Professional Documents
Culture Documents
General journal
$
120 000
210 000
Cost of goods sold at 50% mark-up, 210 000 1.5 = $140 000
Cost of goods sold
Inventory
140 000
120 000
210 000
140 000
200
200
35 000
35 000
Closing entries
Sales revenue
Profit and loss summary
Profit and loss summary
Cost of goods sold expense
Inventory shortage expense
Operating expenses
Profit and loss summary
Retained profits
210 000
210 000
175 200
140 000
200
35 000
34 800
34 800
40 000
120 000
40 000
120 000
19 800
210 000
35 000
19 800
19 800
210 000
35 000
Closing entries
Sales revenue
COGS Closing inventory
Profit and loss summary
Profit and loss summary
COGS Purchases
Operating expenses
COGS Opening inventory
Profit and loss summary
Retained profits
210 000
19 800
229 800
195 000
120 000
35 000
40 000
34 800
34 800
*** The two journals for the opening and closing inventory are taken directly to profit and loss summary
in the textbook. Students should recall that under the periodic system there is no running record of the
inventory balance. The closing inventory has to be journalised as shown here.
2.
a.
Perpetual inventory
Frog Ltd
Income Statement for year ended 30 June 2016
$
Sales
Less:
Cost of goods sold
Inventory shortage
Gross profit
Less:
Operating expenses
Net profit
140 000
200
$
210 000
140 200
69 800
35 000
34 800
2. b. Periodic inventory
Frog Ltd
Income Statement for year ended 30 June 2016
$
Sales
Less:
Cost of goods sold
Inventory 1 July 2011
Purchases
Available for sale
Less: Inventory 30 June 2012
Cost of goods sold
Gross profit
Less: Operating expenses
Net profit
$
210 000
40 000
120 000
160 000
19 800
140 200
69 800
35 000
34 800
In
$
1.1.12
Balance
10.2.12
Purchase
14.4.12
9.5.12
24.7.12
21.10.12
12.11.12
80
Out
$
60
110
100
300
770
COGS
Purchase
480
COGS
Purchase
Balance
2,050
110
550
110
550
80
480
50
250
80
480
50
250
80
480
110
770
50
250
10
60
70
420
110
770
10
60
110
770
100
800
800
COGS
10
60
30
210
80
560
100
800
1,590
1,010
b Perpetual LIFO
COGS = 60 x $6 + (110 x $7 + 10 x $6) + 90 x $8 = $1910
Closing inventory = 110 x $5 + 10 x $6 + 10 x $8 = $690
Date
In
$
1.1.12
Balance
10.2.12
Purchase
14.4.12
9.5.12
24.7.12
21.10.12
12.11.12
80
Out
$
60
110
100
360
770
COGS
Purchase
480
COGS
Purchase
Balance
110
550
110
550
80
480
110
550
20
120
110
550
20
120
110
770
770
110
550
10
60
10
60
110
550
10
60
100
800
110
550
10
60
10
80
90
2,050
110
800
COGS
720
1,910
690
Useful tip: calculating that the total cost of goods available for sale was $550 +$ 2,050 = $2600
allows checking that COGS + Closing Inventory equals $2600.
2. Net realisable value
Only closing inventory is adjusted the net realisable value is designed to prevent companies
overstating inventory.
Therefore under both FIFO and LIFO, Closing inventory should be $650 (130 x $5).
FIFO Closing inventory should be reduced by $360
LIFO Closing inventory should be reduced by $40.
7
$
120 000
30 000
90 000
7 500
2 500
100 000
3 125
96 875
Freight charges
Installation and testing
Cost
Less:
Salvage value
Depreciable amount
6
months
12
= $25 000
2 Straight-line:
$96 875 20%
6
months
12
= $9 687.5
3 Units-of-production method:
70,000
$96 875
= $8 750
775,000
Cash
Accumulated depreciation
Cr Delivery truck at cost
$8,000
$39,000
$47,000
Gain/(Loss) on sale = proceeds less asset book value = $8,000 ($47,000 $39,000) = $Nil
2 Dr
Dr
Cr
Cr
Cash
Accumulated depreciation
Gain on sale
Delivery truck at cost
$9,000
$39,000
$1,000
$47,000
Gain/(Loss) on sale = proceeds less book value = $9,000 ($47,000 $39,000) = $1,000 gain
3 Dr
Dr
Dr
Cash
Accumulated depreciation
Loss on sale
Cr Delivery truck at cost
$7,100
$39,000
$900
$47,000
Gain/(Loss) on sale = proceeds less book value = $7,100 ($47,000 $39,000) = ($900) loss
Journal entries
2.
Market effect
A write down in inventory is treated as an expense which reduces net profit for the period. This
unexpected decrease in profit is likely to lead to a drop in share price. The market may also have
a negative reaction to managements handling of the situation.
Companies that have overvalued inventory often end up failing.
Dick Smith Holdings Limited anybody?
http://www.smh.com.au/business/retail/dick-smith-float-looks-like-window-dressing-20160205gmmg88.html
10