Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Gifford v. Key Bank of ME, 1st Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views3 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the district court's order dismissing Frank and Elaine Gifford's second motion to reopen their chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedings. The Giffords filed the motion to challenge Key Bank of Maine's right to enforce its mortgage against their residence. The Court of Appeals summarily affirmed the dismissal order, finding that the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion as the Giffords demonstrated no valid basis for reopening the case.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1994-07-08 Precedential Status: Precedential Docket: 93-2063

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the district court's order dismissing Frank and Elaine Gifford's second motion to reopen their chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedings. The Giffords filed the motion to challenge Key Bank of Maine's right to enforce its mortgage against their residence. The Court of Appeals summarily affirmed the dismissal order, finding that the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion as the Giffords demonstrated no valid basis for reopening the case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views3 pages

    Gifford v. Key Bank of ME, 1st Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the district court's order dismissing Frank and Elaine Gifford's second motion to reopen their chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedings. The Giffords filed the motion to challenge Key Bank of Maine's right to enforce its mortgage against their residence. The Court of Appeals summarily affirmed the dismissal order, finding that the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion as the Giffords demonstrated no valid basis for reopening the case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 3

    USCA1 Opinion

    [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]


    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
    ____________________
    No. 93-2063
    FRANK P. GIFFORD, ET AL.,
    Appellants,
    v.
    KEY BANK OF MAINE,
    Appellee.
    ____________________
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE
    [Hon. D. Brock Hornby, U.S. District Judge]
    ___________________
    ____________________
    Before
    Cyr, Boudin and Stahl,
    Circuit Judges.
    ______________
    ____________________
    Frank Gifford and Elaine Gifford on brief pro se.
    _____________
    ______________
    Jana S. Stabile and Michael S. Haenn on brief for appellee.
    _______________
    ________________
    ____________________

    July 7, 1994
    ____________________

    Per Curiam.
    __________
    appeal
    order

    Appellants,

    a district court

    former chapter 7 debtors,

    order affirming a

    dismissing appellants' second

    chapter

    proceedings,

    challenging appellee's

    this
    right

    for

    the

    enforce

    its

    mortgage against debtors' residence.


    summarily

    affirm

    the

    See Loc. R. 27.1.


    ___

    reopen their
    purpose
    real

    of

    estate

    Upon careful review, we

    dismissal order

    demonstrated no abuse of discretion.


    Affirmed.
    ________

    motion to

    time
    to

    bankruptcy court

    as

    appellants

    have

    -2-

    You might also like