Professional Documents
Culture Documents
) .(2007
Market Structure
.
.
.
)
( Competitive Relationship
) (
) .
1995(.
Negotiative
Relationship
.
) .
1995 (.
) 1995 ( :
.
.
.
.
-
.Pure Competition
) ( Perfect Competition
Perfect Knowledge
.
.
) . 1995 (.
MonopolisticCompetition
Pure Oligopoly
.Differentiated Oligopoly
.Monopoly
.
) Monopsony 1995 (.
:
.Oligopoly with Competitive Fringe
Duopoly .Duopsony ) (poly-
) (sony- )
(-Oli ) (-Mono
) (-Du .
) Bilateral Monopoly
1995 (.
: Market Concentration
.
) .(Hazledinel,1989
Hight Concentration
Low Concentration
.
:
-1 :
%50 %70
.
.
-2 )Herfindahl-Hirschman Index :(H H I
:
.
.
.
10000
) .( %100
-3 :Gini Coefficient
.
.
:
-1 ) Index of Dissimilarity (ID
)(Y
N
ID 0.5 Xi Yi
N 1
GCR X i Yi 1 X i 1 Yi
3
-3 ) :Mean Difference (GMD Ginis
i 1
} Xk
{ X
j 1 k 1
1
N2
GMD
: Lerner
MR MC)(MR = M c
1
)
E
MR P (1
):(Lerner,1934
1
P P 1
P MR
1
1
E
1 1
P
P
E
E
:
= P.
= E .
. . .
.
.
Herbert Hovenkamp
. George Hay
Hay
)
(
Hay
,
.
Landes and posner
Market share
Landes and posner
.
: )
( -
.
Landes and posner
%23
%61 %20
.
: Bain
.
.
O = PQ C (Q) D iv
=O.
= P.
= Q.
) = C (Q
= D
= iv
:
.Lerner index
) Krugman 1987, Baker and Bresnahan 1988, Knetter 1989 and 1993, Goldberg
.(,and Knetter 1999, Glauben and loy 2003
.
Goldberg and Knetter 1999
:
) (
.
Bresnahan
.
)) New Empirical Industrial Organization (NEIO
Inverse elasticity of residual demana Baker and) :
(Bresnahan, 1989 and 1993
.
i
Qi
Qj j = I
.Z i :
)Maximize n = Pi (Qi,Qj,Z)Qi eiCi (Qi,Wi
)( 1
:
= Pi i
= ei
.
= Ci .i
n .
:
)[ei MCi = O - (Pi + Qi a Pi/aQi + (aPi/aQj) (aQj/aQi
)( 2
i = j
Conduct
parameters i
.
Inverse deman relationships
).(Bresnahan, 1989
) Goldberg and Knetter, (1999
reduced From
.
:
Goldberg and
Knetter :
)(3
ex
(3) Ln Pmt m nm LnQ mtex am ln Z ln wmtN mt
mt
:
:m .
:N .
.
.
.
) Baker and Bresnahan, (1999
.
)Goldberg
and Knetter, (1999
.