Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Aalar Achsah
Aalar Achsah
A
AALAR (ahhap
[BI),
Esd. 536f A V = E z r a 2 5 ~ ,
AARONITES
ABARIM
...
(LJ
2,
5 224 b.
See ESTHER,
a,, chamberlain of
11. 5 3.
fi:nK
(nhx)
-1;
(n'l~~T;
ABARIM, THE
~ B a p e [BAL],
i~
-IN
[BL], and phrases with d p u v [BAL], see below ; Jos.
a ~ a p s i c ) literally
,
' Those-on - the-other - side ' -i.e . ,
of the Jordan-is employed by the latest documents of
the Pentateuch (P and R) in the phrase, Mt. or Mts.
of the Abarim, to describe the edge of the great
Moabite plateau overlooking the Jordan valley, of which
Mt. NEBOwas the most prominent headland :-Nii.2712
..
...
TW
ABBA
ABEL-BETH-MAACHAH
Nlqll.
As seen from W. Palestine this range forms a continuous mountain-wall, at a pretty constant level, which
is broken only by the valley-mouths of the Yarmk,
Zerk or Jabbok, and Arnon. Across the gulf of the
Jordan valley it rises with great impressiveness, and
constitutes the eastern horizon (cp Stanley, S P ;
GASm, H G 53, 519,548). The hardly varying edge
masks a considerable difference of level behind. On
the whole the level is maintained from the foot of
Hermon to the S. end of the Dead Sea at a height of from
The basis through2000 to 3000 feet above the ocean.
out is limestone. N. of the Yarmk this is deeply
covered by volcanic deposits, and there are extinct craters
NE. of the Lake of Galilee.
Between the Yarmiik
and the Wdy Hesbn, at the N. end of the Dead Sea,
run transverse ridges, cut by deepwdies, and well
wooded as far S. as the Zerk. S. of Wdy Hesbn
rolls the breezy treeless plateau of Moab, indented in
its western edge by short wdies rising quickly to the
plateau level, with the headlands that are more properly
the Mts. of Abrim between them ; and cut right through
to the desert by the great trenches of the wdies, Zerk,
M h , and Mjlb or Arnon. For details see AsriDoTHP ISGAH , BAMOTII-BAAL, BETH-PEOR, MOAB, NEBO,
PISGAH, ZOPHIM, etc., with authorities quoted there.
On Nu. 3347 see W ANDERINGS , $ 11.
G. A. S.
ABBA ( ~ B B A[Ti. WH], i.e. K?K, Ab, father, in
the emphatic state), an Aram. title of God used by
Jesus and his contemporaries, and retained by Greekspeaking Christian Jews. See Mk. 1436 Rom. 815 Gal.
46f ; where in each case 6 TUT?^^ is subjoined.
ABDA (KT;1y, J 51, frequent in Phcen. and Aram.
On the form cp Renan, R E J v . 165f.[Sz], and see
NAMES,3%37, 51).
I.
Father of Adoniram
(I
K. 46 ; aaw [Al ; +a
[BI ; s8pnp
[I!
Levite in list of inhabitants of Jerusalem (see
ii. B 56,
15 [I1 a), Neh. 11 17 (aac
~ w p ~ I ~ * l , [BI,
EZRA,
[Nc.a.mg.
?w. [ A ] , aSLac
wq
(Til?,
ABDI
$ 52, abbr. for servant of YahwB?
cp Palm. T i Y , and see O BADIAH ; ABAIA [LI).
I. Father of Kish, a Levite under Hezekiah, mentioned
in the genealogy of ETHAN [P.v.], I Ch. 644 [29] z Ch.
2912 : ,a/3G[e]~[BAL].
2. One of the bne ELAM[P.v.
ii. I], in list of
those with foreign wives (see E ZRA , i. $ 5 end), Ezra1026
(ap[e]ta[BKA], - ~ [ L ] ) = IEsd. 927 (RVOABDIUS,
AV
om., wa[e]ios [BA]).
ABDIAS (ABDIAS), 4 Esd.,l3gf. See OBADIAH, I.
ABDIEL
(5@??Y, $5
21,
ABEDNEGO (U! W
J or RtjJ Til, 5 8 6 ; a
corruption of 1 D f3y, servant of Nebo, which
Dccurs in an Assyrio-Aramaic inscription, COT2 126 ;
a B A s N A r w [BA 871 ;
; ABDENAGO), the
court name given to Azariah [IO], the friend of Daniel
(Dan. 17, etc.). On name see also NERGAL.
(32?, $
ABEL
6 ; aBeA [ADL];
..
eAbel.There
are three phases in Jewish beliefs respecting
The second and the third may be mentioned first.
AEEL),
Gen.4~
(!>e,
ABEL
$$ 89-100) occurs, apparently in
the sense of meadow, in the place-names dealt with in
the following six articles. As a place-name it is to be
hK
Maacah
ABEL-SHITTIM
ABEL-CHERAMIM
..
ABEL-CHERAMIM (Pi?!? +$, ' meadow of vineYards,' 103 ; EBEAXAPMEIN [BI ; ABEA AMTKAUNUN [AL] : Judg. 1 1 3 3 t RV), the limit of Jephthah's
pursuit and slaughter of the Ammonites. Ens. and Jer.
(OS(2)225 5 96 io,"AeX &pr&Xwv,AbeZ uinearum) identify it with a village of their day, named "AeX, 7 R.
m. from Philadelphia. This Abel may be any of the
many fertile levels among the rolling hills around
'Amman, on which the remains of vineyards and of
terraces are not infrequent.
G. A. S .
h?,
..
$aq,
52y
173.
ABEZ
ABI
IO
ABIA
ABIATHAR
*'
~~~~~~p
~= tribal?
BEELIADA).
T. K. C.
ABIASAPH ( ~ ~
44 : ~
the (divine)
' i father
$
gathers ' or ' removes ' or [if the EC be nat original, see
below] ' adds ' [cp the popular etymologies of JOSEPH],
unless it be supposed that P and the Chronicler adopted
m ancient name indeed [Gray, HPN 2441, but underI
-1,
I1
I2
('??-IIT fl~?Y"?K, 5 4,
ABIB
ABIGAIL
W. E. A.
ABIB
See MONTH,
2, 5.
1 See, however, I R A , 3, where a Judahite origin is suggested.
2 The section in its present form is from the school of thq
Deuteronomist. But the expression walk before my anointed
proves conclusively that there is an older substratum.
13
(IT??,
ABIDAN
44, the (divine) father is judge;
cp Daniel; &B[E]IAAN
[BAL]; ABIDAN), chief of
Benjamin in the time of Moses (Nu.111 222 76065.
On the age of the name see Gray, HPN
i0zqJi).
202, 244.
Possibly P had a consciousness that -dun
was archaic (cp D AN ,
I), and therefore suitable in
the name of a tribal chief at the time of the Exodus.
T o infer with Homniel ( A H S 298-301)from such a
name as Abidan that P s record is itself ancient, is critically unjustifiable. P also gives the names SHAPHAT and
SHIPHTAN, which are scarcely archaic.
ABIEL ($&iK, $0 4, 44, God is father (of the
clan?) ; aB[e]i~A[BAL] ; A B I E L ) .
I. Father of Ner and Kish ( I S . 91, also 14 SI?,
- ~ [BI)
p
; see ABNER.
2. One of Davids thirty mighty men ( I Ch. 1132) ;
see ABIALBON.
ABIEZER, AV Abi-ezer (V???, 44, the (divine)
father is help, cp Ahiezer; ~Biezsp[BAL]: Judg.
634 efc.).
I . The clan from which Gideon sprang belonged to
the Gileadite branch of the tribe of Manasseh. In
Gideons time its seat was at Ophrah (Judg. 624), an
unidentified site, but apparently on the west side of
Jordan. It is probable that the first settlements of the
Manassites lay to the west of that river, but the date at
which their conquests were extended to the eastward is
not known (Josh. 172 t e l a [BI, axielep [A], apierep
[LI ; Judg. 61124). I n Nu. 2630 the name Abiezer
appears, not asin the parallel I Ch.718, but in a n
abbreviated form as I EZER ( l y e , AV J EEZER , axie{ep
[BAL]), and the gentilic as I EZERITE ( V ~ < K , AV
JEEZERITE, 0 aXie{eipei [BI, +pi [AL]).
In I Ch.
7 18 Abiezer finds a place in the Manassite genealogy as
son of Hammolecheth the sister of Machir b. Manasseh.
The patronymic ABI-EZRITE AV, ABIEZRITERV (35
?m), occurs in Judg. 61124 ( T U T ~ ~TOU
S eopei [BI ; r.
apie~pi,m, T . ~ { p r[A]; r.(~.)
e.Qer [LI) and (perhaps
as a gloss, see Moore, ad Zoc.) 832 ( a p i e d p ~[BI, ~ i f s
a/3ie+x [A], W U T ~ ~a.S [LI).
2. Of Anathoth, one of Davids heroes (z S. 23 27,
apeie{ep [BI ; I Ch. 1128 2712?), see DAVID, 11 ( a ) i.
ABIGAIL (usually
???K,
but !Yj11K in
S. 25 18
?.-
Kt., and
in I S. 2532, z S. 33 Kt., and [so RV
ABIGAL] in 17 2s ; and, perhaps with 1 and 1 transposed,
B-1
i;
45; so oftenest -a
\,t
sometimes
cp
BDB Lex. s.v. ; a [ s ] i y ~ i[BAL],
~
but in 1 s.253
Aipaia [A]; meaning uncertain ; Abi is a divine
title (see NAMES, 44, and cp XP477, 8 5 ) .
I. Wife of N ABAL (4.v.).and, after his death, of
David ( I S. 25). Her tactful speech against the causeless
sheddingofblood( IS. 25 22-31)isnoteworthyforthehistory
of Israelitish morality. Like Ahinoam, she accompanied
David to Gath and Ziklag, and was taken captive by the
Amalekites, but was recovered by David ( I S. 273 30 518).
While at Hebron she bore David a son (see DANIEL, 4).
2. A sister of David, who married Jether or Ithra,
and became the mother of Amasa, z S. 1725 (see above),
I Ch. 2 16l 17.
I n M T of the former passage, her father
1 B omits Abigail in v. 16, and BA read &SeA$$ for &3eA+ai
of L.
14
ABIGAL
ABILENE
walked in all the sins of his father ; and, since the first
Llm)),
[BI,
which, however, seems to he a corruption from the Jezreelite (re{paqhinp [LI, de iesrneli
[ed. Rom.], de NiesreZi [cod. Amiat.]), just as Ahinoam
the Jezreelitess ( I S. 273) becomes in B axeiuaap $
It is true, in I Ch. Z.C. Jether is called
iUpU$,iTlS.
the Ishmaelite ( r a p u ~ h ( ~ ) r [BA],
~ q s isnzuhelites), but
this is plainly a conjectural emendation of the Israelite
(1, indeed has rapa. ; Pesh. om.). In 2 S. 17 25 the same
emendation appears in bA(iopa.). Davids sister was
not likely to marry an Ishmaelite. Heyse wonders
to what town Jeromes reading can refer. We can easily
answer the question. It was the Jezreel situated in Judah
(Josh. 1556), from which not only Davids brother-in-law
but also his first wife Ahinoam probably came (so Marq.
T. K. C .
Fund. 2 4 ; see J EZREEL , i. 2).
ABIGAL
(!)??:),
z S. 1725 RVT.
See ABIGAIL,
2.
(hJ9?K,
Nu&/,
AEIHAIEL,
AEIXAIL).
1.5
La);
aA),
RIESTS &.U.)-
I Ch.
24 I O (AV A BI J AH );
2 Ch 29 I.
See Ani.
8. Priest in Zerubbabels band (see E ZRA, ii. $ 66), Neh. 124
6.
9. Priestly signatory to the covenant(see E ZRA , i. $7), Neh. 10
[XI.
ABIJAM
T. K. C.W.
(q?Y),
E. A.
I.
[Ha ;
ABIMAEL
(i????,
ABIMAEL
God is a father, cp Sah.
name lnfiyD2K, a father is Attar [inf&],
Hal.
MLZ.; ZDMG, xxxvii. 18 r831, and see J ERAHMEEL , I n.
I ; A B I M ~ H A [AL] ; B om. or wanting), a descendant of
J OKTAN (Gen. 1028 ; ABIMEAEHA
[E]; I Ch. l z z f ,
-MBEI)\ [LI).
Tribal connection uncertain, but see
Glaser, Skizze, ii. 426.
ABIMELECH (q2nP?K; AB[E]IMEAEX [BAL], -AGK
[B Judg.9~81,L e . , most probably, Melech (Milk), the
divine king, is father. Abimilki and Qimilki occur as
names of princes of Arvad in the Annals of ASurhnipal
(ZChii. 172 f.); the former name, which is evidently
Canaanitisb, also belongs to the Egyptian governor of
Tyre in the Amarna tablets.
I. A Philistine, king of GERAR (see below), Gen.
261 7-1116, who, according to a folk-story in J, took
Rebekah to be Isaacs sister, and reproved Isaac for
having caused this mistake, and so very nearly brought
guilt upon the Philistines. The same tradition is
preserved in E (Gen. 20), hut without the anachronistic
reference to the Philistines. The persons concerned are
Ahimelech, king of Gerar, Abraham, and Sarah. T h e
details are here much fuller, and the differences from Js
narrative are striking. There is reason, however, to
think that the narrative of E in its original form made
no mention of Gerar. In this case the principality of
Abimelech was described by E simply as being between
Kadesh and Shur (omitting the following words). In
Js account (Gen. 26) thete are traces of a confusion
between two Gerars, the more southerly of which (the
trne seat of Abimelechs principality) wa3 probably in
the N. Arabian land of Musri (for particulars on this
region see M IZRAIM , 2 [b]).
Js account also refers
to disputes between the herdsmen ofAbimelech and those
of Isaac about wells, which were terminated by a covenant
between Isaac and Abimelech at Beersheba (Gen. 26 17
19-33). The Elohistic form of this tradition passes lightly
over the disputes, and lays the chief stress on the deference
shown to Abraham by Abimelech when the oaths of
friendship were exchanged. The scene of the treaty is,
as in J, Beersheba (Gen. 21 22-32 a). On Ps. 34, title,
see ACHISH.
T. K. C.
2. Son of Jerubbaal (Gideon).
His history, as
related in Judg. 9, is of very great value for the light
which it throws on the relations between the Israelites
and the older population of the land in this early
period. His mother was a Shechemite, and after his
fathers death he succeeded, through his mothers
kinsmen, in persuading the Canaanite inhabitants of
Shechem to submit to his rule rather than to that bf the
seventy sons of Jerubbaal. With silver from the templetreasure of BAAL-BERITH (4.71.) he hired a band of
bravos and slaughtered his brothers, -Jotham, the
youngest, alone escaping,-and was acclaimed king by
the people of Shechem and Beth-millo, at the sacred
tree near Shechem. From a safe height on Mt.
Gerizim, Jotham cried in the ears of the assembly his
fable of the trees who went about to make them a king
(see JOTHAM,I ), and predicted that the partners in the
crime against Jerubbaals house would destroy each
2
I7
ABINER
ABINADAB (2l$kJ
my father apportions, see
N AMES ,
44, 46, or the father ( i . e . , god of the clan)
is munificent, cp Jehonadab ; AM[E]INAAAB [BKA],
ABIN. [LI).
I. Davids second brother, son of Jesse; 1S.168
1713, also I c h . 213 (Upw. [LI). See D AVID , 8 I ( a ) .
2. Son of Saul, slain upon Mt. Gilboa, according to
I S. 312.
The name Abinadab, however, is not
given in the list in I S. 1449. There may have been a
mistake ; Jesses second son was named Abinadab. So
Marq. Fund. 25 (rwvaa [BI-i.e., J ONADAB [q.v. 3]),
I Ch. 833 939 ; also I Ch. 102 (apepuaa [B b.vid.],
aprv. [LI).
3. Of Kirjath-jearini, in whose house the ark is said
to have been kept for twenty years ( I S.715 25.
63f: I Ch. 1 3 7 ) . See A RK , 3 5.
4. I K. 411, see BEN-ABINADAB.
~
ABINER (l??:),
I S. i 4 5 o f , AV mg.
1 Judg. 9 28
See ABNER.
ZZQ
f:
18
ABNER
ABINOAM
ABINOAM (D$l??,
45, the (divine) father is
pleasantness, cp Ahinoam. Elnaam ; aB[~]iNEEM
[BAL], I A B I N . [A in Judg. 4 121 ; A B Z N O ~ W ) ,father of
Barak (Judg. 46 IZ 5 I I.?).
ABIRAM ( D T I N-:, 44-i.e.,
the Father is the
High One, cp ABI, NAMES WITH, 0 2 ; ABCIPUN
[BA], A B H ~ .[LI ;
; ABZRON). another form of
Abu-ram, whlch (Abu-rmu) is a well-attested Babylonian and Assyrian name (it occurs, e.$. , in a contracttablet of the time of Abil-sin, 2324-2300 B.c.. and in
the Assyrian eponym-canon under B.C. 677).l The
second element in the name (-ram) is a divine title (cp
Pupas 6 $lUTOS &Os, Hesych. ), biit is also used, in the
Para1171
plur., of all heavenly beings (Job 21 22).
Hebrew names are Ahi-ram, Adoni-ram, Jeho-ram,
Malchi-ram (see also ABRAM). Abiramu is the name
of a petty Babylonian lcing under A&-nqir-pal, and
Malik-ram-mu that of a king of Edom in the time of
Sennacherib (COTi. 95, 281).
I. A fellow conspirator of D ATHAN ( q . ~ . ) ,Nu. 1 6
( u ~ u p w v[A once], apip. [F twice]) ; Dt. 1 1 6 Ps. 10617
and (AV ARIRON) Ecclus. 4 5 18, 4 Macc. 217 i. ( u ~ p o v
[Val).
2. Eldest son of Hie1 the Bethelite, who died when
his father laid the foundation of Jericho anew ; I K.
1634T ( A B I R A M ; L om. verse), cp Josh.626 &VAL.
See HIEL.
T. K. C.
ABIRON ( D V I K ) , Ecclus. 4 5 181. AV. See ABIRAM, I .
ABISEI (ABISSEZetc.), 4Esd. 1z?. See ABISHUA,2.
T
p-1
(@?e,
-1
(pi?,
(5-
and 3
pounded with 5D seems very improbable.
might be confounded in Palmyrene characters; ABITAL) ;
wife of David, mother of Shephatiah ; z S. 34, I Ch.
33? (ABEITAA, T H C CAB. [BI ; &BIT. [Al; -TA&
-TAM [LI).
In z Ch.362, d B reads AEiruh for
H AMUTAL , the name of Jehoahazs mother. T. K. C.
ABNER.
(dp??),
%a~,.=.l;
20
ABOMINATION O F DESOLATION
ABOMINATION
ignoble. The result was not what he had expectedthe highest place under a grateful king. He had just
left David with the view of procuring a popular assembly
for the recognition of David as king of all Israel, when
Joab enticed him back, and treacherously assassinated
him beside the gate of Hebron (see SIRAH,W ELL OF),
partly perhaps from jealousy, partly in revenge for the
eath of Asahel ( z S: 330).
Abuer's death was regarded by David as a national
calamity. ' Know ye not,' he said, ' that a prince and
a great man is fallen this day in Israel?' H e ordered
a public mourning for Abner, and himself sang an elegy
over his grave, a fragment of which is preserved ( z S.
331-39); see POETICAL L ITERATURE , 9 4, iii. (h). The
Chronicler gives Abuer a son named JAASIEL (4.71.2).
T. K. C.
...
(TO
BAehyrMdr T H C ~ P H M ~ C E ~ an
C )enigmatical
.
expression in the apocalyptic section (Mt.2415-28) of the
discourseof Christrespecting Hisnbpoycia(Mt. 241s=
Mk. 1314). The passage containing the phrase runs
thus in Mt.-' When therefore ye see the abomination of
desolation, which was spoken of by Daniel the prophet,
standing ( & ~ r b s ) in the holy place (let him that readeth
understand), then let them that are in J u d z a flee unto
the mountains.' The reference to 'Daniel, however,
which is wanting in Mk., is clearly an addition of
Mt. (cp Mt. 223 414, etc.), and Mark's 6urqKbra (masc.),
1 It is also used in 15.134 for dgi?, the word rendered
'stank' inzSi106(AV).
2 But in Is. Z.C. Duhm and Cheyne read
; so aka
Sam. and some MSS. at Lev.Izr. In L e v . 1 1 1 0 3 we may
and in Ez.810 read
(with @, Co.).
point
Y?$,
21
ABRAHAM
ABRAHAM
A B R A U M (nT?$, 4 4 ; A B ~ A A M [BAL];
The name has no meaning in
once A B ~ A M [A]).
Hebrew, and seems to be another form
1. Name,
,
probably to a
of ABRAM ( q . ~ . )due
misunderstanding of an early orthography.3 In J and
P, however, the latter is represented as the original
name, which was changed at a critical point in the
patriarchs life into Abraham (Gen. 175, P, where the
etymology is a mere word-play ; on Js narrative, see
Fripp, Gen. 53). It is only from the time of Ezekiel
1 See K. EinL 482.
2
23
24
ABRAHAM
ABRAHAM
but this unique narrative, so flattering to the pride of
the later Jews, is Zvidently a fragment of a post-exilic
midrash on the life of Abraham.' It even contains a
specimen of the mystic reckoning called ' gematria,'
the number 318 in 1 4 1 4 being suggested by the name
of Abraham's servant Eliezer,% of which it is the
numerical equivalent, just as it is stated in the Haggada
that Abraham served God from his third year, because
2py in nynv i d r 3,rtv (2218) is equivalent to 172 (he was
175 when he offered up Isaac, according to the Midrash
Tanchuma), and as the ' number of the beast ' in Rev.
1318 is 666 (or 616). ,
The narratives of P differ, it is true, in some respects
from those of J and E. This writer, who is a lover of
3. Story of p. gradual, orderly progress, even in the
history of revelation, represents the
migration into Canaan-as having been planned, without
any express divine command, by Terah (Gen. 1 1 3 1 ) ~
and admits . n o theophany before that in Abraham's
ninety-ninth year (17 I): He introduces, also, some
important modifications into the character of the patriarch. The friendly intimacy between Yahwk and
Abraham has disappeared; when Yahwi: at length
manifests himself, Abraham falls upon his face (17 3 17).
A legal element, too, finds its way into his righteousness,
the rite of circumcision having been undergone, according to P, by Abraham and all the males of his honsehold. Still, it may be said of P as truly as of his predecessors that he regards Abraham as the greatest of men,
and exhibits him as the pattern for Israelitish piety.
With this object in view,, he has no scruple in dealing
very freely. with the traditional material.
Since all
things are best at their beginnings, he asserts that the
ancestor of Israel was all, and more than all, that his
own sober imagination can devise.
Later writers
attempted to supply his deficiencies. Even in the O T
we have a strange reference in Is. 29 22 (post-exilic) to
dangers incurred by Abraham, which agrees with the
hints dropped in the Book .of Jubilees (c. 11), and
points the way to the well-known legend of the furnace
of Nimrod. Not less did the enigmatical war-chronicle
in Gen. 14 stimulate later writers.
Nicolaus 'of
Damascus, the court historian of Herod the Great,
related (Jos. Ant. i. 72 ; cp Justin, 362) that Abraham
came with an army out of Chaldza and reigned in
Damascus, after which he settled in Canaan; he adds
that there still exists a village called 'Appltpou o k ~ p t s
(see HOBAH). The only Biblical trace of such a story is
in Gen. 15 2, where, however, ' Damascus ' appears to be
a gloss (see ELIEZER,
I ).
It is bold in Ew. (Hist.i. 312)
to assume on such a basis that Damascus was a
traditional link i; the chain of the Hebrew migration.
More probably these stories were invented by the Jews
of Damascus (who were a numerous body) to glorify
the national ancestor.
The Moslems took up the
tradition with avidity (see Ew. Z.C.), and still point to
the village of Berza, or Berzat el Halil ( ' the marriagetent of Abraham'), one hour N. from Damascus, where
the marriage of the patriarch furnishes the occasion of
an annual festival (Wetz. ZDMG xxii. 105 r681).
2. What historical element (if any) do these narratives
contain? The Abraham traditions are twofold. Some
4. Historical belong exclusively to the great patriarch ; others are also attached to one
gernel.
or another of' his successors.
The
latter we can disregard : the foundation of the sanctuaries of Shechem and Bethel has a better traditional'connection with Jacob (Gen. 33 18-20 28 11-m),
and that of Beersheba with Isaac (2624f.), while the
I
~~~~~
25
26
ABRAHAM
be but a foreshadowing of the separation between Israel
and Moab and Ammon ; but, if Lot is to be explained
by Lotan (the eponym of an Edomitish clan, Gen. 36
zo-zg), the asserted relationship between Abraham and
Lot accords with the theory of the original non-Israelitish
character of Abraham.
iii. Connection with &?urnin or &,--As
to ( a ) , even
if we reject the theory of the migration of a clan called
after Abraham from HarrHn or Ur Kasdim, it does
not a t once follow that the tradition is altogether
unhistorical. Not only Abraham, but the wives of
Isaac and Jacob also, are declared to have come from
Harran. This cannot be a baseless tradition. Critics,
it is true, are divided as to its historical value, nor
can we discuss the matter here.
But there is, at
any rate, a s Stade admits, nothing a priori improbable in the view that certain Hebrew clans came
from the neighbourhood of HarrHn to Palestine. The
fluctuation of the tradition between HarrHn and Ur
Ibsdim need not detain us (see special articles). Both
HarrHn and Urn were seats of the worship of the moongod under different names, and we can well believe that
at some unknown period the moon-worship of Harran
affected the Hebrew clans (cp S ARAH, i. 2, M ILCAH , I).
For what critic of to-day can venture to assume that it
was repugnance to this worship, and in general to idolatry
(cp Josh. 2 4 z $ ) , l that prompted the Hebrew clans to
leave their early homes? Surely this asserted religious
movement is a specimen of that antedating of religious
conditions which is characteristic of the O T narrators,
and was copied from them by Mohammed. First, the
insight of Isaiah is ascribed to Moses ; then, as if this
were not wonderful enough, it is transferred to Abraham.
But how recent is the evidence for either statement, and
how inconsistent is the spiritual theism ascribed to
Abraham with sound views of historical development !
Instead therefore of speaking of that life of faith which
historically began with Abraham (H. S. Holland, Lux
Mundi, 41),should we not rather say that life of faith
which, though germinally present from the earliest
times, first found clear and undoubted expression in the
writings of the prophets and in the recast legends of
Abraham ?
Hommels ambitious attempt to prove the strictly
historical character of the Abraham narratives from the
Arabian personal names of the dynasty of Hammurgbi
is, critically regarded, a failure.
The existence in
early Semitic, antiquity of personal names expressing
lofty ideas of the divine nature in its relation to man
has long been known, though it is only in recent years
that such names have been discovered so far back in the
stream of history. But hitherto scholars have with good
reason abstained from inferring the extreme antiquity of
Hebrew narratives in which similar names occurred,
because the age of these narratives had necessarily to be
first of all determined by the ordinary critical methods,
and the existence of such a phrase as i n the days of
Amraphel (Hammurabbi?) proves only that the writer
may have been acquainted with documents in which
events of this period were referred to, not that his own
narrative is strictly historical.
For the later Haggadic stories concerning Abraham
see Beer, Leben Abrahams nach Aufassung der jiid.
Sage, 1859; Hamburger, RE fey Bib. u. Talm.F
(s. v. Abraham ) ; also Griinbaum, Neue Beitr. zur
sem. Sagenkunde, 1893, pp. 89,-131 (Jewish and
Mohammedan legends) ; and, especially, a late apocryphal book called The Testament of Abraham ( T e x t s
and Studies, Cambridge, 1892),which presents perhaps
the finest imaginable glorification of the character of the
patriarch. All that he needs is to see the retributions
1 The words, and worshipped other gods,belongLO R. But
the sense of the earlier narrators is correctly given (cp. Gen.
31 1953 354.). And of course, Israels point ofreligious departure
must, consideringprimitive circumstances, have been in some
sense polytheistic (cp Reinach, REJ xv. 311 (871 ; Boscawen,
ABRECH
of heaven and hell that he may learn (like Jonah) to
have pity on sinners (see APOCRYPHA, 5 11). For the
archaeological aspects of the life of the patriarch see
Tomkins, Studies on the Times of Abraltam (78;
second ed. 97). The best critical literature is cited
by Ki. gist. i. ; add to his list Hal. RE/ xv. 1 6 1 3
(87); Rev. slm. i. 18(93); Renan, Hist. dupeupZe
dZsraeZ, i. (1887); and reviews of Renan by Reinach,
RElxv. 3028; and by WRS, Eng. Hist. Rev. iii. 1283
(88). Renans statements that the Abraham of Genesis
is the type of a n Arab sheikh, and that the ancient
Hebrews, represented by Abraham, worshipped a patriarchal, just, and universal God, from whom the worship
of Yahwh was a falling away, are fantastically erroneous.
For N o l d . ~view that Abraham and Sarah are divine
names, see bis essay on the patriarchs in Zm neuen
Reich, 1871, p. 5088, and on the other side Baethg.
Beitr. z. sem. ReL-gexh. 1 5 4 3 See also EDOM(5 2 ;
supposed divine character of Abraham) and HOBAH
(his connection with Damascus).
T. K. C.
ABRAHAMS BOSOM (Lk. l6zz.F). See HADES.
(Dl?&,
ABRAM
44, Gen. 112 7 - 1 7 5 a I Ch.
127 Neh. 9 7 T ; ~ B P A M [BADL], but -PAN [A twice in
Gen.], -PAAM [A once in Gen. ; B in Ch. and By vid.
K L in Neh. ;
ABRAM), i.e. probably, in the mind
of thepriestlywriter (Gen. 1 7 3 ) , high father (patriarch),
to which the name Sarai, if taken as another form of
SARAH [ q . ~ . ] ,would be a suitable companion. If,.
however, the name A BRAM be a genuine traditional
one, it will be related to A BIRAM [q.~.], as ABNER
[q.w.] is to A BINER , and be explained similarly (cp
A BRAHAM , I).
y;$;
...
o )3) [cp 45 8
Pesh., omitting
paraphrases b
Pesh.], and Vg. clamante precone ut omnes coyam. eo
genu ffecterent. Jerome himself, however (Quest. in
Gen.), remarks, Mihi videtur non tam przeco sive
adgeniculatio
intelligenda, quam illud qnod
Hebrzei tradunt, dicentes patreni tenerum,
significante Scriptura quod juxta prudentiam quidem
pater omnium fuerit, sed juxta zetatem tenerrimus
adolescens et puer. So, in fact, the Midrash (Bey.
rabbn, par. 90) and the two later Targums (as an
appendage to father of the king ) expressly interpret,
and in Baa. Rathra, 4a we even find this justified by
the combination of 11 and rex. In JubiZees 40 7 (Charles)
the form is Abirer, ;.e. Abirel ( God is a mighty one,
or, being an imaginary form, mighty one of God ).
The different views of modern sGiolars can only be
glanced at here. Luther is content with Lnndesvnter,
EV with bow the knee. RV mg. adopts the view
that the original word was similar in sound to the
Hebrew word meaning to kneel (so Benfey, Brugsch,
Chabas). The Mas. vocalisation, however, is guesswork, and the Hiphil of 172 occurs only once again
(Gen. 2411),and then in the sense of t o cause (the
camels) to kneel down. If we look at the context, we
shall find reason to doubt whether any outward display
of reverence at all (prostration would be more natural
than kneeling) can be meant by Abrech. An official
title is what the context most favours, not, however,
such a title as chief of the wise men (ap-rex-u) ; but
rather great lord, or some other equivalent to grand1 Harkavy, JAs., mars-avril 1870, pp. 161-165. Le Page
Renoufs explanation (PSBA xi. 5 fi [88]), thy command is
our desire (ab(-rc)-rek),i e . , w e are at.thy service, is much less
suitable to the context.
28
. . .
...
ABRONAH
ABSALOM
29
30
(&$p,
&,
'
ACELDAMA
ABUBUS
was about twenty when he took up his sisters cause,
he must have died a little over thirty. Apparently
his three sons died before him (251427 1818). On
his daughter, see TAMAR, 3, and MAACAH, 3, 4.
The notice respecting Absaloms monument in 2 S1818
is not very clear, perhaps owing to some confusion in
the text of VV. 17-19 (so Klo.). It is evidently parenthetical, and reminds the reader that,Absalom had a
suitable monument (erected, according to Klo. s reading, by David) in the Kings Vale (see S HAVEH , i.,
MELCHIZEDEK, 3). The building close to Jerusalem,
now known as Absaloms tomb, is of very late origin, as
W. E. A.
its Ionic pillars prove.
2. Father of Mattathias (I Macc. 1170; 4Jldhopos [AV],
Jlahpo66s. [PI).
ZGckler proposes to read Jonathan for
Mattathias here; or else to read Mattathias in ~Macc.
13 II also.
ACCHO, RV ACCO
(by),
Judg. 1 3 1 and (see UMMAH)
Josh. 19 30f ; see PTOLEMAIS.
HUBBAH,
I Ch. 734 Kr. ; AZOSUS), father of Ptolemy, captain of
the plaip of Jericho, and son-in-law to Simon the
Maccabee ( I Macc. l61115T).
ABYSS, THE (H ~ ~ y c c o cthe
) , term substituted jn
RV of N T for the deep and the bottomless pit of
AV; see Lk.831; Rom.107; Rev.913 II 1 1 7
1 7 8 201 3 t .
In the second of these passages, by
an inexact use of the term, the abyss is equivalent
to Sheol ; over the sea in Dt. 3013 is taken to mean
over the world-encircling ocean into which the rivers
discharge
of the underworld (Ps. 184 [SI, 5y53 h)
themselves to the place where all flesh wanders (i.e . ,
Sheol ; Enuch 176). Elsewhere it means the deeplyplaced abode of the dragon or devil, of the beast
his helper, and of the 8aipbvia.-whether this abode be
taken to be the deep (tZh8m)that coucheth beneath
(Gen. 49 25 RV), or the waste place with no firmament
above and no foundation of earth beneath, by which
the fire-filled chasm was thought to be bordered (Emci3
The former view is in accordance
18 IZ ; cp 21 27).
with O T usage, the tJh5m of M T and the tlpuuuos of
@ being the flood or ocean which once enfolded
the earth, but is now shut up in subterranean storechambers (Ps. 337) ; and it is favoured by the use of
BdXauua in Rev. 131 as synonymous with B ~ U O U O S .
But the latter is more probably right in the Apocalypse,
which agrees with Enoch in asserting the existence of a
lake of fire, destined for the final punishment of the
devil and his helpers. This fiery lake is not in either
book technically called the abyss ; in EnoclzlO 13 the
ETXW
Greek has r b xdos roc m p 6 s , and in 21 7 GiaKo+
6 rbros hws r?js~ ~ P ~ G U O U . The angelic overseer of this
region is Uriel, who is described in EnochBOz (Gizeh
Gk. ) as 6 d i d roc K ~ U ~ OKai
U roG raprdpou.
Tartarus
occurs also in JOb4123, 6 ,in the phrase rbv rdpTapov
6 s ! ~ ~ G U O [BRA],
U
which, being used in connection with
Leviathan, is doubtless to be taken of the subterranean
abode of YahwBs enemy, the dragon (see D RAGON ,
4 3 ) . Cp raprapduas, used of the fallen angels,
T. IC. C.
2 Pet. 24.
ACACIA (nyp), Ex. 255 etc., RV. See SHITTAH
CP
TREE.
ACATAN (AKATAN [BA]), I Esd. 838Jy AV=Ezr.
812, HAKKATAN.
ACCABA ( ~ K K A B[B]),
~ I Esd. 530 RV=Ezra246,
HAGAB.
ACCAD (738; apxah [AL], ax. [DEI; s ) ;
A C H A D ) is one of the four cities mentioned in Gen.
1010 as forming the beginning of the kingdom of
Nimrod in the land of Shinar or Babylonia. I n the
cuneiform inscriptions the name of Akkad is most fre1 If a Hebrew original could have been supposed for 2 Macc.
pcuuaha might have represented a transliteration of part of a
participle of n\w (ot ?rfp$e6Tssfollows).
3
ACCARON
( A K K ~ P ~[A*]),
N
I Macc. 108gJyAV=
RV E KRON (q.v.).
x,
~.
32
ACHIACHARUS
ACHAIA
material is still dug out in the neighbourhood. The
traditional Aceldama was used to bury Christian pilgrims
in at least from 570 (Anton. phc. Itin. 26): especially
during the Crusades, but, according to Maundrell, who
says it was then called Campo Santo, even as late as
1697. A charnel house into which the bodies were let
down from above has stood here from very early times.
The best history and description of the site (with plans)
is that by Schick, PEFQ, 1892, pp. 2838
G . A. S.-H.
W. H.
It is a fact of some
interest that both at the begmnmg and a t the end of their
history the word Achzan' was k e d as the general designation of the inhabitants of Greece proper. During
the classical period Achaia denoted only the narrow strip
of coastland and the adjoining mountain stretching along
the S. shore of the Corinthian gulf from the river
Sythas (mod. Trikalitikos) 20 m. west of Corinth, to the
river Larisus near Cape Araxus (mod. Kalogria). In the
time of Paul, Achaia signified the Roman province-i.e.,
the whole country south of Macedonia and Illyricum, including some of the adjacent islands. The name Achaia
was given to it in consequence of the part played by the
Achzan League in the last spasmodic effort which
occasioned the sack of Corinth and the downfall of Greek
independence, 146 B.C. (Paus. vii. 1610). Whether the
formation of the'province dates from that year, or not, is
of no consequence to the student of the Bible. It was in
27 B.C. that Augustus definitely settled the boundaries of
Achaia, assigning to it Thessaly, Btolia, Acarnania, and
part of Epirus (Strabo, p. 840). The Achaia of Paul is,
therefore, practically synonymous with the modern
kingdom of Greece, but a little more extensive towards
the north-west. The combination ' Macedonia and
Achaia ' embraces the whole of European Greece, as in
Acts1921, GrehNw T+U MUKEGOU~UV
K d 'Axalau (see
also Rom. 15 26 I Thess. 1 7 3 ).
From 27 B. c. Achaia
naturallyranked as asenatorid province-i. e . , its governor
was an ex-prztor, with the title proconsul (Strabo, Z.C.).
In 15 A.D., however, owing to their financial embarrassments, hoth Achaia and Macedonia were taken charge
of by Tiberius ; and it was not until 44 A. D. that Claudius
restored them to the Senate (Tac. Ann. i. 7 6 ; Suet.
Claud. 25). The writer of ActslSrz is thus quite correct
in speaking of Gallio in 53 or 54 A.D. as du8dTuTosi. e., proconsul. The fiasco of Nero's proclamation made
all Greece free, but this state of things lasted only a
short time. With this exception, a proconsular governor
was stationed in Corinth, the capital of Achaia, until
the time of Justinian.
In the N T we hear of only three towns of AchaiaATHENS, CORINTH, and C ENCHREA ;-but the Salutations of the two Corinthian Epistles (esp. 2 Cor. 11 i u
6x3 q 'Axalp) imply other Christian communities in
the province. In-1 Cor. 16 15 the ' house of Stephanas '
is called the 'first-fruits of Achaia' (daapx+T ? ~'Axalas).
S
In this place, for 'Achaia' we should expect ' Corinth' ;
for, according to Actsl734, Dionysius the Areopagite
and other Athenians must have been the first-fruits of
teaching in the province of Achaia. In Rom. 16 5, where,
according to the Text. Rec., Epaenetus is spoken of as
the d?rapx+ T+S 'Axalas, the best texts read 'Aulas [Ti.
W & H , following BAN, etc.]. The charity of Achajan
converts is praised in 2Cor. 92 Rom. 1526; but the
reference may be merely to the church at Corinth (cp
W. J. W.
z Cor. 8 IO).
ACHAICUS (AXATKOC [Ti.WH]), a member of the
Corinthian church, who, along with Stephanas and Fortunatus, had carried to Paul at Ephesus news of the
Corinthians which had gladdened and refreshed him
( I Cor. 1617f.).
H e is enumerated as one of the
Seventy (Lk. 101)in Chron. Pasc. (Bonn ed. i. 402).
ACHAIA
( A X ~ ~[Ti.WH]).
A
33
7 1, A X A N ) L], A X A N [A ; but
nxapin Josh.724 1Ch.27l);'thesonofCarmib.Zabdib.
Zerah h. Judah, who unlawfully took possession of some
3f the ' devoted' spoil of Jericho (see BAN). His breach
Jf a taboo had involved the whole host in guilt (RRS('4
162).and the community had to free itself of responsibility by destroying,no$ only Achan but also his whole
family (Josh. 7). This is quite in accordance with
primitive notions (RS(')421), although our present text
IS due to later insertions in v. 24f:
With the variety
in the form of the name is to be connected the wordCp
CARMI,
I
.
play in Josh. 7 25.
ACHAZ ( A X A Z [Ti], A X A C [WH], Mt.lg), RV
A HAZ (4,s.I ) .
ACHBOR (7\37y, 3 68, i.e., MOUSE [g.v.] ; cp Ph.
7237, Kl13Y, P723Y ; bxoBwp [BAL]).
I. Father of Baal-hanau [I] king of Edom (Gen. 3638,
xopwp [A"D]; 39; I Ch.149, i2?y [Sa. Ginsb.], axwpwp
[B], x. [L]) ; also s. 50 in
See EDOM, 4.
2. b. Micah ; a courtier of King Josiah ( 2 K. 221214 ;
Jer. 2622, M T and Theod. in Q mg. [BAR om.] ; Jer.
3612, U K X O @ p [BH*], -87)[R"], U K O p W p [Q]) ; in 2 Ch.
3420 named ABDON [p.v.,4](upGoGop [B], apGwu [AL]).
I , X A [BF
~
and (except Josh.
eBA:
1713~Hi
; ])lfi,q *nN; Vg. Ackior, and Pesh. in lzrf.
h a u l .
34
'ACHSAH
ACHIAS
I n the romance the forms are JbLp ;
$h
[cod. Sach.1;
BOOK OF.
ACHISH ( h K , a r x o y c [BA], AKX. [LI), a Philistine, son of Maoch ( I S. 272) or Maachah ( I I<. 239f: ;
ArXic [A]); a king of Gath, with whom David and
his band took refuge from the persecution of Saul (see
5). H e is described as a credulous man
DAVID,
whom David found it easy to deceive, representing that
his raids against Bedouin tribes were really directed
against the Judahites and their allies, and taking care
not to leave any of his captives alive to reveal the truth
to Achish. At Ziklag, which had been assigned to
him as his place of residence, David lived as a freebooter
in vassalage to Achish for a year and four months
(@ only four months). The confidence, however, with
which his suzerain regarded him was not shared by
the Philistine lords, who prevailed upon Achish to
dismiss David from his army when starting to meet
Saul at Gilboa. See I S. 271-282 291-11,
a connected
passage of date prior to 800 ( S B O T ) . In another passage
( I K.2393) where the execution of Shimei [ I ] is accounted for by his having gone to Gath in search of
some runaway slaves, it is said that the fugitives went
to Achish. No doubt the same king is meant (son of
Maacah, v. 39), though the reference to Achish has the
appearance of being a later ornamental insertion made
in oblivion of chronology.
[II-161)
T o a very much later writer (see I S.2110-15
the account in 1S.27-29 seemed to reflect on David's
patriotism. H e therefore devised an entertaining and
unobjectionable story, in the style of the Midrash,
which he hoped would supplant the no longer intelligible
historical tradition. According to him, David went
alone, and was compelled to feign madness for safety
1 According to information received from Mr. F. C. Cony.
beare, there are two Armenian recensions, the earlier of which
appears to be in some respects more primitive than the Syriac.
There is also, probably, a Georgian version.
35
ACIIITOB (AXEITWB
AV = Ezra
[BI),
Esd.82=4 Esd.
7 2 , AHITUB, 2.
ACHMETHA
(Hcpnv),Ezra 6 zj.,
11t
the capital of