USCA1 Opinion

June 29, 1995

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 94-2143

KEVIN G. TAYLOR,

Petitioner, Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent, Appellee.

____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Walter Jay Skinner, U.S. District Judge]

___________________

____________________

Before

Cyr, Boudin and Stahl,

Circuit Judges.
______________

____________________

Kevin G. Taylor on brief pro se.

_______________
Donald K. Stern, United States
________________

Attorney, and

Assistant U.S. Attorney, on brief for appellee.

Kimberly S. Bu
_______________

____________________

____________________

Per Curiam.
__________

This is an appeal of a district court order

denying the

motion of petitioner

his conviction

affirm

and sentence.

the district

court's

Kevin Taylor to

See 28
___

order

U.S.C.

substantially

set aside

2255.

We

for

the

reasons given by Judge Skinner, adding a brief comment.

the district court, we

of

counsel at

trial.

No

can find no indication that

arraignment affected

presumption exists

arraignment

prejudices

proceeding where, as here,

the arraignment

without some

all

the lack

petitioner's subsequent

that lack

subsequent

of counsel

stages

at an

of

the

the only significant happening at

was the entry

of a not

infection of the subsequent

is no warrant for relief under

Affirmed.
________

Like

2255.

guilty plea.

And,

proceedings, there