Gull Lake Community Schools Teacher Performance Evaluation 4/20/16 Name: Norah Karnazes Dat Building: Kellogg Elementary Grade/Subject: Young Fives Section 1 - Framework for Teaching (60% of the overall evaluation rating) Domain 1 Planning and Preparation 1 ME £ HE A, Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy x 8, Demonstrating Knowledge of Students x C. Setting Instructional Outcomes x , Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources x E. Designing Coherent Instruction x F. Designing Students Assessments x Domain 2 Classroom Management 1 ME € A Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport 8. Establishing a Culture for Learning C. Managing Classroom Procedures, D. Managing Student Behavior E. Organizing Physical Space Domain 3 Communicating with Students 1 ME & HE A. Communicating with Students, x 8B, Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques x . Engaging Students in Learning x D. Using Assessment in Instruction x E, Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness x ME HE Domain 4 Professional Responsit A Reflecting on Teaching 8. Managing Accurate Records . Communicating with Families D. Participating in a Professional Community E, Growing and Developing Professionally F, Showing Professionalism x Section 1 Total Points 7 Section 1 Mean Score 3.53 Section 2 - Performance Goals (15% of the overall evaluation rating) System of Common Assessments Integrating Technology Initiative x Section 2 Total Points 7 Section 2 Mean Score 3.50‘Measuring Student Achievement ‘Measuring Student Growth Section 3 Total Points, Section 3 Mean Score Total Evaluation Rating Total Evaluation Rating Range HE- Highly Effective (3.50-4.0) E- Effective (2.50-3.49) ME Minimally Effective (1.50-2.49) | Ineffective (0.00-1.49) Notes: Point values for each rating column is as follows: J-1pt ME-2pts E-3pts HE-4 pts Receiving $ or more accumulated marks of | or ME in ll domains will reduce the overoll rating by 1 point and an individualized development plan will be initiated. Goals for Next Year Data Goal Section 3 - Student Growth and Assessment (25% of the overall evaluation rating) Highly Effective 3.64 Recommendation Re-employ for 2nd year probation X_ Re-employ for 3rd year probation Re-employ for &th year probation Re-employ or Sth year probation Pace on tenure ‘Continue on tenure Not applicable ‘Other action recommended TI Teaching staff will utilize common assessment dats to collaboratively analyze learning standards attainment in their content area. ‘Technology Goal Integrate the district technology initiatives ip the classroom/school Domain 2 and Domain 3 Select two additional goals / Mie MAE. 7 ° ‘Signature of Evaluator AL “Lor Date of Conference Ihave read and/or discussed with the evaluator the attached evaluation. 4 i L{Mat? Kauantr t T” Signatufe of Teacher Dare |