‘a Viral Destar Project (uae) s Teo L- Alex Bedbsii BS \1/25/ig] "AT Ocwwar; we eerie Bo cnacki BY Team Norms- (00 Next page) Gtep LF efi the Problem \ client- MeDoaalds Pesteome Chain Turqek Concomer ~ Chiller 3-3 years old fc Sfatemut —M. OoualtZ los c 0, Geet Strat Maa a set apd iv be use. fn cw ery A +S bused 0 ALA Rot bine’ oth - The beat pete ob Bea," te a Design Stalewent - Design « Hypy eal Pret LHe based on the Disiay Fila “Rolie Pole Olle - The Geet Detail of Fun”. The toy Slend reblect te vtume of the File. a ar MY finds S 1.)The toy must rete the How of the Fl Naples Theta tte ee Bd The Hy pt he whe fo Le sorrebteing lett tov bin 4 The ty rust bart om addatoval wt thet Poactions 05 We (CEEB50ry Gey Tht hey may nck Oath 3x Sie” ug sabety “pulang Da ats US, Counter Softly Gibbs Corns ono SIGNATURE ' are ef 5 rs “Rb ‘ DAE St. Louis | Gree" Mec SE Se alTeam Norms Team Members: AJ Oruwari, Alex Bendusk, Eric Biernacki Workload: » Mii) RCA l + Mertet, tachable 1 gt (leather Suk wi chevrcter fo LA. ’ latte Seale bal °F ©) Dothan, CR “ Z layers, facets Filletet nt Magb ted at tie cn thee fine + ey a Aaa : Le Boaldee iw PO Wefe ae ‘ e * ager Witen (r4llo WEES. Louis BORING PAae < 5: Develep A a lotio Daily Gates for J + pect (eet eat Bes/ya bet zy Rea ast ietiaht Crier OFF i Yaw Ps 1 loder Copiseen Prtpes oeviree © Peleyerce in senietye cig] Patines \ late] TAGS 3 [ie tor et ad (egar ea eats Mahe | Oeelt tied oll Oryonining Try Grgiuering Ackeloww’e. J sijatel eaiflog $0 | foam ile = ane Riley | Crees ave doe) a 3 i Helle Ca Mert were qirnned and Aapctial 5 Et FY Mo the feteber be , tsps loetc ft Salter Got ae, potiocts bf Very hy BL gary te “y wale Ga toe focdel slip bet love UVC T updated the recéet tors Min tre fy fhe ach! Fe bef. 2 ad pute ery ts to saint vipa al jvgtee wa nh ae mon ara NAS aT ral te orate O rwrAt- Gece rm heared bie Mt the ue ae sy MA ; Se GRE oe! C14) S saat iedag RS ee SP ao a ye ilo ye tetris Q seeme BAUS. Lows Q SEEING 77a Soul McC ee ge es sg a4 1. € a idles eda, bata Ko Us Coustoct nd Tesha ype \ Uo-Tes geing Bo oe Cooshoehy ft paced sla HC A oleae THN: 3 Bby 5 ine Gy 24 os ‘ is 2 at > Go = men BBS. Louis ie Community ollege uly GikoeS Cathe nee 1 2/157/b— Taloy LT farirbed the /raget PRC, as wet as 1" m9 ra ened heh glial (B Ato E Wertad-on Hoe Shedp tccwrtily Pode, tule eur grog agreed tat Af woold bor The pRecrtunty wd EC wwe wesle ot UMMC He draewty S Far He Siuip Brig lo- tue Just about Prasad tue edplsig tr te ship talay; mesh the pect come ty tbns fodagy WW DZ wi, - L ems ont 0F Setool fara weet dine fo is yes, bok luchily ase went over & hen proteber Cleted w ad Aew ve bace Yo work. The presertebor cs cot wily & lnm crraliong my Aotetor le Md On Bie 7. ey TH alot oh doktor ore Ea, Pilg ft Cures gethly Spates Bl 3/416 ~ Talay 2 beled samte Cred seit Paes? POC aang Sreossed with AY Kerr whet tre gene plan ts. WeFe PrlaStesf i SUG Bes. louis Eins13 Our Solution: ur solution to the design prompt was within all constraints and effectively solved the problem given to us, and few constraints caused any problems big enough that it set the group back alot n inventor work. It is @ good toy because of its ses in “imaginative play” withthe younger age group, safety for younger children, and recognizable child riendly theme; all of which appeal to the young ‘audience who buy happy meals. Though it isnt lawess, it also closely resembles What | think our group was aiming for as @ team. If| had to do it again, | probably ‘would have spent some more time adding smaller details that make it more ‘accurate, and manage my time better between recording things in my engineering notebook and inventor, and included more technology (and functionality) to the toy, like a winding-up function. Overall, mast ofthe project the inventor work, was fun and not overy difficult tothe point of frustration, but instead gave my group and | a challenge to work through that was actualy pretty fun, and at the end it felt worth the work ba Kl, © The Process : Cor {ial flat by the ond of the project we an juertor— created “Mudel of tr “poure Folie oie Racketh Hayy ” Foy ad Hs decharvel dmg s. est part for our group was communicating eflectaty| Suns that at tne begining. we actualy jumped ahead of ourselves and stated sending al srs f information to each oer because we were over-exated, and there were communication Problems eary on because of that. However, Deleve that once mastered nonverbal communicaton wih yout teammates can echance decison making sks because fs harder to lrgue cr avocate another postion, and ceates hale. lates easier to workin the same “iow” as you teats and suppor each other, instead of creating confit This also was ‘managed by ou expe team nome, which worked out very wot for us asa team Our competence as a group in designing the norms and following them led o few oad bumps later on. The gant chat we designed also helped us know what our goals were, but tank twas iss uae to team han twas a8 ler sis we learned. The expanence of working al vez ably Te} xr Rebbe “ele Hie Oe “footet Sie tat | eed “Bee on Sie re = Saye BAS. Louis Tas ‘ommunity College