Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Daigle v. Maine Medical, 19 F.3d 7, 1st Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views1 page
    This document is a court ruling dismissing a cross-appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. The court had already decided the merits of the plaintiff's original appeal in a related case. As the court had already ruled on the underlying issues in the previous decision, it was unnecessary to also decide the cross-appeal. Therefore, the court issued a brief per curiam ruling dismissing the cross-appeal with no costs assigned.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1994-01-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 19 F.3d 7 Docket: 93-1528

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court ruling dismissing a cross-appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. The court had already decided the merits of the plaintiff's original appeal in a related case. As the court had already ruled on the underlying issues in the previous decision, it was unnecessary to also decide the cross-appeal. Therefore, the court issued a brief per curiam ruling dismissing the cross-appeal with no costs assigned.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views1 page

    Daigle v. Maine Medical, 19 F.3d 7, 1st Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court ruling dismissing a cross-appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. The court had already decided the merits of the plaintiff's original appeal in a related case. As the court had already ruled on the underlying issues in the previous decision, it was unnecessary to also decide the cross-appeal. Therefore, the court issued a brief per curiam ruling dismissing the cross-appeal with no costs assigned.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    19 F.

    3d 7

    NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished


    opinions may be cited only in related cases.
    Dawn DAIGLE, Plaintiff, Appellee,
    v.
    MAINE MEDICAL CENTER, INC., Defendant, Appellant.
    No. 93-1528.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    First Circuit.
    January 31, 1994

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New
    Hampshire
    Christine M. Rockefeller, with whom Paul R. Cox and Burns, Bryant,
    Hinchey, Cox & Schulte, P.A. were on brief, for plaintiff.
    Gerald F. Petruccelli, with whom Mary Mitchell Friedman and Petruccelli
    & Martin were on brief, for defendant.
    D.N.H.
    DISMISSED.
    Before Selya, Circuit Judge, Coffin, Senior Circuit Judge, and Cyr, Circuit
    Judge.
    Per Curiam.

    Having today decided the merits of plaintiff's appeal, see Daigle v. Maine
    Medical Center, Inc., No. 93-1470 (1st Cir. Jan., 1994), it is unnecessary to
    decide this cross-appeal. We, therefore, dismiss it.

    Appeal dismissed. No costs.

    You might also like