Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Atrium Smoke Management System Design: Reputation Resources Results
Atrium Smoke Management System Design: Reputation Resources Results
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
& SCIENTISTS
ISSUE NO. 13
Design
fire
DESIGN FACTORS
Sinclair2 lists several aspects of the atrium smoke management problem that make it challenging to design and
potentially costly to build. The paper notes that the height of the atrium and the architectural complexity are
the most significant considerations. Also, having an unoccupied volume at the top of the atrium is essential to
store smoke prior to the activation of the emergency ventilation system. This also ties into the need for a rapid
detection and response of the smoke management system, plus the need for careful planning of make-up air
locations and flow rates.
PRELIMINARY CALCULATIONS
The design of an effective smoke management system
requires calculation of smoke mass flow rates and rate of
descent of the smoke layer. It is particularly important to
consider the time from ignition of the fire until detection,
after which the system would be expected to control further
growth of the smoke layer.
A starting point to estimate quantities of smoke from a fire
is the empirical formulae listed in applicable building or fire
codes, or the NFPA 92B1.
Design fires may be located far from walls and other
obstructions or under balconies. In NFPA 92B, these two
situations are described as axisymmetric plume or balconyspill plume scenarios, respectively. The following summarizes
some key factors that affect the quantity of smoke predicted
from a postulated fire scenario.
For the axisymmetric plume scenario, NFPA 92B equation (8)
is:
The NFPA equation (8) also has the smoke generation rate
strongly proportional to the height z, being a 5/3rds power
relationship. Compared to a 15.24 m (50 ft) high atrium, an
atrium 5 m shorter or 5 m taller would have a predicted
smoke generation rate approximately 50% less or more,
respectively.
These trends may be useful to architects and engineers who
look for ways to reduce the required smoke exhaust rate. If
the architecture can be modified to allow the smoke layer to
descend to a lower level there are potentially greater savings
in the required smoke exhaust rate than trying to reengineer the design fire to a lower heat release rate.
The NFPA equation (10) predicts the smoke mass flow rate
for a fire located under a balcony, a situation that can
generate significantly more smoke than the axisymmetric
plume situation. This balcony-spill-plume equation has the
following form:
Successful design
keeps smoke layer at
4th floor level
Front View
End view
NARROW ATRIUM
COMPLEX ATRIUM
Figure 3 shows the complex architecture of an atrium space
that starts from a common footprint and evolves into two
distinct, irregular-shaped towers, each equipped with its own
exhaust fans. Unlike a typical atrium, the space has meeting
rooms almost entirely encapsulated by the volume of the sixlevel atrium. Approximately 70% of the required make-up
air is provided by supply fans bringing outside air into the
lowest levels of the atrium with the remainder coming
through door openings on the first floor or ground level.
The design fire of 2.43 MW was located at the base of the
atrium, under a meeting room floor slab approximately
REFERENCES
1. NFPA 92B, 2000, Guide for smoke management systems in atria, covered malls, and large areas. Quincy, Mass.:
National Fire Protection Association.
2. Sinclair, J.R., CFD Simulation in Atrium Smoke Management System Design, presented at the ASHRAE winter
meeting, Jan 27-31, 2001, Atlanta, GA.
www.rwdi.com
www.rwdi-anemos.com