mechanics
Average
Product, APP
15
0
12
5
10
0
AP
P
75
50
1
2
3
Number
7
8 of
Mechanics
Marginal Product =
Mechanics
Average and
Marginal
Marginal
Product
MPP>APP
150
|----------|
and Average
MPP<APP
|-----------------------------|
125
100
75
50
25
APP
MPP=APP
0
1
Number of Mechanics
MPP
RETURNS TO SCALE
DIMINISHING RETURNS REFER TO RESPONSE OF
OUTPUT TO AN INCREASE
OF A SINGLE INPUT
TO
INCREASES
PRODUCED.
OF
SCALE
OR
INPURTS
THE
OF
SCALE
QUANTITY
CONSTANT RETURNS TO
SCALE
THIS DENOTES A CASE WHERE A
CHANGE IN ALL INPUTS LEADS TO A
PROPORTIONAL CHANGE IN OUTPUT.
FOR EXAMPLE IF LABOUR, LAND
CAPITAL
AND
OTHER
INPUTS
INCREASING RETURNS TO
SCALE
THIS IS ALSO CALLED ECONOMIES OF SCALE.
THIS ARISES WHEN AN INCREASE IN ALL
INPUTS
LEADS
TO
MORE-THAN-
SCALE
CHEMICAL
PLANT
WILL
DECREASING RETURNS TO
SCALE
THIS OCCURS WHEN A BALANCED INCREASE
OF ALL INPUTS LEADS TO A LESS THAN
PORPORTIONAL INCREASE IN TOTAL OUTPUT.
IN
MANY
PROCESS,
SCALING
UP
MAY
IMPORTANCE OF RETURNS
TO SCALE CONCEPT
IF AN INDUSTRY IS CHARACTERIZED BY
INCREASING RETURNS TO SCALE, THERE WILL
BE A TENDENCY FOR EXPANDING THE SIZE OF
THE FIRM AND THUS THE INDUSTRY WILL BE
DOMINATED BY LARGE FIRMS.
THE OPPOSITE WILL BE TRUE IN INDUSTRIES
WHERE DECREASING RETURNS TO SCALE
PREVAIL.
IN CASE OF INDUSTRIES WITH CONSTANT
RETURNS TO SCALE, FIRMS OF ALL SIZES
WOULD SURVIVE EQUALLY WELL.
FROM PRODUCTION TO
COST
TO
BE,
WE
MUST
TRANSLATE
THE
ASSUME
THE
COST
PER
# o f m e c h a n ic s
T o ta l
T o ta l
O u tp u t
C o s t
1 0 0
1 0 0 0
2 5 0
2 0 0 0
3 6 0
3 0 0 0
4 4 0
4 0 0 0
5 0 0
5 0 0 0
5 4 0
6 0 0 0
5 5 0
7 0 0 0
Total Costs
(thousands)
Total Costs
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
100
2 00 300
400
Total Output
500
600
To ta l
# of m ec ha nic s O utput
C os t
10 0
100 0
25 0
200 0
36 0
300 0
44 0
400 0
50 0
500 0
54 0
600 0
55 0
700 0
Quantity of
Output
Total
Cost
100
250
360
440
500
540
550
Average
Cost
Marginal
Cost
1,000
10
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8
8.33
9
10
11.1
12.7
10
6.7
9.1
12.5
16.7
25
100